I have a use case where we need to periodically load BigQuery table in to a cache and support SQL query from there. I'm doing researching on Apache Ignite and think it could be a good fit to our use case. Only that it's not clear to me yet how I can get auto-load from BigQuery. By "auto-load" I mean to keep Apache Ignite updated with BigQuery table data and let this updating transparent to applications. In most cases, our BigQuery tables are updated by other scheduled jobs/queries with intervals from 5 minutes to 1 month.
I'm new to Ignite, and I guess my questions are as the following:
Is this a feature supported in Ignite already? (I couldn't find any)
Or is there any exiting pluggins already? (I couldn't find any)
how to implement the auto-load cache for BigQuery using Ignite?
You can do this once with Cache Store / loadCache(), but doing this every few minutes is infeasible. You may wish to design a BigQuery streamer to Apache Ignite, if it supports pushing of deltas.
If Google BigQuery doesn't open its changelog files for CDC tools then find how to capture those updates differently and stream them to Ignite via its IgniteDataStreamer API. There should be a way to capture the changes with some pub/sub mechanism.
Related
I am currently exporting logs from Stackdriver to BigQuery using sinks. But i am only interessted in the jsonPayload. I would like to ignore pretty much everything else.
But since the table creation and data insertion happens automatically, i could not do this.
Is there a way to preprocess data coming from sink to store only what matters?
If the answer is no, is there a way to run a cron job each day to copy yesterday data into a seperate table and then remove it? (knowing that the tables are named using timestamps which makes it possible to query them by day)
As far as I know both options mentioned are currently not possible in the GCP platform. On my end I've also tried to create an internal reproduction of your request and noticed that there isn't a way to solely filter the jsonPayload.
I would therefore suggest creating a feature request in regards to your ask on the following public issue tracker link. Note that feature requests do not have an ETA as to when they'll processed or if they'll be implemented.
I am trying to read from multiple kafka brokers using KafkaIO on apache beam. The default option for offset management is to the kafka partition itself (no longer using zookeper from kafka >0.9). With this setup, when i restart the job/pipeline, there is issue with duplicate and missing records.
From what i read, the best way to handle this is to manage offset to external data stores. Is it possible to do this with current version of apache beam and KafkaIO? I am using 2.2.0 version right now.
And, after reading from kafka,i will write it to BigQuery. Is there a setup in KafkaIO where I can set the committed message only after i insert the message to BigQuery? I can only find auto commit setup right now.
In Dataflow, you can update a job rather than restarting from scratch. The new job resumes from the last checkpointed state, ensuring exactly-once processing. This works for KafkaIO source as well. The auto-commit option in Kafka consumer configuration helps but it is not atomic with Dataflow internal state, which implies restarted job might have small fraction of duplicate or missing messages.
We need to load millions of key/values into Apache Geode and we'd like to know what are some the options available. Our values happen to be in the 256kb range.
There are several options depending on your application requirements/SLAs or whether you need to perform conversion or other transformations, etc.
Out-of-the-box, Apache Geode provides the Cache & Region Snapshot Service. This is useful when you want to migrate data from 1 existing Apache Geode cluster to another, for instance. Not so useful if your data is coming from an external source, like a RDBMS.
Another option is to lazily load the data based on need. This can be accomplished by implementing the CacheLoader interface and registering the CacheLoader with a Region. Obviously, you could create a CacheLoader implementation that intelligently loads a block of data based on some rules/criteria in addition to loading and returning the single value of interests based on the current requests.
A lot of times, users create an external, custom Conversion process or tool to extract, transform and bulk load (ETL) a bunch of data into Apache Geode. This is typical in complex Use Cases or requirements. However, it is highly advisable to use perhaps a framework/tool like...
Spring XD (now Spring Cloud Data Flow on Pivotal's Cloud Foundry (PCF)) is great ETL tool and pipeline for creating stream-based applications. Spring XD / SCDF provides many different options for "sources" and "sinks" (e.g. GemFire Server). In addition to sources & sinks, you can even "tap" the stream to process the data with "Processors". So whether you are doing real-time stream or batch-oriented data operations (e.g. bulk loads), Spring XD is a great option.
I am sure Google might provide other answers on how to perform ETL with a KeyValue store like Apache Geode.
Hope this helps get you going.
Cheers,
John
We have very limited options to load Gemfire regions .
