The following is a first attempt at learning to simply change the style of an element onPress in react native. Being well versed in web languages I am finding it difficult as it is not as straight forward.
For reasons as yet unknown, the element requires two clicks in order to execute.
export class NavTabItem extends React.Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.state = {
active: false
}
this.NavTabAction = this.NavTabAction.bind(this)
}
NavTabAction = (elem) => {
elem.setState({active: !elem.state.active})
}
render() {
return (
<TouchableOpacity
style={this.state.active ? styles.NavTabItemSelected : styles.NavTabItem}
onPress={()=> {
this.NavTabAction(this)
}}>
<View style={styles.NavTabIcon} />
<Text style={styles.NavTabLabel}>{this.props.children}</Text>
</TouchableOpacity>
);
}
}
Other issues:
I also have not worked out how a means of setting the active state to false for other elements under the parent on click.
Additionally, Is there a simple way to affect the style of child elements like with the web. At the moment I cannot see a means of a parent style affecting a child element through selectors like you can with CSS
eg. a stylesheet that read NavTabItemSelected Text :{ // active style for <Text> }
Instead of calling elem.setState or elem.state, it should be this.setState and elem.state.
NavTabAction = (elem) => {
this.setState(prev => ({...prev, active: !prev.active}))
}
And instead of passing this in the onPress, you should just pass the function's reference.
onPress={this.NavTabAction}>
You should also remove this line because you are using arrow function
// no need to bind when using arrow functions
this.NavTabAction = this.NavTabAction.bind(this)
Additionally, Is there a simple way to affect the style of child elements like with the web
You could check styled-component, but I think that feature don't exists yet for react native. What you should do is pass props down to child components.
Thanks to everyone for their help with this and sorting out some other bits and pieces with the code.
The issue in question however was that the style was changing on the second click. A few hours later and I have a cause and a solution for anyone suffering from this. Should any of the far more experienced people who have answered this question believe this answer is incorrect or they have a better one, please post it but for now here is the only way I have found to fix it.
The cause:
Using setState was correctly re rendering the variables. This could both be seen in the console via console.log() and directly outputted in the render making them visible.
However, no matter what was tried, this did not update the style. Whether it was a style name from the Stylesheet or inline styles, they would update on the second click rather than the first but still to the parameters of the first. So if the first click should make a button turn from red to green, it would not do so even though the new state had rendered. However if a subsequent click should have turned the button back to red then the button would now go green (like it should have for the first click). It would then go red on the third click seemingly always one step behind the status passed to it.
Solution
To fix this, take the style off the the primary element (forgive terminology, someone edit), in my case, the TouchableOpacity element. Add in a child View element and place the styles on that View element instead along with the ternary operator and wallah.
It seems any change to status on the effective master element or container if you prefer, only takes affect after another render, not that contained in setStatus.
Final code:
export class NavTabItem extends React.Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.state = {
active: false
}
}
NavTabAction = () => {
this.setState({active: !this.state.active})
}
render() {
this.state.active == true ? console.log("selected") : console.log("unselected")
return (
<TouchableOpacity onPress={this.NavTabAction}>
// added View containing style and ternary operator
<View style={this.state.active == true ? styles.NavTabItemSelected : styles.NavTabItem}>
<View style={styles.NavTabIcon} />
<TextCap11 style={styles.NavTabLabel}>{this.props.children}</TextCap11>
</View>
// End added view
</TouchableOpacity>
);
}
}
In this example, I have this react class:
class MyDiv extends React.component
constructor(){
this.state={sampleState:'hello world'}
}
render(){
return <div>{this.state.sampleState}
}
}
The question is if I can add React hooks to this. I understand that React-Hooks is alternative to React Class style. But if I wish to slowly migrate into React hooks, can I add useful hooks into Classes?
