I want to create a "Fact" type relationship between a Measure group and a "Fact dimension" both based on the same fact table.
I use the below piece of code
var cubeDim = OlapCube.Dimensions.GetByName(dimensionName);
var regMgDim = new RegularMeasureGroupDimension(cubeDim.ID);
olapMeasureGroup.Dimensions.Add(regMgDim);
var cubeDimKeyAttr = cubeDim.Dimension.KeyAttribute;
var mgAttr = regMgDim.Attributes.Add(cubeDimKeyAttr.ID);
mgAttr.Type = MeasureGroupAttributeType.Granularity;
But it gets created as a "Regular" type relationship.
I want it to end up like this (See relationship type):
Managed to figure it out.
The code should be,
var cubeDim = OlapCube.Dimensions.GetByName(dimensionName);
var regMgDim = new DegenerateMeasureGroupDimension(cubeDim.ID);
olapMeasureGroup.Dimensions.Add(regMgDim);
Although the name DegenerateMeasureGroupDimension is not obvious, it is the dimension to create fact dimension relationship.
Related
After reading this excellent Medium article, I've been stoked on Migrations in CraftCMS. They've been super useful in importing the same changes across the 10 or so developers who work on our site.
When trying to change the handles on individual fields within block types within matrix blocks (whew) via migrations, I came across a hurdle. The field itself can easily have its "handle" attribute updated, but the columns table for that matrix block's content (matrixcontent_xxxxx) do not get updated to reflect any updated handles. The association between the Matrix Block & its associated Matrix Content table only exists in the info column in the field record for that Matrix Block.
If the Matrix Block's field is updated via the CMS, the change is reflected, so it's gotta be somewhere in Craft's source, but it's not apparent through the Craft CMS Class Reference.
Any ideas?
Edited to add the migration snippet:
public function safeUp()
{
// Strings for labels, etc.
$matrix_block_instructions = "instructions";
$block_label = "Video";
$block_handle = "video";
$field_handle = "video_url";
$field_label = "Video URL";
$field_instructions = "Add a YouTube or Facebook video URL.";
// Fetching the MatrixBlock fields used on the entries themselves
$video_gallery_1 = Craft::$app->fields->getFieldByHandle("handle_1");
$video_gallery_2 = Craft::$app->fields->getFieldByHandle("handle_2");
$video_gallery_3 = Craft::$app->fields->getFieldByHandle("handle_3");
$galleries = [$video_gallery_1, $video_gallery_2, $video_gallery_3];
foreach( $galleries as $gallery ) {
// Fetching the record for this specific MatrixBlock field.
$gallery_record = \craft\records\Field::find()->where(
['id' => $gallery->id]
)->one();
// Fetching the record for this specific MatrixBlockType
$gallery_block_id = $gallery->getBlockTypes()[0]->id;
$gallery_block = \craft\records\MatrixBlockType::find()->where(
['id' => $gallery_block_id]
)->one();
// Assigning standard labels for the MatrixBlockType
$gallery_block->name = $block_label;
$gallery_block->handle = $block_handle;
$gallery_block->update();
// Getting the specific ... 1 ... field to edit
$field_group = \craft\records\FieldLayout::find()->where(
['id' => $gallery_block->fieldLayoutId]
)->one();
$field_layout_field = $field_group->fields[0];
$field = $field_layout_field->field;
$field = \craft\records\Field::find()->where(
['id' => $field->id]
)->one();
// Assigning standard labels for the Label
$field->name = $field_label;
$field->handle = $field_handle;
$field->instructions = $field_instructions;
$field->update();
// Updating the MatrixBlock record with new instructions
$gallery_record->refresh();
$gallery_record->instructions = $matrix_block_instructions;
$gallery_record->update();
}
OK, so my apologies if anyone was stoked on figuring this out, but my approach above was kind of a crazy person's approach, but I've found my own solution.
The key here is that I should have been interacting with craft\fields\MatrixBlock and the craft\fields\PlainText objects, not craft\records\Field objects. There's a method within \craft\services\Fields for saving the field that requires a FieldInterface implemented. This is actually the default classes returned, and I was making more work for myself in the code!
