I'm working on a python module that creates a matplotlib figure with an on_resize listener. The listener forces the height of the lower axes to a specific number of pixels (rather than scaling relative to figure size). It works. However, if (in matplotlib interactive mode) after creating the plot the user calls fig.subplots_adjust() it messes up subplot sizes. Here's a radically simplified version of what the module does:
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
plt.ion()
def make_plot():
fig = plt.figure()
gs = plt.GridSpec(10, 1, figure=fig)
ax_upper = fig.add_subplot(gs[:-1])
ax_lower = fig.add_subplot(gs[-1])
ax_upper.plot([0, 1])
ax_lower.plot([0, 1])
fig.canvas.mpl_connect('resize_event', on_resize)
return fig
def on_resize(event):
fig = event.canvas.figure
# get the current position
ax_lower_pos = list(fig.axes[1].get_position().bounds) # L,B,W,H
# compute desired height in figure-relative coords
desired_height_px = 40
xform = fig.transFigure.inverted()
desired_height_rel = xform.transform([0, desired_height_px])[1]
# set the new height
ax_lower_pos[-1] = desired_height_rel
fig.axes[1].set_position(ax_lower_pos)
# adjust ax_upper accordingly
ax_lower_top = fig.axes[1].get_position().extents[-1] # L,B,R,T
ax_upper_pos = list(fig.axes[0].get_position().bounds) # L,B,W,H
# new bottom
new_upper_bottom = ax_lower_top + desired_height_rel
ax_upper_pos[1] = new_upper_bottom
# new height
ax_upper_top = fig.axes[0].get_position().extents[-1] # L,B,R,T
new_upper_height = ax_upper_top - new_upper_bottom
ax_upper_pos[-1] = new_upper_height
# set the new position
fig.axes[0].set_position(ax_upper_pos)
fig.canvas.draw()
Here's the output if the user calls fig = make_plot():
Now if the user calls fig.subplots_adjust, the bottom axis is squished and the space between bottom and top axes is even more squished (the on_resize listener had set them both to 40px):
fig.subplots_adjust(top=0.7)
At this point, grabbing the corner of the window and dragging even a tiny bit is enough to trigger the on_resize listener and restore what I want (fixed pixel height for bottom axes and space between axes) while keeping the newly-added wide top margin intact:
How can I get that result without having to manually trigger a resize event? As far as I can tell, subplots_adjust does not fire off any events that I could listen for.
I think the problem lies in ax.update_params() updating the axes position with a figbox taken from the underlying subplotspec (which as far as I can tell doesn't get updated after initial figure creation?). (note: update_params is called from within subplots_adjust, see here).
The underlying problem seems to be to make an axes with a specific height in pixels. An easy solution to this is to use mpl_toolkits.axes_grid1's make_axes_locatable.
This allows to get rid of any callback and hence of the complete problem of the race condition in the events.
A note: The plot seems to be part of a bigger library. Since it is always nice not to patronize the users of such packages, one would usually allow them to specify the axes to plot to, such that they can put the plot into a bigger figure with other elements. The below solution makes this particularly easy.
Of course, also calling plt.subplots_adjust is still possible at any time.
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from mpl_toolkits.axes_grid1.axes_divider import make_axes_locatable
desired_height_px = 40 #pixel
def make_plot(ax=None):
if not ax:
fig, ax = plt.subplots()
else:
fig = ax.figure
div = make_axes_locatable(ax)
cax = div.append_axes("bottom", desired_height_px/fig.dpi, pad=0.25)
sc1 = ax.scatter([2,1,3], [2,3,1], c=[1,2,3])
sc2 = cax.scatter([3,2,1],[2,3,1], c=[3,1,2])
return fig, ax, cax, (sc1, sc2)
fig, (ax1, ax2) = plt.subplots(1,2)
make_plot(ax=ax1)
#user plot on ax2
ax2.plot([1,3])
fig.subplots_adjust(top=0.7)
plt.show()
Related
I am writing a Python tool that needs several figures open at the same time, each one with its own widgets (sliders, for the most part). I don't need any interactions across the figures here. Each figure is independent of the other ones, with its own plot and its own sliders affecting only itself.