High order components are how we have been doing this type of thing until hooks came along. You can write a simple high order component wrapper for your hook.
function withMyHook(Component) {
return function WrappedComponent(props) {
const myHookValue = useMyHook();
return <Component {...props} myHookValue={myHookValue} />;
}
}
While this isn't truly using a hook directly from a class component, this will at least allow you to use the logic of your hook from a class component, without refactoring.
class MyComponent extends React.Component {
render(){
const myHookValue = this.props.myHookValue;
return <div>{myHookValue}</div>;
}
}
export default withMyHook(MyComponent);
Class components don't support hooks -
According to the Hooks-FAQ:
You canβt use Hooks inside of a class component, but you can definitely mix classes and function components with Hooks in a single tree. Whether a component is a class or a function that uses Hooks is an implementation detail of that component. In the longer term, we expect Hooks to be the primary way people write React components.
As other answers already explain, hooks API was designed to provide function components with functionality that currently is available only in class components. Hooks aren't supposed to used in class components.
Class components can be written to make easier a migration to function components.
With a single state:
class MyDiv extends Component {
state = {sampleState: 'hello world'};
render(){
const { state } = this;
const setState = state => this.setState(state);
return <div onClick={() => setState({sampleState: 1})}>{state.sampleState}</div>;
}
}
is converted to
const MyDiv = () => {
const [state, setState] = useState({sampleState: 'hello world'});
return <div onClick={() => setState({sampleState: 1})}>{state.sampleState}</div>;
}
Notice that useState state setter doesn't merge state properties automatically, this should be covered with setState(prevState => ({ ...prevState, foo: 1 }));
With multiple states:
class MyDiv extends Component {
state = {sampleState: 'hello world'};
render(){
const { sampleState } = this.state;
const setSampleState = sampleState => this.setState({ sampleState });
return <div onClick={() => setSampleState(1)}>{sampleState}</div>;
}
}
is converted to
const MyDiv = () => {
const [sampleState, setSampleState] = useState('hello world');
return <div onClick={() => setSampleState(1)}>{sampleState}</div>;
}
Complementing Joel Cox's good answer
Render Props also enable the usage of Hooks inside class components, if more flexibility is needed:
class MyDiv extends React.Component {
render() {
return (
<HookWrapper
// pass state/props from inside of MyDiv to Hook
someProp={42}
// process Hook return value
render={hookValue => <div>Hello World! {hookValue}</div>}
/>
);
}
}
function HookWrapper({ someProp, render }) {
const hookValue = useCustomHook(someProp);
return render(hookValue);
}
For side effect Hooks without return value:
function HookWrapper({ someProp }) {
useCustomHook(someProp);
return null;
}
// ... usage
<HookWrapper someProp={42} />
Source: React Training
you can achieve this by generic High order components
HOC
import React from 'react';
const withHook = (Component, useHook, hookName = 'hookvalue') => {
return function WrappedComponent(props) {
const hookValue = useHook();
return <Component {...props} {...{[hookName]: hookValue}} />;
};
};
export default withHook;
Usage
class MyComponent extends React.Component {
render(){
const myUseHookValue = this.props.myUseHookValue;
return <div>{myUseHookValue}</div>;
}
}
export default withHook(MyComponent, useHook, 'myUseHookValue');
Hooks are not meant to be used for classes but rather functions. If you wish to use hooks, you can start by writing new code as functional components with hooks
According to React FAQs
You canβt use Hooks inside of a class component, but you can
definitely mix classes and function components with Hooks in a single
tree. Whether a component is a class or a function that uses Hooks is
an implementation detail of that component. In the longer term, we
expect Hooks to be the primary way people write React components.
const MyDiv = () => {
const [sampleState, setState] = useState('hello world');
render(){
return <div>{sampleState}</div>
}
}
You can use the react-universal-hooks library. It lets you use the "useXXX" functions within the render function of class-components.
It's worked great for me so far. The only issue is that since it doesn't use the official hooks, the values don't show react-devtools.
To get around this, I created an equivalent by wrapping the hooks, and having them store their data (using object-mutation to prevent re-renders) on component.state.hookValues. (you can access the component by auto-wrapping the component render functions, to run set currentCompBeingRendered = this)
For more info on this issue (and details on the workaround), see here: https://github.com/salvoravida/react-universal-hooks/issues/7
Stateful components or containers or class-based components ever support the functions of React Hooks, so we don't need to React Hooks in Stateful components just in stateless components.
Some additional informations
What are React Hooks?
