I know this sound strange, but please bear with me. We have a legacy desktop app (DataFlex), and we are developing a new web app. Both apps share the same business logic. We are in the process of moving the business logic to a centralized project that is exposed as an asp.net-core web api, to be used both by the desktop app and the web app.
So far, we have been able to access the new business logic project from the legacy desktop app via COM, but because maintaining interfaces and DataFlex wrapper classes is a pain, we are hoping to find an easier way.
We could access the business logic using the web api via http. But many users are still only using the desktop app, and setting up web servers for all of them is not something that can be done anytime soon. So we want to call the asp.net-core project in a way that resembles the way a web app does it, passing method calls as strings (JSON?)
Is this feasible? If so, how?
Related
I am developing a web application on the Vue Framework. But I ran into a problem and I don't know how to implement a Zoom API and any video calling company since my web application is dedicated to allowing different people with similar tastes to come in and talk to each other.
I would appreciate if you can explain to me how it could be done or what would be the process to carry out in order to implement it
The Zoom API allows developers to access information from Zoom. You can use this API to build private services or public applications on the zoom app marketplace. To learn how to get your credentials and create private/public applications. All endpoints are available via HTTPS and are located at api.zoom.us/v2/.
For instance you can list all users on an account via https://api.zoom.us/v2/users/.
First off, I need to mention that I'm not sure if what I'm trying to achieve is even supported by Piranha CMS (that's partly what I'm trying to determine here). They mention the ability to create a standalone content hub on their website, but my assumptions of what is possible with that model might be incorrect. What I've already done is created an ASP.NET MVC application that is hosting Piranha CMS and I've published it to Azure websites for testing purposes--that part works as expected. The content management interface is the only user facing piece here--it is meant only to serve as the content hub for the client application (just the one for now as this is just proof of concept work).
I am now trying to build a client ASP.NET MVC application that pulls content from the hub. This is where I'm thinking that my assumptions may have been wrong. I was thinking that I'd be able to install the Piranha CMS nuget package(s) on the client as well, and I'd be able to configure the framework to get content from the hub in the same way that it would if the content were hosted on the client site. I realize that I could get the content from the hub using Piranha's REST api, but what I want to do is to be able to use the more friendly entity model based api for this.
So my question is whether it is possible (within reason) to setup Piranha CMS in the way that I've described. If it is, how exactly do I configure the client such that it is aware of the location of the content hub?
There are currently no .net client api consuming the rest services as the simplest scenario would be to deploy .net applications together with the server. In the setups I've done native apps & html5 knockout/angular applications have used the rest api's for getting json data. You should however be able to white such a module, performing the HTTP calls and the deserializing the json without any problems.
Regards
Håkan
I've programmed a lot in asp.net mvc web applications. Now I want to write cross-platform mobile applications with cordova for the frontend and azure for the backend.
I am in doubt whether to use azure mobile services or WebAPI, because I want the power and freedom of WebAPI, but the convenience of azure mobile services. I do not understand concepts such as authentication, push notifications, etc.
My main goal is to focus on the application logic, frontend and backend with a significant weight of that logic in the backend. For this I have great doubts.
1st. I see both good mechanisms in AMS and WebAPI for external authentication, but not to manage your own authentication. What is the best way to manage your own authentication? Is Azure Active Directory solution?
2nd My intention is to create a well-defined API methods that return the exact data (json), rather than a rest api queryable (odata).
Wich is te best for this, WebAPI or AMS?
3rd I have experience with SQL Server, its relationships and Entity framework, but I do not care to learn and use NoSQL technologies, which is better? (However, I'm not comfortable with I can not use many to many relationships in NoSql).
Thank you very much.
there is not a real general answer for that, so take these as advices.
At first, keep in mind that AMS and WebApi are not so far. An AMS project IS a WebApi project with some helpers inside to make you comfortable working with related services (push notification, table entities), but you will lose a bit of control on your application.
The choice depends on your needs
Azure Active Directory IS a solution, but there are a lot more. You can use your preferred framework. AMS has got a pretty integrated login with most known social network and azure active directory as well, and is very easy to set up.
I'd suggest AMS. It will be easier to setup and mantain.
AMS is just WebApi castrated. To get all these services easier for you, you cannot for example
Customize startup of your application
Use a dependency injection framework
Run background tasks
And other stuff like that.
Hope it helps!
If I have a working ASP.NET MVC 4 application with MVC in IIS on the back end and Angular and other scripts on the front end, and I'm looking to port that to Icenium to get it into app stores, is it correct to assume that any dynamic "server-side" stuff is outside of the scope of what Icenium will handle? In other words, the server-side implementations of any AJAX calls, etc., will not be present in the application and I'll have to make the client-side code act as though it's communicating with an external third-party API (perhaps with new concerns with cross-domain AJAX that I didn't have to worry about before).
Icenium is a Cloud Based IDE to create Cross Platform Mobile Apps. You can use any client side library like
jQuery Mobile
Kendo UI Mobile etc
to create apps. Now coming back to AJAX call scenario. Icenium has nothing to do with AJAX call. It is task of library being used to handle those and bring result back to apps.
For example if you are using Kendo UI Mobile library then you can use KendoUI DataSource to create data source using AJAX call
Bottom line is Icenium has no role in making AJAX call etc. It is an IDE which allows you to create Cross Platform mobile Apps.
One more good news is that now Icenium plugin for Visual Studio is also available
Thanks
/DJ
I am developing a application that is using backbone.js for most of the front end logic and was thinking of using sqlite for storage, but i have run into a few complications with it and need to switch to another NoSQL database.
I see on ravendb's site that it was created in C# and you need a .net compiler. Most of the docs are for ASP MVC type application. I can not go this root because we are developing this as a tablet application with no microsoft based technologies on the client side ( because we want it to work with android and apple )
The server however will be .NET and so i figured this might be do able. Just wondering if this is worth pursuing and if anyone has had any experience using ravendb? Or should i go for mongodb?
It is possible to expose RavenDB directly to a JavaScript application, sure. But it's usually not recommended. The main reason is security, but there are many other reasons to have a middle-layer.
For example, you often need a server-side location to perform application logic. Not everything can be done in the database itself, and if you do it all in the application then you will probably send a lot more data to the app than it really needs. Over the internet, that could mean a slow app.
The route many people take, is to use ASP.Net WebAPI, or ServiceStack, or another similar framework. This gives you a way to expose REST endpoints that your JavaScript app can call. You can connect to RavenDB from there.
Also, you seem to have the misconception that if you used ASP.Net MVC on the server that you couldn't target Apple or Android. That's just false. Whether you use a SPA approach or a traditional approach, you are delivering standards-based content, such as HTML, CSS, JSON and JavaScript.
Yes, You can use it. Actually RavenDB's server is a RESTful web service, which means you can work with it with any kinds of HTTP clients. These clients should be able to issue standard HTTP verbs like GET, PUT, DELETE etc.
ASP MVC is server side. I still at a loss as to why you would want to expose your db to a clientside piece. It is completely worth doing in a server side piece, but do not expose something like a db directly to your client.