I have to consume two different REST API providers about VoIP. Both API do the same with different endpoints and parameters. I'm modeling classes as strategy pattern and the problem that i have encountered is the parameters of each method strategy because are different.
public interface VoIPRequests
{
string ApiKey { get; set; }
string GetExtensionsList();
string TriggerCall();
string DropCall();
string RedirectCall();
}
How can i change parameters for each of this methods depend on the implementation?.
It's good idea use strategy pattern for this case?
There is another pattern that suits better?
Thank you.
Per comment thread:
TriggerCall(), one api only needs one parameter "To" , and other api has two mandatory parameters "extension" and "destination"
I'll focus on TriggerCall, then, and let you extrapolate from there.
Implementation 1
public class VoIPRequests1 : VoIPRequests
{
private readonly object to; // Give this a more appropriate type
public VoIPRequests1(object to)
{
this.to = to;
}
public string TriggerCall()
{
// Use this.to here and return string;
}
// Other interface members go here...
}
Implementation 2
public class VoIPRequests2 : VoIPRequests
{
private readonly object extension; // Give this a more appropriate type
private readonly object destination; // Give this a more appropriate type
public VoIPRequests2(object extension, object destination)
{
this.extension = extension;
this.destination = destination;
}
public string TriggerCall()
{
// Use this.extension and this.destination here and return string;
}
// Other interface members go here...
}
The JSON response from my ASP.NET Core 3.1 API controller is missing properties. This happens when a property uses a derived type; any properties defined in the derived type but not in the base/interface will not be serialized to JSON. It seems there is some lack of support for polymorphism in the response, as if serialization is based on a property's defined type instead of its runtime type. How can I change this behavior to ensure that all public properties are included in the JSON response?
Example:
My .NET Core Web API Controller returns this object that has a property with an interface type.
// controller returns this object
public class Result
{
public IResultProperty ResultProperty { get; set; } // property uses an interface type
}
public interface IResultProperty
{ }
Here is a derived type that defines a new public property named Value.
public class StringResultProperty : IResultProperty
{
public string Value { get; set; }
}
If I return the derived type from my controller like this:
return new MainResult {
ResultProperty = new StringResultProperty { Value = "Hi there!" }
};
then the actual response includes an empty object (the Value property is missing):
I want the response to be:
{
"ResultProperty": { "Value": "Hi there!" }
}
While the other answers are good and solves the problem, if all you want is the general behavior to be like pre netcore3, you can use the Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.NewtonsoftJson NuGet package and in Startup.cs do:
services.AddControllers().AddNewtonsoftJson()
More info here. This way, you don't need to create any extra json-converters.
I ended up creating a custom JsonConverter (System.Text.Json.Serialization namespace) which forces JsonSerializer to serialize to the object's runtime type. See the Solution section below. It's lengthy but it works well and does not require me to sacrifice object oriented principles in my API's design. (If you need something quicker and can use Newtonsoft then check out the top voted answer instead.)
Some background: Microsoft has a System.Text.Json serialization guide with a section titled Serialize properties of derived classes with good information relevant to my question. In particular it explains why properties of derived types are not serialized:
This behavior is intended to help prevent accidental exposure of data
in a derived runtime-created type.
If that is not a concern for you then the behavior can be overridden in the call to JsonSerializer.Serialize by either explicitly specifying the derived type or by specifying object, for example:
// by specifying the derived type
jsonString = JsonSerializer.Serialize(objToSerialize, objToSerialize.GetType(), serializeOptions);
// or specifying 'object' works too
jsonString = JsonSerializer.Serialize<object>(objToSerialize, serializeOptions);
To accomplish this with ASP.NET Core you need to hook into the serialization process. I did this with a custom JsonConverter that calls JsonSerializer.Serialize one of the ways shown above. I also implemented support for deserialization which, while not explicitly asked for in the original question, is almost always needed anyway. (Oddly, supporting only serialization and not deserialization proved to be tricky anyway.)
