I installed Mautic in-house instance. I tried to integrate it with Amazon SES service. After all was set as needed (please find the attached screenshot below), I clicked "Test connection" button and got the following error:
Connection could not be established with host
email-smtp.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com [An attempt was made to access a
socket in a way forbidden by its access permissions. #10013] Log data:
++ Starting Mautic\EmailBundle\Swiftmailer\Transport\AmazonTransport !! Connection could not be established with host
email-smtp.eu-west-1.amazonaws.com [An attempt was made to access a
socket in a way forbidden by its access permissions. #10013] (code: 0)
++ Starting Mautic\EmailBundle\Swiftmailer\Transport\AmazonTransport
Can someone give a hand on this? What am I doing wrong?
Screenshot Mautic_Amazon-SES_Integration Settings
I had the same problem and fixed it by leaving the field "Port" empty (Mautic --> email settings --> Port). Apparently my server wasn't able to use port 25, and leaving this field empty made Mautic find the best port.
Related
I have a mail server working ok with Postfix+Courirer+MySql (virtual users), and SquirrelMail, I could never configure SqMail properly for message characters sets, so I would like to give a try to Roundcube, I have installed it, I did some configs, but at login screen I always get:
IMAP Error in /usr/share/roundcube/program/lib/Roundcube/rcube_imap.php (196): Login failed for user#domain.tls from AA.BBB.CC.DDD. Could not connect to ssl://domail.tls:993: Conection refused
I've been searching around and testing changes on config but no success, can anybody advice me on how to proceed to achieve the functioning of Roundcube.
My current system still works...
What info is suitable for you to have an idea of what could be wrong?
I have Data Virt running via the standalone.sh script, and can log in with my username and password. My next task is configuring it so that it automatically runs whenever the instance is up and running (without having to execute standalone.sh), and uses SSL (port 443) rather than my username and password to log me in. I added the vault.keystore, dv_keystore.jks, and dv_truststore.jks files, and modified both standalone.sh and standalone.xml, according to the JBoss and other online documentation, to account for using these files. I start the standalone.sh script, which runs without any errors. When I browse to:
http://<IP>:8443/dashboard
after starting standalone.sh, I get the following error:
This page can't be displayed
Turn on TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and TLS 1.2 in Advanced settings and try connecting to https://:8443 again. If this error persists, it is possible that this site uses an unsupported protocol or cipher suite such as RC4, which is not considered secure. Please contact your site administrator.
The settings Use TLS-1.0-ON, Use TLS-1.1-ON, and Use TLS-1.2-ON are all checked in the Browser properties.
By contrast, when I browse to
http://<IP>:8443/dashboard
when standalone.sh is not running, I get the following:
This page can't be displayed
- Make sure the web address https://:8443 is correct.
- Look for the page with your search engine.
- Refresh the page in a few minutes.
It appears the browser is sensing something going on when standalone.sh is running, but something is not allowing the browser to access the dashboard.
What am I missing here?
Have you validated any other ssl access? Is it just an issue with the dashboard application?
Hi I've been trying to try out the Fiware service.
I've setup an POI Instance in the Waterford Region.
I've followed the instructions and assigned a floating IP.
On the Instance page I have no IP address and an Status Error.
Under the security page -> Floating IP tab there is an IP address assigned. The Instance is blank. When I try and associate an IP to the instance i get a 400 error:
undefined. Cause: 400 Error
{"badRequest": {"message": "No nw_info cache associated with instance", "code": 400}}
Has anyone had the same problem?
Have you used the 'Allocate IP to project' menu under the Security Tab first ?
If you have a floating IP available it should be connected to the instance you've created using the Associate IP -Action under the Security/Floating IP's. Remember to also allocate and connect the keys and open relevant ports as described here: http://catalogue.fiware.org/enablers/poi-data-provider/creating-instances
There has been some resource (floating IPs) limitations in the FILAB cloud servers so this may be also the reason if you have followed all the above.
Currently, there seems to be some problems with the POI GE image in the Fiware Cloud. Currently a working choice is to start an Ubuntu 14.04 image and install the POI GE according to http://forge.fiware.org/plugins/mediawiki/wiki/fiware/index.php/POI_Data_Provider_-_Installation_and_Administration_Guide .
I have a website running 2 WCF services. Working awesome until I needed to move them from the "Default Web Site" in IIS7 to a dedicated website with a new IP address. Now I get the error message:
"...could not be loaded because more than one endpoint configuration for that contract was found. Please indicate the preferred endpoint configuration section by name"
ALL I did was change:
net.tcp://localhost/...
TO:
net.tcp://10.1.2.204/...
I have changed every spot in my configs which once used localhost to specified IP address. The new website is setup exactly the same with the proper net.tcp bindings and it is bound to the single IP address of 10.1.2.204.
I cannot seem to figure out what is going on. I am looking at the svc trace logs and all I get is a bunch of the same.
My new website is called "core" whereas previously I was hosting on "Default Web Site". I added a new FQDN/public IP to route to this new site (backwards to the mentioned private IP address). Now my services are busted.
I know baseAddress is ignored when using IIS/WAS hosting, so I am not sure what else to check. I changed absolutely nothing else in the configs.
