I am having a very weird situation in VS 2012 RC VB.NET project targeting .NET 2.0. For some reason the property's Set method is called in addition to its Get method:
This works as expected:
Dim _searchparray = New Byte() {37, 115, ...}
Dim rep() As Byte = _opt.ReplaceBytes
If Arrays.CompareTo(rep, _searchparray, 1, False) = -1 AndAlso _opt.SearchMatchPlaceholderInReplaceBytes Then ...
That is _opt.ReplaceBytes's Get method is called only once, and it's Set method is not called.
But this does not work:
Dim _searchparray = New Byte() {37, 115, ...}
If Arrays.CompareTo(_opt.ReplaceBytes, _searchparray, 1, False) = -1 AndAlso _opt.SearchMatchPlaceholderInReplaceBytes Then ...
Here, first _opt.ReplaceBytes's Get method is called, then Arrays.CompareTo returns and THEN _opt.ReplaceBytes's Set method is called! Why? The call stack indicates that the caller is the last line in the sample above! But where does it set the property? It cannot be in Arrays.CompareTo because the Set method is called after the function returned a value, and it cannot be set via _opt.SearchMatchPlaceholderInReplaceBytes's Get method either, because its Get method returns the value of the underlying field and does nothing else!
Does any one have an explanation for this weird behavior?
Thanks.
Here's the entire sample project that demonstrates this:
Imports System.Runtime.CompilerServices
Module Module1
Sub Main()
Dim _opt As New Opts
Dim _searchparray = New Byte() {37, 115}
If Arrays.CompareTo(_opt.ReplaceBytes, _searchparray, 1, False) = -1 AndAlso _opt.SearchMatchPlaceholderInReplaceBytes Then
Console.WriteLine("0")
End If
Console.WriteLine("1")
End Sub
End Module
Module Arrays
<Extension()> _
Friend Function CompareTo(Of T As IEquatable(Of T))(ByRef SearchArray() As T, ByRef AnotherArray() As T, ByRef aWildCardElement As T, Optional aUseWildcards As Boolean = True) As Integer
Dim min As Integer = If(SearchArray.Length < AnotherArray.Length, SearchArray.Length, AnotherArray.Length) - 1
If aUseWildcards AndAlso aWildCardElement IsNot Nothing Then
For i = 0 To min
If SearchArray(i).Equals(aWildCardElement) Then Continue For
If Not SearchArray(i).Equals(AnotherArray(i)) Then Return i
Next
Else
For i = 0 To min
If Not SearchArray(i).Equals(AnotherArray(i)) Then Return i
Next
End If
If SearchArray.Length = AnotherArray.Length Then
Return -1
Else
Return min + 1
End If
End Function
End Module
Public Class Opts
Private _ReplaceBytes() As Byte = New Byte() {}
<Xml.Serialization.XmlIgnore()> _
Public Property ReplaceBytes As Byte()
Get
Return _ReplaceBytes
End Get
Set(ByVal value As Byte())
_ReplaceBytes = value
End Set
End Property
Private _SearchMatchPlaceholderInReplaceBytes As Boolean = False
Public Property SearchMatchPlaceholderInReplaceBytes() As Boolean
Get
Return _SearchMatchPlaceholderInReplaceBytes 'Set breakpoint here
End Get
Set(ByVal value As Boolean)
'Set breakpoint here too
_SearchMatchPlaceholderInReplaceBytes = value
End Set
End Property
End Class
Namespace Global.System.Runtime.CompilerServices
<AttributeUsage((AttributeTargets.Method Or (AttributeTargets.Class Or AttributeTargets.Assembly))), System.Reflection.Obfuscation(ApplyToMembers:=True, Exclude:=True)> _
Public NotInheritable Class ExtensionAttribute
Inherits Attribute
Public Sub New()
End Sub
End Class
End Namespace
This is an interaction between the ByRef declaration and passing a property as the argument. This is forbidden in C# but the VB.NET compiler works around the problem.