Within that foreach loop, this worked out:
// Fetching the record for this specific MatrixBlock field.
$gallery->instructions = $matrix_block_instructions;
// Update the MatrixBlockType
$gallery_block_id = $gallery->getBlockTypes()[0]->id;
$gallery_block = \craft\records\MatrixBlockType::find()->where(
['id' => $gallery_block_id]
)->one();
$gallery_block->name = $block_label;
$gallery_block->handle = $block_handle;
$gallery_block->update();
// Update the actual field.
$field = $gallery->blockTypeFields[0];
$field->name = $field_label;
$field->handle = $field_handle;
$field->instructions = $field_instructions;
Craft::$app->getFields()->saveField( $field );
Craft::$app->getFields()->saveField( $gallery );
Thanks for looking at this, and sorry for being a crazy person.
I have a datatable with two columns ID & Role.
Same ID can have multiple roles.
I need to convert this table to a comma separated grouped table.
I am trying to use following query but unable to solve the issue.
LINQ:
From row As DataRow In dtData.Rows.Cast(Of DataRow)
Group row By id = row.Field(Of Integer)("ID") Into Group
Select ID, Role = String.Join(",", From i In Group Select i.Field(Of String)("Role"))
Issue
Any help will be appreciated.
Update 1:
Table structure
Needed table Structure
You could create a linq like in your comments just that this returns a list of arrays of string:
Here is the code:
(From row As DataRow In myDatatable
Group row By id = row.Field(Of String)("ID") Into Group
Select {id, String.Join(",", From i In Group Select i.Field(Of String)("Role"))}).ToList
If you need the result in a datatable you can build a new datatable
Make a for each of result and use the activity Add data row. In ArrayRow add the item and in DataTable the new data table
If you use the activity Output data table you can see the results
I am kind of confused by what you are wanting as the ultimate outcome. An idea that may guide you but not be exactly what you want is you can change a DataTable to an anonymous projection and then get what you want out of that. You can do a 'Select' off a DataTable which enters into an extension method of 'what' do you want to select. If I was to do a new {} without any class or container object after the 'new' I would be scoped to just a method or not. This is a good advantage when you want to mold something for a specific use in just a single method to use tailored to a specific view.
static void Main(string[] args)
{
DataTable d = new DataTable();
d.Columns.Add("ItemName", typeof(string));
d.Columns.Add("MinValue", typeof(float));
d.Columns.Add("MaxValue", typeof(float));
d.Rows.Add("Widget1", 0.1, 0.2);
d.Rows.Add("Widget2", 0.2, 0.4);
d.Rows.Add("Widget3", 0.1, 0.2);
var dataTable = d.AsEnumerable();
//What do you want to select? The new {} without an indicator means anonymous type projection. This will exist only in
// the scope listed.
var data = dataTable.Select(x => new { ItemName = x[0], MinValue = x[1], MaxValue = x[2] }).ToList();
//My 'data' type is now well typed for it's properties in the scope it's in.
var joined = String.Join(", ", data.Select(x => x.ItemName).ToList());
Console.WriteLine(joined);
Console.WriteLine($"{data.Count}");
Console.ReadLine();
}
EDIT 1-26-18
Strange I thought I updated the code yesterday. To get a reusable object you could bind your front end to, you just make a POCO like so:
public class Foo
{
public string Bar { get; set; }
public string MinAndMax { get; set; }
}
While you could make another DataTable, frankly DataTables are like WinForms. They get the job done, but they are archaic and not friendly to do Linq with as easily as just a well formed POCO. And if you get into using Linq it will play better with well formed objects and they are easy to create.
var data = dataTable.Select(x => new Foo { Bar = x[0].ToString(), MinAndMax = $"{x[1]} {x[2]}" }).ToList();
//My 'data' type is now well typed for 'Foo' class and it's properties in the scope it's in.
var joined = String.Join(", ", data.Select(x => $"{x.Bar} {x.MinAndMax}").ToList());
I successfully change BKPF-BKTXT with FM CHANGE_DOCUMENT but why can't I change BSEG-ZUONR with FM CHANGE_DOCUMENT too?
