SQL Order By using concat - sql

I'm concatenating two fields and I only want to order by the second field (p.organizationname). Is that possible?
I'm displaying this field so I need a solution that doesn't include me having to select the fields separately.
Here is what i have so far:
SELECT distinct Concat(Concat(f.REFERENCEFILE, ','),p.ORGANIZATIONNAME)
FROM PEOPLE p,FOLDER f,FOLDERPEOPLE fp,folderinfo fi...
Order By concat(Concat(f.REFERENCEFILE, ','),p.ORGANIZATIONNAME)

Use GROUP BY and ORDER BY an aggregate instead of DISTINCT:
SELECT Concat(Concat(f.REFERENCEFILE, ','),p.ORGANIZATIONNAME)
FROM PEOPLE p,FOLDER f,FOLDERPEOPLE fp,folderinfo fi...
GROUP BY Concat(Concat(f.REFERENCEFILE, ','),p.ORGANIZATIONNAME)
Order By MAX(p.ORGANIZATIONNAME)
The problem can be illustrated with an example:
ID Col1
1 Dog
1 Cat
2 Horse
Distinct ID? Easy: 1,2
Distinct ID Order by Col1... wait.. which value of Col1 should SQL use? SQL is confused and angry.
Since you are using a concatenation of two fields and want to sort by one of those fields, you could also include the sort field in a DISTINCT subquery and then ORDER BY the sort field without including it in your SELECT list.

Since you have a DISTINCT your ORDER BY clause should be specified in the SELECT, you can use a subquery to achieve the same result in your case since the Distinct values will be the same when you add P.ORGANIZATIONNAME
SELECT col
FROM( SELECT distinct Concat(Concat(f.REFERENCEFILE, ','),p.ORGANIZATIONNAME) a,
p.ORGANIZATIONNAME b
FROM PEOPLE p,FOLDER f,FOLDERPEOPLE fp,folderinfo fi... ) t
order by b

Related

How to use Array_agg without returning the same values in different Order?

When using Array_agg, it returns the same values in different orders. I tried using distinct in a few places and it didn't work. I tried using an order before and after the array and it would fail or not properly exclude results.
I am trying to find all fields in the field column that share the same time and same ID and put them into an array.
Columns are Fieldname, ID, Time
select b.Field, count(*)
from (select Time, ID, array_agg(fieldname) as Field
from a
group by 1,2
order by 3) b
group by b.field
order by 1 desc
This produces duplicate results
For example I will have:
Field Name Count
Ghost,Mark 1234
Mark,Ghost 1234
I also tried this below where I add a subquery where I first order the fields alphabetically when grouping time and ID but it failed to execute. I think due to array_agg not being the root query?
select a.Field, count(*)
from
(select Time, ID, array_agg(fieldname) as field
from
(select Time, ID, fieldname
from a
group by 1,2
order by 3 desc) a
group by 1,2 ) b
group by 1
order by 2 desc

SAS SQL SELECT DISTINCT WITH GROUP BY

What if a SQL code as below?
Proc SQL;
SELECT DISTINCT ID,SUM(AMOUNT) AS M,SUM(NO) AS CNT
FROM CUSTOMER_LIST
GROUP BY ID
ORDER BY CNT DESC;
QUIT;
Use DISTINCT with GROUP BY. Any possible error will occur when using this combination Or DISTINCT just a redundant word?
Thanks~
Use DISTINCT with GROUP BY. Any possible error will occur when using this combination? Or DISTINCT just a redundant word?
This won't error, but that's just unnecessary redondancy. GROUP BY ID guarantees that each ID will appear only on one row in the resulset. There is no benefit for adding DISTINCT here - and it makes the intent of the query harder to understand.
On the other hand, there are situations where you would use DISTINCT without GROUP BY: typically when you want to deduplicate a set of columns, but do not need to use aggregate functions (SUM(), COUNT()...).
SELECT ID,SUM(AMOUNT) AS M,SUM(NO) AS CNT
FROM CUSTOMER_LIST
GROUP BY ID
ORDER BY CNT DESC;
We already group by id so no need distinct id