I can get Matplotlib sliders working fine on a single figure, but I can't get them to work on multiple figures concurrently. Only the sliders of the LAST figure to open are working. The other ones are unresponsive.
I recreated my problem with the simple code below, starting from the example in the Matplotlib.Slider doc. If I run it as-is, only the sliders for the second figure (amplitude) works. The other doesn't. If I invert the two function calls at the bottom, it's the other way around.
I've had no luck googling solutions or pointers. Any help would be much appreciated.
I'm on Python 3.9.12, btw. I can upload a requirements file if someone tries and cannot reproduce the issue. Thank you!
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from matplotlib.widgets import Slider
# The parametrized function to be plotted
def f(time, amplitude, frequency):
return amplitude * np.sin(2 * np.pi * frequency * time)
# Define initial parameters
init_amplitude = 5
init_frequency = 3
t = np.linspace(0, 1, 1000)
def create_first_fig():
# Create the figure and the line that we will manipulate
fig1, ax1 = plt.subplots()
line1, = ax1.plot(t, f(t, init_amplitude, init_frequency), lw=2, color='b')
ax1.title.set_text('First plot - interactive frequency')
ax1.set_xlabel('Time [s]')
# adjust the main plot to make room for the sliders
fig1.subplots_adjust(left=0.25, bottom=0.25)
# Make a horizontal slider to control the frequency.
axfreq = fig1.add_axes([0.25, 0.1, 0.65, 0.03])
freq_slider = Slider(
ax=axfreq,
label='Frequency [Hz]',
valmin=0,
valmax=30,
valinit=init_frequency,
)
# register the update function with each slider
freq_slider.on_changed(lambda val: update_first_fig(val, fig1, line1))
plt.draw()
plt.pause(0.1)
return fig1
# The function to be called anytime a slider's value changes
def update_first_fig(val, fig, line):
line.set_ydata(f(t, init_amplitude, val))
fig.canvas.draw_idle()
plt.pause(0.1)
def create_second_fig():
# Create the figure and the line that we will manipulate
fig2, ax2 = plt.subplots()
line2, = ax2.plot(t, f(t, init_amplitude, init_frequency), lw=2, color='r')
ax2.title.set_text('Second plot - interactive amplitude')
ax2.set_xlabel('Time [s]')
# adjust the main plot to make room for the sliders
fig2.subplots_adjust(left=0.25, bottom=0.25)
# Make a vertically oriented slider to control the amplitude
axamp = fig2.add_axes([0.1, 0.25, 0.0225, 0.63])
amp_slider = Slider(
ax=axamp,
label="Amplitude",
valmin=0,
valmax=10,
valinit=init_amplitude,
orientation="vertical",
)
# register the update function with each slider
amp_slider.on_changed(lambda val: update_second_fig(val, fig2, line2))
plt.draw()
plt.pause(0.1)
return fig2
# The function to be called anytime a slider's value changes
def update_second_fig(val, fig, line):
line.set_ydata(f(t, val, init_frequency))
fig.canvas.draw_idle()
plt.pause(0.1)
figure1 = create_first_fig()
figure2 = create_second_fig()
plt.show()
I would expect the slider in both figures to work the way it does when I only open the corresponding figure. So far it's only the slider in the figure that's created last that works.
Edit in case someone else looks at this: see Yulia V's answer below. It works perfectly, including in my initial application. The site doesn't let me upvote it because I am too new on here, but it's a perfect solution to my problem. Thanks Yulia V!
You need to save the references to sliders as variables to make it work. No idea why, but this is how matplotlib works.
