Run method on component with Vuex - vue.js

I have a Vue component that contains a Leaflet map. For the time being I'm using the event bus pattern to run some Leaflet methods when other components request it:
// in Map.vue
eventBus.$on('invalidateMapSize', () => {
this.map.invalidateSize(true)
})
eventBus.$on('setMapView', (coordinates, zoom) => {
this.map.setView(coordinates, zoom)
})
// in other components
eventBus.$emit('setMapView', [47.6623, 23.6970], 15)
Now I want to transition my app to Vuex and my question is how to achieve the same functionality?

While it is true that there is a trend on using VueX and steering away from the event bus pattern, I personally find both patterns to be complementary.
VueX states match well with Vue component data/props and their derivatives (computed, watch).
But there are cases where you do not manage a state, but really some event: a user click that should trigger a one time action (and you do not care about recording such a change, so a state is useless / overkill for this purpose); a network response that carries temporary data (like a search result); etc.
For these cases, I still use an event bus, since the equivalent feature has been purposefully removed from VueX.
In your situation, it seems to me that it fits well in the latter case: Leaflet does not (only) display static data derived from some states (could be the case of Markers, Tile Layers...), but enables user interactivity where your app can interfere by forcing a view from time to time, based on some events.
Trying to achieve this functionality using states would very probably require recording the last requested map view in a state, watching that state, and triggering a side effect on state change. Then there is an issue when it is requested to re-set the view to the same position...

Related

Wait for dispatch to end in redux

I'm using React Native to build an offline app, and, because I need to pass many data between screens, I decided to use redux. However, I have a doubt concerning the dispatch method. The dispatch method is synchronous right? So what happens when I have code after that dispatch, which depends on the changes that the dispatch made? For example, I have this function:
make_action(){
this.props.dispatch(action());
//rest of the code
}
How can I make sure that the "rest of the code" only runs after the dispatch is completed? Thank you all!!
The short answer is if you want to follow Redux, don't actually put that logic there, where you are indicating with the "rest of the code" comment.
Instead you would use a reducer to handle the result of the action and translate it into a (store) state change. Then you would use the state to drive the impacted view (e.g. container or component), which may be as simple as using that state in its existing render method (if class) or function body (if pure function). Think about the code you are labeling as "rest of the code" and whether it should live in the action itself, state processing (reducer), or the rendered view(s). Typically in a React+Redux app such code as you are proposing would live in one or more of those places, or perhaps it isn't needed at all.
If instead you introduce code where you have the "rest of the code" comment that actually depends on the action having being completed at that point, you are effectively working around (or against) Redux.
Remember that with Redux actions should only return results that are interpreted by reducers to mutate state, which drives views. It's intended to be a unidirectional, cyclical flow of data:
view dispatches action ->
action does something to produce result ->
result is reduced to mutated state, driving updated view ->
... (now we're back to view; repeat)

Vue - Passing data between dynamic components using eventBus?

I have 3 Components in my 'Search' (parent) View; 'SearchForm', 'ResultList', 'DetailPage'. I switch from the SearchForm to the ResultList when I have received a response from the backend.
<keep-alive>
<component v-bind:is="currentComponent"></component>
</keep-alive>
When a response is recieved in my 'SearchForm' I save it to the searchBus;
searchBus.$emit('searchIssue', response.data);
Then, in my ResultList I want to retrieve it again and display the results;
mounted() {
searchBus.$on(['searchIssue'], (search) => {
this.table_items = search;
});
}
I display a loading animation (also a component) until the response is fully loaded and the ResultList is displayed.
Due to the Vue lifecycle everything is working when all components are displayed in one View, as they are already listening when the bus is updated.
Should I choose a different approach? E.g. using v-show or pass the response back to the Parent and inserting it again with a prop (Idk if it would work as not all components have the same props).
Is there a way to use the Bus anyway ? And how could it be solved making it one linear hierarchy and still hide the non-relevant components? (SearchForm -> ResultList -> DetailPage)
Should I choose a different approach?
I thing that is coming time for using Vuex
At the center of every Vuex application is the store. A "store" is
basically a container that holds your application state. There are two
things that make a Vuex store different from a plain global object:
Vuex stores are reactive. When Vue components retrieve state from it, they will reactively and efficiently update if the store's state
changes.
You cannot directly mutate the store's state. The only way to change a store's state is by explicitly committing mutations. This
ensures every state change leaves a track-able record, and enables
tooling that helps us better understand our applications.

Which approach to storing loading processes is preferable?

