Recently I wrote a c++ code and I used a function from an external library. the type of one of the arguments of this function is std::vector, but my data is in a variable named payload, which it's type is const uint8_t*. so I copied my payload data into a vector with std::copy like below:
std::vector my_vector;
std::copy(payload, payload + length, back_inserter(my_vector));
because of calling so much of this code, I'm in search for a lower cost operation to copy my payload data into my_vector variable in order to prepare input argument of the function which I used in my code.
is there any way to this purpose?
Related
I am a beginner in rust and working with some api that returns bytes that I can deserialize by defining their types.
result: (f64, f64, f64) = api.call();
Can I do the same by dynamically by passing a value n for the number of elements?
All elements of the tuple are of the same type. I would like to do something like this:
result: tuple(f64, 3) = api.call();
Here is the API of the call function.
Edit:
In case anyone ever encounters that issue in the future. I could deserialize the output by adopting this solution.
For reference: call() returns a Result<D: Detokenize, _>. Detokenize is mainly implemented for all T that implement Tokenizable.
All types that can receive the result are listed here.
Note that additional to tuples of various size, it's also implemented for:
impl<T: TokenizableItem + Clone, const N: usize> Tokenizable for [T; N]
Further, note that it is an async function with a Result, meaning you have to await it and deal with the potential error.
So you should(tm) be able to write:
result: [f64; 3] = api.call().await.unwrap();
Of course in a real project I would advise to replace unwrap() with some proper error handling.
Disclaimer: I don't know how to use the rest of ethers-core, so I'm unable to verify this in a test project. This information is purely derived from the documentation.
Static vs dynamic size
[f64; 3] requires you to know the number of elements at compile time.
Note that another Tokenizable is Vec<T>, meaning you could also specify Vec<T> as a result type. The length of this one will then be resolved at runtime, depending on how many elements of T the api.call() returns.
Further background information
Note that there is no such thing as a tuple that has N number of T elements, because a tuple is not a repetition of one type, it's a collection of types. Every element of a tuple can have a different type.
If you want to represent a repetition of one type, an array is what you really want. It's defined as one type T repeated N times: [T; N].
I would like to modify an Xcos block from within a gateway function using the new (non-legacy) Scilab API, for example, replace the block's model property by a new model structure. In other words, do the same as the Scilab command(s):
m = scicos_model()
block.model = m
However, I did not manage to achieve this behavior with the functions from Scilab 6 API: a block created by standard_define() is correctly passed to my gateway function, where this argument is available as scilabVar of type 128. On the other hand, the Scilab help claims that a block is a "scilab tlist of type "Block" with fields : graphics, model, gui and doc".
Attempts
Assume scilabVar block taken from gateway function argument, string constants of type wchar_t[], scilabVar model holding the result of scicos_model():
Application of function scilab_setTListField (env, block, "model", model) returns error status (as its equivalents for MList and List do)
Knowing that property .model is at index 3, a setfield (3, model, block) called through scilab_call ("setfield", ...) also fails.
This is not surprising: when called directly from the Scilab command line, it ends up with
setfield: Wrong type for input argument #3: List expected. .
However, a getfield (3, block) works, so that at least read access to the block's data fields is possible.
An external helper function
function block = blockSetModel (block, model)
block.model = model
endfunction
also called through scilab_call("blockSetModel", ...) actually returns a block with changed model,
but the original block passed to this function remains unchanged.
Although ugly, this gives at least a way to construct an individual block structure
which needs to be returned as a copy.
Summary
So, is there simply a function missing in the API, which returns the TList (or whatever) behind a type 128 pointer variable?
Or is there any other approach to this problem I was unable to discover?
Background
The goal behind is to move the block definition task from the usual interfacing "gui" function (e.g. a Scilab script MyBlock.sci) into own C code. For this purpose, the interfacing function is reduced to a wrapper around a C gateway, which, for example, usesscilab_call ("standard_define",...) to create a new block when being called with parameter job=="define".
Modification of the contained model and graphics objects through the Scilab API works fine since these are standard list types. However, getting or setting these objects as attributes .model and .graphics of the
original block fails as described above.
Starting from Scilab/Xcos 6.0.0, the data-structure behind a block is no more an MList (or TList) so you cannot upgrade the model to your own MList. All the data behind are stored using a classical MVC within a C++ coded Block.hxx.
On each try you made, a serialization/deserialization happens to reconstruct the block model field as a Scilab value.
