what does signal "resource-request-starting" do in webkitgtk? - webkit

I am a beginner in webkitgtk. I would like to know the functioning of the signal "resource-request-starting". I have gone through the manual-page but I didnt get enough information. What is the use of this signal in webkitgtk?

When the web page tries to load something through a URI, the signal is emitted, in case you want to modify the load request.
This signal was generally used to implement custom URI schemes. (In WebKit2, there is a better way to do that.)

Related

Intercept and transform key signals to a process in C++ or any other language

I want to intercept Russian keys in a specific application and send it something else. I don't really know the steps required to achieve it.
Is there a way to write an app in C++ that captures key presses and sends different ones to a specific program, process?
I guess I had to find the answer myself so I've duckduckgoed and found this: C++ KeyBoard hook
Seems like I have to inject a DLL in a process and call SetWindowsHookExA function that supposedly ought to intercept and transform key events that are sent to the process.

Can someone clarify IOS Safari Service Worker Support

Looking at the MDN documentation IOS/Safari fully supports ServiceWorkerGlobalScope.onfetch but when you look at the FetchEvent specification it says it is not supported at all by Safari.
In particular, I would like to store some state for each client and was hoping to use the fetchEvent.clientId property of the event to index it. Of course I presume I also have access to the fetchEvent.request object otherwise I can't see how a service worker can do anything useful and I could simulate clientID from a passed in parameter in the url. But the docs don't really tell me what IOS/Safari supports and doesn't so I don't know which way to go.
Can someone please tell me precisely what does IOS/Safari pass when it calls the defined onfetch function.
I found the answer to my question by using https://jakearchibald.github.io/isserviceworkerready/demos/fetchevent/
connecting my iPad to my Macbook and debugging my iPad. I was eventually able to open the web inspector for the Service worker for that page, and the console.log showed the event passed in.
FetchEvent.clientID is present but a zero length string. As it happens I did the same thing on my (linux) Desktop using Chrome and its also a zero length string, BUT it has another parameter resultingClientId with what looks like a UUID in it. That parameter is not there in Safari.
The FetchEvent.request is there, and in particular the URL. So I can generate my own client id in the client (I am using Date.now().toString() as that is good enough for my purposes) for use in the service worker. In fact my site without a service worker was using the in the URLs I need to intercept already, so I am happy that I have a solution.

Request URI too long on spartacus services

I've been trying to make use of service.getNavigation() method, but apparently the Request URI is too long which causes this error:
Request-URI Too Long
The requested URL's length exceeds the capacity limit for this server.
Is there a spartacus config that can resolve this issue?
Or is this supposed to be handled in the cloud (ccv2) config?
Not sure which service are you talking about specifically and what data are you passing there. For starters, please read this: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Status/414
Additionally it would benefit everyone if you could say something about the service you're using and the data you are trying to pass/get.
The navigation component is firing a request for all componentIds. If you have a navigation with a lot of (root?) elements, the maximum length of HTTP GET request might be too long for the given client or server.
The initial implementation of loading components was actually done by a POST request, but the impression was that we would not need to support requests with so many components. I guess we were wrong.
Luckily, the legacy POST based request is still in the code base, it's OccCmsComponentAdapter.findComponentsByIdsLegacy.
The easiest way for you to use this code, is to provide a CustomOccCmsComponentAdapter, that extends from OccCmsComponentAdapter. Then you can override the findComponentsByIds method and simply call the super.findComponentsByIdsLegacy and pass in a copy of the arguments.
A more cleaner way would be to override the CmsComponentConnector and directly delegate the load to the adapter.findComponentsByIdsLegacy. I would not start here, as it's more complicated. Do a POC with the first suggested approach.

can gtk.LinkButton do a POST request?

I am working at a GPL botanical collection manager (bauble), and I am linking to some reference sites like the wikipedia, the plant list, and similar sites.
all the above handle requests as GET and for each of them I'm generating an URI which I am connecting to a gtk.LinkButton.
is it possible to link to sites only handling requests as POST? I'm wondering because I had to link to tropicos, and initially I had not found the way they handle GET requests.
I'm not working with pygtk any more. and I guess that if I still needed this (I don't), I should consider this: »By default, Gtk.LinkButton calls Gtk.show_uri_on_window() when the button is clicked. This behaviour can be overridden by connecting to the Gtk.LinkButton ::activate-link signal and returning True from the signal handler.«

Sencha Touch store sync callback

My store.sync() can return success:false, and if it does, I would like to use something similar to Ext's failure callback to react to the error appropriately, but I did not find a possibility to use any builtin ST functions for this. sync has neither callback nor success nor failure option available in ST.
What did I overlook?
PS: I did find a workaround for success callback at Why is there no sync callback in Sencha Touch? but I need failure callback.
store.sync() is not where you need to look. Take a look at the proxy. Most likely you are using an Ajax request and that in turn will deliver a detailed success and failure.
I am now calling Ext.data.Model.save() on all Ext.data.Model instances that are dirty. This won't batch everything neatly together, but in 90% of the cases, only one item is edited anyways. The best is that this allows to check for failure on each and every item, and not only on the whole batch.