I'm trying to do a test on a code which requires to mock some static methods. I found in the that using powermock, I will be able to mock the static methods being used.
I tried adding these dependencies power mock module-junit4 dependency as well as powermock-api-mockito and setting their versions explicitly to 1.7.1:
<dependency>
<groupId>org.powermock</groupId>
<artifactId>powermock-module-junit4</artifactId>
<version>1.7.1</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.powermock</groupId>
<artifactId>powermock-api-mockito</artifactId>
<version>1.7.1</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
#RunWith(PowerMockRunner.class)
#PrepareForTest({SystemParameterQueryHelper.class})
public class VccTemplateConvertorTest{}
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: org.powermock.modules.junit4.common.internal.impl.JUnit4TestSuiteChunkerImpl.getFrameworkReporterFactory()Lorg/powermock/core/reporter/MockingFrameworkReporterFactory;
at org.powermock.modules.junit4.common.internal.impl.JUnit4TestSuiteChunkerImpl.getMockingFrameworkReporter(JUnit4TestSuiteChunkerImpl.java:140)
at org.powermock.modules.junit4.common.internal.impl.JUnit4TestSuiteChunkerImpl.run(JUnit4TestSuiteChunkerImpl.java:119)
at org.powermock.modules.junit4.common.internal.impl.AbstractCommonPowerMockRunner.run(AbstractCommonPowerMockRunner.java:57)
at org.powermock.modules.junit4.PowerMockRunner.run(PowerMockRunner.java:59)
at org.junit.runner.JUnitCore.run(JUnitCore.java:157)
at com.intellij.junit4.JUnit4IdeaTestRunner.startRunnerWithArgs(JUnit4IdeaTestRunner.java:68)
at com.intellij.rt.execution.junit.IdeaTestRunner$Repeater.startRunnerWithArgs(IdeaTestRunner.java:47)
at com.intellij.rt.execution.junit.JUnitStarter.prepareStreamsAndStart(JUnitStarter.java:242)
at com.intellij.rt.execution.junit.JUnitStarter.main(JUnitStarter.java:70)
You are using a fairly dated version of PowerMock. Looking at the documentation:
PowerMock version 2.0.0 and upper has support of Mockito 2. PowerMock version 1.7.0 and upper has experimental support of Mockito 2.
In this case emphasis is on experimental.
I would suggest to try and update the PowerMock version you're using. This is my current configuration:
<properties>
...
<version.mockito>2.23.4</version.mockito>
<version.powermock>2.0.2</version.powermock>
</properties>
<dependencies>
...
<dependency>
<groupId>org.mockito</groupId>
<artifactId>mockito-core</artifactId>
<version>${version.mockito}</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.powermock</groupId>
<artifactId>powermock-module-junit4</artifactId>
<version>${version.powermock}</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.powermock</groupId>
<artifactId>powermock-api-mockito2</artifactId>
<version>${version.powermock}</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.powermock</groupId>
<artifactId>powermock-core</artifactId>
<version>${version.powermock}</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
</dependencies>
Related
We are using solace as the Messaging system in our application and while writing the unit test classes (using JUNIT )for listners i have to start the solcae in my local.
Instead i was trying to mock the broker (apache ActiveMq) to use amqp protocl and send messages to the listeners.
https://github.com/apache/activemq/blob/activemq-5.15.x/activemq-amqp/src/test/java/org/apache/activemq/transport/amqp/AmqpTransformerTest.java
But when i try to build the maven project i see the error
package org.apache.activemq.transport.amqp.client does not exist.
