React Native watermelon db collection returns undefined - react-native

thanks in advance
Iam using watermelon db in react native android it returns undefined for the collection.
const handleDB = async () => {
const myCollection = database.collections.get('data_items')
await database.action(async () => {
const newPost = await myCollection.create(post => {
post.ItemID = 9
post.ItemParentItem_ID = 8
})
})
}
And i call this from same Functional Component
handleDB()
Is there any work around
My DB
import { Database } from "#nozbe/watermelondb";
import SQLiteAdapter from "#nozbe/watermelondb/adapters/sqlite";
import { dbModel } from "./"
import { mySchema} from "./schema"
const adapter = new SQLiteAdapter({
dbName: 'Northel',
schema: mySchema
});
export const database = new Database({
adapter,
modelClasses: [dbModel],
actionsEnabled: true,
});
If I console log myCollection I get undefined.
i have imported the database as
import { database } from '../model/database'

Have you defined your models, schemas and relationships correctly? See how here:
Schema, Model and Relation.
If everything is fine, did you add this table later to the database and not update the schema version? If so, update the schema version and reinstall your mobile application.
If that doesn't work, share your model and schema definitions, it will help to identify the problem.

The same thing happened to me.
Make sure you have completely configured the database, in my case, forget to add the Model to modelClasses [].

This usually happens when you have not named the model correctly or imported the model in the database setup

Related

Redux Toolkit: Async Dispatch won't work in react-native

I'm trying to make some async actions with redux toolkit in react-native. The project runs on redux without any issues, beside the implementation issues for createAsyncThunk.
I used the same logic as described in the docs
Within my Slice, I'm creating the createAsyncThunk Object as follows:
export const fetchAddressList = createAsyncThunk('/users/fetchAddresses', async(thunkAPI) => {
const state = thunkAPI.getState();
console.log("THUNK state.loggedIn: "+state.loggedIn);
if(state.loggedIn){
return apiHelper.getAddressDataAsync();
}
});
It only differs in the export tag before const tag compared to the docs. I had to make it in order to access the fetchAddressList from outside. The apiHelper.getAddressDataAsync() is an async method, that returns the result of a fetch.
Than I added the extraReducers attribute to my slice object.
export const appDataSlice = createSlice({
name: "appDataReducer",
initialState:{
//Some initial variables.
},
reducers: {
//Reducers...
},
extraReducers: (builder) => {
builder.addCase(fetchAddressList.fulfilled, (state, action) => {
console.log("FULLFILLED::: ",action.payload);
state.addressList = action.payload.addressList;
state.defaultAddressId = action.payload.defaultAddressId;
})
}
});
export const { /*REDUCER_METHOD_NAMES*/ } = appDataSlice.actions;
This slice is stored in the store using configureStore, among other slices, that are definitely working fine.
Calling the fetchAddressList() method using dispatch doesn't do anything:
dispatch(fetchAddressList());
What exactly am I doing wrong here? Would appreciate any hints.
Edit:
Are there configurations required within the configureStore()-method when creating the store object?
This is how I create the store object:
export const store = configureStore({
reducer: {
/*Other reducer objects....,*/
appDataReducer: appDataSlice.reducer
},
});
Maybe something is missing here...
It was due to wrong usage of the createAsyncThunk()-method. I'd passed the thunkAPI to be as the first (and only) parameter to the inner method, which was linked to user arguments passed through parameters into the initial dispatch method (like dispatch(fetchAddressList("ARG_PASSED_TO_FIRST_PARAMETER_OF_ASNYCTHUNK"));). However thunkAPI is being injected into the second parameter of createAsyncThunk()-method and as a result thunkAPI was undefined, since I hadn't passed any parameters by calling dispatch(fetchAddressList());
It was odd, to not have any errors / exceptions
calling a method of an undefined object though => thunkAPI.getState().
The solution is to use the second parameter for thunkAPI.
You do have two options by doing so.
1 - Either load the whole thunkAPI into the second parameter and use it as so:
export const fetchAddressList = createAsyncThunk('/users/fetchAddresses', async(args, thunkAPI) => {
console.log("TEST: ", thunkAPI.getState());
thunkAPI.dispatch(...);
});
2 - Or load exported methods by the thunkAPI:
export const fetchAddressList = createAsyncThunk('/users/fetchAddresses', async(args,{getState, dispatch}) => {
console.log("TEST: ", getState());
dispatch(...);
});
Both ways will work. Happy coding :)

How do I access rootGetters from a different namespaced module in Vuex?

