I have deployed my service fabric stateful api created using default Dotnet framework template in the azure cluster. When I tried to access the api getting below error.
{"Error":{"Code":"E_INVALIDARG","Message":"Invalid argument"}}
However this working fine in my local cluster.
below my api url
https://svfab03test.centralus.cloudapp.azure.com:19080/891d72b6-06cd-4dbf-a6b8-8ee1f4382045/131818608371580228/23f6df71-2458-4e5e-bdfd-76ba47ea8f46/api/values
I have tried like this also but getting the same error
https://svfab03test.centralus.cloudapp.azure.com:19080/PublishTestSF/PublishTestAPI/api/values
Can someone please help
Unless you have changed the defaults configuration, Service Fabric Reverse Proxy by default runs on port 19081, not 19080, the port 19080 is used by the gateway to
provide to access service fabric explorer.
You should try: https://domain:19081/appName/servicename/apipath
if they are stateful, you should pass ?PartitionKey=<key>&PartitionKind=<partitionkind>
Please see the docs in here:
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/service-fabric/service-fabric-reverseproxy
Related
I have followed the instructions here and here to setup SignalR in a ASP.NET Core web app. Then replicated the same code in a Service Fabric ASP.NET Core service only to find that the 100% working code when hosted outside of service fabric did not work when hosted on Service Fabric. When I open the html client included in both of these samples and turn on developer tools in the browser I see what appears to be the WebSocket handshake failing with HTTP 410 GONE errors.
In the Service Fabric documentation for ASP.NET CORE I found that the ServiceFabric Middleware can return HTTP 410 GONE if the identifier that validates each request does not match. But I guess I don't understand the inner workings of SignalR to know how to properly configure Service Fabric to unblock this.
I am running on a local single node cluster so I figured that I wouldn't have any issues until I needed to do multi-node cluster deployment, at which point I would need to figure out the SignalR backplane I'm going to use.
Any idea what would cause this to be?
I needed to disable Service Fabric Integration in the WebHost Builder. Simply replacing this:
.UseServiceFabricIntegration(listener, ServiceFabricIntegrationOptions.UseUniqueServiceUrl)
with this:
.UseServiceFabricIntegration(listener, ServiceFabricIntegrationOptions.None)
allowed it to start working.
I have .net core API inside the web app and that web app is backend pool for azure application gateway. while trying to access the web app got below error.
"502 - Web server received an invalid response while acting as a gateway or proxy server."
On app GW, health prob for that web app in unhealthy but while access the API as a https://abc.azurewebsites.net/api/values then it works.
When we deploy API in Web App Service then apiname.azurewebsites.net does not work give any probes to application gateway and treat unhealthy. API works like xxx.azurewebsites.net/api/values and Application Gateway also know this path. We have to put /api/values in override backend path of http settings. Same have to do in health probes.
Yes, you can first verify if the backend API could access directly without app gateway. Then this error may happen due to the following main reasons:
NSG, UDR or Custom DNS is blocking access to backend pool members.
Back-end VMs or instances of virtual machine scale set are not responding to the default health probe.
Invalid or improper configuration of custom health probes.
Azure Application Gateway's back-end pool is not configured or empty.
None of the VMs or instances in virtual machine scale set are healthy.
Request time-out or connectivity issues with user requests.
Generally, the Backend healthy status and details could point it out and show some clues. You could also verify all of the above reasons one by one according to this DOC.
When trying to call the OData service (in our example the BusinessPartnerService) on the S4 instances we have we are getting the error as seen in ref6 and ref7. However, if we are calling the API via a browser with the same credentials we can retrieve data from the system.
We want to understand what is causing the error and how to configure the connection in the cloud foundry environment correctly.
The full configuration of the system can be discussed and shown during a web session.
I'm looking for a way to expose my customer's WCF Services as REST Services (and create all the security stack to support claims / oauth authentication and authorization)
I'm working on 2 different approach to do so:
Create a new REST Service which will act as a proxy to
expose my WCF Service as REST Services (11 services / 130 web methods to
migrate...) and secure it using an IP STS / RS STS
Use a existing product like Apigee which will do all those job for me and even more feature than initially planned.
I'm trying to play with Apigee first, but I'm facing an issue while creating the API Proxy.
I've deployed a simple WCF Service (with only 2 methods) on a Windows Azure VM exposed in basicHttp (which works as expected - means I test it in a Console app successfully, even when the client app is located outside my Azure's VM -).
Problem comes when I follow the Apigee workflow to expose it as a REST Service. I try to fetch service's wsdl on Apigee portal and got following error:
Error: Cannot invoke method getOperation() on null object
Does someone know where the issue come from ? I don't have much information from Apigee portal.
I already validate my wsdl through http://www.wsdl-analyzer.com/ but everything looks fine...
Meantime, Amazone webservice works fine on Apigee and generate the REST Service so problem seems to come from my service's WSDL
This bug has been fixed and will be included in the next release (R24.4). If you still have any problems with the new release, please let us know.
I recently got a similar error in the most recent version of Apigee (Version 141029).
The error: "Fetch WSDL Error: Cannot invoke method startsWith() on null object".
The fix was to rename my local file from "somename.xml" to "somename.wsdl".
I am running a self-hosted WCF service. In the service configuration, I am using localhost in my BaseAddresses that I hook my endpoints to. When trying to connect to an endpoint using the WCF test client, I have no problem connecting to the endpoint and getting the metadata using the machine's name. The problem that I run into is that the client that is generated from metadata uses localhost in the endpoint URLs it wants to connect to. I'm assuming that this is because localhost is the endpoint URL published by metadata. As a result, any calls to the methods on the service will fail since localhost on the calling machine isn't running the service.
What I would like to figure out is if it is possible for the service metadata to publish the proper URL to a client depending on the client who is calling it. For example, if I was requesting the service metadata from a machine on the same network as the server the endpoint should be net.tcp://MYSERVER:1234/MyEndpoint. If I was requesting it from a machine outside the network, the URL should be net.tcp://MYSERVER.mydomain.com:1234/MyEndpoint. And obviously if the client was on the same machine, THEN the URL could be net.tcp://localhost:1234/MyEndpoint.
Is this just a flaw in the default IMetadataExchange contract? Is there some reason the metadata needs to publish the information in a non-contextual way? Is there another way I should be configuring my BaseAddresses in order to get the functionality I want?
Thanks,
Mike
What .NET version are you using? If you're using .NET 4.0, add the UseRequestHeadersForMetadataAddressBehavior to your service host:
UseRequestHeadersForMetadataAddressBehavior urh =
new UseRequestHeadersForMetadataAddressBehavior();
serviceHost.Description.Behaviors.Add(urh);
Obviously, this needs to be done prior to opening the service host.
If you're using .NET 3.5, there's a hotfix that adds this behavior: support.microsoft.com/kb/971842.