Here's the FM CHANGE_DOCUMENT:
CALL FUNCTION 'CHANGE_DOCUMENT'
TABLES
T_BKDF = t_bkdf
T_BKPF = t_bkpf
T_BSEC = t_bsec
T_BSED = t_bsed
T_BSEG = t_bseg
T_BSET = t_bset
* T_BSEG_ADD =
.
Here's the code to change BKPF-BKTXT (succeeded):
wa_t_bkpf-mandt = sy-mandt.
wa_t_bkpf-bukrs = '1000'.
wa_t_bkpf-gjahr = gjahr_import.
wa_t_bkpf-belnr = belnr_import.
wa_t_bkpf-bktxt = zuonr_import.
APPEND wa_t_bkpf TO t_bkpf.
Here's the code to change BSEG-ZUONR (failed):
wa_t_bseg-mandt = sy-mandt.
wa_t_bseg-bukrs = '1000'.
wa_t_bseg-gjahr = gjahr_import.
wa_t_bseg-belnr = belnr_import.
wa_t_bseg-buzei = '1'.
wa_t_bseg-zuonr = zuonr_import.
APPEND wa_t_bseg TO t_bseg.
As author has no time to confirm, I can do this for him as I just tested this case.
If we pass to FM all parameters from its signature the update runs smoothly. For example, like this:
DATA: lt_bkdf TYPE TABLE OF bkdf,
lt_bkpf TYPE TABLE OF bkpf,
wa_bkpf TYPE bkpf,
lt_bsec TYPE TABLE OF bsec,
wa_bseg TYPE bseg,
lt_bsed TYPE TABLE OF bsed,
lt_bseg TYPE TABLE OF bseg,
lt_bset TYPE TABLE OF bset.
wa_bkpf-mandt = sy-mandt.
wa_bkpf-bukrs = '5900'.
wa_bkpf-gjahr = gjahr_import.
wa_bkpf-belnr = belnr_import.
wa_bkpf-bktxt = 'Batch'.
APPEND wa_bkpf TO lt_bkpf.
wa_bseg-mandt = sy-mandt.
wa_bseg-bukrs = '5900'.
wa_bseg-gjahr = gjahr_import.
wa_bseg-belnr = belnr_import.
wa_bseg-buzei = '1'.
wa_bseg-zuonr = '20151131'.
APPEND wa_bseg TO lt_bseg.
CALL FUNCTION 'CHANGE_DOCUMENT'
TABLES
t_bkdf = lt_bkdf
t_bkpf = lt_bkpf
t_bsec = lt_bsec
t_bsed = lt_bsed
t_bseg = lt_bseg
t_bset = lt_bset
.
COMMIT WORK.
All FM table parameters except the last one are mandatory.
Do not use this FM
CALL FUNCTION 'CHANGE_DOCUMENT'
This FM is changing all other fields to initial if not provided.
CALL FUNCTION 'FI_DOCUMENT_CHANGE'
It seems that this FM cannot be used to change line item which has account type (BSEG-KOART) - 'S' (GL Account).
Try this FM:
'FI_ITEMS_MASS_CHANGE'
The field zuonr references to an object it belongs to.
For example a purchase order.
Lets asume you pay a position of a purchase order.
A document in bkpf/bseg is created (and more).
Bseg-Zuonr contains the number of this purchase order position.
If you were allowed to change this field, you would destroy the referential integrity of the data. It would point to a purchase order position it was not created from or one that doesn't exist at all.
So from a business standpoint it makes no sense to ever change this field after it is created, therefore SAP will never allow to change it.
How to set Custom Menu Field values in Rightnow API of Oracle ?
I have a Custom field of data type Menu like :
Custom field Name : user type
Data Type : Menu
Value can be : Free, Paid or Premium
Can any one send me the java code by solving this problem?
