We're struggling to get IBM MQ to work across SSL.
We've been provided with the certificate chain for the remote host and installed into the Windows Certificate Store (Local Machine). These all look valid.
We're using the following connection properties:
connectionProperties.Add(MQC.SSL_PEER_NAME_PROPERTY, "other-server.com");
connectionProperties.Add(MQC.SSL_CIPHER_SUITE_PROPERTY, "TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA256"); connectionProperties.Add(MQC.SSL_CIPHER_SPEC_PROPERTY, "TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA256");
connectionProperties.Add(MQC.SSL_CERT_STORE_PROPERTY, "*SYSTEM");
connectionProperties.Add("CertificateLabel", "ibmwebspheremqmywindowsusernamewithoutdomain");
MQEnvironment.SSLCertRevocationCheck = true;
We've established that the "CertificateLabel" is the "Friendly name" in Windows parlance.
We've proven unencrypted communication and network-level configuration.
We're using 8.0.0.7 client.
These are the issues we've come across:
All secure communications fail with a 2538 error. (MQRC_HOST_NOT_AVAILABLE, https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSFKSJ_7.5.0/com.ibm.mq.tro.doc/q045380_.htm)
No success setting the Friendly Name to ibmwebspheremq and ibmwebspheremqmywindowsusername#domain and ibmwebspheremqmywindowsusernamewithoutdomain
General questions:
Are we correct in assuming that we can install generated certificates exclusively in the Windows Certificate Store?
Is the 2538 error even related to SSL communications? It feels like a network error, though there is that final point in the referenced error documentation.
Is there anywhere we can look for more informative error information? eg. relating to the SSL trust chain to see if there is an issue there?
The issue was the following line:
connectionProperties.Add(MQC.SSL_PEER_NAME_PROPERTY, "otherserver.com");
Turns out that:
It needs it in a canonical format, so DN=, etc.
You don't even need that line
Though we did learn a few things along the way:
The line:
connectionProperties.Add("CertificateLabel", "ibmwebspheremqmyusername");
Is the string ibmwebspheremq plus your Windows username (without your domain) and the label should be set on the Friendly name of your client machine's outgoing certificate NOT including the username.
The various folders inside your Windows certificate store are significant. The intermediate CAs should be correctly filed.
Related
I basically tried to implement Netty's build in SSLHandler. I had no problems until i implemented the Client-Side SSL.
I tried everything out any neither of all tries actually checked an incoming certificate of a Server. I could basically connect me to invalid SSL Servers.
I only saw codes like these on the internet:
pipeline.addLast("ssl", SslContextBuilder.forClient().trustManager(InsecureTrustManagerFactory.INSTANCE).build().newHandler(channel.alloc(), UserConnection.SERVER_API_DOMAIN, UserConnection.SERVER_CONNECTION_PORT));
Any Ideas?
If you pass in .trustManager(null) , you get the system default which should check certificates based on the default root certs you have on your system.
To quote docs https://netty.io/4.1/api/io/netty/handler/ssl/SslContextBuilder.html#trustManager-java.lang.Iterable-
:
Trusted certificates for verifying the remote endpoint's certificate, null uses the system default
Of course, you could also leave out the .trustManager(...) call altogether, since the default is null
I'm getting errors, such as the one below, in my /var/log/mail.log file.
Apr 9 18:28:29 blueberry postfix/smtps/smtpd[13294]: warning: TLS library problem: error:14094415:SSL routines:ssl3_read_bytes:sslv3 alert certificate expired:../ssl/record/rec_layer_s3.c:1544:SSL alert number 45:
I'm 100% sure the certificates are valid since I'm using them on my websites, all of which couldn't be happier with them. Postfix was also happy previously, but since I renewed the certificates it's been spamming this when my Nextcloud server tries to (and can't) connect to the mail server, despite my mail client still working (although without rDNS as I didn't manage to get my provider to set it up).
I assume the blame is somewhere with Nextcloud - presumably the php handler for mail. Another thing that could be at fault that I tried to check is OpenSSL, but I have no idea how to replace its certificates with my own (generated by Acme.sh).
Both dovecot and postfix have in their config mentioned the correct path to my keys, hence the assumption above.
EDIT: Fixed it.
So, turns out, when I updated my certificate locations when I changed the method of acquiring them (certbot vs acme.sh), I got a typo in one of the filenames. /etc/dovecot/conf.d/10-ssl.conf was correct and so was /etc/postfix/main.cf, but /etc/postfix/vmail_ssl.map had a typo which I didn't see previously - and so was throwing a certificate error.
When using EppLib.net (and as per the Nominet instructions - http://registrars.nominet.uk/namespace/uk/registration-and-domain-management/registrar-systems/epp/testbed)
In order to verify the identity of the secure server you will need the 'Verisign Class 3 Public Primary Certification Authority' root certificate available free from www.verisign.com (the certificate is also distributed with most web browsers).
I am supplying the Verisign Class 3 PPCA Certs in .crt format (I can't export as a pfx) within the code (and have tried every cert installed on the server).