I have added the below dependencies but i still facing the same issue. Please suggest
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.activemq</groupId>
<artifactId>activemq-broker</artifactId>
<version>5.15.12</version>
<!-- <scope>test</scope> -->
</dependency>
<!-- Testing Dependencies -->
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.qpid</groupId>
<artifactId>qpid-jms-client</artifactId>
<version>0.51.0</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.activemq</groupId>
<artifactId>activemq-kahadb-store</artifactId>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.activemq</groupId>
<artifactId>activemq-jaas</artifactId>
<version>5.15.12</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.activemq</groupId>
<artifactId>activemq-broker</artifactId>
<version>5.15.12</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.activemq</groupId>
<artifactId>activemq-spring</artifactId>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.activemq</groupId>
<artifactId>activemq-http</artifactId>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.activemq</groupId>
<artifactId>activemq-mqtt</artifactId>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.activemq</groupId>
<artifactId>activemq-leveldb-store</artifactId>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.activemq.tooling</groupId>
<artifactId>activemq-junit</artifactId>
<version>5.15.12</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
I am not able to resolve the below compilation issues.
org.apache.activemq.transport.amqp.client can not be resolved since the dependecy for this package is not found,But i have added the above dependencies in the maven project.
import org.apache.activemq.transport.amqp.client.AmqpClient;
import org.apache.activemq.transport.amqp.client.AmqpConnection;
import org.apache.activemq.transport.amqp.client.AmqpMessage;
import org.apache.activemq.transport.amqp.client.AmqpSender;
import org.apache.activemq.transport.amqp.client.AmqpSession;
Please suggest.
thank you experts.
Not entirely clear what your test is doing but the classes it can't find are those of the AMQP test client that is implemented in the ActiveMQ 5.x AMQP module's test jar so you definitely won't find them with the dependencies you have there.
The AMQP test client in the ActiveMQ broker is not meant for general use by anyone as is was built specifically to test the AMQP stack in the broker. If you remove the usage of that from your tests you should have better luck.
I want to migrate junit4 to junit5 , And I use #Rule annotations for junit4. Like this:
public class A {
#ClassRule
public static final SpringClassRule SPRING_CLASS_RULE = new SpringClassRule();
#Rule
public final SpringMethodRule springMethodRule = new SpringMethodRule();
}
And I want migrate junit5 but I don't know how to change Rule and ClassRule
This is my pom.xml section junit5
<!--junit5-->
<dependency>
<groupId>org.junit.jupiter</groupId>
<artifactId>junit-jupiter-api</artifactId>
<version>${junit.jupiter.version}</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.junit.jupiter</groupId>
<artifactId>junit-jupiter-engine</artifactId>
<version>${junit.jupiter.version}</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.junit.vintage</groupId>
<artifactId>junit-vintage-engine</artifactId>
<version>${junit.vintage.version}</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
<!-- Only required to run tests in an IDE that bundles an older version -->
<dependency>
<groupId>org.junit.platform</groupId>
<artifactId>junit-platform-launcher</artifactId>
<version>${junit.platform.version}</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.junit.jupiter</groupId>
<artifactId>junit-jupiter-migrationsupport</artifactId>
<version>${junit.jupiter.version}</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.mockito</groupId>
<artifactId>mockito-junit-jupiter</artifactId>
<version>2.17.0</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.junit.jupiter</groupId>
<artifactId>junit-jupiter-params</artifactId>
<version>5.2.0</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
How to I use Rule and ClassRule at junit5?
JUnit Jupiter introduces a new extension mechanism. Instead of Rules, you have to use the new SpringExtension which is available in Spring 5. There's a backport for Spring 4 by the original author as well.
Since it looks like you're not using Spring already, you do not "have to use the new SpringExtension", you can just use the BeforeAllCallback and AfterAllCallback extension APIs in JUnit 5. There's an example at Baeldung, about 2/3 of the way down the page. Note that "TestExtensionContext" is now "ExtensionContext".
I have a SpringBoot 1.5.12 app using the Edgware.SR3 Spring Cloud release.
The following code:
#Configuration
public class HmlConfig
{
#Value("${jms.destination.name}")
...
}
...
#RestController
#RequestMapping("/api")
public class HmlRestController
{
#Autowired
private JmsTemplate jmsTemplate;
...
}
Raises the following exception:
Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Could not resolve placeholder 'jms.destination.name' in value "${jms.destination.name}"
at org.springframework.util.PropertyPlaceholderHelper.parseStringValue(PropertyPlaceholderHelper.java:174)
at org.springframework.util.PropertyPlaceholderHelper.replacePlaceholders(PropertyPlaceholderHelper.java:126)
Here is my bootstrap.yml content:
spring:
application:
name: hml-core
profiles:
active:
default
cloud:
config:
uri: http://localhost:8888/hml
Going to http://localhost:8888/hml/hml-core/default correctly displays the properties. Did I miss anything ?