Can You please help to decide which one of the architectures will be better
(fetching list from API with with react-native, react-redux, redux-thunk)
example
// component
componentDidMount() {
this.props.dispatch(fetchFunction());
}
// thunk action
fetchFunction () {
dispatch START_LOADING
return dispatch (
fetch()
dispatch SUCCESS_LOADING
);
}
OR
example
// component
componentDidMount() {
this.setState({'loading': true})
this.props.dispatch(fetchFunction()).finally(
this.setState({'loading': false})
);
}
//thunk action
fetchFunction () {
return dispatch (
fetch()
dispatch SUCCESS_LOADING
);
}
My idea is about storing "loading process" in local components state? What are bad and good sides of this approaches?
as i see it - example 2:
If loading takes longer time, i can leave component (it gets unmounted) and i will see warning - "changing state on unmounted component"
1 example:
Saves a lot of extra data that i do not need in redux store (also a lot of data i need to exclude from persist), and for example if i have a web store product component, i will have a lot of UI props stored in redux (for example list with 10 products, and each product has it's own buttons with states) :(
BUT i like it because all the logic stays in redux-thunk-actions, and i do not need to care in component how to continue coding after dispatch, whether it was a promise or wasn't example:
this.props.dispatch(fetchFunction()).then(() => {});
or just
this.props.dispatch(fetchFunction());
.. some code
So far I've made simple projects, and both ways worked fine.
Can you please give some advice which way to go for the bigger project?
If components outside of this component's tree need to know about the loading state, then keep the loading state in the store so that those outside components can query that state.
In a large app, whether a components need to know of a given piece of state is something can changes; starting out, Component X has local state because no other components need to know about local state X, but as the app grows, new components, thunks, etc are introduced that do need to know about local state X, and it has to be moved to the store. So to address this, one approach is to put all state in Redux from the beginning so you don't have to worry about unforeseen refactoring of local to global state.
Keeping everything in the redux store also makes debugging easier because you can see all the values in redux devtools rather than having to find individual components to see their local state.

Vuejs: shared states between components

I would like to know the best practice for implementing shared states between components in Vuejs.
Imagine situation A: you have a web app that shows a modal. The modal has the boolean state show. This state should change if the modal OK-button is clicked, but also if any part of the background is clicked, and perhaps even on some server pushed state change. Thus the modal should be able to change the state as should the parent app.
Situation B: you have a web app that shows input fields inside different components that share a common data value. If the user changes value through the field in one component, it should also update in the other. Again both should even update on a server push event.
Questions:
I am right that the correct way to go about this would be to use vuex and make the shared state a store field that is observed by and changed through emitted actions by all components / parents that need to modify that value?
Does that not introduce this kind of dangerous (since hard to handle) magic reactivity that we know from Meteor?
How to best document the flow, what depends on what?
A: For a modal component, I'd say that show should be a prop. So the parent component can control the modal whatever it wants. In this case there is no shared state at all.
The modal itself doesn't need to know anything about the server. If the prop show is true, just display the modal and vice versa.
I think the mask layer is a part of the modal, so when the mask is clicked, the modal emits an event. The parent component receives the event and can decide to hide the modal or not to.
Vue has an official modal example here (thanks #craig_h for mentioning): https://v2.vuejs.org/v2/examples/modal.html
B: Just bind the vuex state to the inputs. Nothing wrong.
Note that not all the components need to access the vuex store directly. For some pure UI components, just use props. So the parent components have the right to control them and increase flexibility.
I recommend you to read these docs:
https://facebook.github.io/react/docs/lifting-state-up.html
https://medium.com/#dan_abramov/smart-and-dumb-components-7ca2f9a7c7d0#.j7ry4a3as
http://redux.js.org/docs/basics/UsageWithReact.html
Yes these are React / Redux docs. Since Vue is relatively young, react community has more documentation / articles. But both Vue and React are component-based libraries. The idea of how you design a component is basically the same.
You can also take a look at this vuex example: https://github.com/vuejs/vuex/tree/dev/examples/chat
This is a very simple example but it does use all the things I mentioned above. Emitting an event, some pure UI components...

Am i implementing redux correctly in my ReactNative app?

I am implementing a mobile application using ReactNative with Redux, the app that i am implementing looks like that:
Login (screen)
|--> Search for an object (screen)
|--> Show that object and edit it (screen)
|--> Take 2 photos (each photo a screen)
|--> A last screen for make a new object and save it
The above flow shows how each screen do their work and pass to the next screen.
My application state is the next:
{
auth: {
logged: false,
token: ''
},
somethingOfSideBar...
}
But i feel i am doing the things in the wrong way, because most of the screens have their own state, by example searchSomethingScreen fetch data from the server, check if it is valid and enable to pass to the next screen. I feel i am not doing the things in the Redux way, it suppose to make actions that change the entire state application, but i feel i do not need more state than i have. For me the global things are auth data and sidebar (because it is present across the entire application).
Should i make actions for every screen change?
Should i put more information in the global state application?
A one more thing, i have a AppContainer component which is used in connect to have access to the store, but i am passing parts of the state and the actions as well as children properties and i feel this is wrong as well.
I feel the Redux Reddit tutorial may be useful to you. It certainly was for me.
But i feel i am doing the things in the wrong way, because most of the screens have their own state, by example searchSomethingScreen fetch data from the server, check if it is valid and enable to pass to the next screen.
Used in the Redux way, API requests and their successful completion should each map to one action. Change the application state appropriately (in your reducing function) on each action and views/screens bound to your store will re-render. So if you're making an API request:
Create a Search container, mapping state searchResults to props and binding a Search component. (For example, see this container.)
Fire action REQUEST_SEARCH with search term on user input.
AJAX request is fired.
AJAX request successfully completes. Fire action RECEIVE_SEARCH with search results.
SearchReducer stores search results.
Bound Search component re-renders with search results.
Should i make actions for every screen change? Should i put more information in the global state application?
As a general rule, yes. But sometimes I've used component state (without dispatching an action) to store state that is local to the component (e.g. updating a text field).
A one more thing, i have a AppContainer component which is used in connect to have access to the store, but i am passing parts of the state and the actions as well as children properties and i feel this is wrong as well.
In general, higher level components should be containers, which inject state into the stateless components via props. You can have more than one containers and they work like components, so you can nest a container in another container. I encourage you to have a look at the docs, as it was very useful for me. :)