I researched about any plugin/module WSGI for Oracle WebLogic 12c that allows me run a python flask app, with no success.
The reason for why i need to run from WebLogic 12c, it's because i need to use the SSL certfied living there.
Researching, i found many web server (Apache, Gunicorn, etc) can act as proxy of WebLogic, here is an example, where Nginx receive all the requests with SSL and then passed them to WebLogic:
https://medium.com/#Dracontis/nginx-as-proxy-for-weblogic-with-ssl-c7e1076e2c0c
So, i wonder if there is a manner to invert this order? I mean, WebLogic receive all the requests (safely because of SSL certified) and then pass them to any web server with the WSGI standard.
Thanks in advance.
I didn't find a sort of solution that accomplished the topic above. However, in case someone needs implements this topology here is what i did:
I've installed an Oracle HTTP Server (OHS) and creating a wallet for the SSL certified, in certain way in which the OHS can receive the requests secure, then inside the OHS with specific setting achieve forward the request to the Apache running with the module WSGI.
Related
We are currently hosting OSB applications in Weblogic and using Oracle HTTP Server to proxy the requests to the JVMs behind using mod_wl_ohs.
However, we want to log the cluster member (e.g: hostname:port) of each request. In mod_proxy_balancer, We have something like %{BALANCER_WORKER_NAME}e. Any suggestions for OHS config?
I'm trying to implement a reverse proxy in our system, for a micro-services architecture.
The proxy server is HAProxy that works with SSL Termination and needs to proxy requests to a backend server with Https and Kerberos authentication.
I succeeded to terminate the ssl on the proxy server and pass the request to the https server (I need the termination in order to route requests by their body, to specific backend services) , but failing to authenticate with kerberos on the backend server.
Is it possible to implement Kerberos auth on the proxy server and then pass the TGT to the different backend services?
I have successfully done this and it took some work.
At the time I was using HDP so I used ambari to setup a hive server on the HAproxy node. (This was done solely for the purpose of having Ambari manage the kerberos principle. The hive server itself never ran)
Then I merged the keytab for my hive server (on the proxy) with my Hive server keytabs so that the principle could be used on the hive servers. I think I also allowed it as a principle to work with hive. I'm sure there is another path that would allow you to use delegation but this was the past of least resistance and made it so hive managed mostly managed the keytab. I did have to re-merge the keytab when they where regenerated but it wasn't as bad as manually managing keytabs.
I'm on Weblogic AS 10.3.5, I have two managed servers pointed to a cluster, so I have two url, one for the first managed server, the other one for the second.
I will deploy my application on the cluster, so will I reach it on both the url? will the application deployed and running on both the servers?
How does it work? Can you give me some references, please?
Is it clear?
Thanks a lot!
First, you shouldn't be using WebLogic 10.3.5 anymore since it has reached the last stage of support called Sustained Support. Consider to upgrade at least to WebLogic 10.3.6.
Related to your question, I believe you are talking about a Web Application and how to access it. First you need to read about Load Balancing in a Cluster. For the web part (JSP and Servlets) basically you have to options: setup a Web Server (like Apache HTTP) to make use of the WebLogic Plug-in, that will then be connected to the WebLogic cluster. The other easier option is to simply use an LBR (load balance router hardware).
These are the "software" solutions you have for Load Balancing your web application in a clustered WebLogic:
WebLogic Server supports the following Web servers and associated
proxy plug-ins:
WebLogic Server with the HttpClusterServlet
Netscape Enterprise Server with the Netscape (proxy) plug-in
Apache with the Apache Server (proxy) plug-in
Microsoft Internet Information Server with the Microsoft-IIS (proxy) plug-in
You can read more about this options at the Configure Proxy Plug-ins documentation page for WebLogic 10.3.6.
Doesn't have to be Apache, but that's just the only HTTP server I know of (Actually could you guys recommend alternatives that I could look into as well?)
Anyways, so I have been messing around with Amazon Web Services and I created an EC2 server instance with an Amazon Linux Image. On that, (Following guides and examples) I installed Apache and now when I make a GET request to my public IP, it returns to me the HTML files I created on my server.
My question is, what if I never installed Apache, and then made an HTTP request to my public IP? For no reason really, the question just came up in my head and I'm curious. I'd rather not figure out how to uninstall Apache or create a new instance to figure it out, so I was wondering if somebody could weigh in as well as tell me a little more about what it is exactly apache does on a server. My understanding is that it is a layer you can install on your server OS that will create a socket listener to port 80 (HTTP), and when a request is made on that port, Apache will return web pages? Also I think I read somewhere you could configure Apache to forward a port to something like a python server script?
Thanks in advance for your time!
could you guys recommend alternatives that I could look into as well?)
nginx is a popular alternative to apache. It's much more efficient.
what if I never installed Apache, and then made an HTTP request to my public IP?
Your browser would get a "connection reset" because there is nothing on port 80. Your browser would display a message (Chrome says "This webpage is not available"). You would NOT get a "404" because that requires an HTTP server to send HTTP codes.