So what are hooks? Well hooks are a new way or offer us a new way of writing our components.
Thus far, of course we have functional and class-based components, right? Functional components receive props and you return some JSX code that should be rendered to the screen.
They are great for presentation, so for rendering the UI part, not so much about the business logic and they are typically focused on one or a few purposes per component.
Class-based components on the other hand also will receive props but they also have this internal state. Therefore class-based components are the components which actually hold the majority of our business logic, so with business logic, I mean things like we make an HTTP request and we need to handle the response and to change the internal state of the app or maybe even without HTTP. A user fills out the form and we want to show this somewhere on the screen, we need state for this, we need class-based components for this and therefore we also typically use class based components to orchestrate our other components and pass our state down as props to functional components for example.
Now one problem we have with this separation, with all the benefits it adds but one problem we have is that converting from one component form to the other is annoying. It's not really difficult but it is annoying.
If you ever found yourself in a situation where you needed to convert a functional component into a class-based one, it's a lot of typing and a lot of typing of always the same things, so it's annoying.
A bigger problem in quotation marks is that lifecycle hooks can be hard to use right.
Obviously, it's not hard to add componentDidMount and execute some code in there but knowing which lifecycle hook to use, when and how to use it correctly, that can be challenging especially in more complex applications and anyways, wouldn't it be nice if we had one way of creating components and that super component could then handle both state and side effects like HTTP requests and also render the user interface?
Well, this is exactly what hooks are all about. Hooks give us a new way of creating functional components and that is important.
React Hooks let you use react features and lifecycle without writing a class.
It's like the equivalent version of the class component with much smaller and readable form factor. You should migrate to React hooks because it's fun to write it.
But you can't write react hooks inside a class component, as it's introduced for functional component.
This can be easily converted to :
class MyDiv extends React.component
constructor(){
this.state={sampleState:'hello world'}
}
render(){
return <div>{this.state.sampleState}
}
}
const MyDiv = () => {
const [sampleState, setSampleState] = useState('hello world');
return <div>{sampleState}</div>
}
It won't be possible with your existing class components. You'll have to convert your class component into a functional component and then do something on the lines of -
function MyDiv() {
const [sampleState, setSampleState] = useState('hello world');
return (
<div>{sampleState}</div>
)
}
For me React.createRef() was helpful.
ex.:
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.myRef = React.createRef();
}
...
<FunctionComponent ref={this.myRef} />
Origin post here.
I've made a library for this. React Hookable Component.
Usage is very simple. Replace extends Component or extends PureComponent with extends HookableComponent or extends HookablePureComponent. You can then use hooks in the render() method.
import { HookableComponent } from 'react-hookable-component';
// ππππππππ
class ComponentThatUsesHook extends HookableComponent<Props, State> {
render() {
// ππππππ
const value = useSomeHook();
return <span>The value is {value}</span>;
}
}
if you didn't need to change your class component then create another functional component and do hook stuff and import it to class component
Doesn't work anymore in modern React Versions. Took me forever, but finally resulted going back to go ol' callbacks. Only thing that worked for me, all other's threw the know React Hook Call (outside functional component) error.
Non-React or React Context:
class WhateverClass {
private xyzHook: (XyzHookContextI) | undefined
public setHookAccessor (xyzHook: XyzHookContextI): void {
this.xyzHook = xyzHook
}
executeHook (): void {
const hookResult = this.xyzHook?.specificHookFunction()
...
}
}
export const Whatever = new WhateverClass() // singleton
Your hook (or your wrapper for an external Hook)
export interface XyzHookContextI {
specificHookFunction: () => Promise<string>
}
const XyzHookContext = createContext<XyzHookContextI>(undefined as any)
export function useXyzHook (): XyzHookContextI {
return useContext(XyzHookContextI)
}
export function XyzHook (props: PropsWithChildren<{}>): JSX.Element | null {
async function specificHookFunction (): Promise<void> {
...
}
const context: XyzHookContextI = {
specificHookFunction
}
// and here comes the magic in wiring that hook up with the non function component context via callback
Whatever.setHookAccessor(context)
return (
< XyzHookContext.Provider value={context}>
{props.children}
</XyzHookContext.Provider>
)
}
Voila, now you can use ANY react code (via hook) from any other context (class components, vanilla-js, β¦)!
