Mock Apache ActiveMq with amqp protocol - activemq

We are using solace as the Messaging system in our application and while writing the unit test classes (using JUNIT )for listners i have to start the solcae in my local.
Instead i was trying to mock the broker (apache ActiveMq) to use amqp protocl and send messages to the listeners.
https://github.com/apache/activemq/blob/activemq-5.15.x/activemq-amqp/src/test/java/org/apache/activemq/transport/amqp/AmqpTransformerTest.java
But when i try to build the maven project i see the error
package org.apache.activemq.transport.amqp.client does not exist.
I have added the below dependencies but i still facing the same issue. Please suggest
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.activemq</groupId>
<artifactId>activemq-broker</artifactId>
<version>5.15.12</version>
<!-- <scope>test</scope> -->
</dependency>
<!-- Testing Dependencies -->
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.qpid</groupId>
<artifactId>qpid-jms-client</artifactId>
<version>0.51.0</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.activemq</groupId>
<artifactId>activemq-kahadb-store</artifactId>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.activemq</groupId>
<artifactId>activemq-jaas</artifactId>
<version>5.15.12</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.activemq</groupId>
<artifactId>activemq-broker</artifactId>
<version>5.15.12</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.activemq</groupId>
<artifactId>activemq-spring</artifactId>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.activemq</groupId>
<artifactId>activemq-http</artifactId>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.activemq</groupId>
<artifactId>activemq-mqtt</artifactId>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.activemq</groupId>
<artifactId>activemq-leveldb-store</artifactId>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.activemq.tooling</groupId>
<artifactId>activemq-junit</artifactId>
<version>5.15.12</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
I am not able to resolve the below compilation issues.
org.apache.activemq.transport.amqp.client can not be resolved since the dependecy for this package is not found,But i have added the above dependencies in the maven project.
import org.apache.activemq.transport.amqp.client.AmqpClient;
import org.apache.activemq.transport.amqp.client.AmqpConnection;
import org.apache.activemq.transport.amqp.client.AmqpMessage;
import org.apache.activemq.transport.amqp.client.AmqpSender;
import org.apache.activemq.transport.amqp.client.AmqpSession;
Please suggest.
thank you experts.

Not entirely clear what your test is doing but the classes it can't find are those of the AMQP test client that is implemented in the ActiveMQ 5.x AMQP module's test jar so you definitely won't find them with the dependencies you have there.
The AMQP test client in the ActiveMQ broker is not meant for general use by anyone as is was built specifically to test the AMQP stack in the broker. If you remove the usage of that from your tests you should have better luck.

Related

how to add a maven dependency when customizing udf functions

In the hadoop HDP platform, how to add a maven dependency when customizing udf functions,what should be paid attention to
Start with basic dependencies, e.g.,
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.hadoop</groupId>
<artifactId>hadoop-client</artifactId>
<version>2.6.0</version>
<scope>provided</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.hive</groupId>
<artifactId>hive-exec</artifactId>
<version>2.3.7</version>
</dependency>
</dependencies>

