Seems that the SaveChanges() only saves the last object added into the table:
static void Main(string[] args)
{
Category c = new Category();
using (GenericDBEntities db = new GenericDBEntities())
{
foreach (Match i in db.Matches)
{
if (!db.Categories.Any())
{
c.CategoryInternalId = i.CategoryId;
c.CategoryName = i.CategoryName;
c.SportId = i.SportId;
db.Categories.Add(c);
}
else
{
foreach (Category a in db.Categories)
{
if (i.CategoryId != a.CategoryInternalId)
{
c.CategoryInternalId = i.CategoryId;
c.CategoryName = i.CategoryName;
c.SportId = i.SportId;
db.Categories.Add(c);
}
else
{
return;
}
}
}
}
db.SaveChanges();
I have tried it in a few different ways which all have the same or less result, the for loop saves them all, no matter if condition is met or not. Why is it only saving the last object of the Match table? What am I missing?
Clarification: The task is to go through Match table, which has duplicate CategoryIDs and to, if it is not already in the Category table, add it, so it won't store duplicates again, the problem is Category table is initially empty, hence the newbie logic, still learnin'!
You need to create the Category object for each inserted category, otherwise you have just one category object which you are editing all the time and hence just this one (the last edit) will be saved to the DB.
If you want to add all new categories from Matches based on CategoryId you can use something like this:
using (GenericDBEntities db = new GenericDBEntities())
{
var newCategories = db.Matches
.Where(m => !db.Categories
.Select(c => c.CategoryInternalId)
.Distinct().Contains(m.CategoryId))
.Select(m => new { m.CategoryId, m.CategoryName, m.SportId })
.GroupBy(m => m.otherid)
.Select(g => g.FirstOrDefault())
.ToList();
foreach (var i in newCategories)
{
var c = new Category()
{
CategoryInternalId = i.CategoryId,
CategoryName = i.CategoryName,
SportId = i.SportId
};
db.Categories.Add(c);
}
db.SaveChanges();
}
Now you'll get all the new categories from the Matches table in one go. This is a first draft, meaning that the performance can be further tuned if needed.
Related
I have 2 lists of IDs and I need to return a list with the products that aren't in any of those lists:
public IEnumerable<Produto> GetProdutosIdNotInFamily(Guid produtoId)
{
var produtosPai = GetListaPaisId(produtoId);
var produtosFilho = GetListaFilhosId(produtoId);
var prod = _dbContext.Produtos
.Where(u => !produtosPai.Any(p => p.ProdutoFilhoId == u.Id)
&& !produtosFilho.Any(p => p.ProdutoFilhoId == u.Id));
return prod;
}
You can do this in two ways -- One using Contains and other using Any like you provided in your snippet in the post.
Using Contains Method
If you want to use Contains() method, you may be pulling out all the product Ids into a collection and apply LINQ on top of it and get the list that is not part of both your reference lists. Sample code is as shown below
// This is the sample model I am dealing with
public class Dummy
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
}
// Assuming the below call returns list of 'Dummy' objects
var products = _dbContext.Produtos;
// list1 & list2 are populated in your case already through the method calls
var exclusionList1 = list1.Select(x => x.Id).ToList<int>();
var exclusionList2 = list2.Select(x => x.Id).ToList<int>();
var myList = products.Where(x => !exclusionList1.Contains(x.Id) && !exclusionList1.Contains(x.Id)).ToList();
Contains is an instance method and takes an object as a parameter and the time complexity depends on the collection you're using this on.
Using Any
Just like Where, Any is an extension method. It takes a delegate as a parameter which gives you greater flexibility and control with respect to what you would want to do.
Applying Any to your scenario is as shown below:
var products = _dbContext.Produtos;
var exclusionList1 = GetListaPaisId(produtoId);
var exclusionList2 = GetListaFilhosId(produtoId);
var prod = _dbContext.Produtos.Where(x => !exclusionList1.Any(z => x.Id == z.Id) &&
!exclusionList2.Any(z => x.Id == z.Id)).ToList();
You can choose your approach based on the context under which you are performing this operation.
In ravendb, I'm trying to address a race condition where many urls can be added to a single document at the same time. In order to do this safely (and not create duplicate entries in the collection), I need the condition check and array push to happen atomically at the database. For example, the structure might look like this:
public class MyData
{
public string Id { get; set; }
public List<string> Urls { get; set; }
}
Assume all three of these operations happen asynchronously:
AddValue("foo");
AddValue("bar");
AddValue("foo");
I was looking at Patch, but I'm not seeing how to add in the condition. Could someone show me an example of how I might do this?
