What if a SQL code as below?
Proc SQL;
SELECT DISTINCT ID,SUM(AMOUNT) AS M,SUM(NO) AS CNT
FROM CUSTOMER_LIST
GROUP BY ID
ORDER BY CNT DESC;
QUIT;
Use DISTINCT with GROUP BY. Any possible error will occur when using this combination Or DISTINCT just a redundant word?
Thanks~
Use DISTINCT with GROUP BY. Any possible error will occur when using this combination? Or DISTINCT just a redundant word?
This won't error, but that's just unnecessary redondancy. GROUP BY ID guarantees that each ID will appear only on one row in the resulset. There is no benefit for adding DISTINCT here - and it makes the intent of the query harder to understand.
On the other hand, there are situations where you would use DISTINCT without GROUP BY: typically when you want to deduplicate a set of columns, but do not need to use aggregate functions (SUM(), COUNT()...).
SELECT ID,SUM(AMOUNT) AS M,SUM(NO) AS CNT
FROM CUSTOMER_LIST
GROUP BY ID
ORDER BY CNT DESC;
We already group by id so no need distinct id
Related
I don't understand why I can't use this in my code :
SELECT MAX(SMTHNG), COUNT(MAX(SMTHNG))
FROM SomeTable;
Searched for an answer but didn't find it in documentation about these aggregate functions.
Also I get an SQL-compiler error "Invalid column name "SMTHNG"".
You want to know what the maximum SMTHNG in the table is with:
SELECT MAX(SMTHNG) FROM SomeTable;
This is an aggregation without GROUP BY and hence results in one single row containing the maximum SMTHNG.
Now you also want to know how often this SMTHNG occurs and you add COUNT(MAX(SMTHNG)). This, however, does not work, because you can not aggregate an aggregate directly.
This doesn't work either:
SELECT ANY_VALUE(max_smthng), COUNT(*)
FROM (SELECT MAX(smthng) AS max_smthng FROM sometable) t;
because the sub query only contains one row, so it's too late to count.
So, either use a sub query and select from the table again:
SELECT ANY_VALUE(smthng), COUNT(*)
FROM sometable
WHERE smthng = (SELECT MAX(smthng) FROM sometable);
Or count per SMTHNG before looking for the maximum. Here is how to get the counts:
SELECT smthng, COUNT(*)
FROM sometable
GROUP BY smthng;
And the easiest way to get the maximum from this result is:
SELECT TOP(1) smthng, COUNT(*)
FROM sometable
GROUP BY smthng
ORDER BY COUNT(*) DESC;
First of all, please read my comment.
Depending on what you're trying to achieve, the statement have to be changed.
If you want to count the highest values in SMTHNG field, you may try this:
SELECT T1.SMTHNG, COUNT(T1.SMTHNG)
FROM SomeTable T1 INNER JOIN
(
SELECT MAX(SMTHNG) AS A
FROM SomeTable
) T2 ON T1.SMTHNG = T2.A
GROUP BY T1.SMTHNG;
use cte like below or subquery
with cte as
(
select count(*) as cnt ,col from table_name
group by col
) select max(cnt) from cte
you can not use double aggregate function at a time on same column
I'm concatenating two fields and I only want to order by the second field (p.organizationname). Is that possible?
I'm displaying this field so I need a solution that doesn't include me having to select the fields separately.
Here is what i have so far:
SELECT distinct Concat(Concat(f.REFERENCEFILE, ','),p.ORGANIZATIONNAME)
FROM PEOPLE p,FOLDER f,FOLDERPEOPLE fp,folderinfo fi...
Order By concat(Concat(f.REFERENCEFILE, ','),p.ORGANIZATIONNAME)
Use GROUP BY and ORDER BY an aggregate instead of DISTINCT:
SELECT Concat(Concat(f.REFERENCEFILE, ','),p.ORGANIZATIONNAME)
FROM PEOPLE p,FOLDER f,FOLDERPEOPLE fp,folderinfo fi...