If your server was firewalled instead, you'd bet a busy wait for a while, then a message about the server not responding.
Also I think I read somewhere you could configure Apache to forward a port to something like a python server script?
Yes, that is called "reverse proxy" mode. It's essential to any application website if you want to scale. The web server(s) can distribute traffic to one or more backends running the application. The web server is useful for filtering bad requests (since your backend in Ruby/Python will be 1000's of times slower than the reverse proxy.)
Well, if you want to test what will happen if Apache isn't installed, you can always just stop the Apache service by typing:
sudo service apache2 stop
or
sudo service httpd stop
depending on your version. Then if you visit your site's webpage you'll get a 404 error or something similar.
There are ways to use python scripts to run simple servers, but in general it's easier to just let Apache handle that and use a framework like Ruby on Rails or Django to control the display and creation of content for your server.
Recently our Software Analytic provider (NETTRACKER) sent us a plugin in order to be able to capture visitors in a better way. This plugin is for Apache 1.x and Apache 2.x. They said and I quote
that since Apache Tomcat is built on Apache HTTP server the configuration of the plugin should be the same.
I have looked for a httpd.conf in our tomcat deployment but we cannot find one, the only configuration that is similar to that one is the server.xml under the /conf directory.
If someone has better information regarding these two incredible products (Apache HTTP server and Apache Tomcat) I will greatly appreciate to draw the differences.
EDIT:
In case you are curious we know that Apache Web Server and Tomcat can work together using the mod_jk option and other proxys. But this will be too complex for our deployment.
Apache Tomcat and Apache HTTP are completely different server technologies. It is impossible to use a plugin for Apache HTTP server with Tomcat.
Apache HTTP server is developed in C and so are the plug-ins. On the contrary Tomcat is now completely developed in Java. Tomcat doesn't only serve static content, but it can also serve JSP pages and servlets.
Tomcat is used for hosting Java Web Applications. It can sure serve static content - you can host a web application using only Tomcat. Secure connections are supported and the performance is also very good (comparable with the performance of HTTP server).
A plain installation of Apache serves static content. Using the appropriate plug-ins, HTTP requests can be redirected to an application server (Tomcat, JBoss, Glassfish) or a script language interpreter (PHP). With this way dynamic content can be generated. The big advantages of Apache are the numerous plug-ins available, which allows administrators to configure and monitor web sites any way they want and that is the most widespread server available. This makes it the most secure solution, since it is thoroughly tested and any discovered flaw is corrected very quickly.
The best solution would be to use Tomcat proxied by an Apache server. It isn't so difficult to set up. If you can't do this, then you can't take advantage of Apache's plug-ins.
You see this confusion all the time. Many people think that Apache is a web server where in reality it is the name of an organization that has a web server project called "The Apache HTTP Server Project". In short the web server is called HTTPD (D as in daemon or Unix process).
Tomcat is another Apache project. This project implements a Java servlet engine to serve JSP pages and servlets. Tomcat and HTTPD have nothing to do with each other. However, you can set up HTTPD and Tomcat so that they work together. This way you can have HTTPD serve all static content, do URL rewriting and much more fancy stuff that the built in Tomcat web server can't do (or can't do very well). Whenever a JSP page is requested, HTTPD will pass the request on to Tomcat. Tomcat will process the request and will hand the output back to HTTPD which in turn will send it to the client.
Apache has many interesting projects. E.g. there is also a project called Geronimo which is a Java Enterprise server (J2EE). You can e.g. choose to embed Tomcat inside Geronimo to handle requests for JSP's and servlets where Geronimo does the more enterprisy stuff (LDAP, Messaging etc.). And you guessed it probably already, you can use HTTPD as a static content server for Geronimo as well.
totally bogus. Apache httpd plugins are written in C, Tomcat is pure Java.
Tomcat is a Java servlet engine. It can be hosted under Apache or IIS or quite a number of other external facing web servers. It sounds like you may be currently running your Tomcat instance standalone...
If you serve the JSP/servlets off of port 8080 and have it do things standalone, on the same host machine that Apache is running on, this can allow you to have them loosely coupled. Having multiple web servers fielding independent requests is not recommended, especially if you want to use server-based authentication along with Apache. Typically, you have one outside facing server that shepherds everything through it... Apache does this quite well, and the plugin you mention probably relies on this type of setup (everything gets wired through Apache) for its features/capabilities, based on your brief description of it.
If you would like to serve up your Tomcat servlets under Apache, you could configure apache to forward a class of URIs to your tomcat server instances. you could achieve this type of forwarding through mod_rewrite. this is a slower option performance-wise, as it adds slight overhead on everything you server up. You could also proxy incoming requests via a CGI mechanism similarly, from Apache to Tomcat.
mod_jk will simplify deployment and increase performance for placing Tomcat into an Apache server config. It is pretty painless to configure if you follow the docs, so I am not sure what you mean by "too complex" for your deployment -- if you want Apache and have Tomcat already, it would seem only a matter of slight config changes to get mod_jk downloaded and installed.