First, is it standard to remove attribute quotes from HTML in a minified production build? It seems like that would cause problems in some browsers / platforms? If so, then everything below doesn't really matter, but I'm still curious.
I have the below in my vue.config.js and it works to keep attribute quotes in the prod build, but breaks yarn serve.
Local Vue version 2.6.12. #vue/cli version 4.5.4.
chainWebpack: (config) => { // chainWebpack grayed out
config.plugin("html").tap((args) => {
args[0].minify.removeAttributeQuotes = false;
return args;
});
},
It doesn't seem to find minify - I keep getting: ERROR TypeError: Cannot set property 'removeAttributeQuotes' of undefined
First, is it standard to remove attribute quotes from HTML in a minified production build?
It's not standard but still valid HTML. The attribute quotes are removed in production builds to reduce the output size of the HTML size so if you're en DEV environment (like when you're running yarn serve) the object args[0].minify is undefined.
So for keeping the quotes in production build and not get errors in other environments, you can set the attribute removeAttributeQuotes as follows (instead of modifying its value, like in your code):
chainWebpack: (config) => {
config.plugin('html').tap((args) => {
args[0].minify = {
...args[0].minify,
removeAttributeQuotes: false,
}
return args
})
},
See related issue
Related
I try without success to apply a prerendering (or a SSG) to my Vue3 application to make it more SEO friendly.
I found the vue-cli-plugin-prerender-spa, and when I try it with the command line: vue add prerender-spa I have the error:
ERROR TypeError: Cannot read properties of undefined (reading 'endsWith')
After that I tried prerender-spa-plugin but I have an error when I make a npm run build:
[prerender-spa-plugin] Unable to prerender all routes!
ERROR Error: Build failed with errors.
Error: Build failed with errors.
at /Users/myusername/Workspace/myproject/node_modules/#vue/cli-service/lib/commands/build/index.js:207:23
at /Users/myusername/Workspace/myproject/node_modules/webpack/lib/webpack.js:148:8
at /Users/myusername/Workspace/myproject/node_modules/webpack/lib/HookWebpackError.js:68:3
What do you think about this? Do you have any idea?
Nuxt3 is a really powerful meta-framework with a lot of features and huge ecosystem. Meanwhile, it's in RC2 right now so not 100% stable (may still work perfectly fine).
If your project is aiming for something simpler, I'd recommend using Vitesse. It may be a bit more stable and it's probably powerful enough (check what's coming with it to help you decide).
Some solutions like Prerender also exist but it's paid and not as good as some real SSG (/SSR). Also, it's more of a freemium.
I struggled with the same error output until I found the prerender-spa-plugin-next. Then I notice the latest version of prerender-spa-plugin was published 4 years ago and prerender-spa-plugin-next is continually updating. It seems like that prerender-spa-plugin-next is a new version of prerender-spa-plugin with the same functions. So I use prerender-spa-plugin-next instead of prerender-spa-plugin then everything works fine!
Here is my step:
install the package
npm i -D prerender-spa-plugin-next
modify vue.config.js like
const plugins = [];
if (process.env.NODE_ENV === 'production') {
const { join } = require('path');
const PrerenderPlugin = require('prerender-spa-plugin-next');
plugins.unshift(
new PrerenderPlugin({
staticDir: join(__dirname, 'dist'),
routes: ['/'], //the page route you want to prerender
})
);
}
module.exports = {
transpileDependencies: true,
configureWebpack(config) {
config.plugins = [...config.plugins, ...plugins];
},
};
build
npm run build
Then check the index.html under the dist folder you can see the page is prerendered.
Further usage refers to the homepage of prerender-spa-plugin-next
Found and fix about the scss files to import.
In nuxt.config.ts use :
vite: {
css: {
preprocessorOptions: {
scss: {
additionalData: `
#import "#/assets/scss/_variables.scss";
#import "#/assets/scss/my-style.scss";
`
}
},
},
}
Now my 2 mains issue are : how to install vuetify properly, currently syles and components seems working but the JS not, for example, accordions don't expands on click.
