I have JMeter plan that starts with a single JDBC sampler query that captures session ID from the Teradata database (SELECT SESSION;). Same plan also has large number of JDBC samplers with complicated queries producing large output that I don't want to include in the report.
If I configure summary report and tick Save Response Data (XML) then the output from all sampler queries will be saved
How do I add only first query result (it's a single integer) into the test summary report and ignore results from all other queries? For example is there a way to set responseData = false after the first query output is captured?
Maybe sample_variables property can help?
Define something in "Variable Names" section of the JDBC Request, i.e. put session reference name there like:
Add the next line to user.properties file (lives in Jmeter's "bin" folder)
sample_variables=session_1
or alternatively pass it via -J command-line argument like:
jmeter -Jsample_variables=session_1 -n -t /path/to/testplan.jmx -l /path/to/results.csv
You need to use session_1 not session. As per JDBC Request Sampler documentation:
If the Variable Names list is provided, then for each row returned by a Select statement, the variables are set up with the value of the corresponding column (if a variable name is provided), and the count of rows is also set up. For example, if the Select statement returns 2 rows of 3 columns, and the variable list is A,,C, then the following variables will be set up:
A_#=2 (number of rows)
A_1=column 1, row 1
A_2=column 1, row 2
C_#=2 (number of rows)
C_1=column 3, row 1
C_2=column 3, row 2
So given your query returns only 1 row containing 1 integer - it will live in session_1 JMeter Variable. See Debugging JDBC Sampler Results in JMeter article for comprehensive information on working with database query results in JMeter.
When test completes you'll see an extra column in .jtl results file holding your "session" value:
Although not exactly solving your question as posted, I will suggest a workaround, using a "scope" of a listener (i.e. listener will only record items on the same or lower level than a listener itself). Specifically: have two Summary Reports: one on the level of test, the other (together with the sampler whose response you want to record) under a controller. For example:
here I have samplers 1, 2, 3, 4. I only want to save response data from sampler 2. So
Summary Report - Doesn't save responses is on global level, and it's configured to not save any response data. It only saves what I want to save for all samplers.
Summary Report - Saves '2' only is configured to save response data in XML format. But because this instance of Summary Report is under the same controller as sampler 2, but other samplers (1, 3, 4) are on higher level, it will only record responses of sampler 2.
So it doesn't exactly allow you to save response data from one sampler into the same file as all other Summary Report data. But at least you can filter which responses you are saving.
May be you can try assertion for ${__threadNum}
i.e. set condition for assertion as "${__threadNum}=1" and set your listner's "Log/display only" option as "successes"
This way it should log only the first response from samplers.
Related
I have got requirement saying, blob storage has multiple files with names file_1.csv,file_2.csv,file_3.csv,file_4.csv,file_5.csv,file_6.csv,file_7.csv. From these i have to read only filenames from 5 to 7.
how we can achieve this in ADF/Synapse pipeline.
I have repro’d in my lab, please see the below repro steps.
ADF:
Using the Get Metadata activity, get a list of all files.
(Parameterize the source file name in the source dataset to pass ‘*’ in the dataset parameters to get all files.)
Get Metadata output:
Pass the Get Metadata output child items to ForEach activity.
#activity('Get Metadata1').output.childItems
Add If Condition activity inside ForEach and add the true case expression to copy only required files to sink.
#and(greater(int(substring(item().name,4,1)),4),lessOrEquals(int(substring(item().name,4,1)),7))
When the If Condition is True, add copy data activity to copy the current item (file) to sink.
Source:
Sink:
Output:
I took a slightly different approaching using a Filter activity and the endsWith function:
The filter expression is:
#or(or(endsWith(item().name, '_5.csv'),endsWith(item().name, '_6.csv')),endsWith(item().name, '_7.csv'))
Slightly different approaches, similar results, it depends what you need.