I have a Vuex module named 'forms'. I have a different (also namespaced) module named 'users'.
I'm using Vuexfire (for the first time, which I think is what's tripping me up). And have an action that works like this:
const actions = {
loadPendingHoursRequests: firestoreAction((context) => {
context.bindFirestoreRef('pendingHoursRequests', db.collection('hours')
.where('submittedToUID', '==', "iTd865JKWXRmhz2D2mtW7KIpL7a2"))
}),
This works as expected and creates a real-time connection between Firestore and Vuex. The problem is I want "iTd865JKWXRmhz2D2mtW7KIpL7a2" to be a dynamic value drawn from the 'users' module.
I'm just completely lost. If I refactor like this:
loadPendingHoursRequests ({ dispatch, commit, getters, rootGetters }) {
let uid = rootGetters['users/currentUserUID'];
console.log(uid)
firestoreAction((context) => {
context.bindFirestoreRef('pendingHoursRequests', db.collection('hours').where('submittedToUID', '==', uid))
})
}
The console.log above returns 'undefined'. And even if I remove the .where('submittedToUID', '==', uid), the firestoreAction doesn't work anyway.
Thanks in advance. I'd love to know what I'm not understanding here.
Untested (I don't use VuexFire) but assuming the bindFirestoreRef needs the context object, you can access rootGetters as a property of it as well. Putting the two snippets together ilke this:
const actions = {
loadPendingHoursRequests: firestoreAction((context) => {
const uid = context.rootGetters['users/currentUserUID'];
context.bindFirestoreRef('pendingHoursRequests', db.collection('hours')
.where('submittedToUID', '==', uid))
})
}

Globally Accessible Component Instance

In our production applications with Vue 2.x, we have a toast component. This toast component is mounted once via a plugin (code below) and is then added to the Vue prototype making it accessible in every component instance.
This makes life a lot easier instead of having to add the toast to everywhere we use.
Vue 2.x plugin
export default {
install(vue: any, _: any) {
const root = new Vue({ render: (createElement) => createElement(Toast) });
root.$mount(document.body.appendChild(document.createElement("div")));
const toastInstance: Toast = root.$children[0] as Toast;
vue.prototype.$toast = {
show: (state: ToastState, text: string) => { toastInstance.show(state, text); },
hide: () => { toastInstance.hide(); }
};
}
Which can then be called in any component like:
this.$toast.show(ToastStates.SUCCESS, "Some success message");
I have recently started another project and would like to do something similar, except using Vue 3. Because we don't have access to this in the setup function, I can't use the same approach as before.
I have been looking into a few things, and have found a few ways of doing it, but none as a definitive best practice.
Provide / Inject:
This seems the most promising, where I can use
export const appInstance = createApp(App);
then
appInstance.provide("toast", toastComponentInstance)
which I can then inject in any components. The problem with this, is that to get it available in every component, it needs to be attached to the initial app instance, where it hasn't been created yet. Maybe I could manually mount it and pass it in (but that seems like a hack).
Composition:
I have also looked at this issue here: How to access root context from a composition function in Vue Composition API / Vue 3.0 + TypeScript? but didn't find that very useful and I had to do all types of hacks to actually gain access to the plugin. Gross code below..
export function useToast() {
const root = getCurrentInstance();
const openToast: (options: ToastOptions) => void = (options: ToastOptions) => {
root.ctz.$toast.open(options);
}
const closeToast: () => void = () => {
root.ctx.$toast.close();
}
return {
openToast,
closeToast
}
}
I have other ideas but they seem far fetched an hacky. Keen to hear peoples thoughts on other solutions. I just want a simple way to have 1 instance of a toast, that I can call two functions on to open / close it when and where I want.
This is roughly how I'd do it...
I'd use Composition API, because it makes passing around internals easy
(I'm using popup instead of toast for simplicity)
myPopup.vue
// internal
const popupMessage = Vue.ref('');
const popupVisible = Vue.ref(true);
// external
export const popUpShow = function(message) {
popupMessage.value = message
popupVisible.value = true
}
export const popupHide = function () {
popupVisible.value = false
}
export default {
setup(){
return {
popupMessage, popupVisible, popupHide
}
}
}
Some component, anywhere, composition or class based...
import { popUpShow } from "./myPopup";
export default {
methods: {
myTriggeredEvent() {
popUpShow("I am your Liter")
}
}
}
By exposing popUpShow, which acts as a singleton, you can import that from anywhere, and not have to worry about context.
There the drawback in using this kind of setup/architecture is that it doesn't scale well. The problem happens if your architecture reaches a certain size, and you have multiple triggers coming from various sources that the component needs to have complex logic to handle its state (not likely for this example though). In that case, a managed global store, ie. Vuex, might be a better choice.

