In the code below, when trying to remove an item from the Cases list the code breaks in the Setter with an index out of bounds. When running the debugger in VisualStudio 2017 it successfully goes through the Remove() function and deletes the last item but after returning to Main() it will break on the Setter and the call stack says it is coming from the Remove call. Example code below:
Sub Main()
Dim Cases As Collection = New Collection()
Dim caseIndex As Integer = 2
Cases.Remove(Cases(caseIndex))
End Sub
Public Class Collection
Public WithEvents Cases As List(Of CaseClass)
Public Sub New()
Cases = New List(Of CaseClass)()
Cases.Add(New CaseClass)
Cases.Add(New CaseClass)
Cases.Add(New CaseClass)
End Sub
Default Public Property BeltCase(ByVal Index As Integer) As CaseClass
Get
Return Cases(Index)
End Get
Set(ByVal Value As CaseClass)
Cases(Index) = Value
End Set
End Property
Public Sub Remove(ByRef BeltCase As CaseClass)
Cases.Remove(BeltCase)
End Sub
End Class
Public Class CaseClass
Public test As Int16
End Class
Call Stack:
TestingVBBug.exe!TestingVBBug.Module1.Collection.set_BeltCase(Integer Index,TestingVBBug.Module1.CaseClass Value) Line 25 Basic
TestingVBBug.exe!TestingVBBug.Module1.Main() Line 6 Basic
So why would we be going through the Setter at all. And why does that happen after we exit the remove function?
The problem is caused by your Remove() method, that is, you have a ByRef parameter (for some reason). When you use ByRef, any changes made to the parameter inside the method must be reflected to the variable that was passed to the method. That happens by reassigning the value to the original variable.
In your case, it works like this:
The Remove() method is called and a variable (Cases(caseIndex)) is passed to it.
Some work is done inside the Remove() method which might, or might not include changing the value of the parameter BeltCase.
The value of the parameter BeltCase gets reassigned to the variable that was originally passed to the method (which is Cases(caseIndex)).
As a result of the above step, the setter of the BeltCase property gets called with Index = 2 which raises the out of range exception because Cases(2) doesn't exist (was removed).
To confirm, you can see this problem go away when you replace this line:
Cases.Remove(Cases(caseIndex))
..with:
Dim myCase As CaseClass = Cases(caseIndex)
Cases.Remove(myCase)
That way, you create a new variable which refers to the same CaseClass object and most importantly avoid calling the setter of your Collection.BeltClase property.
However, a better solution would be to not use ByRef in the first place since you don't seem to need it in this situation. So, simply use Public Sub Remove(ByVal BeltCase As CaseClass) instead.
Check this question for more about ByVal and ByRef with objects.
One last thing, please don't call your class Collection because it can be very confusing to anyone looking at your project.
Related
I have a weird problem that I can't seem to figure out. Even weirder is that I'm fairly sure it has worked in the past, but not anymore.
I have a class where I define a variable as SortedSet. In a function, I can reference the variable, but its SortedSet attributes are not exposed. If I use them anyway, some of them work, others don't. If I create that variable inside my function, all works as expected.
This is the code:
Public Class MyTest
Public MySortedSet = New SortedSet(Of String)()
Public Sub New()
Dim MySortedSet2 = New SortedSet(Of String)()
'Constructor. To use this, add Dim MyTest As MyTest to the Form1_load sub.
Me.MySortedSet.add("Test")
For Each Item In Me.MySortedSet
MsgBox(Item) 'This does print Test
Next Item
Me.MySortedSet.add '.add not exposed
MySortedSet2.add '.add is exposed
End Sub
End Class
See the screenshot below. The first example only has 4 items, where the 2nd example has a full list of parameters. I need to fix this using the first example, so the ElementAt one works. It works in the second example, but not in the first. It gives the error that ElementAt is not part of this object.
How can I get the full list of parameters for me.MySortedSet.??????
You should declare MySortedSet as a Property:
Public Class MyTest
Public Property MySortedSet As New SortedSet(Of String)()
Public Sub New()
Dim MySortedSet2 As New SortedSet(Of String)()
Me.MySortedSet.Add("Test")
For Each item As String In Me.MySortedSet
Debug.WriteLine(item)
Next item
Me.MySortedSet.Add("Test")
MySortedSet2.Add("Test")
End Sub
End Class
You should also indicate variable types every time you declare a variable, even in a For Each statement.
