I want below code in my where condition:
Condition statement is like :
ONE DAY PRIOR TO RENEWAL,
Policy has the Newly Independent Discount (RAP16.DSCCD = '366' exists)
AND
AT RENEWAL,
The Newly Independent discount drops (RAP16.DSCCD = '366' dropped)
I tried below code
AND case when tt.ja2_effdt_t = rap01.hmedt_t - 1
then trim(RAP16.DSCCD) = '366'
when trim(rap01.hmedt_t) <> tt.ja2_effdt_t)
then trim(RAP16.DSCCD) <> '366'
end
There is some syntax error in below code, But I am unable to rectify it.
It's generally better to use AND/OR constructions instead of case expressions in the WHERE clause. You probalby want something like:
AND ((tt.ja2_effdt_t = rap01.hmedt_t - 1 AND trim(RAP16.DSCCD) = '366')
AND
(trim(rap01.hmedt_t) <> tt.ja2_effdt_t AND trim(RAP16.DSCCD) <> '366'))
Related
I have the following code running in part of excel data query getting information from excel
`
DateTable.FiscalYear IN (?-1,?)
AND DateTable.Week = ?
AND ProductInformation.Brand = 'Drunk Elephant'
AND StoreInformation.Retailer IN CASE
WHEN ? = 'Boots' THEN ('Boots')
WHEN ? = 'Cult Beauty' THEN ('Cult Beauty')
WHEN ? = 'DTC' THEN ('DTC')
WHEN ? = 'Look Fantastic' THEN ('Look Fantastic')
WHEN ? = 'Space NK' THEN ('Space NK')
ELSE (SELECT
DISTINCT StoreInformation.Retailer
FROM
Sellout
INNER JOIN
ProductInformation
ON
Sellout.EAN = ProductInformation.EAN
INNER JOIN
StoreInformation
ON
sellout.StoreNumber = StoreInformation.StoreNumber
WHERE
ProductInformation.Brand = 'Drunk Elephant')
END
`
The ? are referencing cells in excel to bring back values. The code was running originally running fine with = CASE, but the I had to add in the final else clause, which brings back multiple results, so = no longer works. And putting the IN causes it to break, even if I remove the else and have just IN CASE.
Any ideas how to can run this case in the where clause, working if the result of the CASE is either a single value or a sub-query table?
Thanks in advance!
I have tried it with = CASE and without the ELSE, which work. Adding the ELSE brings back an error saying subquery brings back more then 1 value, which is why i tried with IN instead of =.
But having just IN without the ELSE also causes an error.
I have the following select statement in ABAP:
SELECT munic~mandt VREFER BIS AB ZZELECDATE ZZCERTDATE CONSYEAR ZDIMO ZZONE_M ZZONE_T USAGE_M USAGE_T M2MC M2MT M2RET EXEMPTMCMT EXEMPRET CHARGEMCMT
INTO corresponding fields of table GT_INSTMUNIC_F
FROM ZCI00_INSTMUNIC AS MUNIC
INNER JOIN EVER AS EV on
MUNIC~POD = EV~VREFER(9).
"where EV~BSTATUS = '14' or EV~BSTATUS = '32'.
My problem with the above statement is that does not recognize the substring/offset operation on the 'ON' clause. If i remove the '(9) then
it recognizes the field, otherwise it gives error:
Field ev~refer is unknown. It is neither in one of the specified tables
nor defined by a "DATA" statement. I have also tried doing something similar in the 'Where' clause, receiving a similar error:
LOOP AT gt_instmunic.
clear wa_gt_instmunic_f.
wa_gt_instmunic_f-mandt = gt_instmunic-mandt.
wa_gt_instmunic_f-bis = gt_instmunic-bis.
wa_gt_instmunic_f-ab = gt_instmunic-ab.
wa_gt_instmunic_f-zzelecdate = gt_instmunic-zzelecdate.
wa_gt_instmunic_f-ZZCERTDATE = gt_instmunic-ZZCERTDATE.
wa_gt_instmunic_f-CONSYEAR = gt_instmunic-CONSYEAR.
wa_gt_instmunic_f-ZDIMO = gt_instmunic-ZDIMO.
wa_gt_instmunic_f-ZZONE_M = gt_instmunic-ZZONE_M.
wa_gt_instmunic_f-ZZONE_T = gt_instmunic-ZZONE_T.
wa_gt_instmunic_f-USAGE_M = gt_instmunic-USAGE_M.
wa_gt_instmunic_f-USAGE_T = gt_instmunic-USAGE_T.
temp_pod = gt_instmunic-pod.