Trying to test static method using powermock

I'm trying to do a test on a code which requires to mock some static methods. I found in the that using powermock, I will be able to mock the static methods being used.
I tried adding these dependencies power mock module-junit4 dependency as well as powermock-api-mockito and setting their versions explicitly to 1.7.1:
<dependency>
<groupId>org.powermock</groupId>
<artifactId>powermock-module-junit4</artifactId>
<version>1.7.1</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.powermock</groupId>
<artifactId>powermock-api-mockito</artifactId>
<version>1.7.1</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
#RunWith(PowerMockRunner.class)
#PrepareForTest({SystemParameterQueryHelper.class})
public class VccTemplateConvertorTest{}
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: org.powermock.modules.junit4.common.internal.impl.JUnit4TestSuiteChunkerImpl.getFrameworkReporterFactory()Lorg/powermock/core/reporter/MockingFrameworkReporterFactory;
at org.powermock.modules.junit4.common.internal.impl.JUnit4TestSuiteChunkerImpl.getMockingFrameworkReporter(JUnit4TestSuiteChunkerImpl.java:140)
at org.powermock.modules.junit4.common.internal.impl.JUnit4TestSuiteChunkerImpl.run(JUnit4TestSuiteChunkerImpl.java:119)
at org.powermock.modules.junit4.common.internal.impl.AbstractCommonPowerMockRunner.run(AbstractCommonPowerMockRunner.java:57)
at org.powermock.modules.junit4.PowerMockRunner.run(PowerMockRunner.java:59)
at org.junit.runner.JUnitCore.run(JUnitCore.java:157)
at com.intellij.junit4.JUnit4IdeaTestRunner.startRunnerWithArgs(JUnit4IdeaTestRunner.java:68)
at com.intellij.rt.execution.junit.IdeaTestRunner$Repeater.startRunnerWithArgs(IdeaTestRunner.java:47)
at com.intellij.rt.execution.junit.JUnitStarter.prepareStreamsAndStart(JUnitStarter.java:242)
at com.intellij.rt.execution.junit.JUnitStarter.main(JUnitStarter.java:70)
You are using a fairly dated version of PowerMock. Looking at the documentation:
PowerMock version 2.0.0 and upper has support of Mockito 2. PowerMock version 1.7.0 and upper has experimental support of Mockito 2.
In this case emphasis is on experimental.
I would suggest to try and update the PowerMock version you're using. This is my current configuration:
<properties>
...
<version.mockito>2.23.4</version.mockito>
<version.powermock>2.0.2</version.powermock>
</properties>
<dependencies>
...
<dependency>
<groupId>org.mockito</groupId>
<artifactId>mockito-core</artifactId>
<version>${version.mockito}</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.powermock</groupId>
<artifactId>powermock-module-junit4</artifactId>
<version>${version.powermock}</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.powermock</groupId>
<artifactId>powermock-api-mockito2</artifactId>
<version>${version.powermock}</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.powermock</groupId>
<artifactId>powermock-core</artifactId>
<version>${version.powermock}</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
</dependencies>

com.google.inject.ProvisionException: Unable to provision

I have created simple seedstack web project through guideline mentioned on http://seedstack.org/docs/basics/
Undertow is also started with seedstack:run.
However, while accessing "hello" resource undertow throws below exception:
ERROR 2018-07-25 21:37:34,468 XNIO-1 task-2 io.undertow.request
UT005023: Exception handling request to
/api/seed-w20/application/configuration
null returned by binding at
org.seedstack.w20.internal.W20Module.configure(W20Module.java:51) (via
modules: com.google.inject.util.Modules$OverrideModule ->
io.nuun.kernel.core.internal.injection.KernelGuiceModuleInternal ->
org.seedstack.w20.internal.W20Module) but the 3rd parameter of
org.seedstack.w20.internal.FragmentManagerImpl.(FragmentManagerImpl.java:32)
is not #Nullable at
org.seedstack.w20.internal.W20Module.configure(W20Module.java:51) (via
modules: com.google.inject.util.Modules$OverrideModule ->
io.nuun.kernel.core.internal.injection.KernelGuiceModuleInternal ->
org.seedstack.w20.internal.W20Module) while locating
org.seedstack.w20.internal.ConfiguredApplication
for the 3rd parameter of org.seedstack.w20.internal.FragmentManagerImpl.(FragmentManagerImpl.java:32)
while locating org.seedstack.w20.internal.FragmentManagerImpl while
locating org.seedstack.w20.FragmentManager
for field at org.seedstack.w20.internal.rest.application.ApplicationConfigurationResource.fragmentManager(ApplicationConfigurationResource.java:38)
while locating
org.seedstack.w20.internal.rest.application.ApplicationConfigurationResource
Any help please?
This is a bug introduced recently into the w20-bridge, which occurs when no w20.app.json configuration file is present.
You can workaround it by creating an empty-object w20.app.json file at the root of the classpath:
{}
You can also update the version of all w20-bridge dependencies to 3.2.4 which has a fix for it. This can be done by using the dependencyManagement section of your POM:
<dependencyManagement>
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.seedstack</groupId>
<artifactId>seedstack-bom</artifactId>
<version>18.4.3</version>
<type>pom</type>
<scope>import</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.seedstack.addons.w20</groupId>
<artifactId>w20-bridge-web</artifactId>
<version>3.2.4</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.seedstack.addons.w20</groupId>
<artifactId>w20-bridge-web-bootstrap-3</artifactId>
<version>3.2.4</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.seedstack.addons.w20</groupId>
<artifactId>w20-bridge-web-business-theme</artifactId>
<version>3.2.4</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.seedstack.addons.w20</groupId>
<artifactId>w20-bridge-web-components</artifactId>
<version>3.2.4</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.seedstack.addons.w20</groupId>
<artifactId>w20-bridge-rest</artifactId>
<version>3.2.4</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.seedstack.addons.w20</groupId>
<artifactId>w20-bridge-specs</artifactId>
<version>3.2.4</version>
</dependency>
</dependencies>
</dependencyManagement>
This fix will be included in the upcoming SeedStack 18.7.

