I am a newbie to documentum and i am trying to run the following query:
select distinct A.*,A.i_chronicle_id,A.r_full_content_size,B.r_folder_path,B.r_object_id as folder_id
from dm_document A, dm_folder_r B
where any A.i_folder_id = B.r_object_id and B.r_folder_path is not null
for getting the folder path for the documents
I am getting the following error:
[DM_QUERY_E_TABLE_NO_ACCESS]error:
"The table, gwdmpr69.dm_folder_r, is not registered or you do not have access to it."; ERRORCODE: 100; NEXT: null
please help me what should I do to resolve the error
The easiest way to solve this, is to use DM_FOLDER (instead of DM_FOLDER_R) and the ENABLE (ROW_BASED) hint.
I just modified and run your query successfully :
select distinct A.*,A.i_chronicle_id,A.r_full_content_size,
B.r_folder_path,B.r_object_id as folder_id
from dm_document A, dm_folder B
where any A.i_folder_id = B.r_object_id
and B.r_folder_path is not null
ENABLE (ROW_BASED)
Please note that you are querying all the dm_documents in your Documentum system, which may result in a very large result set. Consider reducing your result set by adding more conditions to your where clause.
Try to use either dm_dbo.dm_folder_r or just dm_folder and ANY B.r_folder_path IS NOT NULL
Related
I have the following problem retrieving messages from the OpenFire Monitoring Service plugin. I discovered that the error is due to an incorrect query in the database but I still cannot detect the error for which the query is not working correctly.
SELECT
fromjid,
fromjidresource,
tojid,
tojidresource,
sentdate,
body,
stanza,
messageid,
barejid
FROM
(
SELECT
DISTINCT ofmessagearchive.fromjid,
ofmessagearchive.fromjidresource,
ofmessagearchive.tojid,
ofmessagearchive.tojidresource,
ofmessagearchive.sentdate,
ofmessagearchive.body,
ofmessagearchive.stanza,
ofmessagearchive.messageid,
ofconparticipant.barejid
FROM
ofmessagearchive
INNER JOIN ofconparticipant ON ofmessagearchive.conversationid =
ofconparticipant.conversationid
WHERE
(
ofmessagearchive.stanza IS NOT NULL
OR ofmessagearchive.body IS NOT NULL
)
AND ofmessagearchive.messageid IS NOT NULL
AND ofmessagearchive.sentdate >= 0
AND ofmessagearchive.sentdate <= 1602748770287
AND ofconparticipant.barejid = 'usuario3#192.168.0.79'
AND (
ofmessagearchive.tojid = 'usuario4#192.168.0.79'
OR ofmessagearchive.fromjid = 'usuario3#192.168.0.79'
)
ORDER BY
ofmessagearchive.sentdate DESC
LIMIT
100
) AS part
ORDER BY
sentdate
I get an error when doing the following query
ORA-00907: missing right parenthesis
Command line error:32 Column: 9
There is no LIMIT keyword available in Oracle and if you are using Oracle 12c you can use FETCH FIRST 100 ROWS ONLY instead of it.
You cannot use AS to give alias to the sub query and it is not recognised by Oracle. So either you can remove the alias completely as you are not using it anywhere or just remove the AS and keep the alias name part only which should be fine.
Here is a good SO link about the Oracle limiting result set and you can always look into other sites available such as Oracle base or the official document as well. For 11g solution you have to use row_number
I need to pass a parameter into an HQL at execution time. For this we have updated the .param file with the required value. Now I am facing issue in using it.
SELECT * FROM temp_table A
WHERE PRODT_CTGRY_CD = 'CAR' AND
(
(DATE(A.CUST_BRTH_DT) BETWEEN concat(${hiveconf:PRODYEAR} - 13 ,"-02","-28") and concat(${hiveconf:PRODYEAR} - 7 ,"-03","-01")
AND DATE(A.TERM_DT) >= concat(${hiveconf:PRODYEAR} - 1 ,"-03","-31")
)
In the above query if I don't include the condition of term_dt the query is running fine. However when I include that I am getting an error as below:
FAILED: ClassCastException org.apache.hadoop.hive.serde2.objectinspector.primitive.WritableIntObjectInspector cannot be cast to org.apache.hadoop.hive.serde2.objectinspector.primitive.BooleanObjectInspector (state=42000,code=40000)
Can someone let me know what needs to be done here?
I have a following table:
EstimatedCurrentRevenue -- Revenue column value of yesterday
EstimatedPreviousRevenue --- Revenue column value of current day
crmId
OwnerId
PercentageChange.
I am querying two snapshots of the similarly structured data in Azure data lake and trying to query the percentage change in Revenue.