Private Shared Property _dictOfCoinNameNameBasedOnMarketandSymbol As Dictionary(Of String, String)
Get
End Get
Set(value As Dictionary(Of String, String))
End Set
End Property
The usual way, if it's not a dictionary, is to turn the variable into property. Then we can put breakpoint in set and get.
The thing is setting a dictionary as property will make the compiler think I need a set method to set the dictionary. I want a set method to set an item in the property.
I want to be able to replace spread occurrences of
_dictOfCoinNameNameBasedOnMarketandSymbol("key") = "value"
into a code I can set breakpoint too. How should I?
I suppose I can just create a normal sub and replace all occurrences of _dictOfCoinNameNameBasedOnMarketandSymbol("key") = "value" into AssignCoinNameNameBasedOnMarketandSymbolWithKeyValue("key","value")
I wrote
Function GetCoinNameNameBasedOnMarketandSymbol(key As String) As String
Return _dictOfCoinNameNameBasedOnMarketandSymbol(key)
End Function
Sub AssignCoinNameNameBasedOnMarketandSymbol(key As String, coinname As String)
_dictOfCoinNameNameBasedOnMarketandSymbol(key) = coinname
End Sub
And then I will just manually all other occurrences of _dictOfCoinNameNameBasedOnMarketandSymbol. Then I can put breakpoints in AssignCoinNameNameBasedOnMarketandSymbol if I see _dictOfCoinNameNameBasedOnMarketandSymbol get assigned wrong value.
The problem with this technique is there isn't really anyway to enforce it automatically. I just have to go through the code and replace that one by one.
Are there more elegant ways?
If _dictOfCoinNameNameBasedOnMarketandSymbol is not a dictionary then changing it to property with proper get and set value would do just fine. I don't even have to change anything.
I think that I may have initially misinterpreted the question. I will leave my original answer below for completeness but I will answer here based on my new understanding.
It seems to me that what you actually need is an indexed property that will wrap the Dictionary, e.g.
Public Class SomeClass
Private Shared ReadOnly valuesByKey As New Dictionary(Of String, String)
Public Shared Property ValueByKey(key As String) As String
Get
Return valuesByKey(key)
End Get
Set
valuesByKey(key) = Value
End Set
End Property
End Class
You can now just get and set the ValueByKey property and never have direct access - read-only or otherwise - to the Dictionary object inside the class. You can also add whatever code you like before the Return statement in the getter and before or after the existing line of code in the setter.
ORIGINAL ANSWER:
What you want is a ReadOnly property. That's exactly how collections are exposed throughout the .NET Framework, e.g. Control.Controls, ComboBox.Items, DataSet.Tables, DataTable.Columns, DataTable.Rows, etc, etc. In your case, that would look like this:
Public Shared ReadOnly Property CoinNamesByMarketAndSymbol As New Dictionary(Of String, String)
I've taken the liberty of giving that property a sensible name. Note that this is an auto-property, i.e. one where you don't explicitly specify a getter or setter. Without using an auto-property, the equivalent code would this:
Private Shared _coinNamesByMarketAndSymbol As New Dictionary(Of String, String)
Public Shared ReadOnly Property CoinNamesByMarketAndSymbol As Dictionary(Of String, String)
Get
Return _coinNamesByMarketAndSymbol
End Get
End Property
Note that I have declared this property Public. I note that you have declared it Private but that seems to make little sense. What use could such a property be? If it should only be accessed internally then why would you not just use a field?
With the code above, you can now get the Dictionary from the property to get, add or remove items but you cannot replace the entire Dictionary, i.e. you can do this:
Dim coinName = SomeClass.CoinNamesByMarketAndSymbol(marketAndSymbol)
SomeClass.CoinNamesByMarketAndSymbol.Add(marketAndSymbol, coinName)
SomeClass.CoinNamesByMarketAndSymbol.Remove(marketAndSymbol)
But you cannot do this:
SomeClass.CoinNamesByMarketAndSymbol = New Dictionary(Of String, String)
Been working a lot with custom classes lately and I love the power you can have with them but I have come across something that I'm not able to solve and/or find anything helpful online.
I have a list of a class with properties I'm looking to only store information pulled from a database into.