By declaring the argument ByRef, you tell the compiler that you might modify the passed object reference. Which is fine if you pass a local variable as the method argument, that local variable gets updated when your code assigns the argument. But this is a problem when you pass a property, such an assignment would have to call the property setter. Which in turn invalidates the passed argument. Which can cause a very difficult to diagnose bug.
The C# compiler just forbids this due to the bug possibilities. The VB.NET compiler however works around it by ensuring that the setter gets called after the method stops executing. Which is exactly what you saw with the debugger. Trouble is, it always calls the setter, even if you didn't modify the argument.
The workaround is obvious, using ByRef is just a bug. Your method does not actually assign the SearchArray argument. The argument needs to be ByVal.
It seems that in VB.NET, when you pass a property of Array type by reference, it is copied back at the end of the function. This makes sense because passing it ByRef means that the reference might have changed inside the function. Since it's a property that has been passed by reference, we affect the (possibly changed) reference to the property's setter.
The solution would be to pass it by value instead (ByVal). You have no need to pass it by reference in your code. In fact, in most cases, it is better to pass it by value than by reference. Only use ByRef if a parameter also acts as a return value.
Related
In the code below, when trying to remove an item from the Cases list the code breaks in the Setter with an index out of bounds. When running the debugger in VisualStudio 2017 it successfully goes through the Remove() function and deletes the last item but after returning to Main() it will break on the Setter and the call stack says it is coming from the Remove call. Example code below:
Sub Main()
Dim Cases As Collection = New Collection()
Dim caseIndex As Integer = 2
Cases.Remove(Cases(caseIndex))
End Sub
Public Class Collection
Public WithEvents Cases As List(Of CaseClass)
Public Sub New()
Cases = New List(Of CaseClass)()
Cases.Add(New CaseClass)
Cases.Add(New CaseClass)
Cases.Add(New CaseClass)
End Sub
Default Public Property BeltCase(ByVal Index As Integer) As CaseClass
Get
Return Cases(Index)
End Get
Set(ByVal Value As CaseClass)
Cases(Index) = Value
End Set
End Property
Public Sub Remove(ByRef BeltCase As CaseClass)
Cases.Remove(BeltCase)
End Sub
End Class
Public Class CaseClass
Public test As Int16
End Class
Call Stack:
TestingVBBug.exe!TestingVBBug.Module1.Collection.set_BeltCase(Integer Index,TestingVBBug.Module1.CaseClass Value) Line 25 Basic
TestingVBBug.exe!TestingVBBug.Module1.Main() Line 6 Basic
So why would we be going through the Setter at all. And why does that happen after we exit the remove function?
The problem is caused by your Remove() method, that is, you have a ByRef parameter (for some reason). When you use ByRef, any changes made to the parameter inside the method must be reflected to the variable that was passed to the method. That happens by reassigning the value to the original variable.
In your case, it works like this:
The Remove() method is called and a variable (Cases(caseIndex)) is passed to it.
Some work is done inside the Remove() method which might, or might not include changing the value of the parameter BeltCase.
The value of the parameter BeltCase gets reassigned to the variable that was originally passed to the method (which is Cases(caseIndex)).
As a result of the above step, the setter of the BeltCase property gets called with Index = 2 which raises the out of range exception because Cases(2) doesn't exist (was removed).
To confirm, you can see this problem go away when you replace this line:
Cases.Remove(Cases(caseIndex))
..with:
Dim myCase As CaseClass = Cases(caseIndex)
Cases.Remove(myCase)
That way, you create a new variable which refers to the same CaseClass object and most importantly avoid calling the setter of your Collection.BeltClase property.
However, a better solution would be to not use ByRef in the first place since you don't seem to need it in this situation. So, simply use Public Sub Remove(ByVal BeltCase As CaseClass) instead.
Check this question for more about ByVal and ByRef with objects.
One last thing, please don't call your class Collection because it can be very confusing to anyone looking at your project.
The following code produces results that are confusing. Note I am coming from C# background and know very little VB.
