I'm hoping someone can tell me if I'm barking up the wrong tree. I have built a basic web app using Vue CLI and included the PWA support. Everything seems to work fine, I get the install prompt etc.
What I want to do, is cache various pages (routes) that user hasn't visited before, but so that they can when offline.
The reason here is that I'm planning to build an app for an airline and part of that app will act as an in flight magazine, allowing users to read various articles, however the aircrafts do not have wifi so the users need to download the app in the boarding area and my goal is to then pre cache say the top 10 articles so they can read them during the flight.
Is this possible? and is PWA caching the right way to go about it? Has anyone does this sort of thing before?
Thanks in advance
To "convert" your website to an PWA, you just need few steps.
You need to know that the service worker is not running on the main thread and you cant access for example the DOM inside him.
First create an serviceworker.
For example, go to your root directory of your project and add a javascript file called serviceworker.js this will be your service worker.
Register the service worker.
To register the service worker, you will need to check if its even possible in this browser, and then register him:
if ('serviceWorker' in navigator) {
window.addEventListener('load', function() {
navigator.serviceWorker.register('/serviceworker.js').then(function(registration) {
// Registration was successful
console.log('ServiceWorker registration successful with scope');
}, function(err) {
// registration failed :(
console.log('ServiceWorker registration failed: ', err);
});
});
}
In vue.js you can put this inside mounted() or created() hook.
If you would run this code it will say that the service worker is successfully registered even if we havent wrote any code inside serviceworker.js
The fetch handler
Inside of serviceworker.js its good to create a variable for example CACHE_NAME. This will be the name of your cache where the cached content will be saved at.
var CACHE_NAME = "mycache_v1";
self.addEventListener('fetch', function(event) {
event.respondWith(
caches.open(CACHE_NAME).then(function(cache) {
return cache.match(event.request).then(function (response) {
return response || fetch(event.request).then(function(response) {
cache.put(event.request, response.clone());
return response;
});
});
})
);
});
Everytime you make a network request your request runs through the service worker fetch handler here first. You need to response with event.respondWith()
Next step is you first open your cache called mycache_v1 and take a look inside if there is a match with your request.
Remember: cache.match() wont get rejected if there is no match, it just returns undefined because of that there is a || operator at the return statement.
If there is a match available return the match out of the cache, if not then fetch() the event request.
In the fetch() you save the response inside the cache AND return the response to the user.
This is called cache-first approach because you first take a look inside the cache and in case there is no match you make a fallback to the network.
Actually you could go a step further by adding a catch() at your fetch like this:
return response || fetch(event.request).then(function(response) {
cache.put(event.request, response.clone());
return response;
})
.catch(err => {
return fetch("/offline.html")
});
In case there is nothing inside the cache AND you also have no network error you could response with a offline page.
You ask yourself maybe: "Ok, no cache available and no internet, how is the user supposed to see the offline page, it requires internet connection too to see it right?"
In case of that you can pre-cache some pages.
First you create a array with routes that you want to cache:
var PRE_CACHE = ["/offline.html"];
In our case its just the offline.html page. You are able to add css and js files aswell.
Now you need the install handler:
self.addEventListener('install', function(event) {
event.waitUntil(
caches.open(CACHE_NAME)
.then(function(cache) {
return cache.addAll(PRE_CACHE);
})
);
});
The install is just called 1x whenever a service worker gets registered.
This just means: Open your cache, add the routes inside the cache. Now if you register you SW your offline.html is pre-cached.
I suggest to read the "Web fundamentals" from the google guys: https://developers.google.com/web/fundamentals/instant-and-offline/offline-cookbook
There are other strategies like: network-first
To be honest i dont know exactly how the routing works with SPAs because SPA is just 1 index.html file that is shipped to the client and the routing is handled by javascript you will need to check it out witch is the best strategie for your app.
Related
old Rails and php programmer that is new to js, tyring something and feel I am missing something pretty basic. I have a node server running a small webapp, express, ejs, jquery as well as alpinejs. (very exp with jquery, but learning alpinejs). I have a mqtt server running and can manipulate a couple of topics via my phone, and I can even see them in the node console (code below)
what I fail to understand is how to get, or maybe "bind" the subscription to a variable that I can "pass" into the express app so I can just show the mqtt message in the html. Im currently just trying to set things like fridgeFan = true or somehthing. My idea, I think, is to have mqtt update the alpinejs variable, hence updating the page, then viceversa...