1) Spring batch:
Create Gemfire writer for load data and remove data
Create batch configuration and lod it
2) Apache Spark
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/fast-data-access-using-gemfire-apache-spark-part-vaquar-khan-/
I am trying to figure out how to best store and retrieve data, from S3 to Cassandra, using Spark: I have log data that I store in Cassandra. I run Spark using DSE to perform analysis of the data, and it works beautifully. The log data grows daily, and I only need two weeks worth in Cassandra at any given time. I still need to store older logs somewhere for at least 6 months, and after research, S3 with Glaciar looks like the most promising solution. I'd like to use Spark, to run a daily job that finds the logs from day 15, deletes them from Cassandra, and sends them to S3. My problem is this: I can't seem to settle on the right format to save the Cassandra rows to a file, such that I can one day potentially load the file back into Spark, and run an analysis, if I have to. I only want to run the analysis in Spark one day, not persist the data back into Cassandra. JSON seems to be an obvious solution, but is there any other format that I am not considering? Should I use Spark SQL? Any advice appreciated before I commit to one format or another.
Apache Spark is designed for this kind of use case. It is a storage format for columnar databases. It provides column compression and some indexing.
It is becoming a de facto standard. Many big data platforms are adopting it or at least providing some support for it.
You can query it efficiently directly in S3 using SparkSQL, Impala or Apache Drill. You can also run EMR jobs against it.
To write data to Parquet using Spark, use DataFrame.saveAsParquetFile.
Depending on your specific requirements you may even end up not needing a separate Cassandra instance.
You may also find this post interesting
I'm looking to use Dataflow to load data into BigQuery tables using BQ load jobs - not streaming (streaming would cost too much for our use case). I see that the Dataflow SDK has built in support for inserting data via BQ streaming, but I wasn't able to find anything in the Dataflow SDK that supports load jobs out of the box.
Some questions:
1) Does the Dataflow SDK have OOTB support for BigQuery load job inserts? If not, is it planned?
2) If I need to roll my own, what are some good approaches?
If I have to roll my own, performing a BQ load job using Google Cloud Storage is a multi step process - write the file to GCS, submit the load job via the BQ API, and (optionally) check the status until the job has completed (or failed). I'd hope I could use the existing TextIO.write() functionality to write to GCS, but I'm not sure how I'd compose that step with the subsequent call to the BQ API to submit the load job (and optionally the subsequent calls to check the status of the job until it's complete).
Also, I'd be using Dataflow in streaming mode, with windows of 60 seconds - so I'd want to do the load job every 60 seconds as well.
Suggestions?
I'm not sure which version of Apache Beam you are using, but now it's possible to use a micro-batching tactic using a Stream Pipeline. If you decide one way or another you can use something like this:
.apply("Saving in batches", BigQueryIO.writeTableRows()
.to(destinationTable(options))
.withMethod(Method.FILE_LOADS)
.withJsonSchema(myTableSchema)
.withCreateDisposition(CreateDisposition.CREATE_IF_NEEDED)
.withWriteDisposition(WriteDisposition.WRITE_APPEND)
.withExtendedErrorInfo()
.withTriggeringFrequency(Duration.standardMinutes(2))
.withNumFileShards(1);
.optimizedWrites());
Things to keep in mind
There are 2 different methods: FILE_LOADS and STREAMING_INSERT, if you use the first one you need to include the withTriggeringFrequency and withNumFileShards. For the first one, from my experience, is better to use minutes and the number will depend on the amount of throughput data. If you receive quite a lot try to keep it small, I have seen "stuck errors" when you increase it too much. The shards can affect mostly your GCS billing, if you add to much shards it will create more files per table per x amount of minutes.
If your input data size is not so big the streaming insert can work really well and the cost shouldn't be a big deal. In that scenario you can use STREAMING_INSERT method and remove the withTriggeringFrequency and withNumFileShards. Also, you can add withFailedInsertRetryPolicy like InsertRetryPolicy.retryTransientErrors() so no rows are being lost (keep in mind that idempotency is not guaranteed with STREAM_INSERTS, so duplication is possible)
You can check your Jobs in BigQuery and validate that everything is working! Keep in mind the policies for jobs with BigQuery (I think is 1000 jobs per table) when you are trying to define triggering frequency and shards.
Note: You can always read this article about efficient aggregation pipelines https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/data-analytics/how-to-efficiently-process-both-real-time-and-aggregate-data-with-dataflow
BigQueryIO.write() always uses BigQuery load jobs when the input PCollection is bounded. If you'd like it to also use them if it is unbounded, specify .withMethod(FILE_LOADS).withTriggeringFrequency(...).