I can see create-react-app has added installation with npx. So it made me curious to check which one is better npm, npx or yarn. Which one is better and which is better to use and why?
I don't see why this got negative votes, not everyone comes with inbuilt knowledge on this stuff right ? and this is the place to ask 😅
npm: installation of packages (libraries), i.e. pieces of functionality to help you build your own applications.
npx: npx is a tool to execute packages without installing the packages.
yarn: also installation of packages. yarn is a replacement for npm that sits on top of the same packages repository.
npx isn't the same as the other two, it is a feature of npm to run packages without installing. As for which one is better between npm and yarn, there isn't a clear "winner" (general rule to apply in life too). I personally prefer yarn since in my experience it was faster and less verbose, another positive was it had a lockfile but now npm has one too (and I hear new versions are faster as well).
tl;dr: Either is fine really.
You can compare the feature of npm and yarn. yarn is faster than npm because it is doing parallel installation and npm is doing serial installation of modules. Previous version of npm does not have lockfile now both npm and yarn have lock file. Both are build on the top of same repository.
npx is totally different from npm and yarn. It is a tool to execute packages without installing it.
So I will suggest yarn if you want to decrease the build time of the application.
Related
Note: Do guide me if something is missing.
So, I wanted to install a package from https://rnfirebase.io/auth/usage, but I have an npm project. The command on the website has only for yarn. I don't want to add yarn to project because (Is there any harm in using NPM and Yarn in the same project?) it states that it is not recommended.
So, then how do I install it with npm?
You have to use yarn, or you can look for a package that has the functions that you are looking for using npm
You can install it with npm just fine, don't worry. They are all package managers installing npm packages from the same repository. There is no difference in what you are installing or how they are installed. You can get different node_module structures, but for yarn you need config for that.
Yes its not recommended because it generates different lockfiles that will dictate different structures and versions in your node_modules folder. You want multiples devs to have the same "experience". However, lots of JS frameworks will come pre-configured with yarn, like React Native and you just end up having two lockfiles. One for npm and one for yarn. There is no harm in deleting the yarn file and keeping the package-lock. If you delete both, a new lockfile for the package manager you are using will be generated on npm i | yarn i | pnpm anyway.
To install it with npm just use npm i <PACKAGE_NAME> so npm i #react-native-firebase/app.
Here is the npm repo page for that package, https://www.npmjs.com/package/#react-native-firebase/app, notice the install command is npm! Only reason firebase devs only mention yarn is because they are hipsters ;)
I know pnpm and yarn reuse modules that we already installed, what, in not updated tutorials that i see, we see that this is something that pnpm and yarn came to fix in npm, which downloaded the modules from the internet every time we install it. This still a thing? Does modern npm save cache or something to speed up installation?
Yes, npm has a cache of package tarballs. It does not download the packages from the internet all the time. In fact, you can verify that by running npm install --offline.
The reason npm is slower than pnpm is because of other reasons:
pnpm uses a content-addressable store. Each file inside the node_modules directory is a hard link to the content-addressable store. This makes pnpm faster and more disk space-efficient.
also, pnpm is running the installation stages separately for every installed package. npm cannot do all these operations concurrently as of the current latest versions (v6 and v7).
There might be other reasons pnpm is faster but these 2 must be the most important ones. npm's cache is not one of the reasons.
what should I use to install react-native dependencies? yarn or npm, in my case npm have some problems with some of dependencies.
Sometimes i use npm to install these, but i am still confused to decide which one to use permanently.
Both NPM and Yarn are great tools in managing your project's dependencies. There are a lot of improvements Yarn has over npm from faster speeds and stronger security. Many say that if you are already familiar with NPM that a jump to Yarn isn’t really necessary, especially with the release of version 5. Personally I will favor Yarn over NPM mainly because of the speed. But it all boils down to a matter of preference.
Refer
Refer
yarn is much more faster than npm. furthermore npm is also an impressive option
I have a project with a package.json file and an install bash script that, among other steps, runs npm install.
I'm thinking of updating the script so that it runs yarn install if yarn is available (to take advantage of yarn's caching, lockfile, etc), and falls back to npm install otherwise. As far as I can tell, all the packages seem to install and work ok either way.
Are yarn and npm interchangeable enough for this to be a viable approach, though? Or are there potential issues that this could lead to? Are we meant to just pick one, or is yarn interchangeable with npm in practice?
(nb. I've read this closely related question, but I'm asking this as a separate question because it's about explicitly supporting both yarn and npm install processes in a project)
Yarn and npm (version >=3.0.0) should be relatively compatible, especially moving from npm to Yarn, because compatibility is one of the stated goals of Yarn. As stated in Migrating from npm:
Yarn can consume the same package.json format as npm, and can install any package from the npm registry.
So, in theory, any package.json that is valid for npm should also work equally well for Yarn. Note that I say that npm v2 is probably less compatible - this is because npm migrated from a nested node_modules structure to a flat layout (which is what Yarn uses). That said, Yarn and npm v3 should produce very similar layouts, because, as stated in the issue I linked:
To a first approximation we should try to be very compatible with the node_modules layout for people who need that compatibility, because it'll be the most likely way to avoid long-tail compatibility problems.
However, you will not be able to take advantage of the Yarn.lock generated by Yarn, because (as the name suggests) it's only supported by Yarn, and npm shrinkwrap is not compatible.
Also, as noted by #RyanZim, older versions of Yarn don't support pre- and post-install hooks, but versions later than v0.16.1 do. If you rely on these hooks, you will need to specify to users that versions greater than v0.16.1 are required.
In summary, as long as you encounter no bugs and only use features that are shared by both package managers, you should have no issues whatsoever.
Just tried out Yarn and indeed it's mega-fast. After running yarn in the console with a loaded package.json, it installed everything. I then ran npm dedupe expecting nothing much to happen since Yarn is so optimized, but it removed a ton of stuff. Is there some Yarn equivalent to npm dedupe?
Addition:
As noted in my comment below, I thought perhaps yarn install --flat might be an npm dedupe equivalent as the Yarn documentation describes it as "installing one and only one version of a package". So I played around with --flat and there's a couple things to note:
It will prompt you to choose what version of a package to install when the tree results in requests for more than one version. I could imagine this being one hell of a task for larger projects. I just picked the latest version for each package I was prompted for and as you can imagine, trying to run the app resulted in cannot find module errors.
I ran npm dedupe after doing a yarn install --flat and it still resulted in a ton of removals. This was a surprise to me.
So I'm taking it that npm dedupe is doing some other magic under the hood and I'm just naive about processes that I need not be concerned with. Perhaps it's just best to leave the tree alone and forget about --flat and dedupe altogether.
It seems like even now Yarn doesn't do the greatest job of minimizing duplicate dependencies. Running yarn --flat forces there to be only one version of a dependency even when they may not be compatible, so that's not ideal. You can use the yarn-deduplicate package to minimize the number of duplicates, while still allowing some in cases where there are not overlapping requirements. yarn-deduplicate also has a --fail option which will return a non-zero (failing) status. This can be useful to run on CI to ensure that anybody who modifies dependencies doesn't introduce new duplicates.
Quoted from the Yarn docs:
The dedupe command isn’t necessary. yarn install will already dedupe.
https://yarnpkg.com/lang/en/docs/cli/dedupe/