After I am installing a root library, such as npm install aws-amplify, sometimes it seems that I need to install its sub library such as npm install #aws-amplify/cli. Why did not npm install aws-amplify install every sub library within it?
What's the npm packaging and installing rule here? can someone help me clearing understand that?
You are mixing up 2 different syntaxes. The #namespace/package is relatively new. It used to be just package, and some packages still use this. In the old way package tend to name themselves 'namespace-package' as some sort ofworkaround.
But that is not your question. Your question is 'why do they even do this?'.
Why wouldn't you just download all the npm package out there? Then you have and can use everything, right? As you can imagine this doesn't make much sense, you will only want to download and use what you need. Think of this quote from Joe Armstrong:
You wanted a banana but what you got was a gorilla holding the banana and the entire jungle.
The quote is a entirely out of context since it is more about not using classes, but it still kind of applies to this. At lot of packages will offer you a core package and the option to add sub-packages based on your need. Like in your example, someone might not need #aws-amplify/cli, this way he doesn't have to download it.
Related
In the react-native world I came across using many lib packages, some of them are outdated or not maintained. By going through the issue ticket or google for some solution to some bug, sometime I found a solution but how should I apply it?
I normally just change the code inside node_module directly, but I know this is really bad way cause it not even my git and gonna be lost at some point
what is the proper way to do this?
You can install node modules that aren't in the registry.
See: https://docs.npmjs.com/cli/install
Specifically these two methods are worth a look.
npm install <git-host>:<git-user>/<repo-name>
npm install <git repo url>
If the module in question are hosted on github, clone the repository, apply the patch to it there, and then use the module directly from github.
You could also see if anyone else is maintaining a fork of it.
I am working on a project with dotnet core, in Linux and it is using MVC.
I am reading a book for learning how to put things together. The book advises installing Bower. But the last time I researched bower I believe they were advising towards using something else for new projects.
I would like to know what alternative I can use for front end management. I need to be able to use Bootstrap, Jquery, Popper and Datatables on my page. And of course, I should be able to use it in Linux.
Thanks for the help francium. NPM is working just fine.It is in the official Ubuntu repository. You have to install popper the following way though: npm install popper.js --save
If you don't specify the .js extension it will give you a warning saying that bootstrap requires a popper installation but it was not installed. You also have to install git on your machine to make it work. I did not do it the first time I ran it and it gave me an error asking me if it was installed. Thanks for the suggestion, It was relatively easy to do get things working.
Yarn is now the alternative to Bower, but to install Yarn you need to use NPM
Hi I have made some custom adjustments to a node_module's files to get it to meet client requirements. These changes obviously are not in the packages source code so I want to avoid overwritting them if I need to update npm packages. Is there a way to do this? Maybe something similar to a git ignore?
Modifying a npm package directly is not recommended and could lead to multiple issues, the way to go about this is either contribute your changes to the original source code on GitHub if other would find the code you wrote useful, either that or you could make your own fork of the package and use that as a dependency instead.
You can install your own package by using the tarballs provided by GitHub.
npm install https://github.com/<username>/<repository>/tarball/master
I use npm scripts a lot for my javascript/node projects (npm start, npm test, and npm run build and others), and I was wondering if there is something similar for elm-packages, or if we should use npm scripts instead, and if I have to do it, why do we need a package.json and a elm-package.json?
The quick answer is that (as of May 2017) there's not support for this in elm-package.json.
As for the future: Evan Czaplicki has said on elm-dev mailing list that the file format and functionality will get revamped a little bit (probably with the 0.19 release), but most probably mainly with regards to application vs. library distinction. Based on that, I don't think elm-package.json will get this functionality anytime soon.
I think most devs have some node stuff running to handle their dev environment (e.g. webpack stuff) so you will always have package.json available for such scripts anyway.
There is a question about whether elm should embed its dependencies within package.json but, while most dev instances would have package.json, anyone just trying out with elm-reactor would not. So I think the present situation is here to stay, and enables you to do what you want.
Lately I have been wondering if there is any way to use bower or npm only as a consumer.
Let’s say I am not really interested on developing the package further, but simply using it on my website/application.
So as I would first think:
npm install jquery
I have tried with the flag --production but the same structure was downloaded.
However, that brings me a huge tree of files and the only one I would need is the jquery/dist/jquery.min.js file.
Same goes for bower:
bower install jquery
Again, an expensive list of files, including src folder with a lot of dev-only related files.
I am sorry if I am wrongly assuming package managers behaviour here, but it would be interesting to know how to use these package managers as a simple end-user instead a developer in order to keep my project dependencies updated.
At the moment, I feel that it's just too much for what I need, and that by simply copying jquery.min.js over to my project src folder, it would be much cleaner/simpler.
If the concept of both npm and bower is different and someone can point it out it would be appreciated as well as any tips for an alternative package manager that only imports essential production files.
Apparently Volo does exactly what I was looking for following a concept where JS libraries should be kept as one single JS file.
Here, more information about the project’s design goals.