What else can I provide to help troubleshoot this?
--
I am also seeing this in the service trace viewer:
Activity Name Receive bytes on connection 'Listen at 'net.tcp://hole.myserver.com/...'.'.
...but the WCF services are actually hosted on that new "core" website which translates to my new private IP address. I have change FQDN names for the example. To make it clear:
I used to have 1 FQDN on this server using Default Web Site.
I now added a 2nd FQDN to this server, new website, second IP. It seems to me that the listening should be directed towards: net.tcp://core.myserver.com instead of net.tcp://hole.myserver.com. Let's pretend the server name is hole.myserver.com and my new website is core.myserver.com on the same server.
Hopefully this is not confusing and you can make sense of it.
I'm using the default net.tcp port of 808 and binding of 808:*
--
This is the first exception thrown that I can tell:
The socket connection was aborted. This could be caused by an error processing your message or a receive timeout being exceeded by the remote host, or an underlying network resource issue. Local socket timeout was '00:00:10'.
--
None of these combos will activate the service and all produce the same exception:
net.tcp://localhost
net.tcp://localhost:808
net.tcp://10.1.2.204
net.tcp://10.1.2.204:808
even using a different port which I have done before without issue:
net.tcp://localhost:75
net.tcp://10.1.2.204:75
none of these work. :(
Thanks so much!
Its rights issue. Right click on your new website --> then Edit Permissions. On properties window click security tab and Edit button. Then Add IIS_IUSRS and give Read & Execute, List folder contents, Read permissions. Now iisreset and start to host and connect net tcp on new website.
I'm trying to get WCF to use SSL with ANYTHING for FIVE DAYS now. I've gone through countless walkthroughs, generated more certificates than a mail order diploma company, even tried hot fixes. After working with MS dev tools since VB1, I am now considering flipping burgers as a career option. WCF, as far as I can see, is a complete lemon.
Anyway, to get to my actual question: If I run through this walkthrough:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff648840.aspx
I get to step 11 (adding the service reference) and get "There was an error downloading metadata from the address. Please verify that you have entered a valid address".
Details of the error gives: There was an error downloading 'https://localhost/SSL6/Service.svc'.
Unable to connect to the remote server
No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it 127.0.0.1:443
I'm using VS2008 on Windows 7 with IIS7. I followed the walkthrough exactly (apart from step 5 which was different on IIS7- I went into "SSL Settings" for the VD), so it shows my config (yes I've used httpsGetEnabled and mexHttpsBinding).
Anyone care to save my sanity and job?
EDIT: If I go into IIS, select the VD in content view, right-click on the svc file and browse, I get "Internet Explorer cannot display the webpage". Chrome gives "Google Chrome could not connect to localhost".
IE troubleshooting gives "the remote device or resource won't accept the connection".
If I browse using the IP address rather than using localhost via http, it says that it's secured with https ok. If I browse using the IP and https, I get HTTP error 503. The service is unavailable.
So it looks to me like a DNS issue combined with... something.
When I try to just run the service site project, I get "Unable to start debugging on the web server. Unable to connect to the web server. Verify that the web server is running and that incoming HTTP requests are not blocked by a firewall". I've checked the firewall and it's ok.
Finally cracked it. There were at least three issues at play.
1) A DNS issue of some kind with localhost. It's still unresolved on my machine, but I can work around it by using the IP addy.
2) Another issue may have been that apparently, WCF doesn't work with IIS 7 OOTB. So you need to run command prompt as administrator, and run the following command -
"%windir%\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v3.0\Windows Communication Foundation\ServiceModelReg.exe" -r -y
3) After I got through the certificate stuff I was still getting HTTP error 503, "Service unavailable". That ended up being leftovers from my previous attempts, still listening to ports:
http://blogs.msdn.com/webtopics/archive/2010/02/17/a-not-so-common-root-cause-for-503-service-unavailable.aspx
So to get a hello world level service happening with WCF and SSL took me a whole week, and in my travels I discovered many pilgrims who had taken about the same amount of time. Microsoft: You have failed.
Are you using IIS or self hosting? If you're using IIS, it sounds like it's incorrectly configured, because it seems it's not accepting connections on port 443; I guess you're probably missing a protocol binding (https to port 443). There's a detailed discussion of setting up SSL on IIS7 here that might be useful.
Of course, you could easily verify this using the browser, you should be able to connect to the site using SSL from it.
When I have had this error occur, I have found it very useful to run the service from Visual Studio to get additional information. Right-click on the service, and then select Debug -> Start New Instance from the pop-up menu. VS will launch the service using the WcfTestClient.exe.
WcfTestClient will display all the services and endpoints in your service project. A healthy launch will list your services in the a panel on the left, and provide a Start Page tab in a panel on the right. What will happen in your case, however, is that you'll get a list of services in a panel on the top and an "Additional Information" box along the bottom. Your problem service(s) will have a Status of Error.
Click on a problem service in the upper panel, and the Additional Information box will fill with an error message and stack trace. The message will tell you exactly what that problem mex (metadata exchange) address is. That may be enough of a hint for you to solve the problem. If not, post the Additional Information here and I'll be happy to take a look at it.