Can't use #Value and #Autowired with properties in Spring Cloud Configuration Server

I have a SpringBoot 1.5.12 app using the Edgware.SR3 Spring Cloud release.
The following code:
#Configuration
public class HmlConfig
{
#Value("${jms.destination.name}")
...
}
...
#RestController
#RequestMapping("/api")
public class HmlRestController
{
#Autowired
private JmsTemplate jmsTemplate;
...
}
Raises the following exception:
Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Could not resolve placeholder 'jms.destination.name' in value "${jms.destination.name}"
at org.springframework.util.PropertyPlaceholderHelper.parseStringValue(PropertyPlaceholderHelper.java:174)
at org.springframework.util.PropertyPlaceholderHelper.replacePlaceholders(PropertyPlaceholderHelper.java:126)
Here is my bootstrap.yml content:
spring:
application:
name: hml-core
profiles:
active:
default
cloud:
config:
uri: http://localhost:8888/hml
Going to http://localhost:8888/hml/hml-core/default correctly displays the properties. Did I miss anything ?
Depending on your logs, your client can't access to the Config Server, this is why the field jms.destination.name can't be injected.
Add the full stacktrace of your client will be helpful
Do you happen to have spring.main.sources set somewhere?
We had the excact same issue and removing that line helped us. It seems that having this in the bootstrap.yml hinders the app to connect to cloud config server. This results in missing props.
Also having spring.main.sources param on config server side caused a server side exception. See Spring cloud config /refresh crashes when spring.main.sources is set
I'm updating this post with the results of the last tests. It appears that including the maven dependencies in each of the modules solves the issue and the configuration is then found as expected.
In my original design I had a parent POM which factorized all the spring boot dependencies, as shown below:
<dependencyManagement>
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springframework.cloud</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-cloud-dependencies</artifactId>
<version>Camden.SR5</version>
<type>pom</type>
<scope>import</scope>
</dependency>
</dependencies>
</dependencyManagement>
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springframework.boot</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-boot-starter-web</artifactId>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springframework.boot</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-boot-starter-actuator</artifactId>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springframework.cloud</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-cloud-config-server</artifactId>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springframework.cloud</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-cloud-starter-config</artifactId>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springframework.cloud</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-cloud-config-client</artifactId>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springframework.security</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-security-rsa</artifactId>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springframework.boot</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-boot-starter-activemq</artifactId>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springframework.boot</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-boot-starter-test</artifactId>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
</dependencies>
This way the configuration client doesn't find the config server and the mentioned exception is raised. Modifying the parent POM such that to include only the dependencyManagement, as shown below:
<dependencyManagement>
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springframework.cloud</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-cloud-dependencies</artifactId>
<version>Camden.SR5</version>
<type>pom</type>
<scope>import</scope>
</dependency>
</dependencies>
</dependencyManagement>
and moving the dependencies in the config server POM as follows:
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springframework.cloud</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-cloud-config-server</artifactId>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springframework.cloud</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-cloud-starter-config</artifactId>
</dependency>
</dependencies>
and in the config client as follows:
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springframework.boot</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-boot-starter-web</artifactId>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springframework.boot</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-boot-starter-actuator</artifactId>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springframework.cloud</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-cloud-starter-config</artifactId>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springframework.cloud</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-cloud-config-client</artifactId>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springframework.security</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-security-rsa</artifactId>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springframework.boot</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-boot-starter-activemq</artifactId>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springframework.boot</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-boot-starter-test</artifactId>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
</dependencies>
completely solves the problem and everything works as expected. I don't have any explanation of this as including all the common dependencies in the parent POM should have exactly the same effect as including them in each individual module. In my opinion this shows some instabilities and strange behavior of Spring Boot and Spring Cloud. I don't have time to dig more and to try to understand what happens. Anyway, given this kind of issues, as well as the lack of any support including on this site, we moved from Spring.
But if someone has any explanation of this, I'm still interested to know.
Kind regards,
Nicolas

