My GET request goes like this:
<some ip>/search?IW_INDEX={IW_INDEX}&IW_FIELD_WEB_STYLE={IW_FIELD_TEXT}
The data file is as follows:
IW_INDEX,IW_FIELD_TEXT
index1,text1
index2,text2
My test for iteration 1 is as follows:
tests["parameter1"] = responseBody.has("value=\"19\"");
Now this value 19 will change depending upon the iteration and might be 20 in iteration 2.
Is there a way to provide expected test results iteration-wise in Postman?
I think you could do it by adding a column to your CSV file with "expected_result" and in the test, call that value by {{data.expected_result}}, so your test should probably look like:
tests["parameter1"] = responseBody.has("value=\"{{data.expected_result}}\");
Related
I want to ensure that my test calls the userService.find(userName) only with the expected aTestName and only once. Currently, I am achieving this by the following code. Is there a way to combine the two BDDMockito.then... in one?
String aTestName = "aTestName";
BDDMockito.then(userService).should(times(1)).findByName(any());
BDDMockito.then(userService).should(times(1)).findByName(aTestName);
What you should use is only(). So like:
BDDMockito.then(userService).should(only()).findByName(aTestName);
This is my feature file:
* def Json = read ('1.json')
* print Json.Id
* set Json.Id = Product_Num
* print Json.Id
I want to replace my Id with new Product number. After run Karate, I see the result is correct, new Product_num is put out (by the second print out result)
But id value doesn't update in 1.json file.
How to update 1.json file values? I need to replace id values in 1.json file
You are trying to write to a file. This is normally never needed when you use Karate, and hence is not supported directly. Do you want your test data changing all the time because your tests are updating the files from which test data is being read ? I don't think so.
Please read this answer for details: https://stackoverflow.com/a/54593057/143475
I need to pass multiple query parameters with the same name in a URL, but I am having problems getting it to work with Karate. In my case, the URL should look like this:
http://mytestapi.com/v1/orders?sort=order.orderNumber&sort=order.customer.name,DESC
Notice 2 query parameters named "sort". I attempted to create these query string parameters with Karate, but only the last "sort" parameter gets created in the query string. Here are the ways I tried to do this:
Given path 'v1/orders'
And param sort = 'order.orderNumber'
And param sort = 'order.customer.name,DESC'
And header Authorization = authInfo.token
And method get
Then status 200
And:
Given path 'v1/orders'
And params sort = { sort: 'order.orderNumber', sort: 'order.customer.name,DESC' }
And header Authorization = authInfo.token
And method get
Then status 200
And:
Given path 'v1/order?sort=order.orderNumber&sort=order.customer.name,DESC'
And header Authorization = authInfo.token
And method get
Then status 200
The first two ways provide the same query string result: ?sort=order.customer.name%2CDESC
The last example does not work because the ? get encoded, which was expected and explained in this post - Karate API Tests - Escaping '?' in the url in a feature file
It's clear that the second "sort" param is overriding the first and only one parameter is being added to the URL. I have gone through the Karate documentation, which is very good, but I have not found a way to add multiple parameters with the same name.
So, is there a way in Karate to set multiple URL query parameters with the same name?
Yes you can generate multiple query parameters with the same name in karate
All values of similar key should be provided in an array.
Given path 'v1/orders'
And params {"sort":["order.orderNumber","order.customer.name,DESC"]}
And header Authorization = authInfo.token
And method get
Then status 200
And for setting single parameter using param it will be like
And param sort = ["order.orderNumber","order.customer.name,DESC"]
Please forgive me if my question does not make sense.
What im trying to do is to inject in values for query parameters
GET1 File
Scenario:
Given path 'search'
And param filter[id] = id (default value or variable from another feature file)
POST1 File
Scenario:
def newid = new id made by a post call
def checkid = read call(GET1) {id : newid}
like if one of my feature files creates a new id then i want to do a get call with the above scenario. therefore i need a parameter there which takes in the new id.
On the other hand if i do not have an id newly created or the test creating it is not part of the suite. i want to still be able to run the above mentioned scenario but this time it has a default value to it.
Instead of param use params. It is designed so that any keys with null values are ignored.
After the null is set on the first line below, you can make a call to another feature, and overwrite the value of criteria. If it still is null, no params will be set.
* def criteria = null
Given path 'search'
And params { filter: '#(criteria)' }
There are multiple other ways to do this, also refer to this set of examples for data-driven search params: dynamic-params.feature
The doc on conditional logic may also give you some ideas.
I have JMeter plan that starts with a single JDBC sampler query that captures session ID from the Teradata database (SELECT SESSION;). Same plan also has large number of JDBC samplers with complicated queries producing large output that I don't want to include in the report.
If I configure summary report and tick Save Response Data (XML) then the output from all sampler queries will be saved
How do I add only first query result (it's a single integer) into the test summary report and ignore results from all other queries? For example is there a way to set responseData = false after the first query output is captured?
Maybe sample_variables property can help?
Define something in "Variable Names" section of the JDBC Request, i.e. put session reference name there like:
Add the next line to user.properties file (lives in Jmeter's "bin" folder)
sample_variables=session_1
or alternatively pass it via -J command-line argument like:
jmeter -Jsample_variables=session_1 -n -t /path/to/testplan.jmx -l /path/to/results.csv
You need to use session_1 not session. As per JDBC Request Sampler documentation:
If the Variable Names list is provided, then for each row returned by a Select statement, the variables are set up with the value of the corresponding column (if a variable name is provided), and the count of rows is also set up. For example, if the Select statement returns 2 rows of 3 columns, and the variable list is A,,C, then the following variables will be set up:
A_#=2 (number of rows)
A_1=column 1, row 1
A_2=column 1, row 2
C_#=2 (number of rows)
C_1=column 3, row 1
C_2=column 3, row 2
So given your query returns only 1 row containing 1 integer - it will live in session_1 JMeter Variable. See Debugging JDBC Sampler Results in JMeter article for comprehensive information on working with database query results in JMeter.
When test completes you'll see an extra column in .jtl results file holding your "session" value:
Although not exactly solving your question as posted, I will suggest a workaround, using a "scope" of a listener (i.e. listener will only record items on the same or lower level than a listener itself). Specifically: have two Summary Reports: one on the level of test, the other (together with the sampler whose response you want to record) under a controller. For example:
here I have samplers 1, 2, 3, 4. I only want to save response data from sampler 2. So
Summary Report - Doesn't save responses is on global level, and it's configured to not save any response data. It only saves what I want to save for all samplers.
Summary Report - Saves '2' only is configured to save response data in XML format. But because this instance of Summary Report is under the same controller as sampler 2, but other samplers (1, 3, 4) are on higher level, it will only record responses of sampler 2.
So it doesn't exactly allow you to save response data from one sampler into the same file as all other Summary Report data. But at least you can filter which responses you are saving.
May be you can try assertion for ${__threadNum}
i.e. set condition for assertion as "${__threadNum}=1" and set your listner's "Log/display only" option as "successes"
This way it should log only the first response from samplers.