When using the chrome.downloads.onCreated function, the callback function provided is being called repeatedly with all downloads in the users download history which can be found at chrome://downloads/. Based off documentation (and common sense) this should only fire once when a new download is created.
I have searched extensively about this issue and have come across one short thread from 2014. I am not sure how to reproduce the issue as it happens infrequently or what the best way to solve it is.
chrome.downloads.onCreated.addListener(download => {
console.log("GOT DOWNLOAD");
href = download.finalUrl;
message = {message: "businessHref",href: href};
messageContentScript(message);
});
Related
In my application code, there are a lot of calls (like 100+) to the "top object" referring to window.top such as top.$("title") and so forth. Now, I've run into the problem using Cypress to perform end-to-end testing. When trying to log into the application, there are some calls to top.$(...) but the DevTools shows a Uncaught TypeError: top.$ is not a function. This resulted in my team and I discovering that the "top" our application is trying to reach is the Cypress environment itself.
The things I've tried before coming here are:
1) Trying to stub the window.top with the window object referencing our app. This resulted in us being told window.top is a read-only object.
2) Researching if Cypress has some kind of configuration that would smartly redirect calls to top in our code to be the top-most environment within our app. We figured we probably weren't the only ones coming across this issue.
If there were articles, I couldn't find any, so I came to ask if there was a way to do that, or if anyone would know of an alternate solution?
Another solution we considered: Looking into naming window objects so we can reference them by name instead of "window" or "top". If there isn't a way to do what I'm trying to do through Cypress, I think we're willing to do this as a last resort, but hopefully, we don't have to change that, since we're not sure how much of the app it will break upfront.
#Mikkel Not really sure what code I can provide to be useful, but here's the code that causes Cypress to throw the uncaught exception
if (sample_condition) {
top.$('title').text(...).find('content') // Our iframe
} else {
top.$('title').text(page_title)
}
And there are more instances in our code where we access the top object, but they are generally similar. We found out the root cause of the issue is that within Cypress calls to "top" actually interface with Cypress instead of their intended environment which is our app.
This may not be a direct answer to your question, it's just expanding on your request for more information about the technique that I used to pass info from one script to another. I tried to do it within the same script without success - basically because the async nature of .then() stopped it from working.
This snippet is where I read a couple of id's from sessionStorage, and save them to a json file.
//
// At this point the cart is set up, and in sessionStorage
// So we save the details to a fixtures file, which is read
// by another test script (e2e-purchase.js)
//
cy.window().then(window => {
const contents = {
memberId: window.sessionStorage.getItem('memberId'),
cartId: window.sessionStorage.getItem('mycart')
}
cy.writeFile(`tests/cypress/fixtures/cart.json`, contents)
})
In another script, it loads the file as a fixture (fixtures/cart.json) to pull in a couple of id's
cy.fixture(`cart`).then(cart => {
cy.visit(`/${cart.memberId}/${cart.cartId}`)
})
Hi I have begun to use the package for some very simple tasks, mainly cloning a Git-Wiki repo and subsequently pulling the changes from the server when needed.
Now I can not see any methods corresponding to the Task-Async (TAP) pattern. Also in the documentation I could not find anything concerning.
Could you please give me some direction how to wrap the LibGit2Sharp methods into a TAP construct? Link to documentation (if I missed something) or just telling me which callback to hook up to the TaskCompletionSource object would be nice.
It also doesn't really help that I am a newbie with Git, and normally I only do basic branching, merging, pushing with it.
For cloning I use:
Repository.Clone(#"https://MyName#bitbucket.org/MyRepo/MyProject.git/wiki", "repo");
For pulling I use:
using (var repo = new Repository("repo"))
{
// Credential information to fetch
LibGit2Sharp.PullOptions options = new LibGit2Sharp.PullOptions();
options.FetchOptions = new FetchOptions();
var signature = new LibGit2Sharp.Signature(new Identity("myname", "mymail#google.com"), DateTimeOffset.Now);
Commands.Pull(repo, signature, options);
}
Thanks in advance
First of all, you should never try sync over async or async over sync. See this article.
If you're thinking of using Task.Run, don't. That will just trade on thread pool thread for another with the added cost of 2 context switches.
But you should reconsider your whole approach to this. You don't need to clone the repository just to get the contents of a file. Each version of a file, has a unique URL. You can even get the URL of a file for a specific branch.
currently i develop an Ionic2 application which commuicates with a Firebase database. While updating a node sometimes it works and sometimes it doesn't.
So i tired to handle the error with the following code:
this.db.list("/Events/" + this.eventID+ "/teilnehmer").push(this.userID)
.then(resolve => {
console.log('success');
}, reject => {
console.log('error');
})
.catch(reject => {
console.log('catch');
});
But even if i disconnect my internet connection there is no error thrown.
Does someone of you know how i could handle an error if the push was not successful?
I had the same situation that push does not return promises sometime, so i raised issue on github FirebaseListObservable push() takes too long to add but unfortunately it was not resolved, I contacted firebase support through email, the support team reviewed my issue and checked the code i sent, and replied there is nothing to do in the code , and advised me to clear the phone's storage cache, i did the same and issue got resolved,
here is the mail from firebase support
Hi xxxx,
I suggest that you try clearing your phone's cache before proceeding
again, its memory might be too high. To do this, go to: Settings ->
Storage -> Cached Data. Select it then then choose ok (for clearing
the cache). Also please check this the same issue raised on Github
and answered by one of our engineers.
If the issue persists after trying the proposed suggestions, please
get back to me with a minimal and runnable code that we can use to
simulate this, possibly a plunkr or jsfiddle code, or a from the
scratch code that can demonstrate the issue.