GROUP BY Concat(Concat(f.REFERENCEFILE, ','),p.ORGANIZATIONNAME)
Order By MAX(p.ORGANIZATIONNAME)
The problem can be illustrated with an example:
ID Col1
1 Dog
1 Cat
2 Horse
Distinct ID? Easy: 1,2
Distinct ID Order by Col1... wait.. which value of Col1 should SQL use? SQL is confused and angry.
Since you are using a concatenation of two fields and want to sort by one of those fields, you could also include the sort field in a DISTINCT subquery and then ORDER BY the sort field without including it in your SELECT list.
Since you have a DISTINCT your ORDER BY clause should be specified in the SELECT, you can use a subquery to achieve the same result in your case since the Distinct values will be the same when you add P.ORGANIZATIONNAME
SELECT col
FROM( SELECT distinct Concat(Concat(f.REFERENCEFILE, ','),p.ORGANIZATIONNAME) a,
p.ORGANIZATIONNAME b
FROM PEOPLE p,FOLDER f,FOLDERPEOPLE fp,folderinfo fi... ) t
order by b
I have a simple query in a tabloid control that gets all the leads in one month. I then use the tabloid control to group them into lead source. And then I have an associated count column. I want to sort my report on the count descending, without doing it in the query. I keep getting an error saying you cannot sort on an aggregate.
Thanks.
you can do one more thing..
just write your query in subquery part and write order by clause in outer query.
(suppose you have group by query as follow-
select lead_source, count(*) cnt
from your_table
group by lead_source
)
so you can do as follow -
select lead_source, cnt from (
select lead_source, count(*) cnt
from your_table
group by lead_source
)
order by cnt
this your_table and group by column list you have to edit accordingly your table structure ..
Looking for sql to get distinct names and count of those names from a sql table:
Structure:
id
name
other details
Do I use distinct to get each group and then count through those to get:
name1 count(name1)
name2 count(name2)
etc
Thanks
Rob.
When you want a COUNT() or a SUM(), you're using an AGGREGATE FUNCTION based on a GROUP BY clause.
As GROUP BY brings together all records with the same values specified in the GROUP BY columns, you're already getting the same effect as DISTINCT.
Except that DISTINCT doesn't allow aggregates, and GROUP BY does.
SELECT
name,
COUNT(*) AS count_of_name
FROM
yourTable
GROUP BY
name
Try :
SELECT *, COUNT(*) FROM my_table GROUP BY name
Something like this?
select name,COUNT(name) FROM Persons GROUP BY name
In the end I used:
SELECT DISTINCT `school`,COUNT(`school`) AS cat_num FROM table GROUP BY school order by cat_num DESC
When I try to use the following SELECT statement:
SELECT [lots of columns]
FROM Client, Customer, Document, Group
WHERE [some conditions]
GROUP BY Group.id
SQL Server complains that the columns I selected are not part of the GROUP BY statement nor an aggregate function. Am I using GROUP BY wrong? What should I be using instead?
To return all single occurences of a group by field, together with associated field values, write a query like:
select group_field,
max(other_field1),
max(other_field2),
...
from mytable1
join mytable2 on ...
group by group_field
having count(*) = 1;
Yes, you are using GROUP BY incorrectly. The point of using GROUP BY is to use aggregate functions. If you have no aggregrate functions you probably want SELECT DISTINCT instead.
SELECT DISTINCT
col1,
col2,
-- etc
coln
FROM Client
JOIN Customer ON ...
JOIN Document ON ...
JOIN [Group] ON ...
WHERE ...
My first guess would be that the problem is that you have table called Group, which I believe is a reserved word in SQL. Try wrapping the Group name with ' '
You want to group by all columns you are selecting that is not in an aggregate funcion.
SELECT ProductName, ProductCategory, SUM(ProductAmount)
FROM Products
GROUP BY ProductName, ProductCategory
This will give you a disticnt result of Product names and categories with the sum total of product amount in all aggregate child records for that group.