I have a class that save data.
Every time I extract data, I call its method, and extract only one data at a time.
So I need a loop to extract.
Like this:
while (dataNumber == 0) {
id res = [testClass numericFromColumnBy_Cid:columnID];
}
But I want it to support Objective-C's "for in" loop, just like NSArray.
for (NSString *str in NSArray) {};
How do I set it up?
This is done with NSFastEnumeration.
Example from Fast Enumeration, part 1:
#interface Orchestra : NSObject <NSFastEnumeration>
- (void) addMusician: (Musician *) musician;
#end // Orchestra
And add the required method, which just turns around and passes the arguments through to the array:
- (NSUInteger) countByEnumeratingWithState: (NSFastEnumerationState *) enumerationState
objects: (id __unsafe_unretained []) buffer
count: (NSUInteger) len {
return [_members countByEnumeratingWithState: enumerationState
objects: buffer
count: len];
} // countByEnumeratingWithState
For the curious, Mike Ash has a fantastic blog post where he dives into the internals, providing several reference implementations of NSFastEnumeration.
Related
It is clear from this question that there are many ways to remove duplicates from an NSArray when the array's elements are primitive types, or when the elements are perfect duplicates. But, is there a way to remove duplicates based on a transformation applied to each element, as is permitted in Underscore.js's uniq function, rather than by simply comparing the whole elements? And if a manual implementation would be difficult to optimize, is there an efficient system-provided method (or 3rd party library algorithm) for accomplishing this that I am missing?
A simple approach:
NSMutableArray* someArray = something;
for (int i = someArray.count - 1; i > 0; i--) {
MyObject* myObject = someArray[i];
for (int j = 0; j < i; j++) {
MyObject* myOtherObject = someArray[j];
if ([myObject isSortaEqual:myOtherObject]) {
[someArray removeObjectAtIndex:i];
break;
}
}
}
Yes, it's N-squared, but that's not a biggie unless the array is fairly large.
If you want to redefine what equality means for your objects, then consider overriding -hash and -isEqual:. Then you can create an NSSet from your array if order is irrelevant, or an NSOrderedSet if it is relevant. Here's an example of a Person class where I want the name of the person to determine object equality.
#interface Person
#property (nonatomic, copy) NSString *name;
#end
#implementation Person
- (BOOL)isEqual:(id)object
{
Person *otherPerson = (Person *)object;
return [self.name isEqualToString:otherPerson.name];
}
- (NSUInteger)hash
{
return [self.name hash];
}
#end
Uniquing them now is rather easy:
NSArray *people = ...;
// If ordered is irrelevant, use an NSSet
NSSet *uniquePeople = [NSSet setWithArray:people];
// Otherwise use an NSOrderedSet
NSOrderedSet *uniquePeople = [NSOrderedSet orderedSetWithArray:people];
Absolutely. You are looking for a way to pass your own method for testing for uniqueness (at least, that's what the uniq function you refer to does).
indexesOfObjectsPassingTest: will allow you to pass your own block to determine uniqueness. The result will be an NSIndexSet of all the objects in the array that matched your test. With that you can derive a new array. The block you are passing is roughly equivalent to the Underscore iterator passed to uniq.
The sister method, indexesOfObjectsWithOptions:passingTest: also allows you to specify enumeration options (i.e. concurrent, reverse order, etc.).
As you mention in your question, there are lots of ways to accomplish this. NSExpressions with blocks, Key-value coding collections operators, etc. could be used for this as well. indexesOfObjectsPassingTest: is probably the closest to what you seem to be looking for, though you can do much the same thing (with a lot more typing) using expressions.
