We are trying to create a cross-database query using Azure's preview Elastic Query. So we will be creating an External Table to make these queries happen.
Unfortunately, I have some apprehension about how the queries will be executed. I don't want a query or stored procedure to fail at run-time because the database connection fails. I just don't understand how the External Tables work.
Azure's External Table docs have good information on how to query and create the table. I just can't find information that specifically spells out how the data exists.
Oracle's version of external tables is just flat files that are referenced. SQL*Loader loads data from external files into tables of an Oracle database. I couldn't find any documentation about Azure doing the same. (Is it implied that they are the same? Is that a stupid question?)
If it is this way (external flat files), when the external table gets updated, does SQL Server update the flat files so our external table stays up to date? Or will I have to delete/create the link again every time I want to run the query for up to date information?
Per Microsoft Support:
Elastic queries basically works as remote queries which means the data is not stored locally but is pulled from the source database every time you run a query. When you execute a query on an external table, it makes a connection to the source database and gets the data.
With that being said, you do not have to delete/create the links. Once you have performed these steps, you can access the horizontally partitioned table “mytable” as though it were a local table. Azure SQL Database automatically opens multiple parallel connections to the remote databases where the tables are physically stored, processes the requests on the remote databases, and returns the results.
There is no specific risk associated with using this feature but it is simply like opening connections to the source database so it can pull data. Besides this you can expect some slowness when executing a remote query but nothing that will cause any other issues with the database.
In case any of the database becomes unavailable, queries that are using the affected DB as source or target will experience query cancellations or timeouts.
Related
I have a need to frequently run a large-ish query against a remote Oracle DB, which with my link speed, takes 10+ minutes. Is there a technique that I can use to create a local copy of the data in order to improve performance?
A few notes:
I would just need a local copy of a predetermined set of tables
Being able to schedule an update to run nightly would be a huge bonus
The data generally doesn't need to be refreshed throughout the day, though being able to do a delta update would be nice
I do have remote machines that can access the data much quicker, but I'm not able to install Excel on them to perform the actual work that needs to be done (using SQL Developer is not a problem). But it would be possible to set up an auto download of the data on those machines and then create a task to copy the files to my local machine
I've considered a few ideas so far, such as configuring SQL Developer to automatically pull the data that I need and dump it to Excel (or some other format that I can use to pull the data in from another Excel file), but I thought there might be a better way.
One way is to use the expdp and impdp tools to dump (export) only a subset of the tables :
https://oracle-base.com/articles/10g/oracle-data-pump-10g
But this solution could be quite hard to implement since you must have the tools on your local server and an access to the remote server to launch the export.
I think the simplest solution it to use CTAS (Create Table As Select). This will make a copy of the data from the distant server to you local server. For example if you use a database link called DistantServer, issue on you local server :
DROP TABLE MyTable;
CREATE TABLE MyTable AS SELECT * FROM MyTable#DistantServer;
You can search for Oracle CTAS for more informations.
Then if the CTAS script is correct you can schedule it every night by creating a Oracle JOB on you local server. See DBMS_JOB for older release of Oracle RDBMS or better DBMS_SCHEDULER package.
I need to create a database solely for analytical purposes. The idea here is for it to start off as a 1:1 replica of a current SQL Server database but we will then add in additional tables. The idea here is to be able to have read-write access to a db without dropping anything in production inadvertently.
We would ideally like to set a daily refresh schedule to update all tables in the new tb to match the tables in the live environment.
In terms of the DBMS for the new database, I am very easy - MySQL, SQL Server, PostgreSQL would be great -- I am not hugely familiar with the Google Storage/BigQuery stack but if this is an easy option, I'm open to it.
You could use a standard HA/DR solution with a readable secondary (Availability Groups/mirroring /log shipping).
then have a second database on the new server for your additional tables.
Cloud Storage and BigQuery are not RDBMS services themselves, but could be used in this case to store the backups/exports/dumps from the replica, and then have the analytical work performed on those backups.
Here is an example workflow:
Perform a backup and restore in a different database
Add the new tables in the new database
Export the database as a CSV file on your local machine
Here you could either directly load the CSV file in BigQuery, or upload that file in a Cloud Storage bucket previously created
Query the data
I suggest to take a look at the multiple methods for loading data in BigQuery, as well as the methods for querying against external data sources which may help to determine which database replication/export method might be best for your use case.
I realize that Azure SQL Database does not support doing an insert/select from one db into another, even if they're on the same server. We receive data files from clients and we process and load them into a "load database". Once the load is complete, based upon various rules, we then move the data into a production database of which there are about 20, all clones of each other (the data only goes into one of the databases).
Looking for a solution that will allow us to move the data. There can be 500,000 records in a load file and so moving them one by one is not really feasible.
Have you tried Elastic Query? Here is the Getting Started guide for it. Currently you cannot perform remote writes, but you can always read data from remote tables.
Hope this helps!
Silvia Doomra
I'm working on a legacy project, written for the most part in Delphi 5 before it was upgraded to Delphi 2007. A lot has changed after this upgrade, except the database that's underneath. It still uses MS-Access for data storage.