Solution
I created a base class, DerivedTypeJsonConverter, which contains all of the serialization & deserialization logic. For each of your base types, you would create a corresponding converter class for it that derives from DerivedTypeJsonConverter. This is explained in the numbered directions below.
This solution follows the "type name handling" convention from Json.NET which introduces support for polymorphism to JSON. It works by including an additional $type property in the derived type's JSON (ex: "$type":"StringResultProperty") that tells the converter what the object's true type is. (One difference: in Json.NET, $type's value is a fully qualified type + assembly name, whereas my $type is a custom string which helps future-proof against namespace/assembly/class name changes.) API callers are expected to include $type properties in their JSON requests for derived types. The serialization logic solves my original problem by ensuring that all of the object's public properties are serialized, and for consistency the $type property is also serialized.
Directions:
1) Copy the DerivedTypeJsonConverter class below into your project.
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Dynamic;
using System.IO;
using System.Linq;
using System.Reflection;
using System.Text;
using System.Text.Json;
using System.Text.Json.Serialization;
public abstract class DerivedTypeJsonConverter<TBase> : JsonConverter<TBase>
{
protected abstract string TypeToName(Type type);
protected abstract Type NameToType(string typeName);
private const string TypePropertyName = "$type";
public override bool CanConvert(Type objectType)
{
return typeof(TBase) == objectType;
}
public override TBase Read(ref Utf8JsonReader reader, Type typeToConvert, JsonSerializerOptions options)
{
// get the $type value by parsing the JSON string into a JsonDocument
JsonDocument jsonDocument = JsonDocument.ParseValue(ref reader);
jsonDocument.RootElement.TryGetProperty(TypePropertyName, out JsonElement typeNameElement);
string typeName = (typeNameElement.ValueKind == JsonValueKind.String) ? typeNameElement.GetString() : null;
if (string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(typeName)) throw new InvalidOperationException($"Missing or invalid value for {TypePropertyName} (base type {typeof(TBase).FullName}).");
// get the JSON text that was read by the JsonDocument
string json;
using (var stream = new MemoryStream())
using (var writer = new Utf8JsonWriter(stream, new JsonWriterOptions { Encoder = options.Encoder })) {
jsonDocument.WriteTo(writer);
writer.Flush();
json = Encoding.UTF8.GetString(stream.ToArray());
}
// deserialize the JSON to the type specified by $type
try {
return (TBase)JsonSerializer.Deserialize(json, NameToType(typeName), options);
}
catch (Exception ex) {
throw new InvalidOperationException("Invalid JSON in request.", ex);
}
}
public override void Write(Utf8JsonWriter writer, TBase value, JsonSerializerOptions options)
{
// create an ExpandoObject from the value to serialize so we can dynamically add a $type property to it
ExpandoObject expando = ToExpandoObject(value);
expando.TryAdd(TypePropertyName, TypeToName(value.GetType()));
// serialize the expando
JsonSerializer.Serialize(writer, expando, options);
}
private static ExpandoObject ToExpandoObject(object obj)
{
var expando = new ExpandoObject();
if (obj != null) {
// copy all public properties
foreach (PropertyInfo property in obj.GetType().GetProperties(BindingFlags.Public | BindingFlags.Instance).Where(p => p.CanRead)) {
expando.TryAdd(property.Name, property.GetValue(obj));
}
}
return expando;
}
}
2) For each of your base types, create a class that derives from DerivedTypeJsonConverter. Implement the 2 abstract methods which are for mapping $type strings to actual types. Here is an example for my IResultProperty interface that you can follow.
public class ResultPropertyJsonConverter : DerivedTypeJsonConverter<IResultProperty>
{
protected override Type NameToType(string typeName)
{
return typeName switch
{
// map string values to types
nameof(StringResultProperty) => typeof(StringResultProperty)
// TODO: Create a case for each derived type
};
}
protected override string TypeToName(Type type)
{
// map types to string values
if (type == typeof(StringResultProperty)) return nameof(StringResultProperty);
// TODO: Create a condition for each derived type
}
}
3) Register the converters in Startup.cs.
services.AddControllers()
.AddJsonOptions(options => {
options.JsonSerializerOptions.Converters.Add(new ResultPropertyJsonConverter());
// TODO: Add each converter
});
4) In requests to the API, objects of derived types will need to include a $type property. Example JSON: { "Value":"Hi!", "$type":"StringResultProperty" }
Full gist here
The documentation shows how to serialize as the derived class when calling the serializer directly. The same technique can also be used in a custom converter that we then can tag our classes with.