Can someone point me in the general good direction of what im attemtping?
options={
clientId:"node-admin",
clean:true,
};
const express = require('express');
const app = express();
const mqtt = require('mqtt')
const client = mqtt.connect('mqtt://192.168.10.66', options)
client.on("connect",function(){
console.log("connected");
});
client.on('message',function(topic, message, packet){
console.log("message is "+ message);
console.log("topic is "+ topic);
// assume id like to bind topic and message to
// some variable that I can pass or have access to
// in the res.render calls below??
// couple of things I was trying
//document.getElementById('mqtt_div').innerHTML += topic;
//document.querySelector('[x-data]').__x.getUnobservedData().fridgeFan = message;
});
client.subscribe("sensors/sensor1",{qos:1});
app.set('view engine', 'ejs');
app.use(express.static(__dirname + '/public'));
app.get('/', (req, res) => {
res.render('index', {
title: 'Homepage'
});
});
with the above code, I can publish to "sensors/sensor1" via a phone app, I can see it in the node console, of course not the browser console.
How can I bind the "message" to a alpinejs variable so it will update?
OR do I go a different direction and put the client.on calls elsewhere, say the ejs file? in my testings, the ejs files dont know about require mqtt
You can't move your on message handler into the EJS files as they are only "executed" at the point you call render()
You can declare a global variable in the ExpressJS app and update fields with in it from the on('message',...) callback, you then pass this variable into the call to render() but this would mean that the page would only show the value at the time the page was loaded.
If you want live updates in the page as messages are published then you have one real option. That is to use a broker that supports MQTT over Websockets (nearly all modern brokers support this). With this you can load an MQTT client (either the Paho JavaScript client or you can use the MQTT.js client) into the page and subscribe to the topics you are interested in directly from the page. This way new messages are delivered directly to the page and you can then use what ever JavaScript framework you want to update the page.
I have a Nuxt app with authentication already running in universal mode.
I'm trying to convert the authentication service to Auth0. I'm following the Vue quickstart, but I discovered that auth0-js is a client side library since it uses a lot of 'window'-stuff that is not available on the server-side of Nuxt.
However, I got it kind of working by making it a client-side plugin and wrap all functions (that is calling the authservice in the lifecycle hooks) in a process.client check. It works "kind of" because when going to the protected page whilst not logged in, it flashes the page before being redirected to login page (since its rendered on the server-side as well, but the check only happens once it's delivered on the client side I presume).
My question now is: What can I do in order to add the check to server-side as well? (or at least make sure that the protected pages isn't flashed before being redirected).
What I've tried so far:
Saving the payload and the logged-in state in the store and check in some custom middleware, but that didn't do the trick.
Also, it seems to me that #nuxt/auth is outdated or something and the nuxt auth0 example as well. It uses auth0-lock while I'm using the new auth0 universal.
Anyone have suggestions on how to solve this issue? Thanks in advance!
not sure if this will be any help and have only answered a few questions (other account long time ago).
Update.. I read my answer then the question title (I think my answer does cover some of your context), but in regards to the title you could also look at using auth as a plugin. You can then handle stuff there before the page is hit.
I am not sure how your code is implemented, but this may help (hopefully).
If you are not using Vuex, I strong recommend it. Nuxt Vuex Store Guide
// index/store.js
// At least have the store initialized, but its most likely going to be used..
// page.vue
<template>
...
<div v-else-if="!$auth.loggedIn">
{{ test }}
</div>
...
...
data() {
if (!this.$auth.loggedIn) {
const test = 'Only this will load, no flash'
return { test }
}
}
$auth.loggedIn is built in, I read it ..somewhere.. in the docs
This will solve the no flash issue, you can also take advantage of a loader screen and asyncData to check the state before rendering the view to avoid a flash and populate data if it hangs.
You could also try using Vuex Actions, I am currently playing with these 2 in the process of where I am now. Learning about nuxtServerInit()
// store/index.js
import axios from 'axios'
export const actions = {
nuxtServerInit ({commit}, {request}) {
// This is good if you have the user in your request or other server side stuff
if (request.user) commit('SET_USER', request.user)
},
async GET_USER({ commit }, username) {
const user = await axios.get(`/user/${username}`)
if (user) commit('SET_USER', user)
}
}
export const mutations = {
SET_USER(state, user) {
// simple set for now
state.auth.user = user || null
}
}
The second one is combined using the fetch() method on the page itself.
