I am currently studying SQL and I am still a newbie. I have this task where I need to split some rows with various entries like dates and user IDs. I really need help
+-------+------------------------------+---------------------------+
| TYPE | DATES | USER _ID |
+-------+------------------------------+---------------------------+
| WORK | ["2022-06-02", "2022-06-03"] | {74042,88357,83902,88348} |
| LEAVE | ["2022-05-16", "2022-05-26"] | {83902,74042,88357,88348} |
+-------+------------------------------+---------------------------+
the end result should look like this. the user id's should be aligned or should be in the same as their respective dates.
+-------+------------+---------+
| TYPE | DATES | USER_ID |
+-------+------------+---------+
| LEAVE | 05/16/2022 | 74042 |
| LEAVE | 05/16/2022 | 88357 |
| LEAVE | 05/16/2022 | 88348 |
| LEAVE | 05/16/2022 | 83902 |
| LEAVE | 05/26/2022 | 74042 |
| LEAVE | 05/26/2022 | 88357 |
| LEAVE | 05/26/2022 | 88348 |
| LEAVE | 05/26/2022 | 83902 |
| WORK | 06/2/2022 | 74042 |
| WORK | 06/2/2022 | 88357 |
| WORK | 06/2/2022 | 88348 |
| WORK | 06/2/2022 | 83902 |
| WORK | 06/3/2022 | 74042 |
| WORK | 06/3/2022 | 88357 |
| WORK | 06/3/2022 | 88348 |
| WORK | 06/3/2022 | 83902 |
+-------+------------+---------+
Create table:
CREATE TABLE work_leave (
TYPE varchar,
DATES date,
USER_ID integer
);
INSERT INTO work_leave
VALUES ('LEAVE', '05/16/2022', 74042),
('LEAVE', '05/16/2022', 88357),
('LEAVE', '05/16/2022', 88348),
('LEAVE', '05/16/2022', 83902),
('LEAVE', '05/26/2022', 74042),
('LEAVE', '05/26/2022', 88357),
('LEAVE', '05/26/2022', 88348),
('LEAVE', '05/26/2022', 83902),
('WORK', '06/2/2022', 74042),
('WORK', '06/2/2022', 88357),
('WORK', '06/2/2022', 88348),
('WORK', '06/2/2022', 83902),
('WORK', '06/3/2022', 74042),
('WORK', '06/3/2022', 88357),
('WORK', '06/3/2022', 88348),
('WORK', '06/3/2022', 83902);
WITH date_ends AS (
SELECT
type,
ARRAY[min(dates),
max(dates)] AS dates
FROM
work_leave
GROUP BY
type
),
users AS (
SELECT
type,
array_agg(DISTINCT (user_id)
ORDER BY user_id) AS user_ids
FROM
work_leave
GROUP BY
type
)
SELECT
de.type,
de.dates,
u.user_ids
FROM
date_ends AS de
JOIN
users as u
ON de.type = u.type;
type | dates | user_ids
-------+-------------------------+---------------------------
LEAVE | {05/16/2022,05/26/2022} | {74042,83902,88348,88357}
WORK | {06/02/2022,06/03/2022} | {74042,83902,88348,88357}
I adjusted the data slightly for simplicity. Here's one idea:
WITH rows (type, dates, user_id) AS (
VALUES ('WORK', array['2022-06-02', '2022-06-03'], array[74042,88357,83902,88348])
, ('LEAVE', array['2022-05-16', '2022-05-26'], array[83902,74042,88357,88348])
)
SELECT r1.type, x.*
FROM rows AS r1
CROSS JOIN LATERAL (
SELECT r2.dates, r3.user_id
FROM unnest(r1.dates) AS r2(dates)
, unnest(r1.user_id) AS r3(user_id)
) AS x
;
The fiddle
The result:
type
dates
user_id
WORK
2022-06-02
74042
WORK
2022-06-02
88357
WORK
2022-06-02
83902
WORK
2022-06-02
88348
WORK
2022-06-03
74042
WORK
2022-06-03
88357
WORK
2022-06-03
83902
WORK
2022-06-03
88348
LEAVE
2022-05-16
83902
LEAVE
2022-05-16
74042
LEAVE
2022-05-16
88357
LEAVE
2022-05-16
88348
LEAVE
2022-05-26
83902
LEAVE
2022-05-26
74042
LEAVE
2022-05-26
88357
LEAVE
2022-05-26
88348
So... I am currently using Oracle 11.1g and I need to create a query that uses the ID and CusCODE from Table_with_value and checks Table_with_status using the ID to find active CO_status but on different CusCODE.