Public Class CustomClass
Public _Values As String
Public _Variables As String
Public ReadOnly Property Values() As String
Get
Return _Values
End Get
End Property
Public ReadOnly Property Variables() As String
Get
Return _Variables
End Get
End Property
Sub New(ByVal values As String, ByVal variables As String)
_Values = values
_Variables = variables
End Sub
End Class
I will be iterating through some database entries, and I'm looking to store them into the appropriate property when I hit them (since I won't have them all available immediately, which is part of my problem). I want to just be able to add either the value or the variable at a time and not both of them, but since I have the sub procedure 'New' passing two arguments, it will always require passing them both. I've found the only way around this is by making them optional fields which I don't feel is the right way to solve this. Is what I'm looking to do possible with a class or would it be simpler by using a structure?
You can overload the constructor:
Friend Class Foo
' using auto-implement props:
Public Property Name As String ' creates a _Name backing field
Public Property Value as Integer
Public Sub New(newN as String, newV as Integer)
' access "hidden" backing fields if you want:
_Name = newN
_Value = newV
End Sub
Public Sub New() ' simple ctor
End Sub
Public Sub New(justName As String)
' via the prop
Name = justName
End Sub
End Class
You now have 3 ways to create the object: with full initialization, partial (name only) or as a blank object. You will often need a "simple constructor" - one with no params - for other purposes: serializers, Collection editors and the like will have no idea how to use the parameterized constructors and will require a simple one.
If rules in the App were that there was no reason for a MyFoo to ever exist unless both Name and Value being defined, implementing only the New(String, Integer) ctor enforces that rule. That is, it is first about the app rules, then about coding convenience.
Dim myFoo As New Foo ' empty one
myFoo.Name = "ziggy" ' we only know part of it
Since the default of string is nothing, you could pass nothing for the value you don't have. IE
Collection.Add(New CustomClass("My Value",Nothing))
Every type has a default, so this works with more than just strings.
I am trying to assign a value to global variable, which has a Property of type Double. This Property is passed as Object and the assignment fails.
In the example code below, the value is never assigned to the actual object, but only locally:
Public Class Form1
Friend Home As New Building
Private Sub AssignValues() Handles Me.Load
'Objects of different types are added to a list
Dim listObjects As New List(Of Object)
listObjects.Add(Home.Surface)
'All the Objects in listObjects are assigned a value that
'is stored as String
For Each o As Object In listObjects
SetProperty(o, "45.6")
Debug.Print("Surface = " & Home.Surface.ToString)
Next
End Sub
Private Sub SetProperty(ByRef Variable As Object, ByVal Value As String)
Select Case Variable.GetType
Case GetType(Double)
Variable = CDbl(Value)
Case Else
'...
End Select
End Sub
End Class
Public Class Building
Dim _surface As Double = 0
Public Property Surface As Double
Get
Return _surface
End Get
Set(ByVal value As Double)
_surface = value
End Set
End Property
End Class
The program invariably outputs Surface = 0 instead of 45.6. What am I doing wrong?
I tried to pass the Variable as reference, as suggested here, but without success. I also read about using Reflection, but there ought to be something simpler than that...
When your adding home.surface to the list, your adding a copy of the double to the list and then adjusting that copy. Stick a watch on "o" and see how it changes whilst home.surface remains the same.
If you want to use reflection, try something along these lines.
Dim prop As Reflection.PropertyInfo = o.GetType().GetProperty("Surface")
prop.SetValue(o, 45.6)
With Variable.GetType you will get always Object, because this is the type of Variable. What you can do with an Object is converting/casting it into a different type (like Double).
The best way to determine the "original type" from where the Object comes would be including an additional variable telling it. Another option might be converting the given Object into the target Type and see if it is not nothing/does not trigger an error. But this second option is not too accurate, mainly when dealing with "equivalent types" like Doubles/Integers.
I am having a very weird situation in VS 2012 RC VB.NET project targeting .NET 2.0. For some reason the property's Set method is called in addition to its Get method:
This works as expected:
Dim _searchparray = New Byte() {37, 115, ...}
Dim rep() As Byte = _opt.ReplaceBytes
If Arrays.CompareTo(rep, _searchparray, 1, False) = -1 AndAlso _opt.SearchMatchPlaceholderInReplaceBytes Then ...
That is _opt.ReplaceBytes's Get method is called only once, and it's Set method is not called.
But this does not work:
Dim _searchparray = New Byte() {37, 115, ...}
If Arrays.CompareTo(_opt.ReplaceBytes, _searchparray, 1, False) = -1 AndAlso _opt.SearchMatchPlaceholderInReplaceBytes Then ...