Module Module1
Sub Main()
Dim list As List(Of String) = New List(Of String)()
Dim result As Integer
result = list.Count() '1
result = list.Count(Function(p) True) '2
result = CType(list, IEnumerable(Of String)).Count(Function(p) True) '3
End Sub
End Module
The confusing bits:
There is a property named Count and an extension method with the same name. By calling Count() I expect the extension method to be called, but the property is accessed. Why and how to invoke a method?
I expected extension method call, but compilation fails with BC32016 (as if property was accessed instead of method). Why is that?
This works as expected.
I think it's a limit of VB since doing this doesn't compile. A is already a property, can't have a method with the same name.
Class Test
Public Property A As Integer
Public Function A(ByVal b As String) As Integer
Return 0
End Function
End Class
You also have other options.
Enumerable.Count(list, Function(p) True)
list.AsEnumerable.Count(Function(p) True)
I am trying to assign a value to global variable, which has a Property of type Double. This Property is passed as Object and the assignment fails.
In the example code below, the value is never assigned to the actual object, but only locally:
Public Class Form1
Friend Home As New Building
Private Sub AssignValues() Handles Me.Load
'Objects of different types are added to a list
Dim listObjects As New List(Of Object)
listObjects.Add(Home.Surface)
'All the Objects in listObjects are assigned a value that
'is stored as String
For Each o As Object In listObjects
SetProperty(o, "45.6")
Debug.Print("Surface = " & Home.Surface.ToString)
Next
End Sub
Private Sub SetProperty(ByRef Variable As Object, ByVal Value As String)
Select Case Variable.GetType
Case GetType(Double)
Variable = CDbl(Value)
Case Else
'...
End Select
End Sub
End Class
Public Class Building
Dim _surface As Double = 0
Public Property Surface As Double
Get
Return _surface
End Get
Set(ByVal value As Double)
_surface = value
End Set
End Property
End Class
The program invariably outputs Surface = 0 instead of 45.6. What am I doing wrong?
I tried to pass the Variable as reference, as suggested here, but without success. I also read about using Reflection, but there ought to be something simpler than that...
When your adding home.surface to the list, your adding a copy of the double to the list and then adjusting that copy. Stick a watch on "o" and see how it changes whilst home.surface remains the same.
If you want to use reflection, try something along these lines.
Dim prop As Reflection.PropertyInfo = o.GetType().GetProperty("Surface")
prop.SetValue(o, 45.6)
With Variable.GetType you will get always Object, because this is the type of Variable. What you can do with an Object is converting/casting it into a different type (like Double).
The best way to determine the "original type" from where the Object comes would be including an additional variable telling it. Another option might be converting the given Object into the target Type and see if it is not nothing/does not trigger an error. But this second option is not too accurate, mainly when dealing with "equivalent types" like Doubles/Integers.
I'm just starting on a class to handle client connections to a TCP server. Here is the code I've written thus far:
Imports System.Net.Sockets
Imports System.Net
Public Class Client
Private _Socket As Socket
Public Property Socket As Socket
Get
Return _Socket
End Get
Set(ByVal value As Socket)
_Socket = value
End Set
End Property
Public Enum State
RequestHeader ''#Waiting for, or in the process of receiving, the request header
ResponseHeader ''#Sending the response header
Stream ''#Setup is complete, sending regular stream
End Enum
Public Sub New()
End Sub
Public Sub New(ByRef Socket As Socket)
Me._Socket = Socket
End Sub
End Class
So, on my overloaded constructor, I am accepting a reference to an instance of a System.Net.Sockets.Socket, yes?
Now, on my Socket property, when setting the value, it is required to be ByVal. It is my understanding that the instance in memory is copied, and this new instance is passed to value, and my code sets _Socket to reference this instance in memory. Yes?
If this is true, then I can't see why I would want to use properties for anything but native types. I'd imagine there can be quite a performance hit if copying class instances with lots of members. Also, for this code in particular, I'd imagine a copied socket instance wouldn't really work, but I haven't tested it yet.
