I am trying to use Conv1D to classify malware based on an 1D array of data.
The shape of the X_train is (7200, 1000).
The shape of the Y_train is (1800, 1000).
The shape of X_test is (7200, 1).
The shape of Y_test(1800, 1).
I have tried doing
model.add(Conv1D(5, 5, input_shape=(X_train[1], 1)))
Does anyone know what input shape I should change it to so it will fit my data?
TensorFlow's Conv1D doesn't have an "input_shape" attribute. Try adding an Input layer before this one. Also, that 1 after the "input_shape" would cause an error. You must mention the parameter name too.
Related
I am fairly new to TF, Keras and ML in general.
I am trying to implement a very simple MLP with an input shape of (batch_size,3,2) and an output shape of (batch_size,3), that is (if I got it right): for every 3x2 feature, there is a corresponding 3 value array label.
Here is how I create the model:
model = tf.keras.Sequential([
tf.keras.layers.Dense(50,tf.keras.activations.relu,input_shape=((3,2)),
tf.keras.layers.Dense(3)
])
and these are the X and y shapes:
X_train.shape,y_train.shape
TensorShape([64,3,2]),TensorShape([64,3])
On model.fit I am facing a weird error I cannot understand:
ValueError: Dimensions must be equal, but are 3 and 32 for ... with input shapes: [32,3,3] and [32,3]
I have no clue what's going on, I understand the batch size is 32, but where does that [32,3,3] comes from?
Moreover, if from the original 64, I lower the number (shapes) of X_train and y_train, say, to: (19,3,2) and (19,3), I get the following error instead:
InvalidArgumentError: required broadcastable shapes at loc(unknown)
What's even more weird for me is that if I specify a single unit for the output (last) layer, instead of 3 like this:
model = tf.keras.Sequential([
tf.keras.layers.Dense(50,tf.keras.activations.relu,input_shape=((3,2)),
tf.keras.layers.Dense(1)
])
model.fit works, but the predictions have shape (1,3,1) instead of my expected (3,)
I am very confused.
Whenever you have not any idea about the journey of data throughout your model, use model.summary() to see the details and what happens to the shape of data in each layer.
In this case, the input is a 2D array, and the output is a 1D array, and you just used dense layers. Dense layers can not handle 2d features in nature. For example for an image as input, you can not feed it directly to a dense layer. Instead you should use other layers such as Conv2D or Flatten your input (make it 1D) before feeding your data to the dense layer. Otherwise you will get the other dimension in the output.
Inference: If your input dimension and output dimension differs, somewhere in your model, the shape need to be changed. Most common ways to do so, is using a Flatten layer or GlobalAveragePooling and so on.
When you pass an input to a dense layer, the input should be flattened first. There are 2 ways to deal with this:
Way 1: Adding a flatten input as a first layer of your model:
model = Sequential()
model.add(Flatten(input_shape=(3,2)))
model.add(Dense(50, 'relu'))
model.add(Dense(3))
Way 2: Converting the 2D array to 1D before passing the inputs to your model:
X_train = tf.reshape(X_train, shape=([6]))
or
X_train = tf.reshape(X_train, shape=((6,)))
Then change the input shape of the first layer as:
model.add(Dense(50, 'relu', input_shape=(6,))
I'm trying to migrate TensorFlow checkpoint weights to PyTorch.
When I extract some weights with cp.load_variable(<CKPT>, <FIELD_NAME>), I get a 4D list ordered as HWCN, for example [1, 1, 512, 1024] which is clearly HWCN.
However, all convolution blocks data_format are set to NHWC.
So, the question is, why there's mismatch?
what should I believe? does the 4D list from cp.load_variable is correct and all left to do is permute the dimensions?
Thanks!
The weights are not given as HWCN, as the weights do not have any batch dimension (N), otherwise that would apply a different weight for each sample in the batch. The shape is [kernel_height, kernel_width, in_channels, out_channels]. There is no mismatch, because data_format specifies which format the input and output use.
In PyTorch the weight of convolutions is given as [out_channels, in_channels, kernel_height, kernel_width], therefore you only need to permute the dimensions.
I have a model with conv1d as the first layer.
My data is time series data where each sample consists of 41 time steps where each time step has 4 features.
I have about 1000 samples.
I have specified the input shape of the conve1d layer to be (41,4) as it supposed to be.
However, I keep getting the following error: Input 0 is incompatible with layer conv1d_48: expected ndim=3, found ndim=2.
I suspect that the problem is that the shape of X is (1000,) while the shape of X[0] is (41,4). Has anyone encountered this problem?
Thanks.
l1=Input(shape=(41,4))
x=Conv1D(64,(4))(l1)
x=GlobalMaxPooling1D()(x)
x=Dense(1)(x)
model=Model(l1,x)
model.compile('rmsprop','binary_crossentropy',metrics=['acc'])
model.fit(X,y,32,10)
You defined an expected input on your Conv1D to be be 2D -> (41, 4)
But you give to it an input of shape (41,), be consistant in your definitions !