First, create a custom converter
public class AsRuntimeTypeConverter<T> : JsonConverter<T>
{
public override T Read(ref Utf8JsonReader reader, Type typeToConvert, JsonSerializerOptions options)
{
return JsonSerializer.Deserialize<T>(ref reader, options);
}
public override void Write(Utf8JsonWriter writer, T value, JsonSerializerOptions options)
{
JsonSerializer.Serialize(writer, value, value?.GetType() ?? typeof(object), options);
}
}
Then mark the relevant classes to be used with the new converter
[JsonConverter(typeof(AsRuntimeTypeConverter<MyBaseClass>))]
public class MyBaseClass
{
...
Alternately, the converter can be registered in startup.cs instead
services
.AddControllers(options =>
.AddJsonOptions(options =>
{
options.JsonSerializerOptions.Converters.Add(new AsRuntimeTypeConverter<MyBaseClass>());
}));
I had a similar issue, where I was returning an enumerable of type TAnimal (but the object instances were of derived types such as Dog, Cat, etc.):
[HttpGet]
public IEnumerable<TAnimal> GetAnimals()
{
IEnumerable<TAnimal> list = GetListOfAnimals();
return list;
}
This only included properties defined in TAnimal.
However, in ASP .NET Core 3.1 at least, I found that I could just cast the object instances to object, and the JSON serializer then included all the properties from the derived classes:
[HttpGet]
public IEnumerable<object> GetAnimals()
{
IEnumerable<TAnimal> list = GetListOfAnimals();
return list.Select(a => (object)a);
}
(Note that the signature of the GetAnimals method must also changed, but that doesn't usually matter much in a web API context). If you need to provide type information for Swagger or whatever, you can annotate the method:
[HttpGet]
[Produces(MediaTypeNames.Application.Json, Type = typeof(TAnimal[]))]
public IEnumerable<object> GetAnimals()
{
...
}
Casting to object is a simple solution if you only have a 1-layer-deep object hierarchy to worry about.
This is the expected result. You're upcasting when you do that, so what will be serialized is the upcasted object, not the actual derived type. If you need stuff from the derived type, then that has to be the type of the property. You may want to use generics for this reason. In other words:
public class Result<TResultProperty>
where TResultProperty : IResultProperty
{
public TResultProperty ResultProperty { get; set; } // property uses an interface type
}
Then:
return new Result<StringResultProperty> {
ResultProperty = new StringResultProperty { Value = "Hi there!" }
};
I solved it by writing this extension:
public static class JsonSerializationExtensions
{
public static string ToJson<T>(this IEnumerable<T> enumerable, bool includeDerivedTypesProperties = true)
where T : class
{
var jsonOptions = new JsonSerializerOptions()
{
PropertyNamingPolicy = JsonNamingPolicy.CamelCase
};
if (includeDerivedTypeProperties)
{
var collection = enumerable.Select(e => e as object).ToList();
return JsonSerializer.Serialize<object>(collection, jsonOptions);
}
else
{
return JsonSerializer.Serialize(enumerable, jsonOptions);
}
}
}
I was also struggling with this in a .NET Core 3.1 API, where I wanted the result to include $type attribute.
As suggested, install the correct package and then 'AddNewtonsoftJson'.
I wanted the $type field to be added to show the derived type handling, to get that
services.AddControllers().AddNewtonsoftJson(options =>
{
options.SerializerSettings.TypeNameHandling = Newtonsoft.Json.TypeNameHandling.All;
});
Not knocking Newtonsoft, but I found an easier way to resolve this with the built handlers.