Specifically, in your functions, you need to have
return freq_slider, fig1
...
return amp_slider, fig2
instead of
return fig1
...
return fig2
and in the main script,
freq_slider, figure1 = create_first_fig()
amp_slider, figure2 = create_second_fig()
instead of
figure1 = create_first_fig()
figure2 = create_second_fig()
Just to illustrate my comment below #Yulia V's answer, it works too if we store the sliders as an attribute of the figure instead of returning them:
def create_first_fig():
...
fig1._slider = freq_slider
...
return fig1
def create_first_fig():
...
fig2._slider = amp_slider
...
return fig2
...
figure1 = create_first_fig()
figure2 = create_second_fig()
When exploring data sets with many points on an xy chart, I can adjust the alpha and/or marker size to give a good quick visual impression of where the points are most densely clustered. However when I zoom in or make the window bigger, the a different alpha and/or marker size is needed to give the same visual impression.
How can I have the alpha value and/or the marker size increase when I make the window bigger or zoom in on the data? I am thinking that if I double the window area I could double the marker size, and/or take the square root of the alpha; and the opposite for zooming.
Note that all points have the same size and alpha. Ideally the solution would work with plot(), but if it can only be done with scatter() that would be helpful also.
You can achieve what you want with matplotlib event handling. You have to catch zoom and resize events separately. It's a bit tricky to account for both at the same time, but not impossible. Below is an example with two subplots, a line plot on the left and a scatter plot on the right. Both zooming (factor) and resizing of the figure (fig_factor) re-scale the points according to the scaling factors in figure size and x- and y- limits. As there are two limits defined -- one for the x and one for the y direction, I used here the respective minima for the two factors. If you'd rather want to scale with the larger factors, change the min to max in both event functions.
from matplotlib import pyplot as plt
import numpy as np
fig, axes = plt.subplots(nrows=1, ncols = 2)
ax1,ax2 = axes
fig_width = fig.get_figwidth()
fig_height = fig.get_figheight()
fig_factor = 1.0
##saving some values
xlim = dict()
ylim = dict()
lines = dict()
line_sizes = dict()
paths = dict()
point_sizes = dict()
## a line plot
x1 = np.linspace(0,np.pi,30)
y1 = np.sin(x1)
lines[ax1] = ax1.plot(x1, y1, 'ro', markersize = 3, alpha = 0.8)
xlim[ax1] = ax1.get_xlim()
ylim[ax1] = ax1.get_ylim()
line_sizes[ax1] = [line.get_markersize() for line in lines[ax1]]
## a scatter plot
x2 = np.random.normal(1,1,30)
y2 = np.random.normal(1,1,30)
paths[ax2] = ax2.scatter(x2,y2, c = 'b', s = 20, alpha = 0.6)
point_sizes[ax2] = paths[ax2].get_sizes()
xlim[ax2] = ax2.get_xlim()
ylim[ax2] = ax2.get_ylim()
def on_resize(event):
global fig_factor
w = fig.get_figwidth()
h = fig.get_figheight()
fig_factor = min(w/fig_width,h/fig_height)
for ax in axes:
lim_change(ax)
def lim_change(ax):
lx = ax.get_xlim()
ly = ax.get_ylim()
factor = min(
(xlim[ax][1]-xlim[ax][0])/(lx[1]-lx[0]),
(ylim[ax][1]-ylim[ax][0])/(ly[1]-ly[0])
)
try:
for line,size in zip(lines[ax],line_sizes[ax]):
line.set_markersize(size*factor*fig_factor)
except KeyError:
pass
try:
paths[ax].set_sizes([s*factor*fig_factor for s in point_sizes[ax]])
except KeyError:
pass
fig.canvas.mpl_connect('resize_event', on_resize)
for ax in axes:
ax.callbacks.connect('xlim_changed', lim_change)
ax.callbacks.connect('ylim_changed', lim_change)
plt.show()
The code has been tested in Pyton 2.7 and 3.6 with matplotlib 2.1.1.
EDIT
Motivated by the comments below and this answer, I created another solution. The main idea here is to only use one type of event, namely draw_event. At first the plots did not update correctly upon zooming. Also ax.draw_artist() followed by a fig.canvas.draw_idle() like in the linked answer did not really solve the problem (however, this might be platform/backend specific). Instead I added an extra call to fig.canvas.draw() whenever the scaling changes (the if statement prevents infinite loops).