SELECT vrefer
FROM ever
INTO wa_gt_instmunic_f-vrefer
WHERE ( vrefer(9) LIKE temp_pod ). " PROBLEM WITH SUBSTRING
"AND ( BSTATUS = '14' OR BSTATUS = '32' ).
ENDSELECT.
WRITE: / sy-dbcnt.
WRITE: / 'wa is: ', wa_gt_instmunic_f.
WRITE: / 'wa-ever is: ', wa_gt_instmunic_f-vrefer.
APPEND wa_gt_instmunic_f TO gt_instmunic_f.
WRITE: / wa_gt_instmunic_f-vrefer.
ENDLOOP.
itab_size = lines( gt_instmunic_f ).
WRITE: / 'Internal table populated with', itab_size, ' lines'.
The basic task i want to implement is to modify a specific field on one table,
pulling values from another. They have a common field ( pod = vrefer(9) ). Thanks in advance for your time.
If you are on a late enough NetWeaver version, it works on 7.51, you can use the OpenSQL function LEFT or SUBSTRING. Your query would look something like:
SELECT munic~mandt VREFER BIS AB ZZELECDATE ZZCERTDATE CONSYEAR ZDIMO ZZONE_M ZZONE_T USAGE_M USAGE_T M2MC M2MT M2RET EXEMPTMCMT EXEMPRET CHARGEMCMT
FROM ZCI00_INSTMUNIC AS MUNIC
INNER JOIN ever AS ev
ON MUNIC~POD EQ LEFT( EV~VREFER, 9 )
INTO corresponding fields of table GT_INSTMUNIC_F.
Note that the INTO clause needs to move to the end of the command as well.
field(9) is a subset operation that is processed by the ABAP environment and can not be translated into a database-level SQL statement (at least not at the moment, but I'd be surprised if it ever will be). Your best bet is either to select the datasets separately and merge them manually (if both are approximately equally large) or pre-select one and use a FAE/IN clause.
They have a common field ( pod = vrefer(9) )
This is a wrong assumption, because they both are not fields, but a field an other thing.
If you really need to do that task through SQL, I'll suggest you to check native SQL sentences like SUBSTRING and check if you can manage to use them within an EXEC_SQL or (better) the CL_SQL* classes.
The data that appears does not match the conditions that have been applied
I implemented SQL code in the Navicat application, and have changed the structure of the code several times but it still doesn't work,
data that is not of ilart condition type
still appears
SELECT SERMAT,ILART,sum(GKSTP) as jumlah
FROM swift_zab_iw39
WHERE ILART='OVH' OR ILART='TST' and SERMAT='024147-000:09052'
GROUP BY ILART,SERMAT
Use IN operator:
WHERE ILART IN('OVH','TST') AND SERMAT = '024147-000:09052'
Add parenthesis to the OR condition in the WHERE clause as:
WHERE (ILART = 'OVH' OR ILART = 'TST') AND SERMAT = '024147-000:09052'
I wrote an Access add-in (VBA) which works perfectly fine on my and other test servers, but on one server I encountered a very strange problem. When I execute the query with the data condition, I get the correct results (which are none). When I add the date condition I get more results than before. These results do not even match with my other conditions. I use the exact same database on both servers.
Here is the Query:
select BE.* from dbo.KHKBuchungserfassung AS BE
left join KHKSachkonten AS SSK on BE.KtoSoll = SSK.SaKto and BE.Mandant = SSK.Mandant
left join KHKSachkonten AS HSK on BE.KtoHaben = HSK.SaKto and BE.Mandant = HSK.Mandant
where ((((BE.KtoSollTyp = 1) or (BE.KtoSollTyp = 2)) and (HSK.Kontenart = 'BF' or HSK.Kontenart = 'BG')) or
(((BE.KtoHabentyp = 1) or (BE.KtoHabentyp = 2)) and (SSK.Kontenart = 'BF' or SSK.Kontenart = 'BG')))
and BE.Mandant= 88 and BE.Buchungsdatum>={d '2016-01-01'} AND BE.Buchungsdatum<={d '2016-06-30'}
If I execute this on that specific server with from date < a specific date ('2016-02-24') it also works perfectly fine (e.g. '2016-01-01' & '2016-06-30'). Any given date higher than this one gives results that violate my first condition... (the one in the parenthesis). I already checked the number of parenthesis. I also rotated the places of the given conditions. In addition to that, I am pretty sure my DBMS would give me an error if there is a problem with my syntax (not sure though).