[OperationContract]
[WebInvoke(Method = "GET", UriTemplate = "/emps", BodyStyle = WebMessageBodyStyle.Wrapped, RequestFormat = WebMessageFormat.Json, ResponseFormat = WebMessageFormat.Json)]
List<emp> GetEmps();
//[DataContract(Namespace = "foo")] <<< comment/removed this line
public class emp
{
public string userId { get; set; }
public string firstName { get; set; }
}
public class dept
{
public string deptId{ get; set; }
public string deptName{ get; set; }
}
In my case dept objects where working fine, but emp ones were not - they came across as empty.
I have a WCF service which has methods that depend on reading values (OData) from the http request's querystring. I'm trying to write unit tests which inject in mock values into the querystring, then when I call the method it would use these mock values rather than erroring due to the request context not being available.
I've tried using WCFMock (which is based on Moq) however I don't see a way to set or get the querystring from the WebOperationContext that it provides.
Any ideas?
I ended up using the IOC pattern to solve this, creating an IQueryStringHelper interface that is passed into the constructor of the service. If it isn't passed in then it'll default to use the "real" QueryStringHelper class. When running test cases, it'll use an overloaded service constructor to pass in the TestQueryStringHelper instance, which lets you set a mock value for the querystring.
Here is the querystring helper code.
public interface IQueryStringHelper {
string[] GetParameters();
}
public class QueryStringHelper : IQueryStringHelper {
public string[] GetParameters() {
var properties = OperationContext.Current.IncomingMessageProperties;
var property = properties[HttpRequestMessageProperty.Name] as HttpRequestMessageProperty;
string queryString = property.QueryString;
return queryString.Split('&');
}
}
public class TestQueryStringHelper : IQueryStringHelper {
private string mockValue;
public TestQueryStringHelper(string value) {
mockValue = value;
}
public string[] GetParameters() {
return mockValue.Split('&');
}
}
And the service implementation:
public partial class RestService : IRestService {
private IAuthenticator _auth;
private IQueryStringHelper _queryStringHelper;
public RestService() : this(new Authenticator(), new QueryStringHelper()) {
}
public RestService(IAuthenticator auth, IQueryStringHelper queryStringHelper = null) {
_auth = auth;
if (queryStringHelper != null) {
_queryStringHelper = queryStringHelper;
}
}
}
And how to consume it from a test case:
string odata = String.Format("$filter=Id eq guid'{0}'", "myguid");
var service = new RestService(m_auth,new TestQueryStringHelper(odata));
var entities = service.ReadAllEntities();
Hopefully this helps someone else.
I am trying to use Ninject to implement cascading injection into a class that contains an IList field. It seems that, unless I specifically specify each binding to use in the kernel.Get method, the IList property is always injected with a list of a single default object.
The following VSTest code illustrates the problem. The first test fails because the IList field contains one MyType object with Name=null. The second test passes, but I had to specifically tell Ninject what constructor arguments to use. I am using the latest build from the ninject.web.mvc project for MVC 3.
Does Ninject specifically treat IList different, or is there a better way to handle this? Note that this seems to only be a problem when using an IList. Createing a custom collection object that wraps IList works as expected in the first test.