(β¦hope I didn't make to many name change mistakes :P)
Yes, but not directly.
Try react-iifc, more details in its readme.
https://github.com/EnixCoda/react-iifc
Try with-component-hooks:
https://github.com/bplok20010/with-component-hooks
import withComponentHooks from 'with-component-hooks';
class MyComponent extends React.Component {
render(){
const props = this.props;
const [counter, set] = React.useState(0);
//TODO...
}
}
export default withComponentHooks(MyComponent)
2.Try react-iifcοΌ https://github.com/EnixCoda/react-iifc
Hi I am looking for the solution to change text dynamically.
I am writing code to show processing results on screen.
After some googling, I found there is a code to update text dynamically as follows.
But I would like to update text without any internal event. I want to change text from outside of the class. But I don't know how to implement it as I am a javascript and react-native beginner. There are other classes to process some functions so that I need to show the updated results using Results class which is an another component of the screen.
How can I deliver 'result' to Results class and how to update it dynamically and automatically?
class Results extends Component {
constructor() {
super()
this.state = {
log: 'Processing results'
}
}
updateText = (result) => {
this.setState({log: result})
}
render() {
return (
<View>
<Text onPress = {this.updateText}>
{this.state.log}
</Text>
</View>
)
}
}
This sounds to me that props can solve your problem.
Basically when you try to render Results class, pass along the value as a prop like below:
<Results dynamicText='HI' />
Then, from your Results class, access this external value via this.props.dynamicText as below
class Results extends Component {
render() {
return (
<View>
<Text>
{this.props.dynamicText}
</Text>
</View>
)
}
}
In addition to what #Issac answered, you can also hook up your current class to Redux and dispatch actions from another class to force state changes.
React Native and ReactJS has a different concept of how classes react to each other. Most other languages use inheritance based interactions to affect changes in classes other than itself. React itself is more composition based where changing the value/state/variable of one class requires either a state change or a prop change. The caveat to that us using Redux, which utilizes an overarching Store where any component that's connected to it can pull values or dispatch actions to change values.
I'm trying to figure out the best place to manage the state for lists of input in react-native but haven't found any good, thorough examples or clear guidance and I can see a few options.
For simplicity not including specifics about the tool for managing state, as my understanding is how the state is stored doesn't impact the component where it's managed.
Scenario
A screen component that receives an array of items as props to be displayed in a List of ListItems. Each ListItem includes a input, for simplicity imagine a switch (boolean).
Use cases include an array of form questions or settings to be displayed in a list and allowing user input. Pseudocode:
class SettingsView extends Component {
render () {
return (
<View>
<List style={styles.list}>
{this.props.inputArray.map((item, index) => (
<ListItem
title={item.title}
isSwitched={item.value}
key={index}
onSwitchChange = {this.onChange}
/>
))}
</List>
</View>
);
}
}
Option 1
Based on the Thinking in React page, one option that comes to mind is managing state at the Screen (SettingsView) level by creating an array of (inputArray).length in the SettingsView constructor state and have the onChange function update that array based on key.
Option 2
The second option I see is having each ListItem manage the state it's displaying. This makes sense from an encapsulation perspective to me, but then less so for managing of the state, given that the onSwitchChange function is in the SettingsView and I'm not as clear how this would work.
Are there other options I'm not considering? Admit that experience in React/RN is limited and def coming from a more object mindset like iOS's list datasource model.
Note: Another option is having the entire inputArray in state, instead of passed as props. My understanding is that state should be minimized, so was designing that only the inputs to each item in inputArray should be in the state. i.e. Form Labels (i.e. questions) are props not state.
Option 1 would be the better choice, there is this concept "Smart Components and Dumb Components"
Smart Components: typically holds the state of all the child components associated with it, it also defines the functions that is passed down to child components to modify its state.
Dumb Components: These are components that receives props which includes data and functions they typically don't have their own state and relies heavily on the parent component.
