I am using ServiceStack 5.0.2 and Redis 3.2.100 on Windows.
I have got several nodes with active Pub/Sub Subscription and a few Pub's per second.
I noticed that if Redis Service restarts while there is no physical network connection (so one of the clients cannot connect to Redis Service), that client stops receiving any messages after network recovers. Let's call it a "zombie subscriber": it thinks that it is still operational, but never actually receives a message: client thinks it has a connection, the same connection on server is closed.
The problem is no exception is thrown in RedisSubscription.SubscribeToChannels, so I am not able to detect the issue in order to resubscribe.
I have also analyzed RedisPubSubServer and I think I have discovered a problem. In the described case RedisPubSubServer tries to restart (send stop command CTRL), but "zombie subscriber" does not receive it and no resubscription is made.
Related
I am facing a weird problem with connecting Rabbitmq from UI. I use 'xhr-polling' only due to some reason to connect rabbitmq queue from UI and it works fine for quite sometime when user lands on page but it disconnects with rabbitmq at some point without any error.
I have put in some logic to reconnect, once it is disconnected and as per the log it seems it connects but when I look at the RabbitMQ there is no client connected to it. However browser console (connected to server RabbitMQ/3.6.10) and keeps sending calling xhr_send?t=[random-key] and xhr?=[random-key] gets response 204 or 200 (As per developer tool).
When I refresh the whole page, it connects back again fine and see rabbitmq client queue as well something like (connected to server RabbitMQ/3.6.10).
Technology stacks are : Sockjs + Stompjs + RabbitMQ with Stomp plugin
So in summary reconnect logic shows it is connected but as per rabbitmq there is no subscribed client. Normally I see something like this stomp-subscription-rIUXo4Yvmilga2w3g5Lu6g as queue name when connected.
I wish to run an experiment in which the publisher loses connection with the broker and then enqueues messages in its own queue and then when it regains connectivity it sends all its queued messages to the broker. How can I I do this since if I call close connection, I can no longer send(raises an exception). A trick that I can think of is to use a network of two brokers and simulate the above by breaking the connection between the two brokers. Is there an API call that I can use to do the above?
This is very much like facebook messenger or whatsapp acting as a publisher and enqueuing our to-send messages if we are offline and sending them once we are connected.
There is plenty of solutions you could use to break the connection in order to test, here is a non-comprehensive list :
Make a script that can set/unset a firewall rule on your environement blocking the connection port
If you are working with VMs, you can suspend/resume the one running Activemq, you can even automate it with tools like vagrant (vagrant suspend, then vagrant up)
Tweak the connection manualy accessing the activemq jmx
Develop an activemq plugin able to trash connections on demand (or maybe there is one ?)
Now in order to have the behavior you wish to obtain there is two options :
1) Make sure your connection is failover so it can be reestablished, and store your message on disk before sending them with your producer.
2)Produce to a local broker embbeded in your app, and connect this one to the remote broker.
I have a two activeMQ(5.6.0) brokers. They use a shared kaha database so only one can be 'running' at once.
I have a (asp.net) webservice that puts a message on a queue, locally if I start and stop the brokers the webservice fails over correctly
when I test with the brokers on seperate machines it sometimes works but often I get "socketException: Connection reset" errors and the message is lost.
The connection string I am using is below. Note that I am aware NMS does not understand the priority backup command but I have left it there for the future.
failover:(tcp://MACHINE1:61616,tcp://MACHINE2:62616)?transport.initialReconnectDelay=1000&transport.timeout=10000&randomize=false&priorityBackup=true
How can I make my fail over between brokers fool proof?
The shared Kaha database was on a simple share. Currently activeMQ (or windows) cannot reliably get or release the lock in this configuration. The shared database must sit on a 'real' SAN so that both instances of the queue software see the database as being on a local filestore not a network location.
See this page for more info http://activemq.apache.org/shared-file-system-master-slave.html
I've got an iOS application which uses a STOMP Client to talk to RabbitMQ. The application loads a lot of state during startup, and then keeps that state in sync by receiving updates published on STOMP. Of course, if it loses its connection, it can no longer be sure it's in sync, and therefore has to re-load that large initial blob. Any kind of network interruption triggers this behavior and makes my customers sad.