However each one fails with the error (when trying to negotiate the connection):
An existing connection was forcibly closed by the remote host.
I've confirmed that I can connect from the server to Nominet by running cURL
curl -v https://testbed-epp.nominet.org.uk:700
and that responds as I would expect - or at least without an error!
I have also tried to use the same cert that curl appears to be using without success.
Can anyone help with pointing me in the right direction with the SSL that I should be using or how to get hold of the correct certificate?
thanks in advance
For anyone having a similar issue, it wasn't a question of which SSL certificate to use, but to ensure the correct protocol was being used. Incidentally, I got it working initially using the curl-ca-bundle.crt provided with cURL.
This certificate, in combination with a change to the target .net framework for the EppLib.net project resolved my issue.
On cloning from Github the target was .net 4.0 and Nominet needs at least TLS1.1, which wasn't available in v4.
Therefore I also updated the target to 4.5.1 for the EppLib.net project and changed the SslProtocol from
SslProtocol.Tls to
SslProtocol.Tls12
I am trying to do a xdmp:http-post to a third party URL using the Marklogic (v7.0) query console. The URL is a https:// url and I was able to install the necessary certificate from the admin console. When I run the post, I am receiving the following error:
[1.0-ml] SVC-SOCCONN: xdmp:http-post("https://xxxxx.............", ()) -- Socket connect error: SSL_connect XXX.XXX.XXX.XX:60855-XX.XX.X.XX:443: key size too small (0x0506706e); DH lib (0x14098005)
Can you please assist me here as to what I might be doing wrong? Do I need to follow any additional steps apart from installing the certificate?
Please let me know if I need to supply additional information.
The server's certificate is using a key size that is too small, and therefore considered to be insecure. Since the host name suggests it's a dev machine, the best thing would be to have them use a longer key if you can.
If that's not possible, you can disable FIPS mode on your MarkLogic server. That can be done through the Admin UI by navigating to http://your.host.name:8001/cluster-admin.xqy?section=cluster&local-cluster=true and setting "ssl fips enabled" to false. Be aware that if you do this, the server will allow you to use ciphers and key lengths that are considered weak.
I am trying to monitor https traffic with Fiddler, using current newest version:2.4.4.5
I've successfully set up https, certificates and I can see the full https encrypted traffic for example browsing my bank's web site.
...however...
When I trying to monitor an other server I got this error message in the response window:
"Failed to secure existing connection for 77.87.178.160. A call to SSPI failed, see inner exception. InnerException: System.ComponentModel.Win32Exception: The client and server cannot communicate, because they do not possess a common algorithm"
For full Fiddler window see:
The client is not a in this case browser, but a custom client program, which communicates with its own server.
My question: Is this exception misleading and in reality some other error prevents the secure channel to set up?
...or...
We have still chance to monitor this https communication?
Thx in advance
What is the client program?
This error typically indicates that that client application is only offering certain HTTPS ciphers, and those ciphers are not supported by Fiddler.
However, in this case, the specific problem here is almost certainly this: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ieinternals/archive/2009/12/08/aes-is-not-a-valid-cipher-for-sslv3.aspx
The client is trying to use AES with SSLv3, but that isn't one of the valid ciphers for SSL3. As a consequence, the connection fails.
You might be able to workaround this by clicking Rules > Customize Rules. Scroll down to the Main() function and add the following line within the function:
CONFIG.oAcceptedServerHTTPSProtocols =
System.Security.Authentication.SslProtocols.Ssl3;
Please let me know if this works.
NOTE Current versions of Fiddler offer a UI link for this: Look at the lis of enabled protocols on the HTTPS tab.
Unbelievably this issue is still present some 6 years later.
Just installed the latest version of Fiddle (v5.0.20194.41348), and sure enough on Win7 using Chrome or IE it keeps failing with the dreaded error:
"fiddler.network.https> HTTPS handshake to google.com (for #1) failed. System.ComponentModel.Win32Exception The client and server cannot communicate, because they do not possess a common algorithm"
After some hours of testing, I found a middle ground solution which seems to work with virtually all websites. The aim was to get the highest possible security with no errors in the log. Without needing to add any code, simply changing this line under Tools > Options > HTTPS > Protocols is what worked for me (just copy and paste it):
<client>;ssl3;tls1.1;tls1.2
Basically removed the ssl2 and tls1.0 protocols which leaves us with some pretty decent security and no errors so far. Having spent hours of frustration with this error, hope someone out there might find this useful, and a big thanks to EricLaw who discovered the root of the problem.
Yes I too have seen this error when working outside of fiddler and it was connected with AuthenticateAsServer but only went wrong when using IE10 and not Chrome as the browser.
Odd thing is that it did not break all the time for IE10 using SslProtocols.Tls for the protocol so I will add a bit of code to switch the protocol if one fails
The protocol that can be used also seems to change on if you are using a proxy server like Fiddler or using an invisible server by hijacking the DNS via the hosts file to divert traffic to the server