Anyway, if you could either confirm my understanding, or explain the flaws in my foggy logic, I would greatly appreciate it.
I think you're confusing the concept of references vs. value types and ByVal vs. ByRef. Even though their names are a bit misleading, they are orthogonal issues.
ByVal in VB.NET means that a copy of the provided value will be sent to the function. For value types (Integer, Single, etc.) this will provide a shallow copy of the value. With larger types this can be inefficient. For reference types though (String, class instances) a copy of the reference is passed. Because a copy is passed in mutations to the parameter via = it won't be visible to the calling function.
ByRef in VB.NET means that a reference to the original value will be sent to the function (1). It's almost like the original value is being directly used within the function. Operations like = will affect the original value and be immediately visible in the calling function.
Socket is a reference type (read class) and hence passing it with ByVal is cheap. Even though it does perform a copy it's a copy of the reference, not a copy of the instance.
(1) This is not 100% true though because VB.NET actually supports several kinds of ByRef at the callsite. For more details, see the blog entry The many cases of ByRef
Remember that ByVal still passes references. The difference is that you get a copy of the reference.
So, on my overloaded constructor, I am accepting a reference to an instance of a System.Net.Sockets.Socket, yes?
Yes, but the same would be true if you asked for it ByVal instead. The difference is that with ByVal you get a copy of the reference — you have new variable. With ByRef, it's the same variable.
It is my understanding that the instance in memory is copied
Nope. Only the reference is copied. Therefore, you're still working with the same instance.
Here's a code example that explains it more clearly:
Public Class Foo
Public Property Bar As String
Public Sub New(ByVal Bar As String)
Me.Bar = Bar
End Sub
End Class
Public Sub RefTest(ByRef Baz As Foo)
Baz.Bar = "Foo"
Baz = new Foo("replaced")
End Sub
Public Sub ValTest(ByVal Baz As Foo)
Baz.Bar = "Foo"
Baz = new Foo("replaced")
End Sub
Dim MyFoo As New Foo("-")
RefTest(MyFoo)
Console.WriteLine(MyFoo.Bar) ''# outputs replaced
ValTest(MyFoo)
Console.WriteLine(MyFoo.Bar) ''# outputs Foo
My understanding has always been that the ByVal/ByRef decision really matters most for value types (on the stack). ByVal/ByRef makes very little difference at all for reference types (on the heap) UNLESS that reference type is immutable like System.String. For mutable objects, it doesn't matter if you pass an object ByRef or ByVal, if you modify it in the method the calling function will see the modifications.
Socket is mutable, so you can pass any which way you want, but if you don't want to keep modifications to the object you need to make a deep copy yourself.
Module Module1
Sub Main()
Dim i As Integer = 10
Console.WriteLine("initial value of int {0}:", i)
ByValInt(i)
Console.WriteLine("after byval value of int {0}:", i)
ByRefInt(i)
Console.WriteLine("after byref value of int {0}:", i)
Dim s As String = "hello"
Console.WriteLine("initial value of str {0}:", s)
ByValString(s)
Console.WriteLine("after byval value of str {0}:", s)
ByRefString(s)
Console.WriteLine("after byref value of str {0}:", s)
Dim sb As New System.Text.StringBuilder("hi")
Console.WriteLine("initial value of string builder {0}:", sb)
ByValStringBuilder(sb)
Console.WriteLine("after byval value of string builder {0}:", sb)
ByRefStringBuilder(sb)
Console.WriteLine("after byref value of string builder {0}:", sb)
Console.WriteLine("Done...")
Console.ReadKey(True)
End Sub
Sub ByValInt(ByVal value As Integer)
value += 1
End Sub
Sub ByRefInt(ByRef value As Integer)
value += 1
End Sub
Sub ByValString(ByVal value As String)
value += " world!"
End Sub
Sub ByRefString(ByRef value As String)
value += " world!"
End Sub
Sub ByValStringBuilder(ByVal value As System.Text.StringBuilder)
value.Append(" world!")