In addition, do avoid all the global variables, I wrapped everything into a class called MarkerUpdater. Each Axes instance can be registered separately to the MarkerUpdater instance, so you could also have several subplots in one figure, of which some are updated and some not. I also fixed another bug, where the points in the scatter plot scaled wrongly -- they should scale quadratic, not linear (see here).
Finally, as it was missing from the previous solution, I also added updating for the alpha value of the markers. This is not quite as straight forward as the marker size, because alpha values must not be larger than 1.0. For this reason, in my implementation the alpha value can only be decreased from the original value. Here I implemented it such that the alpha decreases when the figure size is decreased. Note that if no alpha value is provided to the plot command, the artist stores None as alpha value. In this case the automatic alpha tuning is off.
What should be updated in which Axes can be defined with the features keyword -- see below if __name__ == '__main__': for an example how to use MarkerUpdater.
EDIT 2
As pointed out by #ImportanceOfBeingErnest, there was a problem with infinite recursion with my answer when using the TkAgg backend, and apparently problems with the figure not refreshing properly upon zooming (which I couldn't verify, so probably that was implementation dependent). Removing the fig.canvas.draw() and adding ax.draw_artist(ax) within the loop over the Axes instances instead fixed this issue.
EDIT 3
I updated the code to fix an ongoing issue where figure is not updated properly upon a draw_event. The fix was taken from this answer, but modified to also work for several figures.
In terms of an explanation of how the factors are obtained, the MarkerUpdater instance contains a dict that stores for each Axes instance the figure dimensions and the limits of the axes at the time it is added with add_ax. Upon a draw_event, which is for instance triggered when the figure is resized or the user zooms in on the data, the new (current) values for figure size and axes limits are retrieved and a scaling factor is calculated (and stored) such that zooming in and increasing the figure size makes the markers bigger. Because x- and y-dimensions may change at different rates, I use min to pick one of the two calculated factors and always scale against the original size of the figure.
If you want your alpha to scale with a different function, you can easily change the lines that adjust the alpha value. For instance, if you want a power law instead of a linear decrease, you can write path.set_alpha(alpha*facA**n), where n is the power.
from matplotlib import pyplot as plt
import numpy as np
##plt.switch_backend('TkAgg')
class MarkerUpdater:
def __init__(self):
##for storing information about Figures and Axes
self.figs = {}
##for storing timers
self.timer_dict = {}
def add_ax(self, ax, features=[]):
ax_dict = self.figs.setdefault(ax.figure,dict())
ax_dict[ax] = {
'xlim' : ax.get_xlim(),
'ylim' : ax.get_ylim(),
'figw' : ax.figure.get_figwidth(),
'figh' : ax.figure.get_figheight(),
'scale_s' : 1.0,
'scale_a' : 1.0,
'features' : [features] if isinstance(features,str) else features,
}
ax.figure.canvas.mpl_connect('draw_event', self.update_axes)
def update_axes(self, event):
for fig,axes in self.figs.items():
if fig is event.canvas.figure:
for ax, args in axes.items():
##make sure the figure is re-drawn
update = True
fw = fig.get_figwidth()
fh = fig.get_figheight()
fac1 = min(fw/args['figw'], fh/args['figh'])
xl = ax.get_xlim()
yl = ax.get_ylim()
fac2 = min(
abs(args['xlim'][1]-args['xlim'][0])/abs(xl[1]-xl[0]),
abs(args['ylim'][1]-args['ylim'][0])/abs(yl[1]-yl[0])
)
##factor for marker size
facS = (fac1*fac2)/args['scale_s']
##factor for alpha -- limited to values smaller 1.0
facA = min(1.0,fac1*fac2)/args['scale_a']
##updating the artists
if facS != 1.0:
for line in ax.lines:
if 'size' in args['features']:
line.set_markersize(line.get_markersize()*facS)
if 'alpha' in args['features']:
alpha = line.get_alpha()
if alpha is not None:
line.set_alpha(alpha*facA)
for path in ax.collections:
if 'size' in args['features']:
path.set_sizes([s*facS**2 for s in path.get_sizes()])
if 'alpha' in args['features']:
alpha = path.get_alpha()
if alpha is not None:
path.set_alpha(alpha*facA)
args['scale_s'] *= facS
args['scale_a'] *= facA
self._redraw_later(fig)
def _redraw_later(self, fig):
timer = fig.canvas.new_timer(interval=10)
timer.single_shot = True
timer.add_callback(lambda : fig.canvas.draw_idle())
timer.start()
##stopping previous timer
if fig in self.timer_dict:
self.timer_dict[fig].stop()
##storing a reference to prevent garbage collection
self.timer_dict[fig] = timer
if __name__ == '__main__':
my_updater = MarkerUpdater()
##setting up the figure
fig, axes = plt.subplots(nrows = 2, ncols =2)#, figsize=(1,1))
ax1,ax2,ax3,ax4 = axes.flatten()
## a line plot
x1 = np.linspace(0,np.pi,30)
y1 = np.sin(x1)
ax1.plot(x1, y1, 'ro', markersize = 10, alpha = 0.8)
ax3.plot(x1, y1, 'ro', markersize = 10, alpha = 1)
## a scatter plot
x2 = np.random.normal(1,1,30)
y2 = np.random.normal(1,1,30)
ax2.scatter(x2,y2, c = 'b', s = 100, alpha = 0.6)
## scatter and line plot
ax4.scatter(x2,y2, c = 'b', s = 100, alpha = 0.6)
ax4.plot([0,0.5,1],[0,0.5,1],'ro', markersize = 10) ##note: no alpha value!
##setting up the updater
my_updater.add_ax(ax1, ['size']) ##line plot, only marker size
my_updater.add_ax(ax2, ['size']) ##scatter plot, only marker size
my_updater.add_ax(ax3, ['alpha']) ##line plot, only alpha
my_updater.add_ax(ax4, ['size', 'alpha']) ##scatter plot, marker size and alpha
plt.show()
I want to increase the grey area around the plot, but keeping the plot the same size. I've already tried changing the figure size, which ends up stretching the plot.
The axes inside the figure is positionned relative to the figure. Per default you have e.g. a fraction of 0.125 of figure width as space at the left. This means that resizing the figure, scales the axes as well.
You may calculate how much the spacings need to change such that if the figure is rescaled, the axes size remains constant. The new spacings then need to be set using fig.subplots_adjust.
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
def set_figsize(figw,figh, fig=None):
if not fig: fig=plt.gcf()
w, h = fig.get_size_inches()
l = fig.subplotpars.left
r = fig.subplotpars.right
t = fig.subplotpars.top
b = fig.subplotpars.bottom
hor = 1.-w/float(figw)*(r-l)
ver = 1.-h/float(figh)*(t-b)
fig.subplots_adjust(left=hor/2., right=1.-hor/2., top=1.-ver/2., bottom=ver/2.)
fig, ax=plt.subplots()
ax.plot([1,3,2])
set_figsize(9,7)
plt.show()
You may then also use this function to update the subplot params when the figure window is resized.
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
class Resizer():
def __init__(self,fig=None):
if not fig: fig=plt.gcf()
self.fig=fig
self.w, self.h = self.fig.get_size_inches()
self.l = self.fig.subplotpars.left
self.r = self.fig.subplotpars.right
self.t = self.fig.subplotpars.top
self.b = self.fig.subplotpars.bottom
def set_figsize(self, figw,figh):
hor = 1.-self.w/float(figw)*(self.r-self.l)
ver = 1.-self.h/float(figh)*(self.t-self.b)
self.fig.subplots_adjust(left=hor/2., right=1.-hor/2., top=1.-ver/2., bottom=ver/2.)
def resize(self, event):
figw = event.width/self.fig.dpi
figh = event.height/self.fig.dpi
self.set_figsize( figw,figh)
fig, ax=plt.subplots()
ax.plot([1,3,2])
r = Resizer()
cid = fig.canvas.mpl_connect("resize_event", r.resize)
plt.show()
In the window of a matplotlib figure, there's a button called 'Configure subplots' (see below picture, screenshot on Windows 10 with matplotlib version 1.5.2). Try to change the parameters 'left' and 'right'. You can also change these parameters with plt.subplots_adjust(left=..., bottom=..., right=..., top=..., wspace=..., hspace=...).