This is what I have so far - obviously does not work as it should unless CusCODE and ID are provided manually:
SELECT wm_concat(CoID) as active_CO_Status_for_same_ID_but_different_CusCODE
FROM Table_with_status
WHERE
CoID IN (SELECT CoID FROM Table_with_status WHERE ID = Table_with_value.ID AND CusCODE != Table_with_value.CusCODE)) AND Co_status = 'active';
Table_with_value:
|CoID | CusCODE | ID | Value |
|--------|---------|----------|----|
|354223 | 1.432 | 0784296L | 99 |
|321232 | 4.212321.22 | 0432296L | 32 |
|938421 | 3.213 | 0021321L | 93 |
Table_with_status:
|CoID | CusCODE | ID | Co_status|
|--------|--------------|----------|--------|
|354223 | 1.432 | 0784296L | active|
|354232 | 1.432 | 0784296L | inactive |
|666698 | 1.47621 | 0784296L | active |
|666700 | 1.5217 | 0784296L | active |
|938421 | 3.213 | 0021321L | active |
|938422 | 3.213 | 0021321L | active |
|938423 | 3.213 | 0021321L | active |
|321232 | 4.212321.22 | 0432296L | active |
|321232 | 4.212321.22 | 0432296L | active |
|321232 | 1.689 | 0432296L | inactive |
Expected output:
|CoID | active_CO_Status_for_same_ID_but_different_CusCODE | ID | Value |
|--------|---------|----------|----|
|354223 | 666698,666700 | 1.432 | 0784296L | 99 |
|321232 | N/A | 4.212321.22 | 0432296L | 32 |
|938421 | N/A | 3.213 | 0021321L | 93 |
Any idea on how this can be implemented ideally without any PL/SQL for loops, but it should be fine as well since the output dataset is expected < 300 IDs.
I apologize in advance for the cryptic nature in which I structured the question :) Let me know if something is not clear.
From your description and expected output, it looks like you need a left outer join, something like:
SELECT v.CoID,
wm_concat(s.CoID) as other_active_CusCODE -- active_CO_Status_for_same_ID_but_different_CusCODE
v.CusCODE,
v.ID,
v.value
FROM Table_with_value v
LEFT JOIN Table_with_status s
ON s.ID = v.ID
AND s.CusCODE != v.CusCODE
AND s.Co_status = 'active'
GROUP BY v.CoID, v.CusCODE, v.ID, v.value;
SQL Fiddle using listagg() instead of the never-supported and now-removed wm_concat(); with a couple of different approaches if the logic isn't quite what I interpreted. With your sample data they all get:
COID OTHER_ACTIVE_CUSCODE CUSCODE ID VALUE
------ -------------------- ----------- -------- -----
321232 (null) 4.212321.22 0432296L 32
354223 666698,666700 1.432 0784296L 99
938421 (null) 3.213 0021321L 93
Your code looks like it should work, assuming you are referring to the correct tables:
SELECT wm_concat(s.CoID) as active_CO_Status_for_same_ID_but_different_CusCODE
FROM Table_with_status s
WHERE s.CoID IN (SELECT v.CoID
FROM Table_with_value v
WHERE v.ID = s.ID AND
v.CusCODE <> s.CusCODE
) AND
s.Co_status = 'active';
I'm trying to join the two table and at the same time getting the value of the certain column by using inner join, I tried joining until the 3rd diagram but when it comes to the fourth it doesn't display the null values, how can I display the values of the 4th column even the null values
here's the code of the SQL
betl.user_id,
betl.agent_id,
ah1.parent_id,
ah2.user_id,
ah3.user_id AS parent_of_agent
FROM
wpc16_02.bets_logs betl
INNER JOIN
wpc16_02.agent_heirarchy ah1 ON betl.agent_id = ah1.user_id
INNER JOIN
wpc16_02.agent_heirarchy ah2 ON ah1.parent_id = ah2.id
INNER JOIN
wpc16_02.agent_heirarchy ah3 ON ah2.parent_id = ah3.id
WHERE
fight_id = 1930 AND agent_income = 0
here's what I'm trying to achieve by using innerjoins:
Here's the result I got when trying the joining upto the 3rd diagram:
user_id | agent_id | parent_id | user_id_of_parent