Update
Here is what I'm currently using
var listing = _session.Query<ListingData>()
.Where(l => l.ListingId == listingId && l.OwnerId == userId)
.ToList().SingleOrDefault();
if (listing == null)
return DataResult.NotFound;
_session.Advanced.Patch(
listing,
l => l.PhotoUrls,
urls => urls.Add(url));
_session.SaveChanges();
This seems to work for now if everything goes perfectly, but if there were cases were, for example, a application-side retry based on a false negative were to occur, then I think I would end up with duplicates because
There's a round trip I have to do in order to get the entity/id
The operation simply adds the value without checking to see if it exists first
Just use a patch script.
using (var session = store.OpenSession())
{
var listing = _session.Query<ListingData>()
.Where(l => l.ListingId == listingId && l.OwnerId == userId)
.ToList().SingleOrDefault();
session.Advanced.Defer(new PatchCommandData(
id: listing.ListingId,
changeVector: null,
patch: new PatchRequest
{
Script = #"
if (this.PhotoUrls.includes(url))
throw ‘Url already exists’;
this.PhotoUrls.push($newUrl);
",
Values =
{
["newUrl"] = "The Url to add"
}
},
patchIfMissing: null));
session.SaveChanges();
}
See:
https://ravendb.net/docs/article-page/4.1/csharp/client-api/operations/patching/single-document#non-typed-session-api
https://github.com/ravendb/book/blob/v4.0/Ch04/Ch04.md#patching-documents-and-concurrent-modifications
Can someone please have a look at my code, I think there must be a way to optimize the foreach piece of code?
I have a database with Artists, each artist has multiple songTitles (called Titles), and each Title can have multiple Meanings.
Artist [1..*] Title [1..*] Meaning [0..*]
I want to find the count of Meanings, per Title, for an Artist, and return it as a new ViewModel List.
public class TitleVM
{
public int TitleID { get; set; }
public int MeaningCount { get; set; }
}
public List<TitleVM> GetTitlesByArtistID(int artistID)
{
//find the artist by ID
var titles = context.Titles.Where(x => x.ArtistID == artistID);
//create new VMList to be returned
var titleVMList = new List<TitleVM>();
//loop through each title,
foreach (var item in titles)
{
//find the number of meanings,
var count = 0;
if (item.Meanings != null && item.Meanings.Count > 0)
{
count = item.Meanings.Count();
}
// and map it to VM, add to list
titleVMList.Add(new TitleVM
{
TitleID = TitleID,
MeaningCount = count
});
}
return titleVMList;
}
I thought mapping it would be easiest, but have no idea how to map a viewmodel with lists in this way.
In my project I use Omu.ValueInjecter for mapping basic models, because Automapper needs full trust to run, and my host doesn't allow it.
Let me know if more information is needed.
Ok I read that its better to do an .AddRange then adding the the item with .Add each time.
I got my code down to the below:
public int CountMeanings(IEnumerable<Meaning> meanings)
{
if (meanings != null && meanings.Count() > 0)
return meanings.Count();
return 0;
}
public List<TitleVM> GetTitlesByArtistID(int artistID)
{
var titleVMList = new List<TitleVM>();
var titles = context.Titles.Where(x => x.ArtistID == artistID).AsEnumerable();
titleVMList.AddRange(titles.Select(item => new TitleVM {
TitleID = item.TitleID,
MeaningCount = CountMeanings(item.Meanings)
}));
return titleVMList;
}
I'm trying to do a sum of a count of a child collection in a Raven query. It is returning a count of 0. If I use the same LINQ on the object directly, then it works with a count of 2.
Is this query possible with auto-indexing on Raven? If I need to create a map-reduce index, can someone help me with that?
[TestMethod]
public void CalculateUserClickCount()
{
var db = new EmbeddableDocumentStore { RunInMemory = true };
db.Initialize();
using (var session = db.OpenSession())
{
var user = new User();
var product = new Product();
product.Clicks.Add(new Click());
product.Clicks.Add(new Click());
user.Storefront.EndoProducts.Add(product);
session.Store(user);
session.SaveChanges();
var users = session.Query<User>()
.Customize(t => t.WaitForNonStaleResults())
.Select(t => new
{
StoreFrontId = t.Storefront.StorefrontID,
itemCount = t.Storefront.EndoProducts.Count,
updateDate = t.Storefront.LastUpdateDate,
clickCount = t.Storefront.EndoProducts.Sum(r => r.Clicks.Count), // this is improperly set to 0
TotalAffiliateRevenue = t.Storefront.SaleReports.Sum(r => r.TotalAffiliateEarnings) // this works
})
.ToList();
int clickCount = user.Storefront.EndoProducts.Sum(t => t.Clicks.Count); // this is properly set to 2
Assert.AreEqual(2, users[0].clickCount);
}
}
You don't need a map/reduce for this, because you are only operating on a single document at any time.