The problem is that when you create a component you need to decide whether it's smart or dumb, usually I associate a screen to a smart component, in your example it would be the SettingsView(smart) that will hold the state and function and it's children will be the dumb components but this is really application specific decision because you might have a SettingsView that are dynamic based on context and so it would be much better to make it a dumb component let's use your example above
Since Settings View relies on this.props.inputArray passed from a parent
component(I will call this ParentComponent) you couldn't modify
inputArray directly in SettingsView what you could do is pass another prop from
ParentComponent to SettingsView which is a function that modifies inputArray
class ParentComponent extends Component {
constructor(props) {
super(props);
this.state = {
inputArray: [],
};
this.onSwitchChange = this.onSwitchChange.bind(this); // when passing fn
}
onSwitchChange(index) { // index will come from the child component
// do some logic here based on the index then update the state
this.setState('inputArray' updatedState); // updatedState is just an example variable
}
render() {
return (
<View>
<SettingsView
onSwitchChange={(index) => () => this.onSwitchChange(index)}
inputArray={this.state.inputArray}
/>
</View>
);
}
/*
(index) => () => this.onSwitchChange(index)
this is a function that will return another function
we need this because we want to delay the execution of onSwitchChange
and capture index and associate it with that method, typically this
is used if were passing function to child component(SettingsView) which will be used as
a handler for events.
*/
}
class SettingsView extends Component {
render () {
return (
<View>
<List style={styles.list}>
{this.props.inputArray.map((item, index) => (
<ListItem
title={item.title}
isSwitched={item.value}
key={index}
onSwitchChange={this.props.onSwitchChange}
/>
))}
</List>
</View>
);
}
}
This example might be pointless because you could just use SettingsView as the parent of ListItem and other components but since SettingsView state is now managed by ParentComponent it is now a dumb component and can be used in other screens that have the specific state that SettingsView needs to operate. the general goal is to create as many dumb components as possible the reason being is that these type of components are highly reusable because you just need to pass them props to properly work.
I have a component and I want to call a method checking the state whenever it changes. This is my component with a dummy method to demonstrate what I want to do (animate the view offscreen if onboarding.show === false):
export class Onboarding extends Component {
animateView() {
// i want to call this method when
// the state changes
// something like;
if (!this.props.onboarding.show) {
Animated.spring(...);
}
}
render() {
const { onboarding, finish } = this.props;
return (
<Animated.View>
...
</Animated.View>
);
}
}
...
export default connect(
state => {
return {
onboarding: state.onboarding,
};
},
dispatch => {
return {
};
}
)(Onboarding);
Is there a way to subscribe to the changes in state?
== UPDATE ==
as requested, here's what my slideOffScreen method does:
slideOffScreen() {
Animated.timing(this.state.offsetX, {
toValue: -Dimensions.get('window').width,
duration: 350,
easing: Easing.elastic(),
}).start();
}
The react-redux connect method wraps the component with a container component that is aware of the store's state changes. Whenever the state changes, connect re-renders the wrapped component (Onboarding in your case).
According to the redux docs:
Technically, a container component is just a React component that uses
store.subscribe() to read a part of the Redux state tree and supply
props to a presentational component it renders. You could write a
container component by hand, but we suggest instead generating
container components with the React Redux library's connect()
function, which provides many useful optimizations to prevent
unnecessary re-renders.
If your component doesn't re-rendered when the state changes, check if you're not mutating the state instead of replacing it. Redux checks if the state changed by shallowly comparing the old state, and the new state (comparing only the references, and not the values).
For example, to add an item to an array, you can't use array.push(item) because that won't create a new array, just mutate the existing one. Instead you'll have to use something like array.concat(item), which does.
To update objects, you can see in the redux docs under handling actios example, you can see that to create a new state:
We don't mutate the state. We create a copy with Object.assign().
Object.assign(state, { visibilityFilter: action.filter }) is also
wrong: it will mutate the first argument. You must supply an empty
object as the first parameter. You can also enable the object spread
operator proposal to write { ...state, ...newState } instead.
Looks like this works:
componentWillReceiveProps(props) {
if (!props.onboarding.show) {
this.slideOffScreen();
}
}
not sure if there's a way to do it through the redux API