Add conditions where with 2 field conditions do not run accurately - sql

The data that appears does not match the conditions that have been applied
I implemented SQL code in the Navicat application, and have changed the structure of the code several times but it still doesn't work,
data that is not of ilart condition type
still appears
SELECT SERMAT,ILART,sum(GKSTP) as jumlah
FROM swift_zab_iw39
WHERE ILART='OVH' OR ILART='TST' and SERMAT='024147-000:09052'
GROUP BY ILART,SERMAT

Use IN operator:
WHERE ILART IN('OVH','TST') AND SERMAT = '024147-000:09052'

Add parenthesis to the OR condition in the WHERE clause as:
WHERE (ILART = 'OVH' OR ILART = 'TST') AND SERMAT = '024147-000:09052'

Related

How to write an Open SQL statement with substring in the JOIN ON condition? [duplicate]

I have the following select statement in ABAP:
SELECT munic~mandt VREFER BIS AB ZZELECDATE ZZCERTDATE CONSYEAR ZDIMO ZZONE_M ZZONE_T USAGE_M USAGE_T M2MC M2MT M2RET EXEMPTMCMT EXEMPRET CHARGEMCMT
INTO corresponding fields of table GT_INSTMUNIC_F
FROM ZCI00_INSTMUNIC AS MUNIC
INNER JOIN EVER AS EV on
MUNIC~POD = EV~VREFER(9).
"where EV~BSTATUS = '14' or EV~BSTATUS = '32'.
My problem with the above statement is that does not recognize the substring/offset operation on the 'ON' clause. If i remove the '(9) then
it recognizes the field, otherwise it gives error:
Field ev~refer is unknown. It is neither in one of the specified tables
nor defined by a "DATA" statement. I have also tried doing something similar in the 'Where' clause, receiving a similar error:
LOOP AT gt_instmunic.
clear wa_gt_instmunic_f.
wa_gt_instmunic_f-mandt = gt_instmunic-mandt.
wa_gt_instmunic_f-bis = gt_instmunic-bis.
wa_gt_instmunic_f-ab = gt_instmunic-ab.
wa_gt_instmunic_f-zzelecdate = gt_instmunic-zzelecdate.
wa_gt_instmunic_f-ZZCERTDATE = gt_instmunic-ZZCERTDATE.
wa_gt_instmunic_f-CONSYEAR = gt_instmunic-CONSYEAR.
wa_gt_instmunic_f-ZDIMO = gt_instmunic-ZDIMO.
wa_gt_instmunic_f-ZZONE_M = gt_instmunic-ZZONE_M.
wa_gt_instmunic_f-ZZONE_T = gt_instmunic-ZZONE_T.
wa_gt_instmunic_f-USAGE_M = gt_instmunic-USAGE_M.
wa_gt_instmunic_f-USAGE_T = gt_instmunic-USAGE_T.
temp_pod = gt_instmunic-pod.
SELECT vrefer
FROM ever
INTO wa_gt_instmunic_f-vrefer
WHERE ( vrefer(9) LIKE temp_pod ). " PROBLEM WITH SUBSTRING
"AND ( BSTATUS = '14' OR BSTATUS = '32' ).
ENDSELECT.
WRITE: / sy-dbcnt.
WRITE: / 'wa is: ', wa_gt_instmunic_f.
WRITE: / 'wa-ever is: ', wa_gt_instmunic_f-vrefer.
APPEND wa_gt_instmunic_f TO gt_instmunic_f.
WRITE: / wa_gt_instmunic_f-vrefer.
ENDLOOP.
itab_size = lines( gt_instmunic_f ).
WRITE: / 'Internal table populated with', itab_size, ' lines'.
The basic task i want to implement is to modify a specific field on one table,
pulling values from another. They have a common field ( pod = vrefer(9) ). Thanks in advance for your time.
If you are on a late enough NetWeaver version, it works on 7.51, you can use the OpenSQL function LEFT or SUBSTRING. Your query would look something like:
SELECT munic~mandt VREFER BIS AB ZZELECDATE ZZCERTDATE CONSYEAR ZDIMO ZZONE_M ZZONE_T USAGE_M USAGE_T M2MC M2MT M2RET EXEMPTMCMT EXEMPRET CHARGEMCMT
FROM ZCI00_INSTMUNIC AS MUNIC
INNER JOIN ever AS ev
ON MUNIC~POD EQ LEFT( EV~VREFER, 9 )
INTO corresponding fields of table GT_INSTMUNIC_F.
Note that the INTO clause needs to move to the end of the command as well.
field(9) is a subset operation that is processed by the ABAP environment and can not be translated into a database-level SQL statement (at least not at the moment, but I'd be surprised if it ever will be). Your best bet is either to select the datasets separately and merge them manually (if both are approximately equally large) or pre-select one and use a FAE/IN clause.
They have a common field ( pod = vrefer(9) )
This is a wrong assumption, because they both are not fields, but a field an other thing.
If you really need to do that task through SQL, I'll suggest you to check native SQL sentences like SUBSTRING and check if you can manage to use them within an EXEC_SQL or (better) the CL_SQL* classes.

