I have a relatively large table with thousands of rows and few tens of columns. Some columns are meta data and others are numerical values. The problem I have is, some meta data columns are incomplete or partial that is, it missed the string after a ":". I want to get a count of how many of these are with the missing part after the colon mark.
If you look at the miniature example below, what I should get is a small table telling me that in group A, MetaData is complete for 2 entries and incomplete (missing after ":") in other 2 entries. Ideally I also want to get some statistics on SomeValue (Count, max, min etc.).
How do I do it in an SQL query or in Python Pandas?
Might turn out to be simple to use some build in function however, I am not getting it right.
Data:
Group MetaData SomeValue
A AB:xxx 20
A AB: 5
A PQ:yyy 30
A PQ: 2
Expected Output result:
Group MetaDataComplete Count
A Yes 2
A No 2
No reason to use split functions (unless the value can contain a colon character.) I'm just going to assume that the "null" values (not technically the right word) end with :.
select
"Group",
case when MetaData like '%:' then 'Yes' else 'No' end as MetaDataComplete,
count(*) as "Count"
from T
group by "Group", case when MetaData like '%:' then 'Yes' else 'No' end
You could also use right(MetaData, 1) = ':'.
Or supposing that values can contain their own colons, try charindex(':', MetaData) = len(MetaData) if you just want to ask whether the first colon is in the last position.
Here is an example:
## 1- Create Dataframe
In [1]:
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
cols = ['Group', 'MetaData', 'SomeValue']
data = [['A', 'AB:xxx', 20],
['A', 'AB:', 5],
['A', 'PQ:yyy', 30],
['A', 'PQ:', 2]
]
df = pd.DataFrame(columns=cols, data=data)
# 2- New data frame with split value columns
new = df["MetaData"].str.split(":", n = 1, expand = True)
df["MetaData_1"]= new[0]
df["MetaData_2"]= new[1]
# 3- Dropping old MetaData columns
df.drop(columns =["MetaData"], inplace = True)
## 4- Replacing empty string by nan and count them
df.replace('',np.NaN, inplace=True)
df.isnull().sum()
Out [1]:
Group 0
SomeValue 0
MetaData_1 0
MetaData_2 2
dtype: int64
From a SQL perspective, performing a split is painful, not mention using the split results in having to perform the query first then querying the results:
SELECT
Results.[Group],
Results.MetaData,
Results.MetaValue,
COUNT(Results.MetaValue)
FROM (SELECT
[Group]
MetaData,
SUBSTRING(MetaData, CHARINDEX(':', MetaData) + 1, LEN(MetaData)) AS MetaValue
FROM VeryLargeTable) AS Results
GROUP BY Results.[Group],
Results.MetaData,
Results.MetaValue
If your just after a count, you could also try the algorithmic approach. Just loop over the data and use regular expressions with negative lookahead.
import pandas as pd
import re
pattern = '.*:(?!.)' # detects the strings of the missing data form
missing = 0
not_missing = 0
for i in data['MetaData'].tolist():
match = re.findall(pattern, i)
if match:
missing += 1
else:
not_missing += 1
Related
I have a large dataframe, from which I want to select specific columns that stats with several different prefixes. My current solution is shown below:
df = pd.DataFrame(columns=['flg_1', 'flg_2', 'ab_1', 'ab_2', 'aaa', 'bbb'], data=np.array([1,2,3,4,5,6]).reshape(1,-1))
flg_vars = df.filter(regex='^flg_')
ab_vars = df.filter(regex='^ab_')
result = pd.concat([flg_vars, ab_vars], axis=1)
Is there a more efficient way of doing this? I need to filter my original data based on 8 prefixes, which leads to excessive lines of code.
Use | for regex OR:
result = df.filter(regex='^flg_|^ab_')
print (result)
flg_1 flg_2 ab_1 ab_2
0 1 2 3 4
My first question thanks) Sorry for lengthy formulationenter image description here
Researched all related posts
What I have
my Dataframe column (please see screenshot) is strings separated by delimiter ',' Car parameters.
My Dataframe:-
Some rows come with mileage while others not (screenshot) hence some rows have fewer delimiters.
The Task
Need to create 5 columns (max number of delimiters) to store CarParameters separately (Mileage, GearBox, HP, Body etc)
If a row doesn't have Mileage Put 0 in the Mileage Column
What I know and works well
df["name"].str.split(" ", expand = True) by default n=-1 and splits into necessary columns
example:
The issue:
If I use the str.split(" ", expand = True) method - GearBox (ATM) is wrongly put under newly created Mileage column because that row is short of one delimiter (screenshot)
Result:-
-
You can try lambda function combined with list concatenation like below.