Depending on your logs, your client can't access to the Config Server, this is why the field jms.destination.name can't be injected.
Add the full stacktrace of your client will be helpful
Do you happen to have spring.main.sources set somewhere?
We had the excact same issue and removing that line helped us. It seems that having this in the bootstrap.yml hinders the app to connect to cloud config server. This results in missing props.
Also having spring.main.sources param on config server side caused a server side exception. See Spring cloud config /refresh crashes when spring.main.sources is set
I'm updating this post with the results of the last tests. It appears that including the maven dependencies in each of the modules solves the issue and the configuration is then found as expected.
In my original design I had a parent POM which factorized all the spring boot dependencies, as shown below:
<dependencyManagement>
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springframework.cloud</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-cloud-dependencies</artifactId>
<version>Camden.SR5</version>
<type>pom</type>
<scope>import</scope>
</dependency>
</dependencies>
</dependencyManagement>
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springframework.boot</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-boot-starter-web</artifactId>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springframework.boot</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-boot-starter-actuator</artifactId>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springframework.cloud</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-cloud-config-server</artifactId>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springframework.cloud</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-cloud-starter-config</artifactId>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springframework.cloud</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-cloud-config-client</artifactId>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springframework.security</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-security-rsa</artifactId>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springframework.boot</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-boot-starter-activemq</artifactId>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springframework.boot</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-boot-starter-test</artifactId>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
</dependencies>
This way the configuration client doesn't find the config server and the mentioned exception is raised. Modifying the parent POM such that to include only the dependencyManagement, as shown below:
<dependencyManagement>
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springframework.cloud</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-cloud-dependencies</artifactId>
<version>Camden.SR5</version>
<type>pom</type>
<scope>import</scope>
</dependency>
</dependencies>
</dependencyManagement>
and moving the dependencies in the config server POM as follows:
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springframework.cloud</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-cloud-config-server</artifactId>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springframework.cloud</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-cloud-starter-config</artifactId>
</dependency>
</dependencies>
and in the config client as follows:
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springframework.boot</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-boot-starter-web</artifactId>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springframework.boot</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-boot-starter-actuator</artifactId>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springframework.cloud</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-cloud-starter-config</artifactId>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springframework.cloud</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-cloud-config-client</artifactId>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springframework.security</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-security-rsa</artifactId>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springframework.boot</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-boot-starter-activemq</artifactId>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.springframework.boot</groupId>
<artifactId>spring-boot-starter-test</artifactId>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
</dependencies>
completely solves the problem and everything works as expected. I don't have any explanation of this as including all the common dependencies in the parent POM should have exactly the same effect as including them in each individual module. In my opinion this shows some instabilities and strange behavior of Spring Boot and Spring Cloud. I don't have time to dig more and to try to understand what happens. Anyway, given this kind of issues, as well as the lack of any support including on this site, we moved from Spring.
But if someone has any explanation of this, I'm still interested to know.
Kind regards,
Nicolas
I've seen some solutions to this problem but it seems like following them doesn't solve my problem. I am returning a simple string array and when I return it, I am getting this error:
Severe: MessageBodyWriter not found for media type=application/json, type=class [Ljava.lang.String;, genericType=class [Ljava.lang.String;.