UPDATE QUERY - Sum up a value from form with value from table

I've just started using microsoft access so I don't really know how to solve this. I would like to use an update query to add a value from a form to a value on a table.
I originally used the SUM expression which gave me an error saying it was an aggregate function.
I also tried to add the two values together (e.g [field1] + [field2]) which as a result gave me a value with both numbers together instead of adding them together.
The following is the SQL I'm using:
UPDATE Votes
SET Votes.NumVotes = [Votes]![NumVotes]+[Forms]![frmVote]![txtnumvotes]
WHERE (((Votes.ActID) = [Forms]![frmVote]![combacts])
AND ((Votes.RoundNum) = [Forms]![frmVote]![combrndnum]))
I want to add a value [txtnumvotes] a form to a field [NumVotes] from the table [Votes].
Could someone please help me?
You can specify the expected data type with parameters:
PARAMETERS
[Forms]![frmVote]![txtnumvotes] Short,
[Forms]![frmVote]![combacts] Long,
[Forms]![frmVote]![combrndnum] Long;
UPDATE
Votes
SET
Votes.NumVotes = [Votes]![NumVotes]+[Forms]![frmVote]![txtnumvotes]
WHERE
(((Votes.ActID) = [Forms]![frmVote]![combacts])
AND
((Votes.RoundNum) = [Forms]![frmVote]![combrndnum]))
Without the specification, Access has to guess, and that sometimes fails.

Crystal reports - How to translate a group by with condition into a report

I have the following query
SELECT dbo_DIRIGEANTS.IU_DIR,
[1-CR-liste_Pixi].Siren,
[1-CR-liste_Pixi].Nic,
FROM [1-CR-liste_Pixi] LEFT JOIN dbo_DIRIGEANTS ON [1-CR-liste_Pixi].Siren = dbo_DIRIGEANTS.SIREN
GROUP BY
dbo_DIRIGEANTS.IU_DIR,
[1-CR-liste_Pixi].Siren,
[1-CR-liste_Pixi].Nic,
IIf([QUAL_JUR]>"0003","",Right([QUAL_JUR],1))
HAVING
((([1-CR-liste_Pixi].Siren) Not Like "p*")
AND (([1-CR-liste_Pixi].Nic) Not Like "p*")
AND ((dbo_DIRIGEANTS.REP_LEGAL)="1") AND (([1-CR-liste_Pixi].Nicsiège) Not Like "p*"))
ORDER BY IIf([QUAL_JUR]>"0003","",Right([QUAL_JUR],1));
What I'm interested is setting that part
GROUP BY dbo_DIRIGEANTS.IU_DIR,
[1-CR-liste_Pixi].Siren,
[1-CR-liste_Pixi].Nic,
IIf([QUAL_JUR]>"0003","",Right([QUAL_JUR],1))
And especially that part
IIf([QUAL_JUR]>"0003","",Right([QUAL_JUR],1))
Because of performance, I kept my tables and use CR's functions to deal with the condition part instead of creating a query.
I did the following:
Went to Formula selection and choose group
Chose the field I wanted
Put the formula
The error below popped out
It said my formula needs to be using boolean values.
To see if I was right, I've amended it that way IF {DIRIGEANTS.QUAL_JUR} > "0003" THEN TRUE ELSE FALSE. It worked.
TL;DR
Why I cannot do that in my expert group selection?
IF {DIRIGEANTS.QUAL_JUR} > "0003" THEN "" ELSE RIGHT({QUAL_JUR},1)
Thanks
Group selection should return Boolean but that doesn't mean you write true or false....it means you pass some thing to fields to perform job
IF {DIRIGEANTS.QUAL_JUR} > "0003"
THEN datasefield=""
ELSE database fled=RIGHT({QUAL_JUR},1)
This will do the job
Edit: Apologize as conditions are a bit confused for your requirement
Create formula and write below code
IF {DIRIGEANTS.QUAL_JUR} > "0003" THEN ""
ELSE RIGHT({DIRIGEANTS.QUAL_JUR},1)
Now go to insert group and select this formula and click ok. This will do the trick