Different view for different user type in react native

Currently, I'm doing a react native project with expo, and I want to make 2 user type in my app (for example: student and lecturer). What is the best approach to save the user type?
The things you want to google for managing state in a react native app are: react native async storage, react state storage, redux, react hooks, redux alternatives. That should get you started.
You can save these type of information in react native async storage. Let say for Student you save 1 and for lecturer you can save 2. But remember async storage always takes string as input, so don't forget to convert when saving or retrieving. Based on that you can check currently which user is accessing the app and then you have to render that view only.
Sample code for storing data :
storeData = async () => {
try {
await AsyncStorage.setItem('#storage_Key', 'stored value')
} catch (e) {
// saving error
}
}
Reading data :
getData = async () => {
try {
const value = await AsyncStorage.getItem('#storage_Key')
if(value !== null) {
// value previously stored
}
} catch(e) {
// error reading value
}
}
Finally you can make conditional view rendering just like below:
tempUserType ===1 ? <code view for student> : <code view for lecturer>
Here you can read more :-
https://github.com/react-native-community/async-storage
I hope this helps..... Thanks :)

Initializing a map in firestore

I'm trying to build an app using react native with a firestore database. I'm fairly new to the react native framework (as well as working with firestore), so it's possible I might be trying to solve this problem the wrong way.
I have a database that works well and is already populated. For each user of this app, I'd like to add a map to their entry. I want to use this map to store some data about the user which they can fill out later.
Here's some code:
componentDidMount() {
this.readProfile(this.props.uid);
}
readProfile = (uid) => {
this.props.getProfile(uid).then((profile) =>
{
if(!profile.userMap)
{
profile.userMap = generateUserMap();
}
...
}
export const generateUserMap = function () {
var map = new Map();
SomeEnum.forEach((key, value) => {
map.set(key, false);
});
AnotherEnum.forEach((key, value) => {
map.set(key, false);
});
OneMoreEnum.forEach((key, value) => {
map.set(key, false);
});
return map;
};
...
<Input
value={this.state.profile.userMap[SomeEnum.Foo]}
onChangeText={(foo) => this.updateUserMap({ foo })}
/>
What I want this code to be doing is to read in the user's profile when I load the page. That part seems to be working fine. My next concern is to properly initialize the map object. The code doesn't seem to be properly initializing the map, but I'm not sure why. Here's why I say that:
TypeError: Cannot read property 'Foo' of undefined
With the stack trace pointing to my component's Connect() method.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
EDIT: Apologies for the oversight, here is the updateUserMap function:
updateUserMap = (property) => {
const profile = Object.assign({}, this.state.profile, property);
this.setState({ profile });
}
So, as anyone who looks over this question can probably tell, I was doing a few things pretty wrong.
The error I'm getting referred specifically to that input block in my render method - this.state.profile.userMap was undefined at that point. I can guarantee that it won't be undefined if I do my check within the render method but before I'm accessing the userMap. Because of how the lifecycle methods work in react native, ComponentDidMount wouldn't be called before my render method would.
My enum code also wouldn't work. I changed that to a simple for loop and it works like a charm.
Here's my updated code:
render() {
if(!this.state.profile.userMap)
{
this.state.profile.userMap = generateUserMap();
}