Could you describe what kind of field you want to append/edit regarding the block structure ? Some of the predefined fields might be enough to pass extra information.
I am currently sending data between my PC and an ARM M4 Microcontroller via UART. I've defined my own protocol where each message looks like this:
[START_CHAR LEN TYPE SEQ DATA CRC]
The START_CHAR and LEN fields help me determine when the data ends, after which I look up the TYPE (constant offset of 3) to figure out what data came in order to unpack it into a message class.
Now I'm looking into flatbuffers and it seems perfect except that I cannot encode the TYPE into the message without including it inside the actual message. Here is what I am trying to do:
namespace FlatMessage;
uint8 const TYPE = 50; // does not compile
table String {
value:string;
}
root_type String;
I could create an Enum but that is messy. Thank you!
[EDIT] I should add that I could just change the protocol to have an END_CHAR but I need to support the TYPE field for legacy reasons.
Well actually, I suppose I would still need the type to figure out how to deserialize it as a flatbuffer.
e.g.
uint8_t *buf = builder.GetBufferPointer(); // I can do this with END_CHAR because I could get the buffer.
auto receive_string = GetString(buf); // But I wouldn't know what the type is. e.g. this could be GetCoolString(buf).
You have a couple of options to store a type with a FlatBuffer:
Prefix a buffer yourself with a type.
Use the file_identifier feature of FlatBuffers, to make it possible to identify the type of FlatBuffer.
Store the type in FlatBuffers itself, by using a union type. Make the root table have a single union field.
Can I define an ABAP method where the RETURNING parameter and any IMPORTING parameters have a generic type but that can still be called in a single line as a functional method?
In other words I'd like to replace this:
CALL FUNCTION 'CONVERSION_EXIT_ALPHA_INPUT'
EXPORTING
input = lv_external_value
IMPORTING
output = lv_internal_value.
With:
lv_internal_value= zcl_conversion=>alpha_input( lv_external_value ).
Unfortunately the fact that Class Methods can't have an untyped returning parameter is preventing me from declaring the functional method's return value as type ANY or CLIKE. The accepted standard of creating generic method parameters seems to be to define them as TYPE REF TO DATA and dereference/assign them. But as far as I know that prevents me from calling the method in a single statement as I have to first assign the importing parameter and then dereference the returning parameter, resulting in the same or more lines of code than a simple FM call.
Is there a way around this?
Unfortunately, there is no other way to dereference data than to use the dereference operator, either in the form ->* for the full value segment, or in the form ->comp, if the data object is structured and has a component named comp (and, even worse, there are a lot of places in ABAP code where you would like to use a value from a derefenced data object but can't do it for internal reasons / syntax restrictions).
However, you could simply keep the data reference object retrieved by your method in a variable of the calling code and work with that variable (instead of using a field symbol or a variable for the derefenced value segment itself). Either generically, as a ref to data variable, or typed, using the CAST operator (new ABAP syntax).
Most things that can be done with a field-symbol, can also be done directly with a data reference as well.
Example: Working with a variable result of the expected return type:
data(result) = cast t000( cl=>m( ) ).
write result->mandt.
See here the full example:
report zz_new_syntax.
class cl definition.
public section.
class-methods m returning value(s) type ref to data.
endclass.
start-of-selection.
data(result) = cast t000( cl=>m( ) ).
write: / result->mandt. " Writes '123'.
class cl implementation.
method m.
s = new t000( mandt = '123' ).
endmethod.
endclass.
On ABAP NW Stack 7.4 you could just use parameters type STRING and then use the new CONV Operator to convert your actual input in string. Little ugly but should work.
lv_internal_value = CONV #(zcl_conversion=>alpha_input( CONV #(lv_external_value) )).
I can across a copy methods from charTermAttr from the org.apache.lucene.analysis.tokenattributes.CharTermAttribute library.
Can anyone explain what copyBuffer and buffer does for charTermAttr? The documentation isn't very clear. If you could provide an example that would be great too!
CharTermAttributeImpl keeps internally a char array and a length variable that represents the internal term.
The copyBuffer method writes over this array by using the char array provided with the respective offset and length params.
The buffer method returns the internal array that you can directly modify. Additionally, you can get the term representation as a string by calling the attribute's toString method
Have a look at the javadocs for more details: http://lucene.apache.org/core/4_9_0/core/org/apache/lucene/analysis/tokenattributes/CharTermAttribute.html