SQL Update on joined tables with calculated fields

First of all, I know there are already questions and answers about it, this thread being the one that is closest to what I need:
SQL Update to the SUM of its joined values
However, I get a syntax error (operator missing) that seems to occur close to the FROM clause. However I can't see it. Does it not like the FROM itself ? I am not used to using FROM in an update statement but it seems like it's valid from the QA I just linked :|
Any idea why there would be a syntax error there ?
I am using Access 2007 SP3.
Edit:
Wow, I forgot to post the query...
UPDATE r
SET
r.tempsmoy_requete_min = tmm.moy_mob_requete
FROM
rapports AS r INNER JOIN
(SELECT
id_fichier,
Round(Sum(temps_requete_min)/3,0) As moy_mob_requete,
Round(Sum(temps_analyse_min)/3,0) As moy_mob_analyse,
Round(Sum(temps_maj_min)/3,0) As moy_mob_maj,
Round(Sum(temps_rap_min)/3,0) As moy_mob_rap,
Round(Sum(temps_ddc_min)/3,0) As moy_mob_ddc
FROM maintenances
WHERE
periode In (10,9,8) And
annee=2011
GROUP BY id_fichier) AS tmm ON rapports.id_rapport = tmm.id_fichier
WHERE
1=0
The WHERE 1=0 part is because I want to test further the subquery before running it.
Edit: This is some simpler query I am trying. I get a different error this time. It now tells me that tempsmoy_requete_min (and probably all other left operands) are not part of an aggregate function... which is the point of my query. Any idea ?
UPDATE
rapports INNER JOIN maintenances ON rapports.id_rapport = maintenances.id_fichier
SET
rapports.tempsmoy_requete_min = Round(Sum(temps_requete_min)/3,0),
rapports.tempsmoy_analyse_min = Round(Sum(temps_analyse_min)/3,0),
rapports.tempsmoy_maj_min = Round(Sum(temps_maj_min)/3,0),
rapports.tempsmoy_rap_min = Round(Sum(temps_rap_min)/3,0),
rapports.tempsmoy_ddc_min = Round(Sum(temps_ddc_min)/3,0)
WHERE
maintenances.periode In (10,9,8) And
maintenances.annee=2011 AND
1=0
I tried adapting your first query sample, and was able to make your error go away. However then I encountered a different error ('Operation must use an updateable query').
It may be possible to overcome that error, too. However, I found it easier to use a domain function instead of a join to retrieve the replacement value.
UPDATE rapports
SET tempsmoy_requete_min = Round(DSum("temps_requete_min",
"maintenances",
"periode In (10,9,8) AND annee=2011 "
& "AND id_fichier='" & id_rapport
& "'")/3, 0);
If this suggestion works for tempsmoy_requete_min with your data, you will have to extend it to the other fields you want to replace. That won't be pretty. You could make it less ugly with a saved query which you then use as the "Domain" parameter for DSum() ... that could allow you to use a simpler "Criteria" parameter.
UPDATE r
should be
UPDATE rapports
You can't reliably use an alias in the update target.

What to do with the error "Ambiguous Columns Defined"?

