how to set up SEO title and meta description in weebly online store products category pages - seo

I have a simple query in weebly web-site i have updated SEO title and meta description on product category pages but it is not update on website.
is there any another options to update SEO title and Meta description on weebly website.?
here i am update the SEO title and description in weebly web-sitehere i update SEO title and meta description
it is not shown on that product category page

Probably by the phrase SEO titles you mean meta titles.
Check the metadata value from Wikipedia:
Metadata is "data information that provides information about other
data".
Probably meta titles and meta descriptions can be attributed to descriptive metadata. Therefore, let's check the value for this category of metadata:
Descriptive metadata is descriptive information about a resource. It
is used for discovery and identification.
Thus, the meta-elements you have specified can be used as online identifiers for each web page on your website.
The attached screenshot is seen in the meta elements you use an abbreviation such as CBD. Much mention of the abbreviations in your meta elements can be seen as keyword stuffing.
Also in the meta description, you use some kind of URL. This may prevent you from scanning text for voice search (text to speech). Use the correct grammar in the meta elements and do not use characters such as $ as you have it.
In addition, the content of these meta elements is difficult to consider as descriptive and it is difficult to consider it as an identifier for the content of a web page. Phrases such as Best and Popular, if this does not have explicit confirmation, can be attributed to advertising, but not to the description or to the ID.
Check out the following Google guidelines for meta titles and meta descriptions:
Page titles should be descriptive and concise.
Avoid keyword stuffing. It's sometimes helpful to have a few descriptive terms in the title, but there’s no reason to have the
same words or phrases appear multiple times.
Avoid repeated or boilerplate titles.
Brand your titles, but concisely. Include clearly tagged facts in the description.
The fact that Google ignores the content of your meta elements may be a signal that this content is not relevant to the content of the web page.
This is confirmed by the following information from the specified guidelines:
If you’re seeing your pages appear in the search results with modified
titles, check whether your titles have one of the problems described
above. If not, consider whether the alternate title is a better fit
for the query.

Related

Product and Review Schema data

I am trying to understand Schema data. My website has a Products page and a Reviews page. Do you know if I can implement enable the rich snippets for Reviews on a different page than the products? Can I 'hide' the reviews on the product pages? I am just trying to figure out the best way to implement.
If I have to redesign the markup for the products page to include the reviews, then that is what I will do
Yes, the documentation does ask for the reviews to be nested inside the item being reviewed.
"Make sure the review or ratings markup refers clearly to a specific product or service as shown in the examples above. Do this by nesting the review or ratings within the markup of another schema.org type — such as schema.org/Book or schema.org/LocalBusiness — or by using that schema.org typed element as a value for the itemReviewed property.
https://developers.google.com/structured-data/rich-snippets/reviews?hl=en&rd=1

Would google consider a category page to be duplicate content ?

I have a photography website.
Photographs are taken at events. Every photograph is unique to the event. However, a popular search tool and pretty much the only SEO friendly keywords are the people's names at the event.
Each person name links to their person-name slug that shows all the person's photos across all events.
Given that a person's photos can exist on another person's page, and that a person's photos are guaranteed to live on the event page, is this duplicate content? How would I go about ensuring that I can use the SEO-friendly "person-slug" without penalizing my site for duplicate content?
Make sure you category page has:
- unique title
- unique meta description
- unique text
This helps you to avoid duplicate content penalty.

