I have a record of First_Name and Second_Name stored in MySql DB. Currently I am displaying it in 2 different columns of Ag-Grid. I need those data to be combined together as Name and to be displayed in Ag-Grid's single column. Please help!
I am using Vue.Js
You should use a valueGetter in your columnDef like this -
{
headerName: 'Name',
colId: 'name',
valueGetter: function(params) {
return params.data.First_Name + " " + params.data.Second_Name;
},
},
Example from docs here
The ans stated by Pratik is right. Maybe you can use arrow functions for valueGetter so that the code looks more concise and simplify function scoping.
{
headerName: 'Name',
valueGetter: params => {
return ${params.data.First_Name} ${params.data.Second_Name};
},
},
Related
I can't find anything about how to do this type of query in FaunaDB. I need to select only specifics fields from a document, not all fields. I can select one field using Select function, like below:
serverClient.query(
q.Map(
q.Paginate(q.Documents(q.Collection('products')), {
size: 12,
}),
q.Lambda('X', q.Select(['data', 'title'], q.Get(q.Var('X'))))
)
)
Forget the selectAll function, it's deprecated.
You can also return an object literal like this:
serverClient.query(
q.Map(
q.Paginate(q.Documents(q.Collection('products')), {
size: 12,
}),
q.Lambda(
'X',
{
title: q.Select(['data', 'title'], q.Get(q.Var('X')),
otherField: q.Select(['data', 'other'], q.Get(q.Var('X'))
}
)
)
)
Also you are missing the end and beginning quotation marks in your question at ['data, title']
One way to achieve this would be to create an index that returns the values required. For example, if using the shell:
CreateIndex({
name: "<name of index>",
source: Collection("products"),
values: [
{ field: ["data", "title"] },
{ field: ["data", "<another field name>"] }
]
})
Then querying that index would return you the fields defined in the values of the index.
Map(
Paginate(
Match(Index("<name of index>"))
),
Lambda("product", Var("product"))
)
Although these examples are to be used in the shell, they can easily be used in code by adding a q. in front of each built-in function.
As simple sorting by two values in Kotlin can be like this:
.sortedWith(compareBy({ it.lastName }, { it.firstName }))
How to sort by those 2 field and adding case insensitive order?
I know that this can be only applied to sorting by one field:
.sortedWith(compareBy(String.CASE_INSENSITIVE_ORDER, { it.lastName })
How to do this for both fields?
Not like this?
.sortedWith(compareBy({ it.lastName.toLowerCase() }, { it.firstName.toLowerCase() }))
I'm using jquery data tables and I'm assigning an array of values to the initialization of the data table. The table basically looks like this.
based on an an radio button I would like to limit the items that are display in the table and the items that are searched in the table.
For my example it would be based on the "Chart column". I want to limit the table to only show the items that are based on chart "D" or Chart "S". Here is how I'm initializing the table.
if (!$.fn.DataTable.isDataTable( '#fundLookUptbl' ) ) {
fundTable = $('#fundLookUptbl').DataTable( {
data: funds,
columns: [
{ "mData": "chart" },
{ "mData": "fund" },
{ "mData": "orgDefault" },
{ "mData": "progDefault" }
]
} );
var filteredData = fundTable
.columns( [0, 1] )
.data()
.eq( 0 )
.filter( function ( value, index ) {
return value = 'D' ? true : false;
} );
}
This is obviously not working, and the filterData variable is a lousy attempt on trying to make it work. I'm having a hard time understanding the API's. So the question is , How can initialize the table to only show the items that are based on a given chart. I know that I can remove the items of the array but i don't want to do that since I would simple like to be able to switch between chart "D" and "S" but still continue to search through the other columns.
I believe that filtering the column would solve your problem.
table.column(0).search('Bruno').draw()
So you could just filter the column when the radio button selection change
Here is a fiddle example
I´m not sure to be understanding what you want to do but here are some options:
One way is selecting by default value example "s". You can use a dropdown is easier to handled .Then select with jQuery the dafault value "s" on that dropdown and add a function
$("#DropdownId").change(function () {
var chart=$("#DropdownId").val();
});
$.ajax({
url: "url")",//url to reload page with new value
type: "POST",
data: {chart:chart},
success: function (data) {
}
});
});
on this way the filter is on backend. If you want to do something on the row depending of a column value you shoud to add something like this
"fnRowCallback": function (nRow, mData, iDisplayIndex, iDisplayIndexFull) {
if (mData["chart"] =="s") {
return nRow;
}
},
Datatables: custom function inside of fnRowCallback.