The method is really simple (gets a list of files)
#GET
#Produces(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON)
public String[] getSegments(#PathParam("userId") String userId,
#PathParam("deviceId") String deviceId) {
System.out.println("in get, userId passed: " + userId);
String[] segments = storage.getSegments(userId, deviceId);
return segments;
}
My POM.XML seems to have all the things recommended in other posts:
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<groupId>junit</groupId>
<artifactId>junit</artifactId>
<version>3.8.1</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>${project.groupId}</groupId>
<artifactId>RoverServerLib</artifactId>
<version>${project.version}</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>com.fasterxml.jackson.jaxrs</groupId>
<artifactId>jackson-jaxrs-json-provider</artifactId>
<version>2.7.0</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.glassfish.jersey.core</groupId>
<artifactId>jersey-server</artifactId>
<version>${jersey.version}</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.glassfish.jersey.ext</groupId>
<artifactId>jersey-servlet-portability</artifactId>
<version>${jersey.version}</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.glassfish.jersey.connectors</groupId>
<artifactId>jersey-apache-connector</artifactId>
<version>${jersey.version}</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.glassfish.jersey.media</groupId>
<artifactId>jersey-media-json-jackson</artifactId>
<version>${jersey.version}</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.glassfish.jersey.media</groupId>
<artifactId>jersey-media-multipart</artifactId>
<version>${jersey.version}</version>
<type>jar</type>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.glassfish.jersey.media</groupId>
<artifactId>jersey-media-moxy</artifactId>
<version>${jersey.version}</version>
</dependency>
</dependencies>
The problem is with MOXy. It doesn't know how to handle String arrays. When you have MOXy on the classpath, it is the used as the default. To use Jackson (jersey-media-json-jackson). You just need to register the JacksonFeature. This will disable MOXy. Note that even just removing MOXy from your project, will have no affect, as Glassfish has it, so you need to make sure to register the JacksonFeature.
You should also get rid of jackson-jaxrs-json-provider. jersey-media-json-jackson already pulls it in (but a different version).
Another thing is that Glassfish already has it's own version of Jersey and friends. If you don't mark all your Jersey related dependencies as <scope>provided</scope>, then it's possible you may have version conflicts. So you should make them all provided. Glassfish 4.1 uses Jersey 2.10.4. If you need some newer version features, I would recommend updating Jersey in Glashfish.
I'm trying to create an intelliJ plugin that needs to execute maven targets on the current project. All the talk in the intertubes recommends using the MavenEmbedder. Good luck with that. The 2.0.4 version isn't well supported and there are no references for how to use it.
I gave it a whirl and ran into a wall where the embedder had not been initialized with all the fields it needs. Reflective private member injection? Awesome! Why would anyone need an obvious way to initialize an object?
It seems a few people are using a 2.1 version with some success. I have been unable to find that in a jar or even sources.
I went and checked out the 3.0 version of the embedder project: http://maven.apache.org/ref/3.0-beta-3/maven-embedder/ It does away with the MavenEmbedder object all together and seems to only support access through the main or doMain methods on MavenCli. Has anyone used these methods and can give some advice?
Yeah, the's not much in the way of documentation of MavenCli. The API is significatly simpler but i'd still like some examples. Here's one that works...
MavenCli cli = new MavenCli();
int result = cli.doMain(new String[]{"compile"},
"/home/aioffe/workspace/MiscMaven",
System.out, System.out);
System.out.println("result: " + result);
It takes a dir and runs the 'compile' phase...
Working maven configuration for maven 3.6.3
Code
MavenCli cli = new MavenCli();
System.setProperty("maven.multiModuleProjectDirectory", workingDirectory);
cli.doMain(new String[]{"compile"}, workingDirectory, System.out, System.err);
Dependencies
<dependencies>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.maven</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-embedder</artifactId>
<version>3.6.3</version>
</dependency>
<!-- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MNG-5995 -->
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.maven</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-compat</artifactId>
<version>3.6.3</version>
</dependency>
<!-- enable logging -->
<dependency>
<groupId>org.slf4j</groupId>
<artifactId>slf4j-simple</artifactId>
<version>1.7.30</version>
</dependency>
</dependencies>
The dependency matrix information for provided scopes and dynamically acquired components can be a bit confusing. It was for me, since it appeared to me that I got all the required items by direct or transitive dependency, but then remote resolution didn't work.
