I started to write a small engine to render a 2d isometric map. A friend of mine made a small basic image of a train station to use example art for my engine. I tried to import the .png into tiled and create a tileset for it, to then use the information for the rendering of that house.
When I import the image, tiled cuts off the edges of the picture (see attachment "tiled .png import to tileset") on the right and bottom side. I looked into the menus and tried to find information about it but I could'nt find any helpful advice why it happens.
Another thing I find curious is the information within the .tsx file:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<tileset version="1.2" tiledversion="1.2.1" name="bAHNHOF" tilewidth="30"
tileheight="30" tilecount="195" columns="13">
<image source="bAHNHOF.png" width="401" height="468"/>
</tileset>
Shouldn't columns(13) multiplied by tile width(30) result in width of the imported image (i.e. 401). It only is 390 though, so roughly 11 pixels less then the original width.
I probably made a mistake somewhere or am confusing something. Maybe someone can help me?
Thanks in advance :)
Seem like whatever editor you are using wants "whole tile" sizes. This is not uncommon. Increase the size of your base image so that the X and Y align to tile size boundaries to prevent this. 30 for a tile size is also very unusual. I'd expect a power of 2 like "32" or "16".
In short, your importer is culling tiles that are not full size. I'd expect it to display a warning about image size before it did this, but who knows as you didn't state the programs.
When this goes onto whatever platform you are using, a power of 2 tile size will help as well in terms of efficiency, so consider making that change sooner rather than later as well.
Finally, often tiling is done to save memory. If, when you divide up your image into tiles (tile it), you can create identical tiles, the computer can use that knowledge to lessen the amount of memory is needed.
Related
I few years ago (or longer) I create an image where I wrapped an image around itself as in the image attached to make a sort of world. I've tried to duplicate the process but missing the step of wrapping it around. I know that I squared the image and left extra transparent space on both sides. I have the original photoshop file but the layer that I need to know what I did is flattened. Please send me to a tutorial or maybe give me an idea what I did to create this effect. Pretty lame I know!!!
Photo of barn windmill and house.
If your image is landscape, this method will work a lot better.
Make sure the image you're distorting is square, but don't do this by cropping, actually 'squish' the width of the image so that it distorts it slightly.
Then flip the image updide down (180degs)
Then apply a filter: Filter > Distort > Polar Coordinates.
From personal experience it's important to make sure the center of the square has uniform patterns and color to it, this will help avoid too much distortion in the center. Although this can be achieved post-filter.
I'm importing my stimulus from a folder. I would like to make them bigger *the actual image size is 120 pix (height) x 170 pix (width). I've tried to double the size by using this code in the PsychoPy Coder:
stimuli.append(visual.ImageStim(win=win, name='image', units='cm', size= [9, 6.3],
(I used the double number in cms) but this distorts the image. Is it any way to enlarge it without it distorting, or do I have to change the stimuli itself?
Thank you
Just to answer what Michael said in the comment: no, if you scale an image up, the only way of guessing what is in between pixels is interpolation. This is what psychopy does and what ANY software would do. To make an analogy: take a picture of a distant tree using your digital camera. Then scale the image up using all kinds of software. You won't suddenly be able to see the individual leaves since the software had no such information as input.
If you need higher resolution, put higher resolution images in your folder. If it's simple shapes, you may use built-in methods such as visual.ShapeStim and it's variants: visual.Polygon, visual.Rect and visual.Circle. Psychopy can scale these shapes freely so they always stay sharp.
I'm using a 40 x 40 sized image as a search result suggestion image in Windows 8 search. Only advice about the image format I can find is to have correct size for it (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/apps/Hh700542.aspx: "Windows will scale or crop smaller or larger images").
However, the correctly sized image blurs annoyingly. The same thing happens whether I use jpg or png. Original image looks fine, but the result suggestion in the search charm is very ugly, being still of same size! Is Windows converting the image somehow, and how could I get the image to stay crisp?
I haven't noticed blurring with photo-like images, but this image contains clear lines and areas which are vulnerable to any scaling etc.
Update Sep 24:
Here is the test image I used when trying to figure out the problem. I also created different scale versions, but in my case the 100% version was used (that's why the "100" marking) - as I supposed because the resulting image really is 40x40. As you can see, the resulting image (right) is of same size as original (left), but blurry.
it does not happen that often but it seems the right solution in this case was simply to wait ;) I haven't done anything new regarding result suggestion images in my solution and today I realized that the images became crisp. Probably fixed by any of the windows updates.
[Took a stab at answering what seems the related question mentioned in the comments, so I'm posting here as well.]
It sounds like this could be related to automatic scaling of the images. Windows will automatically scale up/down based on pixel density, and you can help things scale well by either using vector-based images or, for bitmap images, supplying scale-specific versions.