>>> import pandas as pd
>>> df = pd.DataFrame([['1,2,3,4,5'],['2,3,4,5']], columns=["CarParameters"])
>>> print(pd.DataFrame(df.CarParameters.apply(
lambda x: str(x).split(',')).apply(
lambda x: [0]*(5-len(x)) + x).to_list(), columns=list("ABCDE")))
A B C D E
0 1 2 3 4 5
1 0 2 3 4 5
I'm trying to replace the values in one column of a dataframe. The column ('female') only contains the values 'female' and 'male'.
I have tried the following:
w['female']['female']='1'
w['female']['male']='0'
But receive the exact same copy of the previous results.
I would ideally like to get some output which resembles the following loop element-wise.
if w['female'] =='female':
w['female'] = '1';
else:
w['female'] = '0';
I've looked through the gotchas documentation (http://pandas.pydata.org/pandas-docs/stable/gotchas.html) but cannot figure out why nothing happens.
Any help will be appreciated.
If I understand right, you want something like this:
w['female'] = w['female'].map({'female': 1, 'male': 0})
(Here I convert the values to numbers instead of strings containing numbers. You can convert them to "1" and "0", if you really want, but I'm not sure why you'd want that.)
The reason your code doesn't work is because using ['female'] on a column (the second 'female' in your w['female']['female']) doesn't mean "select rows where the value is 'female'". It means to select rows where the index is 'female', of which there may not be any in your DataFrame.
You can edit a subset of a dataframe by using loc:
df.loc[<row selection>, <column selection>]
In this case:
w.loc[w.female != 'female', 'female'] = 0
w.loc[w.female == 'female', 'female'] = 1
w.female.replace(to_replace=dict(female=1, male=0), inplace=True)
See pandas.DataFrame.replace() docs.
Slight variation:
w.female.replace(['male', 'female'], [1, 0], inplace=True)
This should also work:
w.female[w.female == 'female'] = 1
w.female[w.female == 'male'] = 0
This is very compact:
w['female'][w['female'] == 'female']=1
w['female'][w['female'] == 'male']=0
Another good one:
w['female'] = w['female'].replace(regex='female', value=1)
w['female'] = w['female'].replace(regex='male', value=0)
You can also use apply with .get i.e.
w['female'] = w['female'].apply({'male':0, 'female':1}.get):
w = pd.DataFrame({'female':['female','male','female']})
print(w)
Dataframe w:
female
0 female
1 male
2 female
Using apply to replace values from the dictionary:
w['female'] = w['female'].apply({'male':0, 'female':1}.get)
print(w)
Result:
female
0 1
1 0
2 1
Note: apply with dictionary should be used if all the possible values of the columns in the dataframe are defined in the dictionary else, it will have empty for those not defined in dictionary.
Using Series.map with Series.fillna
If your column contains more strings than only female and male, Series.map will fail in this case since it will return NaN for other values.
That's why we have to chain it with fillna:
Example why .map fails:
df = pd.DataFrame({'female':['male', 'female', 'female', 'male', 'other', 'other']})
female
0 male
1 female
2 female
3 male
4 other
5 other
df['female'].map({'female': '1', 'male': '0'})
0 0
1 1
2 1
3 0
4 NaN
5 NaN
Name: female, dtype: object
For the correct method, we chain map with fillna, so we fill the NaN with values from the original column:
df['female'].map({'female': '1', 'male': '0'}).fillna(df['female'])
0 0
1 1
2 1
3 0
4 other
5 other
Name: female, dtype: object
Alternatively there is the built-in function pd.get_dummies for these kinds of assignments:
w['female'] = pd.get_dummies(w['female'],drop_first = True)
This gives you a data frame with two columns, one for each value that occurs in w['female'], of which you drop the first (because you can infer it from the one that is left). The new column is automatically named as the string that you replaced.
This is especially useful if you have categorical variables with more than two possible values. This function creates as many dummy variables needed to distinguish between all cases. Be careful then that you don't assign the entire data frame to a single column, but instead, if w['female'] could be 'male', 'female' or 'neutral', do something like this:
w = pd.concat([w, pd.get_dummies(w['female'], drop_first = True)], axis = 1])
w.drop('female', axis = 1, inplace = True)
Then you are left with two new columns giving you the dummy coding of 'female' and you got rid of the column with the strings.
w.replace({'female':{'female':1, 'male':0}}, inplace = True)
The above code will replace 'female' with 1 and 'male' with 0, only in the column 'female'
There is also a function in pandas called factorize which you can use to automatically do this type of work. It converts labels to numbers: ['male', 'female', 'male'] -> [0, 1, 0]. See this answer for more information.
w.female = np.where(w.female=='female', 1, 0)
if someone is looking for a numpy solution. This is useful to replace values based on a condition. Both if and else conditions are inherent in np.where(). The solutions that use df.replace() may not be feasible if the column included many unique values in addition to 'male', all of which should be replaced with 0.
