I'm on Weblogic AS 10.3.5, I have two managed servers pointed to a cluster, so I have two url, one for the first managed server, the other one for the second.
I will deploy my application on the cluster, so will I reach it on both the url? will the application deployed and running on both the servers?
How does it work? Can you give me some references, please?
Is it clear?
Thanks a lot!
First, you shouldn't be using WebLogic 10.3.5 anymore since it has reached the last stage of support called Sustained Support. Consider to upgrade at least to WebLogic 10.3.6.
Related to your question, I believe you are talking about a Web Application and how to access it. First you need to read about Load Balancing in a Cluster. For the web part (JSP and Servlets) basically you have to options: setup a Web Server (like Apache HTTP) to make use of the WebLogic Plug-in, that will then be connected to the WebLogic cluster. The other easier option is to simply use an LBR (load balance router hardware).
These are the "software" solutions you have for Load Balancing your web application in a clustered WebLogic:
WebLogic Server supports the following Web servers and associated
proxy plug-ins:
WebLogic Server with the HttpClusterServlet
Netscape Enterprise Server with the Netscape (proxy) plug-in
Apache with the Apache Server (proxy) plug-in
Microsoft Internet Information Server with the Microsoft-IIS (proxy) plug-in
You can read more about this options at the Configure Proxy Plug-ins documentation page for WebLogic 10.3.6.
Related
I researched about any plugin/module WSGI for Oracle WebLogic 12c that allows me run a python flask app, with no success.
The reason for why i need to run from WebLogic 12c, it's because i need to use the SSL certfied living there.
Researching, i found many web server (Apache, Gunicorn, etc) can act as proxy of WebLogic, here is an example, where Nginx receive all the requests with SSL and then passed them to WebLogic:
https://medium.com/#Dracontis/nginx-as-proxy-for-weblogic-with-ssl-c7e1076e2c0c
So, i wonder if there is a manner to invert this order? I mean, WebLogic receive all the requests (safely because of SSL certified) and then pass them to any web server with the WSGI standard.
Thanks in advance.
I didn't find a sort of solution that accomplished the topic above. However, in case someone needs implements this topology here is what i did:
I've installed an Oracle HTTP Server (OHS) and creating a wallet for the SSL certified, in certain way in which the OHS can receive the requests secure, then inside the OHS with specific setting achieve forward the request to the Apache running with the module WSGI.
We have an Oracle application (Agile PLM) which is deployed in a clustered environment. We have one admin node and two managed nodes supporting our application, where admin and 1 managed nodes are on the same server. We also have Load balancer which manages the traffic between the cluster.
We want to configure SSL in our application so that the application URL will be accessible over https only. We have already configured SSL at Load Balancer level(by installing security certificates in weblogic server which is the admin server) but want to know if we have to configure SSL on the managed server as well or bringing Load Balancer on https is sufficient?
All the users access the application using the Load Balancer URL only but since I am from the development team, so is only aware of the fact that we can also connect to the application with Managed server URLs, which are still running on http. Is it must to bring Managed servers also on https or it is just a good practice but not necessary?
It's not necessary, though probably a good practice.
I believe I have read in Oracle's installation guide that the recommended way is HTTP on the managed servers and terminating SSL on the load balancer. This may have changed.
For what it's worth, I leave HTTP on the managed servers.
I am new to Web Service and LAMP Stack.Currently I am working on a Web Application.It is a PHP Based Application that uses Apache Tomcat Web Server 8.0.26 ,MySQL Database ad Linux operating system(LAMP Stack).It has Web Services in Spring.
Following are the issues I am facing with the Application:-
1) Responses are slow over a period of few weeks from a web service hosted on tomcat.
Temporary Solution:-The problem is solved when we restart the Web Server.
2) What are the tools we can use to monitor tomcat / performance ?
Regards
Kaustubh
Take the dump of heap usage before and after of slow down and analyze. And also check your connection pooling with the database, check whether logs are getting rotated properly or not, check the number of active sessions in tomcat admin console.
One of my client has installed two MobileFirst servers on separate machines but have kept same databases for both to use. For example, databases are WLAdmin, WrkLght, WLReports, WLAppCenter and both servers are pointing to them.
It works well in past but today we seen Runtime synchronization failed exception and console was showing.
FWLSE3000E: A server error was detected.
So is this okay to have same database for multiple servers to use ?
Our Environment:
MobileFirst 6.3
WAS Liberty Core v8.5.5.4
Oracle 11
On both servers same application is deployed and there is no clustering. Only a load balancer is configured to just distribute the traffic.
Since Worklight/MobileFirst 6.2, a configuration with two "independent" servers using a shared administration data base is called a farm of servers and requires some additionally configuration. It is no longer enough that both servers share the data base, it is also needed that both servers can communicate to each other through JMX.
The situation in MobileFirst 6.3 for the farm of servers is in my personal opinion not optimally user-friendly, as some XML configuration file is needed to be shared among all servers (this is often error-prone), hence I recommend to upgrade to MobileFirst 7.0 where this XML configuration file is superfluous and the configuration is much easier.