This is the Result Set:
Dim rs As ADODB.Recordset
sQry = ...
Set rs = goMandant.oData.rsOpenRecordset(sQry, adOpenStatic)
Do Until rs.EOF
...
I am sorry that I can not provide test data due to juridical reasons, but if you would also select SSK.Kontenart and HSK.Kontenart there would be 'NULL' on both sides which is not at all possible in my first condition...
I would also like to note that this is my first question and if I made any mistakes, I would appreciate it if you told me.
Regards
TK
I've got a simple sql query that is trying to update a single row. The code came from some Linq-to-sql code (i used Profiler to grab it), but please don't worry about the source (L2S) ... that's irrelivant to the question.
Now, when i try and do an update with the where clause, I get 0 rows updated.
I then try and do a select with the same where clause. i get a single result back. Ok, so the data is there.
It's only when i turn off some of the where clause statements does the query finally work. I just don't get it :(
I can't really explain it. So I made a video showing this.
Please watch the video on YouTube here.
Can anyone help? It's really weird :(
Database is MS-SQL 2008.
-- UPDATE
The sql i'm trying to execute (after i've cleaned it up from L2S)..
update tblBoardPost
set IsSticky = 1
where IdBoardPost = 1278
and IdAddress = 212787
and Subject = N'ttreterte'
and Banner is null
and UniqueSubject = N'ttreterte5'
AND (NOT ([IsAnnouncement] = 1))
AND (NOT ([IsSticky] = 1))
AND (NOT ([IsLocked] = 1))
and IsVisible = 1
and IdUserModified = 1
AND [IdNewsArticle] IS NULL
AND [IdList] IS NULL
(note: yes, i know the NOT (blah = 1)) is weird, but that's L2S that made that.
Update 2:
The code in the video is being ran in a transaction/rollback trans. this means that if i do run one of those weird scenario's that works, the change works .. but the rollback undoes it .. so when i run it a 2nd time .. the original value has been returned to the db row.
Also, in the vid, the select query is not exactly the same as the update query .. because i've been trying so many permutations (with no luck) .. so by the time i made the vid .. i forgot to show the original code. That said, the same code in both the select statement and the update/where statement (when i copy/paste on my machine) reproduces the exact same probs :(
Update 2 :)
As per Lieven's request, here's the screenshot showing the code and then the results.
alt text http://img196.imageshack.us/img196/7111/lieven.png
I checked your video, and you should try the same SQL conditions, that you used to return one row in your select query, in your update query. The conditions in the two SQL statements in your video aren't the same, and I don't really care why; they're not apples to apples.
Just copy and paste the working WHERE clause over the non-working one.
In the video, your select goes like
and not IsAnnouncement = 1
wich gives entirely different results as in your update
and not (IsAnnouncement = 1)
It seems you are suffering from an operator precedence issue .
Edit
as the queries don't match in your video and although you say they have matched could you copy paste following script and let us know if or if they do not give you the same results? (I for one would have a hard time believing that the rows affected would differ)
begin tran
select *
from tblBoardPost
where
IdBoardPost = 1278
and IdAddress = 212787
and Subject = N'ttreterte'
and Banner is null
and UniqueSubject = N'ttreterte5'
AND (NOT ([IsAnnouncement] = 1))
AND (NOT ([IsSticky] = 1))
AND (NOT ([IsLocked] = 1))
and IsVisible = 1
and IdUserModified = 1
AND [IdNewsArticle] IS NULL
AND [IdList] IS NULL
update tblBoardPost
set IsSticky = 1
where
IdBoardPost = 1278
and IdAddress = 212787
and Subject = N'ttreterte'
and Banner is null
and UniqueSubject = N'ttreterte5'
AND (NOT ([IsAnnouncement] = 1))
AND (NOT ([IsSticky] = 1))
AND (NOT ([IsLocked] = 1))
and IsVisible = 1
and IdUserModified = 1
AND [IdNewsArticle] IS NULL
AND [IdList] IS NULL
rollback tran