Get minimum without using row number/window function in Bigquery

I have a table like as shown below
What I would like to do is get the minimum of each subject. Though I am able to do this with row_number function, I would like to do this with groupby and min() approach. But it doesn't work.
row_number approach - works fine
SELECT * FROM (select subject_id,value,id,min_time,max_time,time_1,
row_number() OVER (PARTITION BY subject_id ORDER BY value) AS rank
from table A) WHERE RANK = 1
min() approach - doesn't work
select subject_id,id,min_time,max_time,time_1,min(value) from table A
GROUP BY SUBJECT_ID,id
As you can see just the two columns (subject_id and id) is enough to group the items together. They will help differentiate the group. But why am I not able to use the other columns in select clause. If I use the other columns, I may not get the expected output because time_1 has different values.
I expect my output to be like as shown below
In BigQuery you can use aggregation for this:
SELECT ARRAY_AGG(a ORDER BY value LIMIT 1)[SAFE_OFFSET(1)].*
FROM table A
GROUP BY SUBJECT_ID;
This uses ARRAY_AGG() to aggregate each record (the a in the argument list). ARRAY_AGG() allows you to order the result (by value) and to limit the size of the array. The latter is important for performance.
After you concatenate the arrays, you want the first element. The .* transforms the record referred to by a to the component columns.
I'm not sure why you don't want to use ROW_NUMBER(). If the problem is the lingering rank column, you an easily remove it:
SELECT a.* EXCEPT (rank)
FROM (SELECT a.*,
ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY subject_id ORDER BY value) AS rank
FROM A
) a
WHERE RANK = 1;
Are you looking for something like below-
SELECT
A.subject_id,
A.id,
A.min_time,
A.max_time,
A.time_1,
A.value
FROM table A
INNER JOIN(
SELECT subject_id, MIN(value) Value
FROM table
GROUP BY subject_id
) B ON A.subject_id = B.subject_id
AND A.Value = B.Value
If you do not required to select Time_1 column's value, this following query will work (As I can see values in column min_time and max_time is same for the same group)-
SELECT
A.subject_id,A.id,A.min_time,A.max_time,
--A.time_1,
MIN(A.value)
FROM table A
GROUP BY
A.subject_id,A.id,A.min_time,A.max_time
Finally, the best approach is if you can apply something like CAST(Time_1 AS DATE) on your time column. This will consider only the date part regardless of the time part. The query will be
SELECT
A.subject_id,A.id,A.min_time,A.max_time,
CAST(A.time_1 AS DATE) Time_1,
MIN(A.value)
FROM table A
GROUP BY
A.subject_id,A.id,A.min_time,A.max_time,
CAST(A.time_1 AS DATE)
-- Make sure the syntax of CAST AS DATE
-- in BigQuery is as I written here or bit different.
Below is for BigQuery Standard SQL and is most efficient way for such cases like in your question
#standardSQL
SELECT AS VALUE ARRAY_AGG(t ORDER BY value LIMIT 1)[OFFSET(0)]
FROM `project.dataset.table` t
GROUP BY subject_id
Using ROW_NUMBER is not efficient and in many cases lead to Resources exceeded error.
Note: self join is also very ineffective way of achieving your objective
A bit late to the party, but here is a cte-based approach which made sense to me:
with mins as (
select subject_id, id, min(value) as min_value
from table
group by subject_id, id
)
select distinct t.subject_id, t.id, t.time_1, t.min_time, t.max_time, m.min_value
from table t
join mins m on m.subject_id = t.subject_id and m.id = t.id

Remove a column after selection with SQL

I want my result set to include only one column, but I'm using a different column to group by and order by.
Can I somehow, after selecting and order by removing the column from the result set?
Using MSSQL2008
Just add another SELECT around your query, like so:
SELECT
sum_columnB
FROM
(SELECT
columnA
, SUM(columB) sum_columnB
FROM Table
GROUP BY columnA
ORDER BY columnA
, sum_columnB) resultset
But if you would post your query, my answer could be more specific and maybe clearer.
You do not have to select all the columns your order or group by, you can just select the column you want.
SELECT A
FROM dbo.Table
GROUP BY A,B
ORDER BY A,B

SQL To get Distinct Name and Number from table

Looking for sql to get distinct names and count of those names from a sql table:
Structure:
id
name
other details
Do I use distinct to get each group and then count through those to get:
name1 count(name1)
name2 count(name2)
etc
Thanks
Rob.
When you want a COUNT() or a SUM(), you're using an AGGREGATE FUNCTION based on a GROUP BY clause.
As GROUP BY brings together all records with the same values specified in the GROUP BY columns, you're already getting the same effect as DISTINCT.
Except that DISTINCT doesn't allow aggregates, and GROUP BY does.
SELECT
name,
COUNT(*) AS count_of_name
FROM
yourTable
GROUP BY
name
Try :
SELECT *, COUNT(*) FROM my_table GROUP BY name
Something like this?
select name,COUNT(name) FROM Persons GROUP BY name
In the end I used:
SELECT DISTINCT `school`,COUNT(`school`) AS cat_num FROM table GROUP BY school order by cat_num DESC