Schema.org mandatory fields and the time needed until Google shows changes

I have implemented Schema.org (using Microdata) inside my product pages and when I check Google Webmaster Tools it is crawled by Googlebot and interpreted successfully. The point is I have not implemented some properties inside Product type like brand.
I need to know whether there is some subset of all product attributes should be implemented essentially?
And the second question is how much it takes for Google to show product rating and price as rich snippet inside search results?
There are no mandatory properties/types in Schema.org.
However, consumers of the data, like Google Search, might have rules under which conditions they will make something with your data (e.g., they are looking for specific properties). So you’d have to check their documentation.
For Google Search, their Rich Snippets are documented at https://developers.google.com/structured-data/rich-snippets/. The Products Rich Snippets lists the required and optional properties/types. As you can see, the brand property is not required by Google for showing their Rich Snippet in the search results.
Hussein
As google has pointed out the structured data required for a snippet are :
Product
Name
Description
Pricespecifications (to include:)
Pricecurrency
Pricevalue
Availability
Validfrom
Image
First you should consider checking if the validfrom and availability attributes are added because both of them are the most common mistakes when you write your first SEO codes.
Then there are some attributes that while they are not in required list by Google's developers there seem to be the once that all successful snippets have (you might have noticed that too ) , the : review and vote attributes including the expect values from schema.org libraries. In some people's opinion ,mine also, having those will "almost" make sure they will get noticed.
Those are not pretty easy to get because u will have to create a way for getting reviews and votes.
Otherwise try using the webmaster new tool search console to highlight data for product snippet. Just make sure that the required attributes have their expected values in the text so you can mark all the above attributes with the tool.
Make sure all the attributes are markup and not meta data as it shows you are just making information up.
About the time , check that the structured data have increase for the peoduct and if not then fetch and submit to index.

Do Canonical Tags Prevent Google Indexing?

We're about to embark on a restructuring of our Website, and we will be separating some of our customers into different groups.
Currently all of our customers visit our homepage: www.example.com
What we are going to be doing is sending customers to specific landing pages depending on marketing segmentation.
For instance, people who we know are more likely to book a hotel might go to www.example.com/hotels, whilst people who like cars will go to www.example.com/cars.
The content might be ever so slightly different (a banner or parameter might change) but the vast majority of text (copy, layout) will stay the same.
Firstly, are Canonical Tags appropriate to use in this case to direct any Google juice back to www.example.com?
Secondly, since we will be marketing to specific groups, we will not want these pages to be indexed by Google, nor for them to appear in search rankings. With this in mind, are Canonical Tags still the correct tag to be using? That is, do Canonical Tags pass on the Google Juice to the canonical page, meaning the referrer page is not indexed?
If the core content of all those pages is the same then I think using the canonical tag will work. If Google accepts the canonicalness of the pages then it will always send people to the page you specify.
What do you mean by "sending customers to specific landing pages depending on marketing segmentation"? How is that implemented?
If all that changes is adverts then why not use the one page and dynamically insert the adverts that suit the visitor?
Seems that if you don't want the specific landing pages indexed by Google, or appearing in the search rankings, then the pages wouldn't have any 'Google juice' to consolidate. In that case, canonical tags won't hurt, but I don't think they'll have any effect.
To keep the landing pages from being indexed, you could use robots.txt, as well as the robots meta tag.

What's more important in SEO: Title or link data?

I'm developing a store locator web site where users may search for a brand and get a list of stores selling this brand.
Now I'm doing some SEO. My goal is that when someone is googling for a store name or storename + city, then my site will be listed on page one.
If you visit a store on my site today, the title will show:
storename, city, country - at mysite.com
My URL will look like this:
http://mysite.com/store/?store=Mardou+&+Dean&storeid=5459
My question is:
- Should I add city name and country in my URL?
- Would it be good or bad in terms of SEO to have this url:
http://mysite.com/store/Norway/Oslo/Mardou+&+Dean/?storeid=5459
In terms of usability,the last url is best, but not sure if it matters to search engines?
I know that there is a lot more to SEO, but now I'm just wondering about this part.
Depends on how much information you want to expose to search engine, you should adjust the data used in these Microdata.
This article is worth reading:
http://www.vanseodesign.com/web-design/html5-microdata/
The impact of keywords in the URL is not as important as you think. Ensuring that your targeted terms are in the page title, content and headings, internal and external backlink anchor text etc are all much more powerful signals.
Don't confuse "exact match domains" with exact match URLs.
For more "educated" "opinion" on what matters, take a look at http://www.seomoz.org/article/search-ranking-factors