Now we want to support SQL Server as an alternate database. Still just for single-user situations, although multi-user support will be a feature for the future. And although there won't be many migration problems (see below) when it needs to use a different database, keeping two database structures synchronized is a bit of a problem.
If I would create an SQL script to generate the SQL Server database then I would need a second script to keep the Access database up-to-date too. They don't speak the same dialect. (At least, not for our purposes.) So I need a way to maintain the database structure in a simple way, making sure it can generate both a valid SQL Server database as an Access database. I could write my own tool where I store the database structure inside an XML file, which combined with some smart code and ADOX would generate both database types.
But isn't there already a good tool that can do this?
Note: the application also uses ADO and all queries are just simple select statements. Although it has 50+ tables, there's one root "Document" table and the user selects one of the "documents" in this table. It then collects all records from all tables that are related to this document record and stores them in an in-memory structure. When the user saves the data, it just writes the document record and all changed data back to the database again. Basically, this read/write mechanism of documents is the only database interaction in the whole application. So using a different database is not a big problem.
We will drop the MS-Access database in the future but for now we have 4000 customers using this application. We first need to make sure the whole thing works with SQL Server and we need to continue to maintain the current code. As a result, we will have to support both databases for at least a year.
Take a look at the DB Explorer, there is a trial download too.
OR
Use migration wizard from MS Access to SQL Server
After development in Access (schema changes), use the wizard again.
Use a tool to compare SQL Server schemata.
I am writing code to migrate data from our live Access database to a new Sql Server database which has a different schema with a reorganized structure. This Sql Server database will be used with a new version of our application in development.
I've been writing migrating code in C# that calls Sql Server and Access and transforms the data as required. I migrated for the first time a table which has entries related to new entries of another table that I have not updated recently, and that caused an error because the record in the corresponding table in SQL Server could not be found
So, my SqlServer productions table has data only up to 1/14/09, and I'm continuing to migrate more tables from Access. So I want to write an update method that can figure out what the new stuff is in Access that hasn't been reflected in Sql Server.
My current idea is to write a query on the SQL side which does SELECT Max(RunDate) FROM ProductionRuns, to give me the latest date in that field in the table. On the Access side, I would write a query that does SELECT * FROM ProductionRuns WHERE RunDate > ?, where the parameter is that max date found in SQL Server, and perform my translation step in code, and then insert the new data in Sql Server.
What I'm wondering is, do I have the syntax right for getting the latest date in that Sql Server table? And is there a better way to do this kind of migration of a live database?
Edit: What I've done is make a copy of the current live database. Which I can then migrate without worrying about changes, then use that to test during development, and then I can migrate the latest data whenever the new database and application go live.
I personally would divide the process into two steps.
I would create an exact copy of Access DB in SQLServer and copy all the data
Copy the data from this temporary SQLServer DB to your destination database
In that way you can write set of SQL code to accomplish second step task
Alternatively use SSIS
Generally when you convert data to a new database that will take it's place in porduction, you shut out all users of the database for a period of time, run the migration and turn on the new database. This ensures no changes to the data are made while doing the conversion. Of course I never would have done this using c# either. Data migration is a database task and should have been done in SSIS (or DTS if you have an older version of SQL Server).
If the databse you are converting to is just in development, I would create a backup of the Access database and load the data from there to test the data loading process and to get the data in so you can do the application development. Then when it is time to do the real load, you just close down the real database to users and use it to load from. If you are trying to keep both in synch wile you develop, well I wouldn't do that but if you must, make a nightly backup of the file and load first thing in the morning using your process.
You may want to look at investing in a tool like SQL Data Compare.
I believe it has support for access databases too, and you can download a trial.
I you are happy with you C# code, but it fails because of the constraints in your destination database you temporarily can disable them and then enable after you copy the whole lot.
I am assuming that your destination database is brand new DB with no data, and not used by anyone when the transfer happens
It sounds like you have two problems:
You're migrating data from one database to another.
You're changing your schema.
Doing either of these things is tricky if you are trying to migrate the data while people are using the data.
The simplest approach is to migrate the data based on a static copy of the data, and also to queue updates to that data from the moment you captured the static copy. I don't know how easy this is in Access, but in SQLServer or Oracle you can use the redo logs for this or a manual solution using triggers. The poor-man's way of doing this is to make triggers for all the relevant tables that log the primary key of the records that have changed. Then after the old database is shut off you can iterate over those keys and get those records from the old database and put them into the new database. Just copy the whole record; if the record was deleted then delete it from the new database.
Your problem is compounded by the fact that you can't simply copy the data, you have to transform it. This means you probably have to shut down both databases and re-migrate the records based on the change list. It will take a lot of planning to ensure you get things right and I'd recommend writing a testing script that can validate that the resulting data is correct.
Also I'd ensure that the code for the migration runs inside one of the databases if possible. Otherwise you are copying the data twice and this will significantly harm the performance.