There are a lot of big-picture ways to fix this (and I'm working on them) but in the meantime, I'm trying to use persistent queues to solve this problem. The idea is that the server will create a queue, bind it to the appropriate topics, and then start building the large startup bundle. When finished, it will hand everything off to the client. The client will set itself up with the startup bundle, open a subscription to the queue, and then process any updates which happened while the server was getting things ready. Similarly, if the client should become disconnected, it can simply reconnect and resume reading the messages it finds in the queue.
My problem is that while the client successfully receives messages sent after it connects, if there were any messages in the queue before it connected, they are not read. Likewise, if the client becomes disconnected, when it reconnects, it won't see any messages which arrived while it was away.
Can anyone suggest how I might get the client to be able to read those missing messages?
It turns out what was happening was that the STOMP adapter was consuming the messages but failing to deliver them. Thus, when the client reconnected, it wouldn't have any messages waiting for it.
To fix the problem, I changed the "ack" setting on the subscribe request to "client", meaning that STOMP shouldn't consider the message delivered until the client sends back an ACK frame. By changing my client appropriately, messages now get delivered even after the client has been away.
I have spent days reading MSDN, forums and article about this, and cannot find a solution to my problem.
As a PoC, I need to consume a queue from more than one machine since I need fault tolerance on the consumers side. Performance is not an issue since less than 100 messages a day should by exchanged.
I have coded two trivial console application , one as client, the other one as server. Using Framework 4.0 (tested also on 3.5). Messages are using transactions.
Everything runs fines on a single machine (Windows 7), even when running multiple consumers application instance.
Now I have a 2012 and a 2008 R2 virtual test servers running in the same domain (but don't want to use AD integration anyway). I am using IP address or "." in endpoint address attribute to prevent from DNS / AD resolution side effects.
Everything works fine IF the the queue is hosted by the consumer and the producer is submitting messages on the remote private queue. This is also true if I exchange the consumer / producer role of the 2012 and 2008 server.
But I have NEVER been able to make this run, using WCF, when the consumer is reading from remote queue and the producer is submitting messages localy. Submition never fails, my problem is on the consumer side.
My wish is to make this run using netMsmqBinding, but I also tried using msmqIntegrationBinding. For each test, I adapted code and configuration, then confirmed this was running ok when the consumer was consuming from the local queue.
The last test I have done is using WCF (msmqIntegrationBinding) only on the producer (local queue) and System.Messaging.MessageQueue on the consumer (remote queue) : It works fine ! => My goal is to make the same using WCF and netMsmqBinding on both sides.
In my point of view, I have proved this problem is a WCF issue, not an MSMQ one. This has nothing to do with security, authentication, firewall, transport, protocol, MSMQ version etc.
Errors info using MS Service Trace Viewer :
Using msmqIntegrationBinding when receiving the message (openning queue was ok) : An error occurred while receiving a message from the queue: The transaction specified cannot be imported. (-1072824242, 0xc00e004e). Ensure that MSMQ is installed and running. Make sure the queue is available to receive from.
Using netMsmqBinding, on opening the queue : An error occurred when converting the '172.22.1.9\private$\Test' queue path name to the format name: The queue path name specified is invalid. (-1072824300, 0xc00e0014). All operations on the queued channel failed. Ensure that the queue address is valid. MSMQ must be installed with Active Directory integration enabled and access to it is available.
If someone can help to find why my configuration cannot be handled by WCF, a much elegant and configurable way than Messaging, I would greatly appreciate !
Thank you.
You may need to post you consumer code and config to give more of an idea but it could be the construction of the queue name - e.g.
FormatName:DIRECT=TCP:192.168.0.2\SomeQueue
There are several different ways to connect to a queue and it changes when you are remote or local as well.
I have found this article in the past to help:
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/johnbreakwell/archive/2009/02/26/difference-between-path-name-and-format-name-when-accessing-msmq-queues.aspx
Also, MessageQueue Constructor on MSDN...
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ch1d814t.aspx