[TestClass()]
public class NinjectTest
{
[TestMethod()]
public void ListTest_Fails_NameNullAndCountIncorrect()
{
var kernel = new Ninject.StandardKernel(new MyNinjectModule());
var target = kernel.Get<MyModel>();
var actual = target.GetList();
// Fails. Returned value is set to a list of a single object equal to default(MyType)
Assert.AreEqual(2, actual.Count());
// Fails because MyType object is initialized with a null "Name" property
Assert.AreEqual("Fred", actual.First().Name);
}
[TestMethod()]
public void ListTest_Passes_SeemsLikeUnnecessaryConfiguration()
{
var kernel = new Ninject.StandardKernel(new MyNinjectModule());
var target = kernel.Get<MyModel>(new ConstructorArgument("myGenericObject", kernel.Get<IGenericObject<MyType>>(new ConstructorArgument("myList", kernel.Get<IList<MyType>>()))));
var actual = target.GetList();
Assert.AreEqual(2, actual.Count());
Assert.AreEqual("Fred", actual.First().Name);
}
}
public class MyNinjectModule : NinjectModule
{
public override void Load()
{
Bind<IList<MyType>>().ToConstant(new List<MyType> { new MyType { Name = "Fred" }, new MyType { Name = "Bob" } });
Bind<IGenericObject<MyType>>().To<StubObject<MyType>>();
}
}
public class MyModel
{
private IGenericObject<MyType> myGenericObject;
public MyModel(IGenericObject<MyType> myGenericObject)
{
this.myGenericObject = myGenericObject;
}
public IEnumerable<MyType> GetList()
{
return myGenericObject.GetList();
}
}
public interface IGenericObject<T>
{
IList<T> GetList();
}
public class StubObject<T> : IGenericObject<T>
{
private IList<T> _myList;
public StubObject(IList<T> myList)
{
_myList = myList;
}
public IList<T> GetList()
{
return _myList;
}
}
public class MyType
{
public String Name { get; set; }
}
lists, collections and arrays are handled slightly different. For those types ninject will inject a list or array containing an instance of all bindings for the generic type. In your case the implementation type is a class which is aoutobound by default. So the list will contain one instance of that class. If you add an interface to that class and use this one the list will be empty.
While my service executes, many classes will need to access User.Current (that is my own User class). Can I safely store _currentUser in a [ThreadStatic] variable? Does WCF reuse its threads? If that is the case, when will it clean-up the ThreadStatic data? If using ThreadStatic is not safe, where should I put that data? Is there a place inside OperationContext.Current where I can store that kind of data?
Edit 12/14/2009: I can assert that using a ThreadStatic variable is not safe. WCF threads are in a thread pool and the ThreadStatic variable are never reinitialized.
There's a blog post which suggests implementing an IExtension<T>. You may also take a look at this discussion.
Here's a suggested implementation:
public class WcfOperationContext : IExtension<OperationContext>
{
private readonly IDictionary<string, object> items;
private WcfOperationContext()
{
items = new Dictionary<string, object>();
}
public IDictionary<string, object> Items
{
get { return items; }
}
public static WcfOperationContext Current
{
get
{
WcfOperationContext context = OperationContext.Current.Extensions.Find<WcfOperationContext>();
if (context == null)
{
context = new WcfOperationContext();
OperationContext.Current.Extensions.Add(context);
}
return context;
}
}
public void Attach(OperationContext owner) { }
public void Detach(OperationContext owner) { }
}
Which you could use like that:
WcfOperationContext.Current.Items["user"] = _currentUser;
var user = WcfOperationContext.Current.Items["user"] as MyUser;
An alternative solution without adding extra drived class.
OperationContext operationContext = OperationContext.Current;
operationContext.IncomingMessageProperties.Add("SessionKey", "ABCDEFG");
To get the value
var ccc = aaa.IncomingMessageProperties["SessionKey"];
That's it
I found that we miss the data or current context when we make async call with multiple thread switching. To handle such scenario you can try to use CallContext. It's supposed to be used in .NET remoting but it should also work in such scenario.
Set the data in the CallContext:
DataObject data = new DataObject() { RequestId = "1234" };
CallContext.SetData("DataSet", data);
Retrieving shared data from the CallContext:
var data = CallContext.GetData("DataSet") as DataObject;
// Shared data object has to implement ILogicalThreadAffinative
public class DataObject : ILogicalThreadAffinative
{
public string Message { get; set; }
public string Status { get; set; }
}
Why ILogicalThreadAffinative ?
When a remote method call is made to an object in another AppDomain,the current CallContext class generates a LogicalCallContext that travels along with the call to the remote location.
Only objects that expose the ILogicalThreadAffinative interface and are stored in the CallContext are propagated outside the AppDomain.