I can't find a way to retrieve notes from a cell. I looked here:https://developers.google.com/sheets/api/reference/rest/v4/spreadsheets/get
I can update the note by using the code here: https://developers.google.com/sheets/api/reference/rest/v4/spreadsheets/cells
... but I can't find a way to retrieve the note in the first place.
This the result of a values.get call on a cell that has a note...
{u'range': u'Sheet1!D5', u'values': [[u'update CD data']], u'majorDimension': u'ROWS'}
as you can see, the notes to the cell are not there.
How about using sheets/data/rowData/values/note to the fields?
The endpoint is as follows.
GET https://sheets.googleapis.com/v4/spreadsheets/### Spreadsheet ID ###?fields=sheets%2Fdata%2FrowData%2Fvalues%2Fnote
From your profile, if you use Python, how about this?
response = service.spreadsheets().get(spreadsheetId=id, fields="sheets/data/rowData/values/note").execute()
Result:
When there are notes at "A1:B2", the result is as follows.
{
"sheets": [
{
"data": [
{
"rowData": [
{
"values": [
{
"note": "sample note A1"
},
{
"note": "sample note B1"
}
]
},
{
"values": [
{
"note": "sample note A2"
},
{
"note": "sample note B2"
}
]
}
]
}
]
}
]
}
Reference:
CellData
If I misunderstand your question, please tell me. I would like to modify it.
Related
I need to update document parameters via REST API.
I've tried using the following:
PUT .../raylight/v1/documents/33903/parameters/3
with the following json payload
{
"parameters":{
"parameter": {
"id": 3,
"answer": {
"values": {
"value": [
"2019/9"
]
}
}
}
}
}
But the returned answer shows unmodified parameters:
{
"parameter": {
"#optional": "false",
"#type": "prompt",
...
"id": 3,
...
"answer": {
...
"info": {
...
"previous": {
"value": [
"2015\/12"
]
}
},
"values": {
"value": [
"2015\/12"
]
}
}
}
}
How can I properly set new prompt parameters?
Do:
PUT .../raylight/v1/documents/33903/parameters
instead of:
PUT .../raylight/v1/documents/33903/parameters/3
Adding a parameter ID at the end performs a different function: it returns the list of parameters that are dependent upon the one provided. You have only one in this case, and it's returning itself. Leave it off, to refresh the document.
I'm trying to write a TextMate grammar for a VS Code language extension. Take the following example
(lang=css attribute2=something-else)
"""
.css-class {
background: gray;
}
"""
The (...) part is an "attributes" section, and the """ ... """ is a code section. I'm trying to highlight everything in the code section according to the lang attribute.
The problem is, they are two distinct sections where one might be present without the other in other parts of the file. For example, you can have attributes without the code block.
In the grammars section of package.json I have
"embeddedLanguages": {
"meta.embedded.block.css": "css",
"meta.embedded.block.javascript": "javascript"
}
In the tmLanguage.json file I have both patterns in the repository property.
"attributes": {
"begin": "\\(",
"end": "\\)",
"captures": {
"0": {
"name": "punctuation.definition.annotation punctuation.section.group punctuation.section.parens"
}
},
"patterns": [
{
"begin": "[a-zA-Z_][a-zA-Z0-9_\\.-]*",
"beginCaptures": {
"0": {
"name": "entity.other.attribute-name"
}
},
"end": "(?=\\s*+[^=\\s])",
"patterns": [
{
"begin": "=",
"beginCaptures": {
"0": {
"name": "punctuation.separator.key-value"
}
},
"end": "(?<=[^\\s=])(?!\\s*=)|(?=/?>)",
"patterns": [
{
"match": "([^0-9-.\\s='\"][^\\s='\")]*)",
"name": "string.unquoted.html"
},
{
"match": "=",
"name": "invalid.illegal.unexpected-equals-sign"
},
{
"include": "#strings"
},
{
"include": "#number"
}
]
}
]
}
]
},
"fenced-code": {
"begin": "\\(.*lang=(css|javascript).*\\)\\s*(\"\"\")",
"beginCaptures": {
"1": {
"name": "string.quoted.triple"
}
},
"end": "\"\"\"",
"endCaptures": {
"0": {
"name": "string.quoted.triple"
}
},
"contentName": "meta.embedded.block.$1",
"patterns": [
{
"include": "source.css"
}
]
}
I have a third pattern not shown where I'm using these together by including them in its patterns array. They seem to be mutually exclusive though. I can have the attributes, and I can have a code block if I start the pattern at """, but if I start the code pattern with \\(.*lang=(css|javascript).*\\)\\s*(\"\"\") to capture the lang attribute, the attributes stop getting highlighting.
Is this even possible? I've never worked with TextMate grammars outside of a VS Code theme and VS Code doesn't seem to have deep documentation on the more "advanced" (I guess) things like this.
I tried using VS Code's HTML grammar for its uses of embedded code, but I don't think the HTML one needs to swap syntax based on something in a previous line.
Update
The fenced-code pattern I have below allows the attributes pattern highlighting while also having the code block with dynamic contentName property, i.e. "meta.embedded.block.$2" becomes meta.embedded.block.css when "css" is found in attributes.
"fenced-code": {
"begin": "(\\(.*lang=(css|javascript).*\\))\\s*(\"\"\")",
"beginCaptures": {
"1": {
"patterns": [
{
"include": "#attributes"
}
]
},
"3": {
"name": "string.quoted.triple"
}
},
"end": "\"\"\"",
"endCaptures": {
"0": {
"name": "string.quoted.triple"
}
},
"contentName": "meta.embedded.block.$2",
"patterns": [
{
"include": "source.css"
},
{
"include": "source.js"
}
]
}
However, there's two things wrong so far.