I just came up against this problem, so I wrote a category on NSArray:
#interface NSArray (RemovingDuplicates)
- (NSArray *)arrayByRemovingDuplicatesAccordingToKey:(id (^)(id obj))keyBlock;
#end
#implementation NSArray (RemovingDuplicates)
- (NSArray *)arrayByRemovingDuplicatesAccordingToKey:(id (^)(id obj))keyBlock
{
NSMutableDictionary *temp = [NSMutableDictionary dictionaryWithCapacity:[self count]];
for (NSString *item in self) {
temp[keyBlock(item)] = item;
}
return [temp allValues];
}
#end
You can use it like this (this example removes duplicate words, ignoring case):
NSArray *someArray = #[ #"dave", #"Dave", #"Bob", #"shona", #"bob", #"dave", #"jim" ];
NSLog(#"result: %#", [someArray arrayByRemovingDuplicatesAccordingToKey:^(id obj){
return [obj lowercaseString];
}]);
Output:
2015-02-17 17:44:10.268 Untitled[4043:7711273] result: (
dave,
shona,
jim,
bob
)
The 'key' is a block that returns an identifier used to compare the objects. So if you wanted to remove Person objects according to their name, you'd pass ^(id obj){ return [obj name]; }.
This solution is O(n), so is suitable to large arrays, but doesn't preserve order.
I've got an method that takes NSDictionary arg. This NSDictionary has some predefined keys it'll take. All the obj's should be strings. But only certain string objs are valid for each key.
So my approach was to typedef NSString for each valid string per key. I'm hoping not to extend the NSString class.
I've typedef'd some NSString's...
typedef NSString MyStringType
Then I define a few...
MyStringType * const ValidString = #"aValidString";
Here's what I'd like to do in my sample method..
- (void)setAttrbiutes:(NSDictionary *)attributes {
NSArray *keys = [attributes allKeys];
for (NSString *key in keys) {
if ([key isEqualToString:#"ValidKey"]) {
id obj = [attributes objectForKey:key];
//Here's where I'd like to check..
if (**obj is MyStringType**) {
}
}
}
}
I'm open to other ideas if there's a better approach to solve the obj type problem of an NSDictionary.
Doesn't work like that; typedefs are a compile time alias that don't survive being passed through a dictionary.
In any case, using typedefs for something like this would be unwieldy.
I suggest you create a property list -- either as a file in your project or in code -- that contains the specifications of your various keys and valid values, then write a little validator that, passed a string and value, can validate the string-value pair for validity.
This also gives you the flexibility to extend your validator in the future. For example, you might have a #"Duration" key that can only be in the range of 1 to 20.
Instead of setting up a typedef for you special values, one possible option would be to create an NSSet of the special values. Then in your code you can verify that the object in the dictionary is in your set.
What about a combination of category on NSString + associated object?
Something along the lines (untested!!):
#interface NSString (BBumSpecial)
- (NSString *) setSpecial: (BOOL) special ;
- (BOOL) special ;
#end
and:
#implementation NSString (BBumSpecial)
static void * key ;
- (NSString *) setSpecial: (BOOL) special {
objc_setAssociatedObject(self, &key, special ? #YES : #NO, OBJC_ASSOCIATION_ASSIGN) ;
return self ;
}
- (BOOL) special {
id obj = objc_getAssociatedObject(self, &key) ;
return obj && [obj boolValue] ;
}
#end
Which you could then use as:
NSString * mySpecialString = [#"I'm Special" setSpecial:YES] ;
?
I'd like to create an NSObject subclass that contains a few member vars:
#interface PointMass : NSObject
{
CGPoint mCurPosition;
CGPoint mLastPosition;
CGPoint mAcceleration;
}
-(id) initWithPosition:(CGPoint*) pos;
#import "PointMass.h"
#implementation PointMass
-(id) initWithPosition:(CGPoint*)pos
{
mCurPosition = *pos;
mLastPosition = *pos;
mAcceleration = ccp(0,0);
return self;
}
#end
And I would like to create a C-style array to hold a bunch of them within a cocos2d class:
// mNumPoint declared in interface, I've set it to 100
PointMass *pointMassList;
pointMassList = malloc(sizeof(PointMass*) * mNumPointMass);
for (int = 0; i < mNumPointMass; i++)
{
CGPoint point = ccp(100,100);
PointMass *p = [[PointMass alloc] initWithPosition: &point];
pointMassList[i] = p;
}
But I get an error
Expected method to write array element not found on object of type 'PointMass *'
Do I need to tell the compiler more about my PointMass Object if I want to store pointers to it in a C array?