// page.vue
async fetch({ $auth, store }) {
await store.dispatch('GET_USER', $auth.$state.user)
}
Now you can call $auth.user in your code as needed.
$auth.user is another built in I read ..somewhere..
You can also call $auth.user with the $auth.loggedIn to check if user exists on top of being logged in $auth.user && $auth.loggedIn.
It may be this.$auth.<value> depending on where you are trying to reference it.
I learned the asyncData() gets call first and logs in my server, then data() logs values in the server console as well (false, null), but in my Brave console they're undefined, i'd like an answer to that lol
I have been struggling with trying to get Auth0 to work how I wanted with JWTs, but as I kept crawling I found useful bits along the way (even in old demos such as the one you mentioned, just nothing with the lock stuff...). Also in terms of express and my API in general... Anyways, hope this helped (someone).
Good time of the day!
After a few weeks of development of my project, i've decided to migrate from plain Vue to Nuxt.
Mainly because i need SSR, although i know that Google can execute JS presented on the page and therefore generate appropriate content for their search bot.
Another reason is a general workflow of the project development. I like idea with automatic instantiation of routes, store, etc.
I've faced, however, a pretty strange behavior of the application when it is running in the mode: universal instead of mode: spa. And i don't want to switch to mode: spa since then i lose the SSR i was migrating for in the first place.
I' have an account module in the store - account.js which is responsible for handling any operations related to the account management, such as login/logout, get profile of authenticated user, store the token obtained from the login request as well as the logic for handling the 2FA TOTP procedure.
In my legacy application, i was able to get the token from the cookies by just using the following bit of the code
import Cookies from 'js-cookie';
export const state = {
user: null,
token: Cookies.get('token')
}
And save token after the successful authentication by executing the following mutation:
[types.ACCOUNT_SAVE_TOKEN] (state, { token, remember }) {
state.token = token;
Cookies.set('token', token, {
expires: 365,
httpOnly: true
});
}
But after migration to Nuxt.js, every time im loggin in, the token value in the state is getting populated, but no cookie is set, and after navigating to the other page inside the project (it is pwa, so no reloading, etc) token is reset back to null.
This issue however is gone if application is switched to the mode: spa from mode: universal and everything is working just fine.
I've read many issues on the github as well as done pretty big portion of crawling throught the websites which are trying to solve the same issue, though none of the suggestions are working for me.
I've even installed the cookie-universal-nuxt package from NPM which claims to be working with the SSR, but yet every time I'm trying to access this.$cookies.get('token') in the state, or anywhere else (mutations for example), I'm just getting error about using the method (get/set/remove) on null.
Does anyone know or have an idea on how to overcome this issue, at least if it is possible without going back to the mode: spa?
P.S. Running npm run build|generate yields same files as for the normal vue (without the content, just the structure until the target element is readched) while in mode: spa.
Okay, after around 12 hours trying to wrap my head around this issue, i've decided to go the 'dirty' way and create middleware which is doing, in my opinion, way to much processing on each request.
import CookieParser from 'cookieparser';
export default async function ({ store, req }) {
if (!store.getters['account/check']) {
if (!store.state.account.token) {
if (process.server) {
let requestCookies = CookieParser.parse(req.headers.cookie);
if (requestCookies.hasOwnProperty('token')) {
store.dispatch('account/saveToken', {
token: requestCookies.token,
remember: true
});
}
}
}
if (store.state.account.token) {
if (!store.state.account.user) {
try {
await store.dispatch('account/fetchUser');
} catch (error) { }
}
}
}
return Promise.resolve();
}
Seems like useCookie has been created for this use case
Background: I have an app that is showing a list of movies, but what I want to do is to show the list only for users who are authorized (by checking token stored on the local-storage).