15012 | 2212 | 96 | 160
227097 | 22061 | 266 | 64
465174 | 464899 | 126 | 211
505094 | 504767 | 980 | 5358
241158 | 8281 | 18 | 67
463344 | 462715 | 751 | 3420
184396 | 29870 | 502 | 2123
486847 | 43225 | 164 | 234
482120 | 482023 | 4430 | 46469
369628 | 217212 | 8283 | 109697
When joining upto 4th diagram:
user_id | agent_id | parent_id | user_id_of_parent | master_uid
184396 | 29870 | 502 | 2123 | 160
482120 | 482023 | 4430 | 46469 | 699
369628 | 217212 | 8283 | 109697 | 71
97287 | 93996 | 7332 | 93866 | 3114
113287 | 113228 | 2714 | 20652 | 4050
366287 | 361918 | 17603 | 235880 | 234
439935 | 236147 | 3776 | 40054 | 103
480201 | 436936 | 1041 | 5761 | 160
456400 | 456248 | 32901 | 431900 | 240
502877 | 497592 | 2571 | 20845 | 3918
notice the other datas have been removed because when I joined the 4th diagram some of the results are null
You seem to want LEFT JOIN. It is a little unclear what the exact query is, because your question doesn't have information such as which columns are in which tables.
But the idea is:
SELECT . . .
FROM wpc16_02.bets_logs betl LEFT JOIN
wpc16_02.agent_heirarchy ah1
ON betl.agent_id = ah1.user_id LEFT JOIN
wpc16_02.agent_heirarchy ah2
ON ah1.parent_id = ah2.id LEFT JOIN
wpc16_02.agent_heirarchy ah3
ON ah2.parent_id = ah3.id
WHERE betl.fight_id = 1930 AND betl.agent_income = 0
This assums that flight_id and agent_income are from the first table. If they are in one of the hierarchy tables, then the conditions should go in the appropriate ON clause.
I'm hoping that im over thinking this. but i need to sum a column where i have no unique link to join on and when i do it double ups columns.
This is my current SQL that works until i add the join on vwBatchInData then it doubles up every record, what is the best way to achieve this?
select b.fldBatchID as 'ID',SUM(bIn.fldBatchDetailsWeight) as 'Batch In', sum(t.fldTransactionNetWeight) as 'Batch Out' , format((sum(t.fldTransactionNetWeight) / sum(bIn.fldBatchDetailsWeight)),'P2' ) as 'Yield'
from [TRANSACTION] t
right join vwBatchInData bIn on bIn.fldBatchID = t.fldBatchID
inner join Batch b on b.fldBatchID = t.fldBatchID
where CAST(b.fldBatchDate as date) = '2020-03-04'
group by b.fldBatchID**
vwBatchInData Table
+------------+---------------+-----------------------+
| fldBatchID | fldKillNumber | fldBatchDetailsWeight |
+------------+---------------+-----------------------+
| 2862 | 601598 | 164.40 |
| 2862 | 601599 | 190.80 |
| 2862 | 601596 | 195.00 |
| 2862 | 601597 | 200.20 |
| 2862 | 601594 | 176.60 |
+------------+---------------+-----------------------+
Transaction Table
+------------+------------------+-------------------------+
| fldBatchID | fldTransactionID | fldTransactionNetWeight |
+------------+------------------+-------------------------+
| 2862 | 10242352 | 16.26 |
| 2862 | 10242353 | 22.82 |
| 2862 | 10242362 | 18.52 |
| 2862 | 10242363 | 21.44 |
| 2862 | 10242364 | 20.32 |
+------------+------------------+-------------------------+
Batch Table
+------------+-------------------------+
| fldBatchID | fldBatchDate |
+------------+-------------------------+
| 2862 | 2020-03-04 00:00:00.000 |
+------------+-------------------------+
Desired output with the above snipets
+------+----------+-----------+---------+
| ID | Batch In | Batch Out | Yield |
+------+----------+-----------+---------+
| 2862 | 927.00 | 90.36 | 10.76 % |
+------+----------+-----------+---------+
I think you just want to aggregate before joining:
select b.fldBatchID as ID,
(bIn.fldBatchDetailsWeight) as batch_in,
(t.fldTransactionNetWeight) as batch_out,