Another solution is to use df.where() and df.mask() in succession. This is because neither of them implements an else condition.
w.female.where(w.female=='female', 0, inplace=True) # replace where condition is False
w.female.mask(w.female=='female', 1, inplace=True) # replace where condition is True
dic = {'female':1, 'male':0}
w['female'] = w['female'].replace(dic)
.replace has as argument a dictionary in which you may change and do whatever you want or need.
I think that in answer should be pointed which type of object do you get in all methods suggested above: is it Series or DataFrame.
When you get column by w.female. or w[[2]] (where, suppose, 2 is number of your column) you'll get back DataFrame.
So in this case you can use DataFrame methods like .replace.
When you use .loc or iloc you get back Series, and Series don't have .replace method, so you should use methods like apply, map and so on.
To answer the question more generically so it applies to more use cases than just what the OP asked, consider this solution. I used jfs's solution solution to help me. Here, we create two functions that help feed each other and can be used whether you know the exact replacements or not.
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
class Utility:
#staticmethod
def rename_values_in_column(column: pd.Series, name_changes: dict = None) -> pd.Series:
"""
Renames the distinct names in a column. If no dictionary is provided for the exact name changes, it will default
to <column_name>_count. Ex. female_1, female_2, etc.
:param column: The column in your dataframe you would like to alter.
:param name_changes: A dictionary of the old values to the new values you would like to change.
Ex. {1234: "User A"} This would change all occurrences of 1234 to the string "User A" and leave the other values as they were.
By default, this is an empty dictionary.
:return: The same column with the replaced values
"""
name_changes = name_changes if name_changes else {}
new_column = column.replace(to_replace=name_changes)
return new_column
#staticmethod
def create_unique_values_for_column(column: pd.Series, except_values: list = None) -> dict:
"""
Creates a dictionary where the key is the existing column item and the value is the new item to replace it.
The returned dictionary can then be passed the pandas rename function to rename all the distinct values in a
column.
Ex. column ["statement"]["I", "am", "old"] would return
{"I": "statement_1", "am": "statement_2", "old": "statement_3"}
If you would like a value to remain the same, enter the values you would like to stay in the except_values.
Ex. except_values = ["I", "am"]
column ["statement"]["I", "am", "old"] would return
{"old", "statement_3"}
:param column: A pandas Series for the column with the values to replace.
:param except_values: A list of values you do not want to have changed.
:return: A dictionary that maps the old values their respective new values.
"""
except_values = except_values if except_values else []
column_name = column.name
distinct_values = np.unique(column)
name_mappings = {}
count = 1
for value in distinct_values:
if value not in except_values:
name_mappings[value] = f"{column_name}_{count}"
count += 1
return name_mappings
For the OP's use case, it is simple enough to just use
w["female"] = Utility.rename_values_in_column(w["female"], name_changes = {"female": 0, "male":1}
However, it is not always so easy to know all of the different unique values within a data frame that you may want to rename. In my case, the string values for a column are hashed values so they hurt the readability. What I do instead is replace those hashed values with more readable strings thanks to the create_unique_values_for_column function.
df["user"] = Utility.rename_values_in_column(
df["user"],
Utility.create_unique_values_for_column(df["user"])
)
This will changed my user column values from ["1a2b3c", "a12b3c","1a2b3c"] to ["user_1", "user_2", "user_1]. Much easier to compare, right?