It only works when the opening """ is on the same line as the attributes section
fenced-code's patterns array doesn't seem to allow a dynamic include, i.e. "patterns": [{"include": "source.$2}]. I'm not sure if including the different languages as I did above will work
I have a scenario where I need to call a secondary feature file that contains an API call where the response is a JSON object. However, I need to call this scenario multiple times, so I am using karate.repeat to achieve this. However, the resulting response is a malformed JSON that I cannot traverse.
This is what I am doing:
* def fun = function(i){ return karate.call('abc.feature#abc', value)}
* def loop = karate.repeat(2, fun)
* karate.log(loop)
The response I get is:
{
"Total_packages1": {
"package1": {
"tags": [
"kj21",
"j1",
"sj2",
"z1"
],
"expectedResponse": [
{
"firstName": "Name",
"lastName": "lastName",
"purchase": [
{
"title": "title",
"category": [
"a",
"b",
"c"
]
}
]
}
]
}
}
}
{
"Total_packages2": {
"package2": {
"tags": [
"kj212",
"j12",
"sj22",
"z12"
],
"expectedResponse": [
{
"firstName": "Name2",
"lastName": "lastName2",
"purchase": [
{
"title": "title2",
"category": [
"a2",
"b2",
"c2"
]
}
]
}
]
}
}
}
As you can see, Total_packages2 starts malformed. I need to grab the "tags" values from each package, however, I cannot simply do Total_packages1.package1.tags like I could with a single response in the JSON.
If I cannot achieve what I need by karate.repeat, is there another method that is recommended for looping like this? I haven't found anything in the documentation for this particular scenario.
Don't use karate.repeat() use call with a JSON array. Read this part of the docs: https://github.com/karatelabs/karate#data-driven-features
There are multiple keys present in x.details[0].user so how to compare in such condition. It works fine where there is only one key while when there are more than one key it fails with error as there are multiple keys for user.
Please guide
* def array =
"""
{
"type": "1",
"array": 2,
"details": [
{
"path": "path",
"user": {
"school": {
"name": [
{
"value": "this is school",
"codeable": {
"details": [
{
"hello": "yty",
"condition": "check1"
}
],
"text": "123S"
}
}
]
},
"sample": "test1",
"id": "22222"
},
"data": {
"check": "abc"
}
},
{
"path": "path",
"user": {
"school": {
"name": [
{
"value": "this is school",
"codeable": {
"details": [
{
"hello": "def",
"condition": "check2"
}
],
"text": "123O"
}
}
]
},
"sample": "test",
"id": "11111"
},
"data": {
"check": "xyz"
}
}
]
}
"""
* def lookup = { 'check1': 'yty', 'check2': 'def' }
* match each array.details contains { user: { school: { name[0]: { codeable: { details[0]: { hello: '#(lookup[_$.user.school.name[0].codeable.details[0].condition])' } } } } } }
I have tried multiple ways but not sure how to make it work when there are more than one keys getting returned.
First let me say this. Please, please do not try to be "too clever" in your tests. Read this please: https://stackoverflow.com/a/54126724/143475
Just have simple tests that test for specific, predictable responses and stop there. The maximum complexity should be match contains, that's it. What you are trying to do is in my opinion a waste of time, and will just cause grief for anyone who tries to maintain these tests in future.
That said, I'm giving you a completely different approach here. There are a few different ways, this is just one. Here we attack the problem piece by piece instead of trying to write one massive match.
* def allXyz = array.details.filter(x => x.data.check == 'xyz')
* match each allXyz..details == [{ hello: 'def', condition: 'check2' }]
You should be able to extend this to do all the weird assertions that you want. If you are wondering what allXyz..details does, you can print it like this:
* def temp = $allXyz..details
* print temp
This is my device inventory with the custom tasks array:
{
...
"c8y_IsDevice": {},
"tasks": [
{
"task_status" : "NEW",
"task_id" : "1",
"task_data" : {
...
}
},
{
"task_status" : "DONE",
"task_id" : "2",
"task_data" : {
...
}
},
...
]
...
}
I want to create a MQTT/SMARTREST PUT template to update a task by id and status.
For example: 800,[task_id],[task_status]
I am not able to find a way for this, especially it's an json array and all my attempts end up in overwriting the complete json array.
Maybe there's sth. like a condition, if task_id = x -> set task_status = y
Thank you.
You can only replace the whole fragment. There is no way to partially modify fragments.
one way to do it is get the whole array, using it for create a new one locally with the changes to want to do and finally put it again into the database. It is not a kind of solution but have been working for me.
Thanks for the info, but I still got a question about updating an array.
Concerning your answers I want to update the whole fragment.
This is my inventory:
"tasks": [
{
"address": {
"street": "Street",
"street_number": "1"
},
"description": "Test Description",
"id": "1",
"status": "NEW"
},
{
"address": {
"street": "Street2",
"street_number": "2"
},
"description": "Test Description 2",
"id": "2",
"status": "DONE"
}
]
My template:
801,<$.tasks.status>,<$.tasks.description>,<$.tasks.address.street>,<$.tasks.address.street_number>
Template screenshot
Now I publish:
//801,SERIAL,status,description,street_name,street_nr
801,SERIAL,NEW,1,2,3,4
Of course, this will overwrite the array and just set a json object tasks.
"tasks": {
"address": {
"street": "2",
"street_number": "3"
},
"description": "1",
"status": "NEW"
}
So I tried tasks[*]/tasks[] in my template (like in response templates), but this won't work too. I don't get it, maybe you can give me a small solution about putting a complete fragment with an array inside.