Good luck
fundTable.order( [0, 'asc'] );
Try that or look at this particular page for reference:
https://datatables.net/reference/api/order%28%29
Basically orders in pair of columnIndex in either asc(ending) or desc(ending) order.
I have an SQL query that grabs some data (language column in dbtable table). The query uses GROUP_CONCAT, so one cell has several results, e.g.
"Ajax, jQuery, HTML, CSS".
What I want to do is to show the result in new lines, like:
"Ajax
jQuery
HTML
CSS"
How can I do that?
I tried to make it by changing "columns": [{ "data": "id" }, { "data": "languages" }... but it didn't work.
I also tried to fix it by adding "< br >" in query as a Separator, but didn't work.
Thank you!
You can use columns.render function for the column like this:
var table = $('#example').DataTable({
columns: [
null,
null,
{
"render": function(data, type, row){
return data.split(", ").join("<br/>");
}
}
]
});
Working example.
Hope that helps and that I've understood your problem.
To implement new line in a column for DataTables
Assume that there are 7 columns in a row and the 4th column has the data
"Ajax, jQuery, HTML, CSS"
so the 3 columns before and 3 columns after has to be made null in the code
$('#example').DataTable({
columns: [
null, null, null,
{
"render": function(data, type, row){
return data.split(", ").join("<br/>");
}
},
null, null, null
]
});
#annoyingmouse answer is perfect taking into account the question description!
Just an extra answer following "strictly" the question (as it is) which says:
How can I implement new line in a column (DataTables)
You have just to add a wrap class on the <table> tag. Tada! Each column text will be wrapped when reaching its predefined width.
I am working with a dgrid where I want to find a search term in my grid on two columns.
For instance, I want to see if the scientific name and commonName columns contain the string "Aca" (I want my search to be case insensitive)
My Grid definition:
var CustomGrid = declare([Grid, Pagination ]);
var gridStore = new Memory({ idProperty: 'tsn', data: null });
gridStore.queryEngine = rql.query;
grid = new CustomGrid({
store: gridStore,
columns:
[
{ field: "tsn", label: "TSN #"},
{ field: "scientificName", label: "Scientific Name"},
{ field: "commonName", label: "Common Name",},
],
autoHeight: 'true',
firstLastArrows: 'true',
pageSizeOptions: [50, 100],
}, id);
With the built in query language (I think simple query language), I was able to find the term in one column or the other, but I couldn't do a complex search that would return results for both columns.
grid.set("query", { scientificName : new RegExp(speciesKeyword, "i") });
grid.refresh()
I started reading and I think RQL can solve this problem, however, I am struggling with the syntax.
I have been looking at these pages:
http://rql-engine.eu01.aws.af.cm/
https://github.com/kriszyp/rql
And I am able to understand basic queries, however the "contains" syntax eludes me.
For instance if I had this simple data set and wanted to find the entries with scientific and common names that contain the string "Aca" I would think my contains query would look like this:
contains(scientificName,string:aca)
However, this results in no matches.
[
{
"tsn": 1,
"scientificName": "Acalypha ostryifolia",
"commonName": "Rough-pod Copperleaf",
},
{
"tsn": 2,
"scientificName": "Aegalius acadicus",
"commonName": "Northern Saw-whet Owl",
},
{
"tsn": 3,
"scientificName": "Portulaca pilosa",
"commonName": "2012-02-01",
},
{
"tsn": 4,
"scientificName": "Accipiter striatus",
"commonName": "Kiss-me-quick",
},
{
"tsn": 5,
"scientificName": "Acorus americanus",
"commonName": "American Sweetflag",
}
]
Can someone guide me in how to formulate the correct syntax? Thank you.
From what I'm briefly reading, it appears that:
contains was replaced by any and all
these are meant for array comparisons, not string comparisons
I'm not sure offhand whether RegExps can just be handed to other operations e.g. eq.
With dojo/store/Memory, you can also pass a query function which will allow you to do whatever you want, so if you wanted to compare for a match in one field or the other you could do something like this:
grid.set('query', function (item) {
var scientificRx = new RegExp(speciesKeyword, 'i');
var commonRx = new RegExp(...);
return scientificRx.test(item.scientificName) || commonRx.test(item.commonName);
});
Of course, if you want to filter only items that match both, you can do that with simple object syntax:
grid.set('query', {
scientificName: scientificRx,
commonName: commonRx
});