I'm basically trying to have a play around with some particle math on iPhone without needing to unpack points from an NSArray constantly if it isn't clear what I'm trying to achieve here.
If I've gone about this in a backwards way I'd love to be corrected - it has been a while since I wrote vanilla C and I'm a little rusty!
it has been a while since I wrote vanilla C
You should still be able to make the distinction between a pointer-to-T and a pointer-to-pointer-to-T (T being PointMass in this case). You want to store an array of PointMass *, and not an array of PointMass (which you couldn't do anyway). So change the declaration of pointMassList to
PointMass **pointMassList;
and it will work. However, if you're using Objective-C anyway, why don't you simply store the instances into an NSArray?
I'm implementing a objective C wrapper for Box2d (which is written in c++). The b2Body keeps a reference to its wrapper B2Body in its userData field. GetUserData returns a void*. I'm now implementing fast iteration for getting the B2Bodies out of the B2World.
I get an 'Assigning to 'id' from incompatible type 'B2Body *' error at the line indicated below. Why?
#import "B2Body.h"
#import "B2World.h"
#import "Box2d.h"
#implementation B2World
-(id) initWithGravity:(struct B2Vec2) g
{
if (self = [super init])
{
b2Vec2 *gPrim = (b2Vec2*)&g;
_world = new b2World(*gPrim);
}
return self;
}
- (NSUInteger)countByEnumeratingWithState:(NSFastEnumerationState *)state objects:(id __unsafe_unretained [])buffer count:(NSUInteger)len;
{
if(state->state == 0)
{
state->mutationsPtr = (unsigned long *)self;
state->extra[0] = (long) ((b2World*)_world)->GetBodyList();
state->state = 1;
}
// pull the box2d body out of extra[0]
b2Body *b = (b2Body*)state->extra[0];
// if it's nil then we're done enumerating, return 0 to end
if(b == nil)
{
return nil;
}
// otherwise, point itemsPtr at the node's value
state->itemsPtr = ((B2Body*)b->GetUserData()); // ERROR
state->extra[0] = (long)b->GetNext();
// we're returning exactly one item
return 1;
}
`
B2Body.h looks like this:
#import
#interface B2Body : NSObject
{
int f;
}
-(id) init;
#end
NSFastEnumerationState is a C structure, and the itemsPtr field is:
id __unsafe_unretained *itemsPtr;
In earlier versions, the __unsafe_unretained specifier was obviously missing.
Note, that the field itemsPtr is a pointer-to-id. Since id is essentially a pointer, itemsPtr is a pointer to an object pointer. Actually, this field is what holds the array of objects that allows the fast enumeration. Basically, it trolls through this array of object pointers.
Since I know nothing about Box2d, that's about all I can say. Assuming b->GetUserData() returns a pointer to an array of objects, you should be able to do this:
state->itemsPtr = (__unsafe_unretained id *)b->GetUserData();
While a bit dated, Mike Ash's article is still a great source for implementing fast enumeration.
EDIT
Just noticed that you are returning a single object. So, I assume GetUserData just returns a single object pointer. Since you need to return a pointer to object pointers, you would need to do something like this:
id object = (__bridge id)b->GetUserData();
state->itemsPtr = &object;
However, that stack object will be gone once you return from this method, which is why you are passed a stack buffer you can use. Thus, you should probably stuff that single pointer into the provided stack buffer:
*buffer = (__bridge id)b->GetUserData()
state->itemsPtr = buffer;
I wanted to create 2 global arrays which can be updated during the run of the programme.In each update i add one element to zeroth position and deleted the last number
I created the arrays as....