I wanted to jump to Maven 3.3.3 (latest as of 2015-05-25). I got it working without the sisu errors that presented when I tried to optimistically update to current versions of things specified here (and elsewhere). This is a project with a tag that worked with the example specified as of today using JDK8.
https://github.com/mykelalvis/test-maven-embedder/tree/20150525-working
Relevant deps (SLF4J is just so I can see the logs)
<dependency>
<groupId>org.slf4j</groupId>
<artifactId>slf4j-simple</artifactId>
<version>1.7.5</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.maven</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-embedder</artifactId>
<version>3.3.3</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.eclipse.aether</groupId>
<artifactId>aether-connector-basic</artifactId>
<version>1.0.2.v20150114</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.eclipse.aether</groupId>
<artifactId>aether-transport-wagon</artifactId>
<version>1.0.2.v20150114</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.wagon</groupId>
<artifactId>wagon-http</artifactId>
<version>2.9</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.wagon</groupId>
<artifactId>wagon-provider-api</artifactId>
<version>2.9</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.wagon</groupId>
<artifactId>wagon-http-lightweight</artifactId>
<version>2.9</version>
</dependency>
Running this is:
rm -r ~/.m2/repository/org/apache/maven/plugins/maven-clean-plugin/
mvn exec:java
Probably should have made it a unit test of some sort.
If someone has a superior solution for embedded Maven 3.3.3 (i.e. came up with a smaller or more range-oriented set of required dependencies), please post them.
to build on the comment from #StevePerkins, and using maven version 3.1.0,
I had to exclude the transitive dependency from aether-connector-wagon to wagon-provider-api to get it working.
pom.xml:
(...)
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.maven</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-embedder</artifactId>
<version>3.1.0</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.eclipse.aether</groupId>
<artifactId>aether-connector-wagon</artifactId>
<version>0.9.0.M2</version>
<scope>test</scope>
<exclusions>
<exclusion>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.wagon</groupId>
<artifactId>wagon-provider-api</artifactId>
</exclusion>
</exclusions>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.wagon</groupId>
<artifactId>wagon-http</artifactId>
<version>2.5</version>
<scope>test</scope>
</dependency>
(...)
and here is a java example:
(...)
MavenCli cli = new MavenCli();
ByteArrayOutputStream baosOut = new ByteArrayOutputStream();
ByteArrayOutputStream baosErr = new ByteArrayOutputStream();
PrintStream out = new PrintStream(baosOut, true);
PrintStream err = new PrintStream(baosErr, true);
cli.doMain( new String[] { "clean" }, new File("."), out, err );
String stdout = baosOut.toString("UTF-8");
String stderr = baosErr.toString("UTF-8");
(...)
full example here
There is a dependency matrix for each version of maven-embedder, e.g. for 3.2.5: http://maven.apache.org/ref/3.2.5/maven-embedder/dependencies.html
Based on that I had to use org.apache.maven:maven-embedder:jar:3.2.5, org.apache.maven:maven-aether-provider:jar:3.2.5, and org.apache.maven.wagon:wagon-provider-api:jar:2.8.
It also fixes dependency on very old Guava library, since this version uses 18.0.
Dependency list for Maven Embedded 3.6.3 version that works in my Spring Boot 2.3 project (JDK8 or JDK 11 runtime):
<!-- Maven Embedder -->
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.maven</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-embedder</artifactId>
<version>3.6.3</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.maven</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-compat</artifactId>
<version>3.6.3</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.wagon</groupId>
<artifactId>wagon-http</artifactId>
<version>3.3.4</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.eclipse.aether</groupId>
<artifactId>aether-connector-basic</artifactId>
<version>1.1.0</version>
<scope>runtime</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.eclipse.aether</groupId>
<artifactId>aether-transport-wagon</artifactId>
<version>1.1.0</version>
<scope>runtime</scope>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.slf4j</groupId>
<artifactId>slf4j-simple</artifactId>
<version>1.7.30</version>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>org.usefultoys</groupId>
<artifactId>slf4j-toys</artifactId>
<version>1.6.3</version>
</dependency>
The Maven CLI command looks like to:
// Maven CLI to execute Maven Commands
MavenCli cli = new MavenCli();
int result = cli.doMain(args, workingDirectory,
org.usefultoys.slf4j.LoggerFactory.getInfoPrintStream(LOGGER),
org.usefultoys.slf4j.LoggerFactory.getErrorPrintStream(LOGGER));
HTH