For example, to scale an image referenced in markup as "AppLogo.jpg", you'd include these images:
AppLogo.scale-100.jpg
AppLogo.scale-140.jpg
AppLogo.scale-180.jpg
You can also use folders, e.g. "\scale-140\AppLogo.jpg".
For search result images, the 100% image is the 40x40 pixel version, 140 is 56x56, and 180 is 72x72. Just reference the image as "AppLogo.jpg" and the appropriate version will be used automatically. (You can also detect scale with DisplayProperties.ResolutionScale and manually choose an image.)
Here's a couple of articles with more examples/details:
"Guidelines for scaling to pixel density"
"Quickstart: Using file or image resources"
There's also some scaling discussion in the forums (general, not specific to search) here and here.
Imagine I have a rectangle say 400px x 300px. Then let’s say I want to load an image in that. All of this is very easy using Sytem.Drawing.DrawImage.
Rectangle http://img576.imageshack.us/img576/2363/rectangle.gif
But then I want to leave the left hand side as 300px but change the right hand side to 250 px. I can draw the box using 4 DrawLines but I don’t know how to squash the image into the new shape. I want the right hand side of the shape to be 250, the left size 300 and the top and bottom 400px.
Resized http://img85.imageshack.us/img85/3479/rectangle2.gif
I can’t use DrawImage as it expects the left and right sizes to be the same. Is there a way to manipulate the image into the new shape?
I've looked at other questions, but they only apply where the left and right hand side is equal.
Any thoughts on how to squash an image into a shape which did not have parallel sides?
(If it helps, I'm happy to sacrifice image quality to fit the right shape.)
Disclaimer: I work for Atalasoft.
Our DotImage product has a command called QuadrilateralWarpCommand that can do this. It's in DotImage Photo.
What you want to do is non-trivial (but also very powerful).
#Heinzi is correct, the general class is called warp transformations. What you're trying to do is specifically a perspective transformation. At a high level, it involves running the individual coordinates through a transformation matrix to get their new positions, and then doing interpolation between pixel values based on the old and new locations.
This article talks about some transformations, one of them being a sheer, so it might be helpful overall. I'm not sure, I haven't read it closely. In general, you want to google for something approximately like "c# image transformation" or "c# image perspective transform".
Depending on what you're planning on using it for, buying a library might be the best way to go about it, although there is a lot to learn about image manipulation by doing it yourself.
I did not find a solution to your problem, but I have some information which might help you along:
What you want is called a warp transformation.
As far as I know, the .net framework natively supports this kind of transformation only for a GraphicsPath, namely, the GraphicsPath.Warp method. Unfortunately, I don't think that this will help you, unless you are willing to redraw your image using a .net GraphicsPath object.
If you need the transformation directly in the UI layer, your UI library might help: Silverlight, for example, includes the PlaneProjection class, which can be used for such effects; in WPF, the 3D engine might be useful for this (requiring more programming effort, through).
I'm completely new to ArcGIS and ArcMap, but someone suggested this program to me for a project I'm working on.
I would like to animate individual entities on a map, and was wondering if it is possible to do so in ArcMap. I asked this earlier here and a member directed me to a tutorial on animating in ArcGIS. The animation in the guide was over a map spread (ie. each pixel on the map displays, say, a different color to indicate population data in the area). However I realized that if I zoom in a lot, eventually the image will degenerate into pixels, which is why I need an actual object to mark a certain point. I checked some online tutorials and it seems like we can place markers on the map. Can someone tell me if it is possible to animate these markers (for example via a for-loop)? And if so, could you point me in a direction where to start?
Thanks in advance!
You can animate layers in ArcMap is the short answer. Its not as simple as using the timeline feature in Google Earth for example though. But then ArcMap is much more than just a visualization tool.
This help page on the ESRI web help looks like a good place to start.
I'm not 100% sure what you mean by the image degenerates into pixels. Are you saying that the markers were single points in the layer. Unlike Google Earth you are not confined to simply plotting points on the map. You can draw completely arbitrary shapes in ArcMap, which can be defined to cover actual areas of the map, so when you zoom-in the shape gets larger.
The way you need to load data into ArcMap to produce an animation isn't too simple. There might be other ways to do this, but the way I know of is to generate a NetCDF file. This file contains a 3D matrix of layer data, where each layer is separated through time. Because you generate a matrix, you are effectively placing a raster image over the map. Thus if you want to cover a large area, each matrix becomes large, and you multiply that by the number of time slices you wish to animate over.
Once you have a NetCDF file with your data in however, getting ArcMap to animate it and produce say a .avi file is pretty simple.
You could try just loading some of the example NetCDF datasets into ArcMap to see how/if they will work to get you started.
Hope that helps.
The upcoming v10 will have better time-aware capabilities, which will allow for animation.