Regards, xxxx
If you would like to handle this you could consider setting a timeout because the Promise will just stay in 'pending' if Firebase doesn't return anything and resolve, reject / catch will never be triggered.
You could do this for example with Promise.race(): Example Promise timeout with Promise.race() also check this thread: More Examples
I'm attempting to debug the .ajaxForm. I have the library jquery.form.js installed with jquery-1.7.1.js and jquery-ui-1.8.17.custom.js. When I use.ajaxForm(....).submit(), the form gets submitted, but when using .ajaxForm(.....) WITHOUT submit() the form doesn't submit. What's yet even more frustrating, is that even with .submit() in place, I can Not get execution happen inside .ajaxForm(....), regardless what I do. It appears to be I don't understand this well. I looked on line, the API description for ajaxForm and a sample are very straight forward, yet, something is wrong. Please help! Here is what I'm attempting to do:
$('#lookUpFrm').ajaxForm(function(result) {
alert("AJAX:"+result)
success: function() {
$("#lookUpFrm")[0].reset();
return false;
},
error: function (error, status, code){
$('#error_dialog').showErrorDialog();
}
});//.submit()
This link may help: Trouble with ajaxForm
This is a question I asked a few days ago and answered earlier today. I had quite a bit wrong with my logic (as you will see) and was trying to use the plug-in in the same way you seem to be. I posted what I had to do to get it working and it is working beautifully now. I hope this helps!
I'am obviously new to Google Apps Script, nevertheless I have some experience in coding in C, PHP and Java. Since we would like to create a small CRM in our company with Google Apps Script, we need to create an application with a form available on Google Sites. I've been searching an answer for this problem a long time, I haven't unfortunately found any answer. I have a code like this:
var klienci_id = new Array(100);
var klienci_nazwa = new Array(100);
var klienci_adres = new Array(100);
var klienci_osoba = new Array(100);
var klienci_telefon = new Array(100);
var klienci_email = new Array(100);
function doGet(e) {
var app = UiApp.createApplication();
// hello world label
var helloworldLabel = app.createLabel("I love Apps Script!").setStyleAttribute("fontSize","16px");
// add the label to the app container
app.add(helloworldLabel);
return app;
}
function main() {
var klienci = SpreadsheetApp.openById("0ArsOaWajjzv9dEdGTUZCWFc1NnFva05uWkxETVF6Q0E");
var kuchnia_polska = klienci.getSheetByName("Kuchnia polska");
var dane = kuchnia_polska.getRange("D7:F22");
doGet();
}
And everytime I try to publish it and enter the given link I get the error "Unknown macro doGet". I know this is a common problem when somebody doesn't use doGet() function but I do - and it still doesn't work. I also believe that Google should create a thorought documentation on Google Apps Script, which would work the way the Unix manual does, since I just cannot get through all these strange pages of goddamn help :) It's neither a Windows help, nor a good manual ;)
Regards,
Kamil
I have a suspicion that you made a "version" once, published the app, went to the "real" link and not the "development" link, and then added the doGet() function. When you make a version, it freezes the code at that time. The version that the app is published at is the version of the code that will run at the "real" link (what you give users), which allows you to keep editing the code without disturbing existing users of your app. There is a special "development" link given to you in the publish dialog that always refers to the most recent version of the code, but which will only work for you and no one else.
I'm affraid there is a little misunderstanding on your side concerning the use of the 'doGet()' function. When you want to run an application as a webapp, the doc says indeed that it must contain a doGet function but what it doesn't say explicitely is that this function is supposed to be the starting point of the whole app, ie the function that the url will call in the first place. So it doesn't make much sense to have the doGet function called from a so called "main" function since the "main" function is not the main function...
I cannot imagine right now a situation where some function calls the doGet function since every function in the script is called initially (directly or indirectly) from this doGet function.... in fact the 'end' of any other function in the script 'returns' to the doGet initial function. Well this is maybe not absolutely true in every case but it gives you the general idea about how it works.
I'm hoping this is clear enough and, to return to your code snippet, if you remove the doGet(e) call, it will ideed show a nice "I love Apps Script!" but it will never do anything else, certainly not see the "main" function.
I've copied your code here https://script.google.com/macros/d/MJ80AK8t7kbgDcC-NaLPYvH797_hv7HHb/edit?template=app&folder=0AKGkLMU9sHmLUk9PVA
and when deployed as a web app appears to work https://script.google.com/macros/s/AKfycbxOiaukLt7P4pIm7bms7aU16uEo6FuZ-MNOh0tSqUwr/dev
Only thing I can think of is there is something else in your code not copied into the snippet that is throwing the exception.
[Just before the GUI Builder was published I came up with Creating a framework for custom form interfaces using Google Apps Script which might help you with your project]
Thank you both for help. Serge, yes, it's really not obvious what the structure of Google Apps Scripts should be. They are based on JavaScript, however, due to lack of HTML in the code they have completely different flow - so naturally, there has to be a main function which is executed first. And of course in every programming environment it has to have a different name to make it more distinguishable ;-)
I created a new copy of my application, not changing the code completely - deployed it and it works beautifuly. Since I haven't changed anything in access options, it's quite strange that two applications with the same code and the same options don't give the same result. I think it may be a kind of the environment flaw, maybe someone from Google should look at this :)
Here's the link to the script, I've set access to "Anyone with the link".
https://script.google.com/a/macros/foodbroker.pl/s/AKfycbwk2IM-rIYLhQl6HOlbppwGOnw4Ik_kH7ixbaSNVxIE-QR7cq8/exec