I have found minor graphical issues while using the spanselector, cursor and fill_between widgets, which I would like to share with you.
All of them, can be experienced in this code (which I took from the matplolib example)
"""
The SpanSelector is a mouse widget to select a xmin/xmax range and plot the
detail view of the selected region in the lower axes
"""
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
from matplotlib.widgets import SpanSelector
import matplotlib.widgets as widgets
Fig = plt.figure(figsize=(8,6))
Fig.set_facecolor('w')
Fig.set
Ax = Fig.add_subplot(211)
x = np.arange(0.0, 5.0, 0.01)
y = np.sin(2*np.pi*x) + 0.5*np.random.randn(len(x))
Ax.plot(x, y, '-')
Ax.set_ylim(-2,2)
Ax.set_title('Press left mouse button and drag to test')
RegionIndices = []
ax2 = Fig.add_subplot(212)
line2, = ax2.plot(x, y, '-')
def onselect(xmin, xmax):
if len(RegionIndices) == 2:
Ax.fill_between(x[:], 0.0, y[:],facecolor='White',alpha=1)
del RegionIndices[:]
indmin, indmax = np.searchsorted(x, (xmin, xmax))
indmax = min(len(x)-1, indmax)
Ax.fill_between(x[indmin:indmax], 0.0, y[indmin:indmax],facecolor='Blue',alpha=0.30)
thisx = x[indmin:indmax]
thisy = y[indmin:indmax]
line2.set_data(thisx, thisy)
ax2.set_xlim(thisx[0], thisx[-1])
ax2.set_ylim(thisy.min(), thisy.max())
Fig.canvas.draw()
RegionIndices.append(xmin)
RegionIndices.append(xmax)
# set useblit True on gtkagg for enhanced performance
span = SpanSelector(Ax, onselect, 'horizontal', useblit = True,rectprops=dict(alpha=0.5, facecolor='purple') )
cursor = widgets.Cursor(Ax, color="red", linewidth = 1, useblit = True)
plt.show()
I wonder if there is some way to avoid these two small issues:
1) You can see that when you select a region the spanselector box (purple) glitches. In this code the effect is barely noticeable but on plots with many lines is quite annoying (I have tried all the trueblit combinations to not effect)
2) In this code when you select a region, the area in the upper plot between the line and the horizontal axis is filled in blue. When you select a new region the old area is filled in white (to clear it) and the new one is filled with blue again. However, when I do that the line plotted, as well as, the horizontal axis, become thicker... Is there a way to clear such a region (generated with fill_between) without this happening... Or is it necessary to replot the graph? Initially, I am against doing this since I have a well structured code and importing all the data again into the spanselector method seems a bit messy... Which is the right way in python to delete selected regions of a plot?
Any advice would be most welcome
Is it possible to setup plot to show more data when expanded?
Matplotlib plots scale when resized. To show specific area one can use set_xlim and such on axes. I have an ecg-like plot showing realtime data, its y limits are predefined, but I want to see more data along x if I expand window or just have big monitor.
Im using it in a pyside app and I could just change xlim on resize but I want more clean and generic solution.
One way to do this is to implement a handler for resize_event. Here is a short example how this might be done. You can modify it for your needs:
import numpy as np
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
def onresize(event):
width = event.width
scale_factor = 100.
data_range = width/scale_factor
start, end = plt.xlim()
new_end = start+data_range
plt.xlim((start, new_end))
if __name__ == "__main__":
fig = plt.figure()
ax = fig.add_subplot(111)
t = np.arange(100)
y = np.random.rand(100)
ax.plot(t,y)
plt.xlim((0, 10))
cid = fig.canvas.mpl_connect('resize_event', onresize)
plt.show()