What you do need it s transform results, most probably, to do this.
I'm having a Entity-Set Countries, reflecting a database table '<'char(2),char(3),nvarchar(50> in my database.
Im having a parser that returns a Country[] array of parsed countries, and is having issues with getting it updated in the right way. What i want is: Take the array of countries, for those countries not already in the database insert them, and those existing update if any fields is different. How can this be done?
void Method(object sender, DocumentLoadedEvent e)
{
var data = e.ParsedData as Country[];
using(var db = new DataContractEntities)
{
//Code missing
}
}
I was thinking something like
for(var c in data.Except(db.Countries)) but it wount work as it compares on wronge fields.
Hope anyone have had this issues before, and have a solution for me. If i cant use the Country object and insert/update an array of them easy, i dont see much benefict of using the framework, as from performers i think its faster to write a custom sql script that inserts them instead of ect checking if an country is already in the database before inserting?
Solution
See answer of post instead.
I added override equals to my country class:
public partial class Country
{
public override bool Equals(object obj)
{
if (obj is Country)
{
var country = obj as Country;
return this.CountryTreeLetter.Equals(country.CountryTreeLetter);
}
return false;
}
public override int GetHashCode()
{
int hash = 13;
hash = hash * 7 + (int)CountryTreeLetter[0];
hash = hash * 7 + (int)CountryTreeLetter[1];
hash = hash * 7 + (int)CountryTreeLetter[2];
return hash;
}
}
and then did:
var data = e.ParsedData as Country[];
using (var db = new entities())
{
foreach (var item in data.Except(db.Countries))
{
db.AddToCountries(item);
}
db.SaveChanges();
}
I would do it straightforward:
void Method(object sender, DocumentLoadedEvent e)
{
var data = e.ParsedData as Country[];
using(var db = new DataContractEntities)
{
foreach(var country in data)
{
var countryInDb = db.Countries
.Where(c => c.Name == country.Name) // or whatever your key is
.SingleOrDefault();
if (countryInDb != null)
db.Countries.ApplyCurrentValues(country);
else
db.Countries.AddObject(country);
}
db.SaveChanges();
}
}
I don't know how often your application must run this or how many countries your world has. But I have the feeling that this is nothing where you must think about sophisticated performance optimizations.
Edit
Alternative approach which would issue only one query:
void Method(object sender, DocumentLoadedEvent e)
{
var data = e.ParsedData as Country[];
using(var db = new DataContractEntities)
{
var names = data.Select(c => c.Name);
var countriesInDb = db.Countries
.Where(c => names.Contains(c.Name))
.ToList(); // single DB query
foreach(var country in data)
{
var countryInDb = countriesInDb
.SingleOrDefault(c => c.Name == country.Name); // runs in memory
if (countryInDb != null)
db.Countries.ApplyCurrentValues(country);
else
db.Countries.AddObject(country);
}
db.SaveChanges();
}
}
The modern form, using later EF versions would be:
context.Entry(record).State = (AlreadyExists ? EntityState.Modified : EntityState.Added);
context.SaveChanges();
AlreadyExists can come from checking the key or by querying the database to see whether the item already exists there.
You can implement your own IEqualityComparer<Country> and pass that to the Except() method. Assuming your Country object has Id and Name properties, one example of that implementation could look like this:
public class CountryComparer : IEqualityComparer<Country>
{
public bool Equals(Country x, Country y)
{
return x.Name.Equals(y.Name) && (x.Id == y.Id);
}
public int GetHashCode(Country obj)
{
return string.Format("{0}{1}", obj.Id, obj.Name).GetHashCode();
}
}
and use it as
data.Countries.Except<Country>(db, new CountryComparer());
Although, in your case it looks like you just need to extract new objects, you can use var newCountries = data.Where(c => c.Id == Guid.Empty); if your Id is Guid.
The best way is to inspect the Country.EntityState property and take actions from there regarding on value (Detached, Modified, Added, etc.)
You need to provide more information on what your data collection contains i.e. are the Country objects retrieved from a database through the entityframework, in which case their context can be tracked, or are you generating them using some other way.
I am not sure this will be the best solution but I think you have to get all countries from DB then check it with your parsed data
void Method(object sender, DocumentLoadedEvent e)
{
var data = e.ParsedData as Country[];
using(var db = new DataContractEntities)
{
List<Country> mycountries = db.Countries.ToList();
foreach(var PC in data)
{
if(mycountries.Any( C => C.Name==PC.Name ))
{
var country = mycountries.Any( C => C.Name==PC.Name );
//Update it here
}
else
{
var newcountry = Country.CreateCountry(PC.Name);//you must provide all required parameters
newcountry.Name = PC.Name;
db.AddToCountries(newcountry)
}
}
db.SaveChanges();
}
}