In the .h file..........
//////////////
#interface Shared : NSObject{
NSMutableArray *x;
NSMutableArray *y;
}
#property (nonatomic,retain) NSMutableArray *x;
#property (nonatomic,retain) NSMutableArray *y;
+(Shared*)sharedInstance;
#end
In .m file
staticShared* sharedInstance;
#implementation Shared
#synthesize x;
#synthesize y;
+(Shared*)sharedInstance
{
if (!sharedInstance) {
sharedInstance=[[Sharedalloc]init];
}
returnsharedInstance;
}
-(Shared*)init
{
self = [superinit];
if(self)
{
x=[[NSMutableArrayalloc] init];
x=[NSMutableArrayarrayWithObjects:#"0",#"0",#"0",#"0",#"0",#"0",#"0",nil];
y=[[NSMutableArrayalloc] init];
y=[NSMutableArrayarrayWithObjects:#"0",#"0",#"0",#"0",#"0",#"0",nil];
}
returnself;
}
#end
Then i used to call them and re,ove and added elements using the following code....
[[shared sharedInstance].y removeLastObject];
[[shared sharedInstance].y insertObject:new_element atIndex:0];
[[shared sharedInstance].x removeLastObject];
[[shared sharedInstance].x insertObject:new_element atIndex:0];
In the mean time i call these values and calculate an arithmetic value using an expression.
This seems to work well. But it seems to be an inefficient way to handle floating point numbers which i store in it. As these arrays creates objects. Is there any easy method that i can create a global array containing specified amount of floating point numbers and update it during the run of the programm(array size is fixed) by deleting the last object, and call them back to do calculation?
Please help me!
EDIT 1
To sir deanWombourne
.................................
I implement as you instructed! Can you please go through this and help me to correct 2 errors i get.
IN the .h file
#interface Shared : NSObject{
#private
float input[7];
float output[6];
}
+(Shared*)sharedInstance;
-(void)addNewInput:(float)input1;
-(float *)input;
-(void)addNewOutput:(float)output1;
-(float *)output;
#end
in .m file............
#implementation Shared
-(id)init{
if((self =[superinit])){
for(int n=0; n<7 ;++n)
input[n]=0.00f;
for(int n=0; n<6 ;++n)
output[n]=0.00f;
}
returnself;
}
-(void)addNewInput:(float)input1{
input[0]=input[1];
input[1]=input[2];
input[2]=input[3];
input[3]=input[4];
input[4]=input[5];
input[5]=input[6];
input[6]=input1;
}
-(float *)input {
returninput;
}
-(void)addNewOutput:(float)output1{
output[0]=output[1];
output[1]=output[2];
output[2]=output[3];
output[3]=output[4];
output[4]=output[5];
input[5]=output1;
}
-(float *)output {
returnoutput;
}
#end
When calling it
float reading= (accel_reading)/(1.165969038*1e5f);
[[SharedsharedInstance] addNewInput:reading];
Problems i get
1. In the implementation, it says incomplete implementation (it's a warning not an error)
2. How can i used a for loop to fill array values or is this way ok?
Major problem i get,
When i call it as shown above, program stops running telling
Terminating application due to uncaught exception 'NSInvalidArgumentException', reason '+[SharedsharedInstance]: unrecognized selector sent to class 0x5780'
Please help me through this...............
Your code Smells (and I mean that in the nicest possible way!)
Using two parallel arrays and keeping in sync is a bad design pattern (and a performance hit in quite a few ways!). Especially as there is already a struct that handles storing an x and y at the same time - CGPoint).
You're solving the 'only objects go in arrays' problem by converting your float' primitives toNSString` objects, which is horrendously inefficient - take a look instead at the NSValue class, it's designed to put native C primitives into an object without expensive parsing operations :)
You might also want to look into malloc (and free etc) and deal with the whole problem at the C level - this will mean no objects at all and would be blindingly fast (at the cost of more complicated code).