The documentation for configuring a farm of servers can be found here:
MobileFirst 6.2: Server Farm in 6.2
MobileFirst 6.3: Server Farm in 6.3
MobileFirst 7.0: Server Farm in 7.0 (strongly recommended)
A server farm can be configured with Websphere Liberty Profile or Full Profile, or with Apache Tomcat.
An alternative to a server farm is using IBM Websphere Application Server Network Deployment (WAS ND) with clusters (see WAS ND configuration for MobileFirst 6,3). This works only with Websphere Full Profile, not with Websphere Liberty Profile. In this case, you do not really have two independent servers since they must both belong to the same cluster and are controlled by the same Websphere Deployment Manager. WAS ND handles all details of JMX communication automatically for you.
Final note: what I say above holds for the MobileFirst Server and Runtime. For IBM Application Center, the situation is slightly different since it does not require any JMX. Having two independent servers with Application Center sharing the same data base should work without problems.
Recently our Software Analytic provider (NETTRACKER) sent us a plugin in order to be able to capture visitors in a better way. This plugin is for Apache 1.x and Apache 2.x. They said and I quote
that since Apache Tomcat is built on Apache HTTP server the configuration of the plugin should be the same.
I have looked for a httpd.conf in our tomcat deployment but we cannot find one, the only configuration that is similar to that one is the server.xml under the /conf directory.
If someone has better information regarding these two incredible products (Apache HTTP server and Apache Tomcat) I will greatly appreciate to draw the differences.
EDIT:
In case you are curious we know that Apache Web Server and Tomcat can work together using the mod_jk option and other proxys. But this will be too complex for our deployment.
Apache Tomcat and Apache HTTP are completely different server technologies. It is impossible to use a plugin for Apache HTTP server with Tomcat.
Apache HTTP server is developed in C and so are the plug-ins. On the contrary Tomcat is now completely developed in Java. Tomcat doesn't only serve static content, but it can also serve JSP pages and servlets.
Tomcat is used for hosting Java Web Applications. It can sure serve static content - you can host a web application using only Tomcat. Secure connections are supported and the performance is also very good (comparable with the performance of HTTP server).
A plain installation of Apache serves static content. Using the appropriate plug-ins, HTTP requests can be redirected to an application server (Tomcat, JBoss, Glassfish) or a script language interpreter (PHP). With this way dynamic content can be generated. The big advantages of Apache are the numerous plug-ins available, which allows administrators to configure and monitor web sites any way they want and that is the most widespread server available. This makes it the most secure solution, since it is thoroughly tested and any discovered flaw is corrected very quickly.
The best solution would be to use Tomcat proxied by an Apache server. It isn't so difficult to set up. If you can't do this, then you can't take advantage of Apache's plug-ins.
You see this confusion all the time. Many people think that Apache is a web server where in reality it is the name of an organization that has a web server project called "The Apache HTTP Server Project". In short the web server is called HTTPD (D as in daemon or Unix process).
Tomcat is another Apache project. This project implements a Java servlet engine to serve JSP pages and servlets. Tomcat and HTTPD have nothing to do with each other. However, you can set up HTTPD and Tomcat so that they work together. This way you can have HTTPD serve all static content, do URL rewriting and much more fancy stuff that the built in Tomcat web server can't do (or can't do very well). Whenever a JSP page is requested, HTTPD will pass the request on to Tomcat. Tomcat will process the request and will hand the output back to HTTPD which in turn will send it to the client.
Apache has many interesting projects. E.g. there is also a project called Geronimo which is a Java Enterprise server (J2EE). You can e.g. choose to embed Tomcat inside Geronimo to handle requests for JSP's and servlets where Geronimo does the more enterprisy stuff (LDAP, Messaging etc.). And you guessed it probably already, you can use HTTPD as a static content server for Geronimo as well.
totally bogus. Apache httpd plugins are written in C, Tomcat is pure Java.
Tomcat is a Java servlet engine. It can be hosted under Apache or IIS or quite a number of other external facing web servers. It sounds like you may be currently running your Tomcat instance standalone...
If you serve the JSP/servlets off of port 8080 and have it do things standalone, on the same host machine that Apache is running on, this can allow you to have them loosely coupled. Having multiple web servers fielding independent requests is not recommended, especially if you want to use server-based authentication along with Apache. Typically, you have one outside facing server that shepherds everything through it... Apache does this quite well, and the plugin you mention probably relies on this type of setup (everything gets wired through Apache) for its features/capabilities, based on your brief description of it.
If you would like to serve up your Tomcat servlets under Apache, you could configure apache to forward a class of URIs to your tomcat server instances. you could achieve this type of forwarding through mod_rewrite. this is a slower option performance-wise, as it adds slight overhead on everything you server up. You could also proxy incoming requests via a CGI mechanism similarly, from Apache to Tomcat.
mod_jk will simplify deployment and increase performance for placing Tomcat into an Apache server config. It is pretty painless to configure if you follow the docs, so I am not sure what you mean by "too complex" for your deployment -- if you want Apache and have Tomcat already, it would seem only a matter of slight config changes to get mod_jk downloaded and installed.