Following is my query i am trying to join on OpportunityId to get the difference between the revenue values:
#opportunityRevenueData = SELECT (((opty.EstimatedCurrentRevenue - optyPrevious.EstimatedPreviousRevenue)*100)/opty.EstimatedCurrentRevenue) AS PercentageRevenueChange, optyPrevious.EstimatedPreviousRevenue,
opty.EstimatedCurrentRevenue, opty.crmId, opty.OwnerId From #opportunityCurrentData AS opty JOIN #opportunityPreviousData AS optyPrevious on opty.OpportunityId == optyPrevious.OpportunityId;
But i get the following error:
E_CSC_USER_SYNTAXERROR: syntax error. Expected one of: AS EXCEPT FROM
GROUP HAVING INTERSECT OPTION ORDER OUTER UNION UNION WHERE ';' ')'
','
at token 'From', line 40
near the ###:
This expression is having the problem i know but not sure how to fix it.
(((opty.EstimatedCurrentRevenue - optyPrevious.EstimatedPreviousRevenue)*100)/opty.EstimatedCurrentRevenue)
Please help, i am completely new to U-sql
U-SQL is case-sensitive (as per here) with all SQL reserved words in UPPER CASE. So you should capitalise the FROM and ON keywords in your statement, like this:
#opportunityRevenueData =
SELECT (((opty.EstimatedCurrentRevenue - optyPrevious.EstimatedPreviousRevenue) * 100) / opty.EstimatedCurrentRevenue) AS PercentageRevenueChange,
optyPrevious.EstimatedPreviousRevenue,
opty.EstimatedCurrentRevenue,
opty.crmId,
opty.OwnerId
FROM #opportunityCurrentData AS opty
JOIN
#opportunityPreviousData AS optyPrevious
ON opty.OpportunityId == optyPrevious.OpportunityId;
Also, if you are completely new to U-SQL, you should consider working through some tutorials to establish the basics of the language, including case-sensitivity. Start at http://usql.io/.
This same crazy sounding error message can occur for (almost?) any USQL syntax error. The answer above was clearly correct for the provided code.
However since many folks will probably get to this page from a search for 'AS EXCEPT FROM GROUP HAVING INTERSECT OPTION ORDER OUTER UNION UNION WHERE', I'd say the best advice to handle these is look closely at the snippet of your code that the error message has marked with '###'.
For example I got to this page upon getting a syntax error for a long query and it turned out I didn't have a casing issue, but just a malformed query with parens around the wrong thing. Once I looked more closely at where in the snippet the ### symbol was, the error became clear.
First of all, I know there are already questions and answers about it, this thread being the one that is closest to what I need:
SQL Update to the SUM of its joined values
However, I get a syntax error (operator missing) that seems to occur close to the FROM clause. However I can't see it. Does it not like the FROM itself ? I am not used to using FROM in an update statement but it seems like it's valid from the QA I just linked :|
Any idea why there would be a syntax error there ?
I am using Access 2007 SP3.
Edit:
Wow, I forgot to post the query...
UPDATE r
SET
r.tempsmoy_requete_min = tmm.moy_mob_requete
FROM
rapports AS r INNER JOIN
(SELECT
id_fichier,
Round(Sum(temps_requete_min)/3,0) As moy_mob_requete,
Round(Sum(temps_analyse_min)/3,0) As moy_mob_analyse,
Round(Sum(temps_maj_min)/3,0) As moy_mob_maj,
Round(Sum(temps_rap_min)/3,0) As moy_mob_rap,
Round(Sum(temps_ddc_min)/3,0) As moy_mob_ddc
FROM maintenances
WHERE
periode In (10,9,8) And
annee=2011
GROUP BY id_fichier) AS tmm ON rapports.id_rapport = tmm.id_fichier
WHERE
1=0
The WHERE 1=0 part is because I want to test further the subquery before running it.
Edit: This is some simpler query I am trying. I get a different error this time. It now tells me that tempsmoy_requete_min (and probably all other left operands) are not part of an aggregate function... which is the point of my query. Any idea ?
UPDATE
rapports INNER JOIN maintenances ON rapports.id_rapport = maintenances.id_fichier
SET
rapports.tempsmoy_requete_min = Round(Sum(temps_requete_min)/3,0),
rapports.tempsmoy_analyse_min = Round(Sum(temps_analyse_min)/3,0),
rapports.tempsmoy_maj_min = Round(Sum(temps_maj_min)/3,0),
rapports.tempsmoy_rap_min = Round(Sum(temps_rap_min)/3,0),
rapports.tempsmoy_ddc_min = Round(Sum(temps_ddc_min)/3,0)
WHERE
maintenances.periode In (10,9,8) And
maintenances.annee=2011 AND
1=0
I tried adapting your first query sample, and was able to make your error go away. However then I encountered a different error ('Operation must use an updateable query').