Hope this helps, if you have any questions just add a comment to this answer :)
EDIT
If all you want to do is store 4 x and y values, then this is probably the easiest way to do it :
#interface Shared : NSObject {
#private
CGPoint points[4];
}
+(Shared *)sharedInstance;
- (void)addNewPoint:(CGPoint)point;
- (CGPoint *)points;
#end
#implementation
- (id)init {
if ((self = [super init])) {
// Start with 0,0 for all your points
for (int n = 0; n < 4; ++n)
points[n] = CGPointZero;
}
return self;
}
- (void)addNewPoint:(CGPoint)point {
// Just move all the points along one and add the new one to the end
// (yes, this could be done in a loop but there's not that much point for 4 points!)
points[0] = points[1];
points[1] = points[2];
points[2] = points[3];
points[3] = point;
}
- (CGPoint *)points {
return points;
}
#end
This gives you a method addNewPoint that removes the first point and adds the new point to the end of your array.
You also get the method points that returns the 4 points. Use it something like :
// To add a point
CGPoint newPoint = CGPointMake(100, 100);
[[Shared sharedInstance] addNewPoint:newPoint];
// To do something with the points (in this case, NSLog them)
CGPoint *points = [[Shared sharedInstance] points];
for (int n = 0; n < 4; ++n)
NSLog(#" Point %i : %#", n, NSStringFromCGPoint(points[n]));
EDIT #2
From your comments, you need two arrays, one with input data and one with output data. Try something like this :
#interface Shared : NSObject {
float inputs[4];
float outputs[5];
}
...
This will give you two arrays to read/write to - one called inputs and the other called outputs. Access them in pretty much the same way you did the ones in my first edit :
float *inputs = [[Shared sharedInstance] inputs];
for (int n = 0; n < 4; ++n)
NSLog(#" Input %i : %f", n, inputs[n]);
float *outputs = [[Shared sharedInstance] outputs];
for (int n = 0; n < 5; ++n)
NSLog(#" Output %i : %f", n, output[n]);
Would a linked list be overkill for what you're trying to achieve? It's not quite as simple as a static array of floats, but makes the removal of the last object and insertion of the zeroth object reasonably simple and fast.
If you want an array containing a specific number of Objects, you can use NSArray, which is static, opposed to NSMutableArray.
As for the array being Global, just implement a singleton class that contains the 2 arrays and provides the associated methods.
in Globals.h:
#interface Globals : NSObject
+ (Globals *) sharedGlobals;
#end
in Globals.m:
#implementation Globals
static Globals *sharedGlobals = nil;
+ (Globals *) sharedGlobals{
#synchronized(self){
if (sharedGlobals == nil){
sharedGlobals = [[self alloc] init];
}
}
return sharedGlobals;
}
you then can access the arrays (after you implemented them) with the following line:
[[Globals sharedGlobals] getArrayX];
Here is a sketch to get you going.
Your array size is fixed and only contains floating point numbers, start with a C array:
double x[] = {0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0};
double y[] = {0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0};
The number of elements in these arrays can be calculated rather than hard-coded:
int xCount = sizeof(x)/sizeof(double);
int yCount = sizeof(y)/sizeof(double);
Now use these arrays as a circular buffer, declare a cursor and initialise:
int xCursor = 0;
The item at the front of the queue is at the cursor:
valueAtFrontOfQueue = x[xCursor]; // get the current front item
To remove the value at front and add a new one to the rear replace the value at the cursor with the new value and increment the cursor:
x[xCursor] = newValueForBackOfQueue; // replace it with new item for back of queue
xCursor = (xCursor + 1) % xCount; // and advance cursor using mod arithmetic to it cycles around
No wrapping doubles as objects, no dynamic allocation at all.
Wrap the above up as you see fit, maybe as a class, and you're done.