Can anyone give a good example of using org.apache.maven.cli.MavenCli programmatically?

I'm trying to create an intelliJ plugin that needs to execute maven targets on the current project. All the talk in the intertubes recommends using the MavenEmbedder. Good luck with that. The 2.0.4 version isn't well supported and there are no references for how to use it.
I gave it a whirl and ran into a wall where the embedder had not been initialized with all the fields it needs. Reflective private member injection? Awesome! Why would anyone need an obvious way to initialize an object?
It seems a few people are using a 2.1 version with some success. I have been unable to find that in a jar or even sources.
I went and checked out the 3.0 version of the embedder project: http://maven.apache.org/ref/3.0-beta-3/maven-embedder/ It does away with the MavenEmbedder object all together and seems to only support access through the main or doMain methods on MavenCli. Has anyone used these methods and can give some advice?
Yeah, the's not much in the way of documentation of MavenCli. The API is significatly simpler but i'd still like some examples. Here's one that works...
MavenCli cli = new MavenCli();
int result = cli.doMain(new String[]{"compile"},
"/home/aioffe/workspace/MiscMaven",
System.out, System.out);
System.out.println("result: " + result);
It takes a dir and runs the 'compile' phase...
Working maven configuration for maven 3.6.3
Code
MavenCli cli = new MavenCli();
System.setProperty("maven.multiModuleProjectDirectory", workingDirectory);
cli.doMain(new String[]{"compile"}, workingDirectory, System.out, System.err);
Dependencies
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.maven</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-embedder</artifactId>
<version>3.6.3</version>
</dependency>
<!-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-5995 -->
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.maven</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-compat</artifactId>
<version>3.6.3</version>
</dependency>
<!-- enable logging -->
<dependency>
<groupId>org.slf4j</groupId>
<artifactId>slf4j-simple</artifactId>
<version>1.7.30</version>
</dependency>
</dependencies>
The dependency matrix information for provided scopes and dynamically acquired components can be a bit confusing. It was for me, since it appeared to me that I got all the required items by direct or transitive dependency, but then remote resolution didn't work.
I wanted to jump to Maven 3.3.3 (latest as of 2015-05-25). I got it working without the sisu errors that presented when I tried to optimistically update to current versions of things specified here (and elsewhere). This is a project with a tag that worked with the example specified as of today using JDK8.
https://github.com/mykelalvis/test-maven-embedder/tree/20150525-working
Relevant deps (SLF4J is just so I can see the logs)
<dependency>
<groupId>org.slf4j</groupId>
<artifactId>slf4j-simple</artifactId>
<version>1.7.5</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.maven</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-embedder</artifactId>
<version>3.3.3</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.eclipse.aether</groupId>
<artifactId>aether-connector-basic</artifactId>
<version>1.0.2.v20150114</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.eclipse.aether</groupId>
<artifactId>aether-transport-wagon</artifactId>
<version>1.0.2.v20150114</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.wagon</groupId>
<artifactId>wagon-http</artifactId>
<version>2.9</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.wagon</groupId>
<artifactId>wagon-provider-api</artifactId>