so the flow I want to achieve is:
user enters the app main page
check if has token in local storage
if yes check if it is authorized
if authorized = show list, else don't show
so what I do right now is in my main (wrapper) component right after I create my store:
const store = configureStore();
var token = localStorage.get(authConstants.LOCAL_STORAGE_TOKEN_KEY);
if(token){
store.dispatch(actions.checkInitialAuth(token));
}
checkInitialAuth actions is:
export function checkInitialAuth(token){
return dispatch => {
dispatch(requestLogin());
return fetch(authConstants.API_USER_DETAILS, {headers: { 'Authorization' : `Bearer ${token}`}})
.then(function(response){
if(!response.ok){
throw Error(response.statusText);
}
return response.json();
})
.then(function(user){
localStorage.set(authConstants.LOCAL_STORAGE_TOKEN_KEY, token);
dispatch(receiveLogin(user)); // <==========
dispatch(setTopMovies()); // <==========
})
.catch(function(err){
// TODO: handle errors
console.log(err);
});
}
}
so the question is, is it the right place to invoke the initial auth check right after the creating store and right before the element creation?
and now if I have to invoke more actions only if the user is authorized do I have to invoke them in the then inside the checkInitialAuth action? is it the right place to make all the action dispatch calls?
and last one, when the auth is wrong (I changed manually the token to be wrong on the local storage) the console.log(err) is logging as expected but I have also this annoying 401 error in the console, can I somehow avoid it?
thanks a lot!
is it the right place to invoke the initial auth check right after the creating store and right before the element creation?
Yes. Usually this is where all the initialization happens before store is passed to Provider.
is it the right place to make all the action dispatch calls?
This depends a lot on your application logic. You component can check if a user is authenticated itself to display the correct content for 'topMovies'. But nothing stops you from dispatch more actions here.
but I have also this annoying 401 error in the console, can I somehow avoid it?
It is the network request error. It is the response from the server your fecth is contacting. You can hide the error by change your Chrome Dev console filter if you really want to hide them (but why?).
I am trying to write an FirefoxOS app for my portal which uses Mozilla Persona for authentication. How I should proceed if I want to achieve:
Allow users of my app to signup to my portal using Persona
Allow users of my app to login to my portal within the FirefoxOS app and perform some actions with the API
Depends if users is logged or not - giving access to different actions.
I have found this post with info that its integrated already: http://identity.mozilla.com/post/47114516102/persona-on-firefox-os-phones but I can't find any real examples.
What type of application I need to create? webapp or privileged?
I am trying to implement it using regular tutorial: https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Persona/Quick_Setup
But with this code:
signinLink.onclick = function() { navigator.id.request(); };
I am getting only following error:
[17:25:18.089] Error: Permission denied to access object
One thing is to make sure you're calling watch() to setup callbacks before you call request().
For example, something like this in your page:
<script src="https://login.persona.org/include.js"></script>
<script>
window.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded", function() {
navigator.id.watch({
// Provide a hint to Persona: who do you think is logged in?
loggedInUser: null,
// Called when persona provides you an identity assertion
// after a successful request(). You *must* post the assertion
// to your server for verification. Never verify assertions
// in client code. See Step 3 in this document:
// https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Persona/Quick_Setup
onlogin: function(assertion) {
// do something with assertion ...
// Note that Persona will also call this function automatically
// if a previously-signed-in user visits your page again.
},
onlogout: function() {
// handle logout ...
},
onready: function() {
// Your signal that Persona's state- and callback-management
// business is complete. Enable signin buttons etc.
}
});
// Set up click handlers for your buttons
document.getElementById("signin").addEventListener(
'click', function() {
navigator.id.request({
// optional callback to request so you can respond to
// a user canceling the sign-in flow
oncancel: function() { /* do something */ }
});
}
});
});
</script>
Here's an example that shows this in action:
https://people.mozilla.org/~jparsons/persona_example.html
However, on FirefoxOS, you should be aware that installed apps (not packaged or certified, but generic installed apps) are given a unique origin of the form app://{uuid}, with a different uuid for each device. This is unfortunately useless for sign-in purposes because there's no way for your server to know whether an app requesting sign-in is friend or foe. The way around this problem is to run your persona code in an invisible iframe hosted on your server. Thus the iframe will have the correct origin and your server will know it's your app. The iframe and the app can communicate via postMessage.
In the case of a packaged app (sometimes called a privileged app), your origin will be the origin declared in your webapp manifest. E.g., app://yourapp.yoursite.org. This gives you better assurance that the app is really yours, but the truly paranoid may still wish to deploy the iframe trick.
Hope this helps!
j