And second topic is to have a i18n module, it seems that vue-i18N no longer works.
Thanks.
I am developing a chrome extension using vue 3, vue-router and vuex based on Kocal's project which uses vue-cli under the hood. I used whenever possible Single File Components with extensive use of vue bindings.
Everything works perfect on development mode but I recently tried to build the application for production and I encountered this error with partial rendering:
chunk-vendors.f6de00a6.js:11 EvalError: Refused to evaluate a string as JavaScript because 'unsafe-eval' is not an allowed source of script in the following Content Security Policy directive: "script-src 'self'".
After a few days of digging, my understanding is that either webpack or vue compiling system is messing with CSP by referring/injecting code through eval scripts. As I am fairly new to this, it's hard for me to read to distinguish what I can do.
I tried different approaches:
defining $vue alias to a runtime only build in vue.config.js (supposedly removing unsafe eval by having code compiled before runtime but ending with a new error: Uncaught TypeError: Object(...) is not a function for o=Object(n["withScopeId"])("data-v-21ae70c6");)
using render() function at root
adding "content_security_policy": "script-src 'self' 'unsafe-eval'; object-src 'self'", to manifest.json
switching a component to render() to see if I have better chance with the partial rendering, but ending up with nothing being displayed although having console.log from render being executed.
Adding a config to chainWebpack splitting manifest and inline manifest on vue.config
What puzzles me is that I can't shake off the unsafe-eval, with at best a partial display, at worst a blank page. Bindings seem to be shaken off regardless and using a router-link to change page will give a blank page.
Edit: After digging through compiled code from webpack and setting minimize opt to false, it seems the error comes from a vendor: vue-i18n
The eval is likely coming from Webpack, due to an issue with global scoping.
see link for more detail https://mathiasbynens.be/notes/globalthis
Could you try adding this configuration to vue.config.js
module.exports = {
configureWebpack: {
node: {
global: false
},
plugins: [
new webpack.DefinePlugin({
global: "window"
})
]
}
};
tl;dr: Check your dependencies/packages, including those you wouldn't think they use unsafe-eval.
After digging into webpack internals and components building for vue3, here are the takeaways:
using Single File Components and default vue-cli config is ok as it will indeed just need vue runtime, so no unsolicited unsafe-eval
webpack config as below works:
module.exports = {
configureWebpack: {
plugins: [
new webpack.DefinePlugin({
global: "window" // Placeholder for global used in any node_modules
})
]
},
...
};
// Note that this plugin definition would break if you are using "unit-mocha" module for vue-cli
In the end, the issue was a dependency I was using for i18n vue-i18n#next, after removing it and switching to chrome's i18n way, it's now working.
I am trying the Quasar Framework (for those not familiar, it's based on Vue) and it's going well. However I've tried running a build (npm run build) and get repeated:
error Unexpected console statement no-console
... so the build fails because it sees console.log(...) and is not happy. My options:
don't use console.log in development. But it's handy.
comment out the eslint rule that presumably enforces that, so letting console.log into production. But that's not ideal for performance/security.
have the build automatically remove any console.log. That's what I'm after.
But how?
I took a look at the build https://quasar.dev/quasar-cli/cli-documentation/build-commands and it mentions using webpack internally and UglifyJS too. Given that, I found this answer for removing console.log in a general Vue/webpack project: https://github.com/vuejs-templates/webpack-simple/issues/21
... but if that's how, where does that go within Quasar since there is no webpack config file? I imagine in the quasar.conf.js file (since I see an 'extendWebpack' line in there - sounds promising). Or is there a better way to do it? How do other people remove console.log in production when using Quasar? Or handle logging without it?