End Sub
Sub ByRefStringBuilder(ByRef value As System.Text.StringBuilder)
value.Append(" world!")
End Sub
End Module
Think of C, and the difference between a scalar, like int, and an int pointer, and a pointer to an int pointer.
int a;
int* a1 = &a;
int** a2 = &a1;
Passing a is by value.
Passing a1 is a reference to a; it is the address of a.
Passing a2 is a reference to a reference; what is passed is the address of a1.
Passing a List variable using ByRef is analogous to the a2 scenario. It is already a reference. You are passing a reference to a reference. Doing that means that not only can you change the contents of the List, you can can change the parameter to point to an entirely different List. It also means you can not pass a literal null instead of an instance of List
Rather than giving the very specific case (which I did earlier), let me give a general example. Let's say that I have a function, called callingFunction. It has one parameter, called parameter. Parameter is of an unknown type. Let us then say that I wish to copy this parameter, and return it as a new object. For example, in pseudo code, something along the lines of...
Function callingFunction(ByVal parameter As Object) As Object
Dim newObj As New Object
'newObj has the same value as parameter, but is a distinctly different object
'with a different reference
newObj = parameter
return newObj
End Function
EDIT: Additional Information
The first time I posted this question, I received only one response - I felt that perhaps I made the question too specific. I guess I will explain more, perhaps that will help. I have an ASP page with 10 tables on it. I am trying, using the VB code behind, to come up with a single solution to add new rows to any table. When the user clicks a button, a generic "add row" function should be called.
The difficulty lies in the fact that I have no guarantee of the contents of any table. A new row will have the same contents as the row above it, but given that there are 10 tables, 1 row could contain any number of objects - text boxes, check boxes, etc. So I want to create a generic object, make it of the same type as the row above it, then add it to a new cell, then to a new row, then to the table.
I've tested it thoroughly, and the only part my code is failing on lies in this dynamic generation of an object type. Hence why I asked about copying objects. Neither of the solutions posted so far work correctly, by the way. Thank you for your help so far, perhaps this additional information will make it easier to provide advice?
You can't do this in general. And it won't be a good idea, for example, if parameter is of a type which implements the singleton pattern. If parameter is of a type which supports copying, it should implement the ICloneable interface. So, your function could look like this:
Function MyFunc(ByVal parameter As Object) As Object
Dim cloneableObject As ICloneable = TryCast(parameter, ICloneable)
If Not cloneableObject Is Nothing Then
Return cloneableObject.Clone()
Else
Return Nothing
End If
End Function
You could implement something like this:
Dim p1 As Person = New Person("Tim")
Dim p2 As Object = CloneObject(p1)
Dim sameRef As Boolean = p2 Is p1 'false'
Private Function CloneObject(ByVal o As Object) As Object
Dim retObject As Object
Try
Dim objType As Type = o.GetType
Dim properties() As Reflection.PropertyInfo = objType.GetProperties
retObject = objType.InvokeMember("", System.Reflection.BindingFlags.CreateInstance, Nothing, o, Nothing)
For Each propertyInfo As PropertyInfo In properties
If (propertyInfo.CanWrite) Then
propertyInfo.SetValue(retObject, propertyInfo.GetValue(o, Nothing), Nothing)
End If
Next
Catch ex As Exception
retObject = o
End Try
Return retObject
End Function
Class Person
Private _name As String
Public Property Name() As String
Get
Return _name
End Get
Set(ByVal value As String)
_name = value
End Set
End Property
Public Sub New()
End Sub
Public Sub New(ByVal name As String)
Me.Name = name
End Sub
End Class
Here's a simple class that will work for most objects (assumes at least .Net 2.0):
Public Class ObjectCloner
Public Shared Function Clone(Of T)(ByVal obj As T) As T
Using buffer As MemoryStream = New MemoryStream
Dim formatter As New BinaryFormatter
formatter.Serialize(buffer, obj)
buffer.Position = 0
Return DirectCast(formatter.Deserialize(buffer), T)
End Using
End Function
End Class