If you specify the input_shape in your Conv1D layer, you don't need to feed an Input layer to it.
Or you can change the shape of this Input layer to be consistant with this input_shape.
Same as the title, in tf.keras.layers.Embedding, why it is important to know the size of dictionary as input dimension?
Because internally, the embedding layer is nothing but a matrix of size vocab_size x embedding_size. It is a simple lookup table: row n of that matrix stores the vector for word n.
So, if you have e.g. 1000 distinct words, your embedding layer needs to know this number in order to store 1000 vectors (as a matrix).
Don't confuse the internal storage of a layer with its input or output shape.
The input shape is (batch_size, sequence_length) where each entry is an integer in the range [0, vocab_size[. For each of these integers the layer will return the corresponding row (which is a vector of size embedding_size) of the internal matrix, so that the output shape becomes (batch_size, sequence_length, embedding_size).
In such setting, the dimensions/shapes of the tensors are the following:
The input tensor has size [batch_size, max_time_steps] such that each element of that tensor can have a value in the range 0 to vocab_size-1.
Then, each of the values from the input tensor pass through an embedding layer, that has a shape [vocab_size, embedding_size]. The output of the embedding layer is of shape [batch_size, max_time_steps, embedding_size].
Then, in a typical seq2seq scenario, this 3D tensor is the input of a recurrent neural network.
...
Here's how this is implemented in Tensorflow so you can get a better idea:
inputs = tf.placeholder(shape=(batch_size, max_time_steps), ...)
embeddings = tf.Variable(shape=(vocab_size, embedding_size], ...)
inputs_embedded = tf.nn.embedding_lookup(embeddings, encoder_inputs)
Now, the output of the embedding lookup table has the [batch_size, max_time_steps, embedding_size] shape.
So recently i am working on a project which i am supposed to take images as input to a CNN and extract the features and feed them to LSTM for training. I am using 2 Layer CNN for feature extraction and im taking the features form fully connected layer and trying to feed them to LSTM. Problem is when i want to feed the FC layer to LSTM as input i get error regarding to wrong dimension. my FC layer is a Tensor with (128,1024) dimension. I tried to reshape it like this tf.reshape(fc,[-1]) which gives me a tensor ok (131072, )
dimension and still wont work. Could anyone give me any ideas of how im suppose to feed the FC to LSTM?here i just write part of my code and teh error i get.
Convolution Layer with 32 filters and a kernel size of 5
conv1 = tf.layers.conv2d(x, 32, 5, activation=tf.nn.relu)
# Max Pooling (down-sampling) with strides of 2 and kernel size of 2
conv1 = tf.layers.max_pooling2d(conv1, 2, 2)
# Convolution Layer with 32 filters and a kernel size of 5
conv2 = tf.layers.conv2d(conv1, 64, 3, activation=tf.nn.relu)
# Max Pooling (down-sampling) with strides of 2 and kernel size of 2
conv2 = tf.layers.max_pooling2d(conv2, 2, 2)
# Flatten the data to a 1-D vector for the fully connected layer
fc1 = tf.contrib.layers.flatten(conv2)
# Fully connected layer (in contrib folder for now)
fc1 = tf.layers.dense(fc1, 1024)
# Apply Dropout (if is_training is False, dropout is not applied)
fc1 = tf.layers.dropout(fc1, rate=dropout, training=is_training)
s = tf.reshape(fc1, [1])
rnn_cell = rnn.BasicLSTMCell(n_hidden, forget_bias=1.0)
outputs, states = rnn.static_rnn(rnn_cell, s, dtype=tf.float32)
return tf.matmul(outputs[-1], rnn_weights['out']) + rnn_biases['out']
here is the error:
ValueError: Cannot reshape a tensor with 131072 elements to shape [1] (1 elements) for 'ConvNet/Reshape' (op: 'Reshape') with input shapes: [128,1024], [1] and with input tensors computed as partial shapes: input[1] = [1].
You have a logical error in how you approach the problem. Collapsing the data to a 1D tensor is not going to solve anything (even if you get it to work correctly).
If you are taking a sequence of images as input your input tensor should be 5D (batch, sequence_index, x, y, channel) or something permutation like that. conv2d should complain about the extra dimension but you probably missing one of them. You should try to fix it first.
Next use conv3d and max_pool3d with a window of 1 for the depth (since you don't want the different frames to interact at this stage).
When you are done you should still have 5D tensor, but x and y dimensions should be 1 (you should check this, and fix the operation if that's not the case).
The RNN part expects 3D tensors (batch, sequence_index, fature_index). You can use tf.squeeze to remove the 1 sized dimensions from your 5D tensor and get this 3D tensor. You shouldn't have to reshape anything.
If you don't use batches, it's OK, but the operations will still expect the dimension to be there (but for you it will be 1). Missing the dimension will cause problems with shapes down the line.