Thanks in Advance
The following link is from the Oracle Service Cloud developer documentation. It has an example of setting a contact custom field using Java and Axis2, which would likely give you most of the information that you need in order to set your custom field.
At a high level, you must create an Incident object and specific the ID of the incident that you want to update. Then, you must create the custom field object structure using generic objects (because each site can have its own unique custom fields). Ultimately, your SOAP envelope will contain the node structure that you build through your java code. Since you're trying to set a menu, the end result is that your custom field is a NamedID object. You'll set the lookup name of the menu to one of the three values that you give above.
I'm a C# guy myself, so my example is in C#, but it should be easy to port to Java using the link above as an example too.
public static void SetMenuTest()
{
Incident incident = new Incident();
incident.ID = new ID();
incident.ID.id = 1234;
incident.ID.idSpecified = true;
GenericField customField = new GenericField();
customField.name = "user_type";
customField.dataType = DataTypeEnum.NAMED_ID;
customField.dataTypeSpecified = true;
customField.DataValue = new DataValue();
customField.DataValue.Items = new object[1];
customField.DataValue.ItemsElementName = new ItemsChoiceType[18]; //18 is a named ID value. Inspect ItemChoiceTypes for values.
customField.DataValue.Items[0] = "Free"; //Or Paid, or Premium
customField.DataValue.ItemsElementName[0] = ItemsChoiceType.NamedIDValue;
GenericObject customFieldsc = new GenericObject();
customFieldsc.GenericFields = new GenericField[1];
customFieldsc.GenericFields[0] = customField;
customFieldsc.ObjectType = new RNObjectType();
customFieldsc.ObjectType.TypeName = "IncidentCustomFieldsc";
GenericField cField = new GenericField();
cField.name = "c";
cField.dataType = DataTypeEnum.OBJECT;
cField.dataTypeSpecified = true;
cField.DataValue = new DataValue();
cField.DataValue.Items = new object[1];
cField.DataValue.Items[0] = customFieldsc;
cField.DataValue.ItemsElementName = new ItemsChoiceType[1];
cField.DataValue.ItemsElementName[0] = ItemsChoiceType.ObjectValue;
incident.CustomFields = new GenericObject();
incident.CustomFields.GenericFields = new GenericField[1];
incident.CustomFields.GenericFields[0] = cField;
incident.CustomFields.ObjectType = new RNObjectType();
incident.CustomFields.ObjectType.TypeName = "IncidentCustomFields";
}
I have two tables, RESTAURANT and HOURS with REST_ID as the key between the two tables. i receive an error when I get to the first line of code to add HOURs. The error asks to create an instance of the object but Intellisence allows me to call that table reference. Here is a snipped of the code:
RESTAURANT addRest = new RESTAURANT();
addRest.REST_NAME = r_name;
addRest.REST_STREET1 = r_street;
addRest.REST_PHONE = r_phone;
addRest.REST_WEBSITE = r_web;
addRest.REST_DESC = r_desc;
addRest.HOUR.HOURS_SUN = h_su;
addRest.HOUR.HOURS_MON = h_mo;
addRest.HOUR.HOURS_TUE = h_tu;
addRest.HOUR.HOURS_WED = h_we;
addRest.HOUR.HOURS_THU = h_th;
addRest.HOUR.HOURS_FRI = h_fr;
addRest.HOUR.HOURS_SAT = h_sa;
addRest.HOURReference.EntityKey = new EntityKey("FVTCEntities.HOURS", "HOURS", 1);
db.AddToRESTAURANTs(addRest);
db.SaveChanges();
HOUR is a contained object inside of RESTAURANT. You need to instantiate it before setting properties on it (like a typical C# object):
addRest.HOUR = new HOUR();
addRest.HOUR.HOURS_SUN = h_su;
...
You haven't created an HOUR object on your RESTAURANT, so that navigation property is null.
...
addRest.REST_DESC = r_desc;
addRest.HOUR = new HOUR();
addRest.HOUR.HOURS_SUN = h_su;
...