Here, first _opt.ReplaceBytes's Get method is called, then Arrays.CompareTo returns and THEN _opt.ReplaceBytes's Set method is called! Why? The call stack indicates that the caller is the last line in the sample above! But where does it set the property? It cannot be in Arrays.CompareTo because the Set method is called after the function returned a value, and it cannot be set via _opt.SearchMatchPlaceholderInReplaceBytes's Get method either, because its Get method returns the value of the underlying field and does nothing else!
Does any one have an explanation for this weird behavior?
Thanks.
Here's the entire sample project that demonstrates this:
Imports System.Runtime.CompilerServices
Module Module1
Sub Main()
Dim _opt As New Opts
Dim _searchparray = New Byte() {37, 115}
If Arrays.CompareTo(_opt.ReplaceBytes, _searchparray, 1, False) = -1 AndAlso _opt.SearchMatchPlaceholderInReplaceBytes Then
Console.WriteLine("0")
End If
Console.WriteLine("1")
End Sub
End Module
Module Arrays
<Extension()> _
Friend Function CompareTo(Of T As IEquatable(Of T))(ByRef SearchArray() As T, ByRef AnotherArray() As T, ByRef aWildCardElement As T, Optional aUseWildcards As Boolean = True) As Integer
Dim min As Integer = If(SearchArray.Length < AnotherArray.Length, SearchArray.Length, AnotherArray.Length) - 1
If aUseWildcards AndAlso aWildCardElement IsNot Nothing Then
For i = 0 To min
If SearchArray(i).Equals(aWildCardElement) Then Continue For
If Not SearchArray(i).Equals(AnotherArray(i)) Then Return i
Next
Else
For i = 0 To min
If Not SearchArray(i).Equals(AnotherArray(i)) Then Return i
Next
End If
If SearchArray.Length = AnotherArray.Length Then
Return -1
Else
Return min + 1
End If
End Function
End Module
Public Class Opts
Private _ReplaceBytes() As Byte = New Byte() {}
<Xml.Serialization.XmlIgnore()> _
Public Property ReplaceBytes As Byte()
Get
Return _ReplaceBytes
End Get
Set(ByVal value As Byte())
_ReplaceBytes = value
End Set
End Property
Private _SearchMatchPlaceholderInReplaceBytes As Boolean = False
Public Property SearchMatchPlaceholderInReplaceBytes() As Boolean
Get
Return _SearchMatchPlaceholderInReplaceBytes 'Set breakpoint here
End Get
Set(ByVal value As Boolean)
'Set breakpoint here too
_SearchMatchPlaceholderInReplaceBytes = value
End Set
End Property
End Class
Namespace Global.System.Runtime.CompilerServices
<AttributeUsage((AttributeTargets.Method Or (AttributeTargets.Class Or AttributeTargets.Assembly))), System.Reflection.Obfuscation(ApplyToMembers:=True, Exclude:=True)> _
Public NotInheritable Class ExtensionAttribute
Inherits Attribute
Public Sub New()
End Sub
End Class
End Namespace
This is an interaction between the ByRef declaration and passing a property as the argument. This is forbidden in C# but the VB.NET compiler works around the problem.
By declaring the argument ByRef, you tell the compiler that you might modify the passed object reference. Which is fine if you pass a local variable as the method argument, that local variable gets updated when your code assigns the argument. But this is a problem when you pass a property, such an assignment would have to call the property setter. Which in turn invalidates the passed argument. Which can cause a very difficult to diagnose bug.
The C# compiler just forbids this due to the bug possibilities. The VB.NET compiler however works around it by ensuring that the setter gets called after the method stops executing. Which is exactly what you saw with the debugger. Trouble is, it always calls the setter, even if you didn't modify the argument.
The workaround is obvious, using ByRef is just a bug. Your method does not actually assign the SearchArray argument. The argument needs to be ByVal.
It seems that in VB.NET, when you pass a property of Array type by reference, it is copied back at the end of the function. This makes sense because passing it ByRef means that the reference might have changed inside the function. Since it's a property that has been passed by reference, we affect the (possibly changed) reference to the property's setter.
The solution would be to pass it by value instead (ByVal). You have no need to pass it by reference in your code. In fact, in most cases, it is better to pass it by value than by reference. Only use ByRef if a parameter also acts as a return value.