I am trying to create some files based on content types set in a library that triggers when item is added to a list.
I am using as an action based on a tutorial that i found the "create item" and i place "Documents" on the list selection so the flow gives me the content type Id and all other columns that are needed.
All looks fine but i get an error of:
To add an item to a document library, use
SPFileCollection.Add()\r\nclientRequestId:
b008247b-f143-44a7-b914-316fcd9eb7d0\r\nserviceRequestId:
df3cbf9e-00cc-8000-97f0-36e3a5627bdb
Is there anything that i can do to edit the flow?
You can upload your own template file to your content types. After that you set up your flow as follows:
Item in list created (trigger action)
Get your file content using "get file content" action (you can of course use several
content types with different template files)
Create a new file using the "Create file" action giving it the file Content of your
previous action
Related
I am trying to create some variables similar to the predefined ones that come with the IntelliJ templating system. I am looking to create a variable called $MY_NAME_AND_EMAIL where I can define it once and then reference it in different templates. Is this possible?
I have tried creating an include called AuthorName.txt:
#set($MY_NAME_AND_EMAIL = "Name <email#example.com>")
Then, in one of my templates, I put the following line at the top:
#parse("AuthorName.txt")
Further down the file, I use ${MY_NAME_AND_EMAIL} in the header. However, when I create a new file base on that template, it still prompts me for the name and email field, even though I set it in an include file and added the #parse directive. What am I doing wrong?
I would like to know, how can i reuse one template (with one page inside and some variables) multiple times a XWPFDocument object.
My idea is:
load the template once in a XWPFDocument as an template-object
clone/create/copy the template-object with all his styles and headers etc
fill the clone with content
add this clone to the destination-XWPFDocument
I got this work for one single page only.
When i try to clone/create/copy the template-object it will lose all his style informations.
How to copy a paragraph of .docx to another .docx withJava and retain the style
How to copy some content in one .docx to another .docx , using POI without losing format?
POI probably does not support this out of the box, but I have done a similar thing in my project poi-mail-merge, it works with the underlying XML to repeatedly replace markers in a template Microsoft Word document and combine the results into one resulting document.
So it basically duplicates the template document multiple times into the resulting document.
See here for how I do it there, basically I work on the XML body text and do replacements/changes there and then append it onto the result document.
POI Mail Merge propably helps in other cases but in my case it doesn't work.
My Workaround is to update my Template-XWPFDocument to the needed structure first, save it temporarily and read it back into a XWPFDocument-object.
Here the steps:
Read the template-file into a XWPFDocument
Read the records from data-file e.g. csv
Calculate the numbers of pages related to the data-records
Get the Bodyelements-Objects from the Template-XWPFDocument
Create new Bodyelements (depending to the numbers of pages) in the Template-XWPFDocument and replace them with the same Objects that we get before
Save the updated Template-XWPFDocument temporarily
Read the temporarily saved Template into a XWPFDocument
Replace all placeholder and fill them with your CSV-Data
Hope this helps somebody
i have two question
1 - i installed referral program module , and i would like to customise the referralprogram-invitation.html mail template
so i putted the new template under : prestashop_root/themes/my_theme/modules/referralprogram/mails/referralprogram-invitation.html
but i doesn't work !
2 - i would like to add some extra text to the program page of referral program module
so i copied the file already included with the module under
prestashop_root/themes/my_theme/modules/referralprogram/translations/fr.php and I added the new text translation in this form
$_MODULE['<{referralprogram}prestashop>program_MD5'] = 'new text';
and it does not work?!!
You only forgot the language folder. Your mail templates must not be in :
prestashop_root/themes/my_theme/modules/referralprogram/mails/referralprogram-invitation.html
but in
prestashop_root/themes/my_theme/modules/referralprogram/mails/fr/referralprogram-invitation.html
If you want to add text to the program page, you must:
First, make a copy of the file : prestashop_root/modules/referralprogram/views/templates/front/program.tpl to prestashop_root/themes/my_theme/modules/referralprogram/views/templates/front/program.tpl
Then, you need to modify this file and add the text you want, where you want. To be translatable, your text must be added like this {l s='new text' mod='referralprogram'}.
Finally, you need to translate this text via the Localization > Traductions page of your BO and not directly in the fr.php file.
Do not hesitate if you need more information,
Paul.
I have a custom content type with 3 FileFields (plone.app.blob.field.FileField) and I want to get their url's, so i can put them on my custom view and people will be able to download these files.
However, when using Clouseau to test and debug, I call :
context.getFirst_file().absolute_url()
Where getFirst_file() is the accessor to the first file (field called 'first_file').
The url returned is 'http://foo/.../eat.00001', where 'eat.00001' is the object of my custom type that contains the file fields...
The interesting thing is, if I call:
context.getFirst_file().getContentType()
It returns 'application/pdf', which is correct since it's a pdf file.
I'm pretty lost here, any help is appreciated. Thanks in advance!
File fields do not support a absolute_url method; instead, through acquisition you inherit the method from the object itself, hence the results you see. Moreover, calling getFirst_field() will return the actual downloadable contents of the field, not the field itself which could provide such information.
Instead, you should use the at_download script appended to the object URL, followed by the field id:
First File
You can also re-use the Archetypes widget for the field, by passing the field name to the widget method:
<metal:field use-macro="python:context.widget('first_field', mode='view')">
First File
</metal:field>
This will display the file size, icon (if available), the filename and the file mime type.
In both these examples, I assumed the name of the field is 'first_field'.
I am using the Content Organizer feature to move documents of a specific content type into a specific folder in a document library in the same site. I created a content organizaer rule with a property setting that uses the property testcolumn. Testcolumn is a site column defined as a lookup to column on a custom List, testlist, and then added to a site content type. The items in this list are displayed in the Value dropdown list and I can select the specific value I want to use for this rule.
The problem is that I can create and save rules provided that there are no more than 19 items in the testlist list. When I have 20 items in the testlist, it looks like the rule was saved by the UI. If I open the rule and go to edit it, the Value for the testcolumn property is (None). If I look at the item in powershell, the Value property is equal to '0' and not the ID of the item I saved in the UI. If I delete a record in the testlist so that the total number of items drops below 20, I can save the rule without issue. I have tried different combinaitions of items in the list in case it was a text issue, but when I have 20 items or more in the list, the rule is not saved.
I have looked at the ULS logs and it states the "Routing Engine: UpdateRule() has successfully updated the rule, rule.Name=TestRule1" when I save the rule.
Thanks for your help.
The answer is partially listed here. Looks like the page renders the control differently if the number of items is 20 or greater. The content organizer rule creation page does not handle this change and does not show any error when saving the information.
I was able to get around this limitation in the UI by adding the rules through code during my feature creation event. A link to creating rules through code is here.