This is my sql command:
select INCOME_TYPE_ID,
REGION_CODE,
FIN_YEAR_CODE,
PORTION_AMOUNT
from INCOME.INCOME_TYPE,
COMMON.REGION,
INCOME.RECEIVE_DOC_PORTION,
INCOME.ASSESS_ORDER_ITEM,
ACCOUNTING.VOUCHER_ITEM_RECEIVE_DOC,
ACCOUNTING.VOUCHER_ITEM,
ACCOUNTING.VOUCHER,
ACCOUNTING.FIN_YEAR
where INCOME.RECEIVE_DOC_PORTION.ASSESS_ORDER_ITEM_ID = INCOME.ASSESS_ORDER_ITEM.ASSESS_ORDER_ITEM_ID
and INCOME.ASSESS_ORDER_ITEM.INCOME_TYPE_ID=INCOME.INCOME_TYPE.INCOME_TYPE_ID
and INCOME.RECEIVE_DOC_PORTION.RECEIVE_DOC_PORTION_ID = ACCOUNTING.VOUCHER_ITEM_RECEIVE_DOC.RECEIVE_DOC_PORTION_ID
and ACCOUNTING.VOUCHER_ITEM_RECEIVE_DOC.VOUCHER_ITEM_ID = ACCOUNTING.VOUCHER_ITEM.VOUCHER_ITEM_ID
and ACCOUNTING.VOUCHER_ITEM.VOUCHER_ID = ACCOUNTING.VOUCHER.VOUCHER_ID
and ACCOUNTING.VOUCHER.REGION_CODE = COMMON.REGION.REGION_CODE
and ACCOUNTING.VOUCHER.FIN_YEAR_CODE = ACCOUNTING.FIN_YEAR.FIN_YEAR_CODE
and I got this error:
Ambiguous Columns Defined
I'm Using SQL Developer as Oracle client.
Apparently one (or more) column names in your select list exists in more than one table of the FROM list.
You need to prefix every column in the SELECT list with the table it's coming from (it's also a good practice to always do that, regardless of the fact if they are ambigous)
Mention name of table before every column in select query.
Ambiguous column means that you have more than one column with the same name in one of the SELECT statements.
Try this instead, prefgixing all selected columns with their fully qualified names (as you have done elsewhere in your SELECT):
select INCOME.INCOME_TYPE.INCOME_TYPE_ID,
COMMON.REGION.REGION_CODE,
ACCOUNTING.FIN_YEAR.FIN_YEAR_CODE,
ACCOUNTING.VOUCHER_ITEM_RECEIVE_DOC.PORTION_AMOUNT
from INCOME.INCOME_TYPE,
COMMON.REGION,
INCOME.RECEIVE_DOC_PORTION,
INCOME.ASSESS_ORDER_ITEM,
ACCOUNTING.VOUCHER_ITEM_RECEIVE_DOC,
ACCOUNTING.VOUCHER_ITEM,
ACCOUNTING.VOUCHER,
ACCOUNTING.FIN_YEAR
where INCOME.RECEIVE_DOC_PORTION.ASSESS_ORDER_ITEM_ID = INCOME.ASSESS_ORDER_ITEM.ASSESS_ORDER_ITEM_ID
and INCOME.ASSESS_ORDER_ITEM.INCOME_TYPE_ID = INCOME.INCOME_TYPE.INCOME_TYPE_ID
and INCOME.RECEIVE_DOC_PORTION.RECEIVE_DOC_PORTION_ID = ACCOUNTING.VOUCHER_ITEM_RECEIVE_DOC.RECEIVE_DOC_PORTION_ID
and ACCOUNTING.VOUCHER_ITEM_RECEIVE_DOC.VOUCHER_ITEM_ID = ACCOUNTING.VOUCHER_ITEM.VOUCHER_ITEM_ID
and ACCOUNTING.VOUCHER_ITEM.VOUCHER_ID = ACCOUNTING.VOUCHER.VOUCHER_ID
and ACCOUNTING.VOUCHER.REGION_CODE = COMMON.REGION.REGION_CODE
and ACCOUNTING.VOUCHER.FIN_YEAR_CODE = ACCOUNTING.FIN_YEAR.FIN_YEAR_CODE
I had to guess the filly qualified name for
ACCOUNTING.VOUCHER_ITEM_RECEIVE_DOC.PORTION_AMOUNT
It might be
INCOME.RECEIVE_DOC_PORTION.PORTION_AMOUNT
But you should be able to resolve that easily.
Hope it helps...