You can always do what #NiharikaMoola-MT suggested . But since you already know the range of the files ( 5-7) , I suggest
Declare two paramter as an upper and lower range
Create a Foreach loop and pass the parameter and to create a range[lowerlimit,upperlimit]
Create a paramterized dataset for source .
Use the fileNumber from the FE loop to create a dynamic expression like
#concat('file',item(),'.csv')
My GET request goes like this:
<some ip>/search?IW_INDEX={IW_INDEX}&IW_FIELD_WEB_STYLE={IW_FIELD_TEXT}
The data file is as follows:
IW_INDEX,IW_FIELD_TEXT
index1,text1
index2,text2
My test for iteration 1 is as follows:
tests["parameter1"] = responseBody.has("value=\"19\"");
Now this value 19 will change depending upon the iteration and might be 20 in iteration 2.
Is there a way to provide expected test results iteration-wise in Postman?
I think you could do it by adding a column to your CSV file with "expected_result" and in the test, call that value by {{data.expected_result}}, so your test should probably look like:
tests["parameter1"] = responseBody.has("value=\"{{data.expected_result}}\");
I am new at pentaho and have some problems during building my job. I have job1, which consists of job2 and other transformation. Job2 contains 3 transformations: 1, 2 and 3. The transformation3 makes some steps and calls another transformation4 (through Transformation executor step). Transformation4 compares some values and then a new variable „result“ is set. Problem is that I need to use this variable in Job1. I have tried to use „set variables“ step with valid in parent, root, system jobs, but the value is always empty. Are there any opportunities to pass this variable in start-job (job1)? Thank you for your help.
From the above Job/Transformation Flow description it would not be possible to set a value from T4 to J1 as Jobs are executed sequentially and Set_variable on the 1st iteration of T4 can not pass data to Get_Variables of J2. If J1 has been marked as "Run for each Row" (default) and data being read from a source like,
Table - make sure the DML is commited.
File - make sure file is closed.
Hope this answers the question
I've this log entry:
"2014-11-22 02:42:10,545 .. - average:2.74425 , min:1.43 , max:4.007..."
i want to create a search query that returns all log entries with "average > 5"
i want to select the date of the log entry and the average value,
can this be done? how can i do this?
Thanks,
It is quite simple to do in Splunk and you'll have to do it in two steps:
Parse your log to get each of the fields in your log files. To do this use the props.conf and transforms.conf files on your indexer server or on your client if you are using the heavy forwarder. Another option is to send you fields using the key=value format that Splunk knows how to parse by default. Example: "2014-11-22 02:42:10,545 .. - average=2.74425 min=1.43 max=4.007..."
After getting your fields in Splunk just search for average>5 and you'll get all these search results easily.
Answer from splunk:
Did you already extract the average field?
If not, go to Settings -> Fields -> Field Extractions -> New, enter "average" as name, fill in your sourcetype, and use this as inline extraction:
average:(?<average>\d+\.?\d*)
it worked. :)
I need count rows in table. So I use reg. exp. extractor. But response assertion ends with error and tried to find exactly rows:${ROWS_matchnr}.
I tried google, but I only find a few non-functional recommendations.
Thread Group
Http Cookie Manager
Http Request
Regular Expression Extractor(ROWS, row-(.*), $1$, 0, )
Response Assertion(rows:${ROWS_matchnr})
Change the value you have in the Match No field from 0 to -1. As documented in the, ahem, useless official help:
If the match number is set to a negative number, then all the possible matches in the sampler data are processed. The variables are set as follows:
refName_matchNr - the number of matches found; could be 0
refName_n, where n = 1,2,3 etc - the strings as generated by the template
refName_n_gm, where m=0,1,2 - the groups for match n
refName - always set to the default value
refName_gn - not set
Then change ${ROWS_matchnr} to ${ROWS_matchNr} (capital N) and it should work.
If you still have issues then use a Debug Sampler to see what is getting returned from the regex.