format(t.fldTransactionNetWeight / bIn.fldBatchDetailsWeight, 'P2' ) as Yield
from batch b left join
(select bin.fldBatchID, sum(fldBatchDetailsWeight) as fldBatchDetailsWeight
from vwBatchInData bin
group by bin.fldBatchID
) bin
on bIn.fldBatchID = b.fldBatchID left join
(select t.fldBatchID, sum(fldTransactionNetWeight) as fldTransactionNetWeight
from transactions t
group by t.fldBatchID
) bin
on t.fldBatchID = b.fldBatchID
where CAST(b.fldBatchDate as date) = '2020-03-04';
Given a data set in MS SQL Server 2012 where travelers take trips (with trip_ID as UID) and where each trip has start_date and an end_date, I'm looking to find the trip_ID's for each traveler where trip's overlap and the range of that overlap. So if the initial table looks like this:
| trip_ID | traveler | start_date | end_date | trip_length |
|---------|----------|------------|------------|-------------|
| AB24 | Alpha | 2017-01-29 | 2017-01-31 | 2|
| BA02 | Alpha | 2017-01-31 | 2017-02-10 | 10|
| CB82 | Charlie | 2017-02-20 | 2017-02-23 | 3|
| CA29 | Bravo | 2017-02-26 | 2017-02-28 | 2|
| AB14 | Charlie | 2017-03-06 | 2017-03-08 | 2|
| DA45 | Bravo | 2017-03-26 | 2017-03-29 | 3|
| BA22 | Bravo | 2017-03-29 | 2017-04-03 | 5|
I'm looking for a query that will append three columns to the original table: overlap_id, overlap_start, overlap_end. The idea is that each row will have a value (or NULL) for an overlapping trip along with the start and end dates for overlap itself. Like this:
| trip_ID | traveler | start_date | end_date |trip_length|overlap_id |overlap_start| overlap_end|
|---------|----------|------------|------------|-----------|------------|-------------|------------|
| AB24 | Alpha | 2017-01-29 | 2017-01-31 | 2|BA02--------|2017-01-31---|2017-01-31--|
| BA02 | Alpha | 2017-01-31 | 2017-02-10 | 10|AB24--------|2017-01-31---|2017-01-31--|
| CB82 | Charlie | 2017-02-20 | 2017-02-23 | 3|NULL--------|NULL---------|NULL--------|
| CA29 | Bravo | 2017-02-26 | 2017-02-28 | 2|NULL--------|NULL---------|NULL--------|
| AB14 | Charlie | 2017-03-06 | 2017-03-08 | 2|NULL--------|NULL---------|NULL--------|
| DA45 | Bravo | 2017-03-26 | 2017-03-29 | 3|BA22--------|2017-03-28---|2017-03-29--|
| BA22 | Bravo | 2017-03-28 | 2017-04-03 | 5|DA45--------|2017-03-28---|2017-03-29--|
I've tried variations of Overlapping Dates in SQL to inform my approach but it's not returning the right answers. I'm only looking for overlaps for the same traveler (i.e., within Alpha or Bravo, not between Alpha and Bravo).
For the overlap_id column, I think the code would have to test if a trip's start_date plus range(0, trip_length) returns a value within the range of dates between start_date and end_date for any other trip where the traveler is the same, then the trip_id is updated to equal the id of the matching trips. If this is the right concept, I'm not sure how to make a variable out of trip_length so I test a range of values for it, i.e., run this for all values of trip_length - x until trip_length - x = 0.
--This might be the bare bones of an answer
update table
set overlap_id = CASE
WHEN ( DATEADD(day, trip_length, start_date) = SELECT (DATEADD(day, trip_length, start_date) from table where traveler = traveler)
You can join the table with itself (the join condition is described here):
SELECT t.*, o.trip_ID, o.start_date, o.end_date
FROM t
LEFT JOIN t AS o ON t.trip_ID <> o.trip_ID -- trip always overlaps itself so exclude it
AND o.traveler = t.traveler -- same traveller
AND t.start_date <= o.end_date -- overlap test
AND t.end_date >= o.start_date