It may be possible to overcome that error, too. However, I found it easier to use a domain function instead of a join to retrieve the replacement value.
UPDATE rapports
SET tempsmoy_requete_min = Round(DSum("temps_requete_min",
"maintenances",
"periode In (10,9,8) AND annee=2011 "
& "AND id_fichier='" & id_rapport
& "'")/3, 0);
If this suggestion works for tempsmoy_requete_min with your data, you will have to extend it to the other fields you want to replace. That won't be pretty. You could make it less ugly with a saved query which you then use as the "Domain" parameter for DSum() ... that could allow you to use a simpler "Criteria" parameter.
UPDATE r
should be
UPDATE rapports
You can't reliably use an alias in the update target.
I'm working on a IBM iseries v6r1m0 system.
I'm trying to execute a very simple query :
select * from XG.ART where DOS = 998 and (DES like 'ALB%' or DESABR like 'ALB%')
The columns are:
DOS -> numeric (3,0)
DES -> Graphic(80) CCSID 1200
DESABR -> Garphic(25) CCSID 1200
I get :
SQL State : 58004
SQL Code : -901
Message : [SQL0901] SQL System error.
Cause . . . . . : An SQL system error has occurred. The current SQL statement cannot be completed successfully. The error will not prevent other SQL statements from being processed. Previous messages may indicate that there is a problem with the SQL statement and SQL did not correctly diagnose the error. The previous message identifier was CPF4204. Internal error type 3107 has occurred. If precompiling, processing will not continue beyond this statement.
Recovery . . . : See the previous messages to determine if there is a problem with the SQL statement. To view the messages, use the DSPJOBLOG command if running interactively, or the WRKJOB command to view the output of a precompile. An application program receiving this return code may attempt further SQL statements. Correct any errors and try the request again.
If I change DES into REF (graphic(25)), it works...
EDIT :
I run some tests this afternoon, and it is very strange :
Just after the creation of the table/indexes, I have no errors.
If I insert some datas : error
If I clear the table : error
If I remove an index (see below) : it works (with or without datas)
!!
The index is :
create index XG.GTFAT_ART_B on XG.ART(
DOS,
DESABR,
ART_ID
)
Edit 2 :
Here is the job log (sorry, it is in French...)
It sais :
Function error X'1720' in machine instruction. Internal snapshot ID 01010054
Foo file created in library QTEMP.
*** stuff with the printer
DBOP *** FAILED open. Exception from call to SLIC$
Internal error in the query processor file
Sql system error
I finally contacted IBM.
It was an old bug from v5.
I have installed the latest PTF, and now, it works.
You need to use the GRAPHIC scalar function to convert your character literals on the LIKE predicate.
CREATE TABLE QTEMP/TEST (F1 GRAPHIC(80))
INSERT INTO QTEMP/TEST (F1) VALUES (GRAPHIC('TEST'))
SELECT * FROM QTEMP/TEST WHERE F1 LIKE GRAPHIC('TE%')
I know this guy got his problem fixed with an update. But here is something that worked for me that might work for the next guy here who has the problem.
My problem query had a lot of common table expressions. Most of them did not create tables with a whole lot of records. So if I figured that the maximum number of records a CTE would make was 1000, I added a "Fetch first 9999 rows only" to it. I knew that the CTE couldn't possibly have more rows than that. I guess the query optimizer had less to think about with that added.
If you have that problem and you don't have the option to upgrade or talk to IBM, I hope this help you.
For other people getting this errore, I encountered it on an IBM i Series v7r3, when tried an UPDATE, retrieving the value to be set on a field using a inner SELECT where multiple results where reduced to 1, using DISTINCT. I solved the problem removing DISTINCT and adding FETCH FIRST 1 ROW ONLY at the end of the inner SELECT.
E.g.: changed from
UPDATE MYTABLE AS T1
SET T1.FIELD1 = (
SELECT DISTINCT T2.FIELD5
FROM MYTABLE AS T2
WHERE T1.FIELD2 = T2.FIELD2
AND T1.FIELD3 = T2.FIELD3
)
WHERE T1.FIELD4 = 'XYZ'
to
UPDATE MYTABLE AS T1
SET T1.FIELD1 = (
SELECT T2.FIELD5
FROM MYTABLE AS T2
WHERE T1.FIELD2 = T2.FIELD2
AND T1.FIELD3 = T2.FIELD3
FETCH FIRST 1 ROW ONLY
)
WHERE T1.FIELD4 = 'XYZ'