Thanks!
https://quasar.dev/quasar-cli/quasar-conf-js#Property%3A-build
quasar.conf.js:
module.exports = function (ctx) {
return {
...
build: {
...
uglifyOptions: {
compress: { drop_console: true }
}
},
}
}
The above will result in configuring terser plugin with the following:
terserOptions: {
compress: {
...
drop_console: true
},
(https://github.com/terser/terser#compress-options)
(you can see the generated config with quasar inspect -c build -p optimization.minimizer)
You still also need to remove the eslint rule to avoid build errors, see https://github.com/quasarframework/quasar/issues/5529
Note:
If you want instead to configure webpack directly use:
quasar.conf.js:
module.exports = function (ctx) {
return {
...
build: {
...
chainWebpack (chain) {
chain.optimization.minimizer('js').tap(args => {
args[0].terserOptions.compress.drop_console = true
return args
})
}
},
}
}
It will do the same as above.
See https://quasar.dev/quasar-cli/cli-documentation/handling-webpack
and https://github.com/neutrinojs/webpack-chain#config-optimization-minimizers-modify-arguments
https://github.com/quasarframework/quasar/blob/dev/app/lib/webpack/create-chain.js#L315
1 Edit package.json in Vue's project what had created it before.
2 Then find "rules": {}.
3 Change to this "rules":{"no-console":0}.
4 if you Vue server in on, off it and run it again. Then the issue will be done.
As an alternative I can suggest using something like loglevel instead of console.log. It's quite handy and allows you to control the output.
https://nuxtjs.org/api/configuration-build#babel
I originally left the presets as default.
I then followed the suggestions on
https://github.com/nuxt/nuxt.js/issues/1776
However this dealt more with pipelines
I am just trying to get it to convert the es6 to es5 (import chief among the reasons)
I get the same result or a complete failure no matter if i add the .babelrc, adjust package.json, adjust nuxt.config.js or a combination of them.
currently i have adjusted my nuxt.config.js to:
/*
** Build configuration
*/
build: {
babel: {
presets: ['#babel/preset-env'],
configFile: false,
babelrc: false,
plugins: ['#babel/plugin-syntax-dynamic-import']
}
}
When i upload the entire .nuxt folder to my server (running plesk using phusion passenger)
I get the following error
/var/www/vhosts/website.com/app/client/server.js:1
(function (exports, require, module, __filename, __dirname) { import { stringify } from 'querystring'
My site root is
/var/www/vhosts/website.com/app/client/
The first line of server.js
import { stringify } from 'querystring
Changing this to
var stringify = require("querystring").stringify
Eliminates the error however i would need to go through page after page to remove this. My understanding is i can progamically adjust this using babel. But no matter what ive tried the file stays the same.
I did use the Nuxt CLI to automatically set up babel and webpack but using the above build config is not the default. I have attempted to play with it but i get the same result
I added babel/polyfill to try and get around the import issues without any success
With the following vue.config.js:
module.exports = {
pwa: {
name: 'My App',
...
workboxPluginMode: 'InjectManifest',
workboxOptions: {
swSrc: 'src/sw.js', //and I use "sw.js" in my registerServiceWorker.js file
skipWaiting: true,
clientsClaim: true,
}
}
}
The validation errors during build are that 'skipWaiting' and 'clientsClaim' are not supported parameters. Why? swSrc is from the same list of options listed here and the build doesn't complain about that option. When I remove these two options, the build works.
So I guess my question is:
skipWaiting, clientsClaim are "not a supported parameter" of what? Of webpack? of the PWA plugin? Of the workbox-webpack plugin? Where can I find the correct set of options? Thanks.
UPDATE: I do not have a .env file setting the NODE-ENV. However npm run build which I guess builds production assets works only if I remove the 2 options. The removed options in dev (npm run serve) yields NO service worker file.
You are using workbox plugin in InjectManifest mode, but pass parameters for GenerateSW.
InjectManifest mode expects an existing service-worker file to be injected and it's path defined in swSrc, while GenerateSW will create service-worker file, thus accepts different set of options (e.g. swDest, etc)
All options for each of modes can be found on the same documentation page of workbox-webpack-plugin you've posted in corresponding sections.