<version>2.9</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.wagon</groupId>
<artifactId>wagon-http-lightweight</artifactId>
<version>2.9</version>
</dependency>
Running this is:
rm -r ~/.m2/repository/org/apache/maven/plugins/maven-clean-plugin/
mvn exec:java
Probably should have made it a unit test of some sort.
If someone has a superior solution for embedded Maven 3.3.3 (i.e. came up with a smaller or more range-oriented set of required dependencies), please post them.
to build on the comment from #StevePerkins, and using maven version 3.1.0,
I had to exclude the transitive dependency from aether-connector-wagon to wagon-provider-api to get it working.
pom.xml:
(...)
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.maven</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-embedder</artifactId>
<version>3.1.0</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.eclipse.aether</groupId>
<artifactId>aether-connector-wagon</artifactId>
<version>0.9.0.M2</version>
<scope>test</scope>
<exclusions>
<exclusion>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.wagon</groupId>
<artifactId>wagon-provider-api</artifactId>
</exclusion>
</exclusions>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.wagon</groupId>
<artifactId>wagon-http</artifactId>
<version>2.5</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
(...)
and here is a java example:
(...)
MavenCli cli = new MavenCli();
ByteArrayOutputStream baosOut = new ByteArrayOutputStream();
ByteArrayOutputStream baosErr = new ByteArrayOutputStream();
PrintStream out = new PrintStream(baosOut, true);
PrintStream err = new PrintStream(baosErr, true);
cli.doMain( new String[] { "clean" }, new File("."), out, err );
String stdout = baosOut.toString("UTF-8");
String stderr = baosErr.toString("UTF-8");
(...)
full example here
There is a dependency matrix for each version of maven-embedder, e.g. for 3.2.5: http://maven.apache.org/ref/3.2.5/maven-embedder/dependencies.html
Based on that I had to use org.apache.maven:maven-embedder:jar:3.2.5, org.apache.maven:maven-aether-provider:jar:3.2.5, and org.apache.maven.wagon:wagon-provider-api:jar:2.8.
It also fixes dependency on very old Guava library, since this version uses 18.0.
Dependency list for Maven Embedded 3.6.3 version that works in my Spring Boot 2.3 project (JDK8 or JDK 11 runtime):
<!-- Maven Embedder -->
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.maven</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-embedder</artifactId>
<version>3.6.3</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.maven</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-compat</artifactId>
<version>3.6.3</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.wagon</groupId>
<artifactId>wagon-http</artifactId>
<version>3.3.4</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.eclipse.aether</groupId>
<artifactId>aether-connector-basic</artifactId>
<version>1.1.0</version>
<scope>runtime</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.eclipse.aether</groupId>
<artifactId>aether-transport-wagon</artifactId>
<version>1.1.0</version>
<scope>runtime</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.slf4j</groupId>
<artifactId>slf4j-simple</artifactId>
<version>1.7.30</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.usefultoys</groupId>
<artifactId>slf4j-toys</artifactId>
<version>1.6.3</version>
</dependency>
The Maven CLI command looks like to:
// Maven CLI to execute Maven Commands
MavenCli cli = new MavenCli();
int result = cli.doMain(args, workingDirectory,
org.usefultoys.slf4j.LoggerFactory.getInfoPrintStream(LOGGER),
org.usefultoys.slf4j.LoggerFactory.getErrorPrintStream(LOGGER));
HTH