If you have only two classes you can use equality operator. For example:
df = pd.DataFrame({'col1':['a', 'a', 'a', 'b']})
df['col1'].eq('a').astype(int)
# (df['col1'] == 'a').astype(int)
Output:
0 1
1 1
2 1
3 0
Name: col1, dtype: int64
I have a TSV file that I loaded into a pandas dataframe to do some preprocessing and I want to find out which rows have a question in it, and output 1 or 0 in a new column. Since it is a TSV, this is how I'm loading it:
import pandas as pd
df = pd.read_csv('queries-10k-txt-backup', sep='\t')
Here's a sample of what it looks like:
QUERY FREQ
0 hindi movies for adults 595
1 are panda dogs real 383
2 asuedraw winning numbers 478
3 sentry replacement keys 608
4 rebuilding nicad battery packs 541
After dropping empty rows, duplicates, and the FREQ column(not needed for this), I wrote a simple function to check the QUERY column to see if it contains any words that make the string a question:
df_test = df.drop_duplicates()
df_test = df_test.dropna()
df_test = df_test.drop(['FREQ'], axis = 1)
def questions(row):
questions_list =
["what","when","where","which","who","whom","whose","why","why don't",
"how","how far","how long","how many","how much","how old","how come","?"]
if row['QUERY'] in questions_list:
return 1
else:
return 0
df_test['QUESTIONS'] = df_test.apply(questions, axis=1)
But once I check the new dataframe, even though it creates the new column, all the values are 0. I'm not sure if my logic is wrong in the function, I've used something similar with dataframe columns which just have one word and if it matches, it'll output a 1 or 0. However, that same logic doesn't seem to be working when the column contains a phrase/sentence like this use case. Any input is really appreciated!
If you wish to check exact matches of any substring from question_list and of a string from dataframe, you should use str.contains method:
questions_list = ["what","when","where","which","who","whom","whose","why",
"why don't", "how","how far","how long","how many",
"how much","how old","how come","?"]
pattern = "|".join(questions_list) # generate regex from your list
df_test['QUESTIONS'] = df_test['QUERY'].str.contains(pattern)
Simplified example:
df = pd.DataFrame({
'QUERY': ['how do you like it', 'what\'s going on?', 'quick brown fox'],
'ID': [0, 1, 2]})
Create a pattern:
pattern = '|'.join(['what', 'how'])
pattern
Out: 'what|how'
Use it:
df['QUERY'].str.contains(pattern)
Out[12]:
0 True
1 True
2 False
Name: QUERY, dtype: bool
If you're not familiar with regexes, there's a quick python re reference. Fot symbol '|', explanation is
A|B, where A and B can be arbitrary REs, creates a regular expression that will match either A or B. An arbitrary number of REs can be separated by the '|' in this way
IIUC, you need to find if the first word in the string in the question list, if yes return 1, else 0. In your function, rather than checking if the entire string is in question list, split the string and check if the first element is in question list.
def questions(row):
questions_list = ["are","what","when","where","which","who","whom","whose","why","why don't","how","how far","how long","how many","how much","how old","how come","?"]
if row['QUERY'].split()[0] in questions_list:
return 1
else:
return 0
df['QUESTIONS'] = df.apply(questions, axis=1)
You get
QUERY FREQ QUESTIONS
0 hindi movies for adults 595 0
1 are panda dogs real 383 1
2 asuedraw winning numbers 478 0
3 sentry replacement keys 608 0
4 rebuilding nicad battery packs 541 0
I am new to pandas. I know how to use drop_duplicates and take the last observed row in a dataframe. Is there any way that I can use it to take only second last observed. Or any other way of doing it.
For example:
I would like to go from
df = pd.DataFrame(data={'A':[1,1,1,2,2,2],'B':[1,2,3,4,5,6]}) to
df1 = pd.DataFrame(data={'A':[1,2],'B':[2,5]})
The idea is that you'll group the data by the duplicate column , then check the length of group , if the length of group is greater than or equal 2 this mean that you can slice the second element of group , if the group has a length of one which mean that this value is not duplicated , then take index 0 which is the only element in the grouped data
df.groupby(df['A']).apply(lambda x : x.iloc[1] if len(x) >= 2 else x.iloc[0])
The first answer I think was on the right track, but possibly not quite right. I have extended your data to include 'A' groups with two observations, and an 'A' group with one observation, for the sake of completeness.
import pandas as pd
df = pd.DataFrame(data={'A':[1,1,1,2,2,2, 3, 3, 4],'B':[1,2,3,4,5,6, 7, 8, 9]})
def user_apply_func(x):
if len(x) == 2:
return x.iloc[0]
if len(x) > 2:
return x.iloc[-2]
return
df.groupby('A').apply(user_apply_func)
Out[7]:
A B
A
1 1 2
2 2 5
3 3 7
4 NaN NaN
For your reference the apply method automatically passes the data frame as the first argument.
Also, as you are always going to be reducing each group of data to a single observation you could also use the agg method (aggregate). apply is more flexible in terms of the length of the sequences that can be returned whereas agg must reduce the data to a single value.
df.groupby('A').agg(user_apply_func)