I'm trying to create an Intergration Automation Script for a PUBLISHED Channel which updates a database field.
Basically for WOACTIVITY I just want a field value setting to 1 for the Work Order if the PUBLISHED channel is triggered.
Any ideas or example scripts that anyone has or can help with please? Just can't get it work.
What about using a SET processing rule on the publish channel? Processing rules are evaluated every time the channel is activated, and a SET action will let you set an attribute for the parent object to a specified value. You can read more about processing rules here.
Adding a new answer because experience, in case it helps anyone.
If you create an automation script for integration against a Publish Channel and then select External Exit or User Exit there's an implicit variable irData that has access to the MBO being worked on. You can then use that MBO as you would in any other script. Note that because you're changing a record that's integrated you'll probably want a skip rule in your publish channel that skips records with your value set or you may run into an infinite publish --> update --> publish loop.
woMbo = irData.getCurrentMbo()
woMboSet = woMbo.getThisMboSet()
woMbo.setValue("FIELD", 1)
woMboSet.save()
Related
I created a script which updates work items in a polarion document. However, right now each workitem update is a single save. But my script updates all work items in the document, which results in a large number of save actions in the api and thus a large set of clutter in the history.
If you edit a polarion document yourself, it will update all workitems.
Is it possible to do this same thing with the polarion API?
I tried
Using the tracker service to update work items. This only allows a single work item to be updated.
Using the web development tools to try and get information from the API. This seems to use a UniversalService for which no documentation is available at the API site https://almdemo.polarion.com/polarion/sdk/index.html
Update 1:
I am using the python polarion package to update the workitems.Python polarion Based on the answer by #boaz I tried the following code:
project = client.getProject(project_name)
doc = project.getDocument(document_location)
workitems = doc.getWorkitems()
session_service = client.getService("Session")
tracker_service = client.getService("Tracker")
session_service.beginTransaction()
for workitem in workitems:
workitem.description = workitem._polarion.TextType(
content=str(datetime.datetime.now()), type='text/html', contentLossy=False)
update_list = {
"uri": workitem.uri,
"description": workitem.description
}
tracker_service.updateWorkItem(update_list)
session_service.endTransaction(False)
The login step that #boaz indicated is done in the backend (See: https://github.com/jesper-raemaekers/python-polarion/blob/3e61527cf0f1f3c8614a30289a0a3409d2d8712d/polarion/polarion.py#L103)
However, this gives the following Java exception:
java.lang.RuntimeException: java.lang.NullPointerException
Update 2
There seems to be an issue with the session. If I call the following code:
session_service.logIn(user, password)
print(session_service.hasSubject())
it prints False.
The same thing happens when using the transaction:
session_service.beginTransaction()
print(session_service.transactionExists())
also prints False
Try wrapping your changes in a SessionWebService transaction, see JavaDoc:
sessionService = factory.getSessionService();
sessionService.logIn(prop.getProperty("user"),
prop.getProperty("passwd"));
sessionService.beginTransaction();
// ...
// your changes
// ...
sessionService.endTransaction(false);
sessionService.endSession();
As shown in the example in Polarion/polarion/SDK/examples/com.polarion.example.importer.
This will commit all your changes in one single SVN commit.
I have a requirement where I need to set assignee's to all the "user-tasks" in a process instance as soon as the instance is created, which is based on the candidate group set to the user-task.
i tries getting the user-tasks using this :
Collection<UserTask> userTasks = execution.getBpmnModelInstance().getModelElementsByType(UserTask.class);
which is correct in someway but i am not able to set the assignee's , Also, looks like this would apply to the process itself and not the process instance.
secondly , I tried getting it from the taskQuery which gives me only the next task and not all the user-tasks inside a process.
Please help !!
It does not work that way. A process flow can be simplified to "a token moves through the bpmn diagram" ... only the current position of the token is relevant. So naturally, the tasklist only gives you the current task. Not what could happen after ... which you cannot know, because if you had a gateway that continues differently based on the task outcome? So drop playing with the BPMN meta model. Focus on the runtime.
You have two choices to dynamically assign user tasks:
1.) in the modeler, instead of hard-assigning the task to "a-user", use an expression like ${taskAssignment.assignTask(task)} where "taskAssignment" is a bean that provides a String method that returns the user.
2.) add a taskListener on "create" to the task and set the assignee in the listener.
for option 2 you can use the camunda spring boot events (or the (outdated) camunda-bpm-reactor extension) to register one central component rather than adding a listener to every task.
I'm new to flowable and I'm trying to start a process instance with variables. params here is the Map of <String,Object> that I'm using to start the process. It all goes well, but if I try to get my variables back it tells me
"execution 22f42f67-5f88-11e9-9df0-d46d6dbfea92 doesn't exist"
But if I search for it in my process instances list, is there. This is what I do:
pi = runtimeService.startProcessInstanceById(processDefinitionId, params);
runtimeService.getVariables(pi.getId());
I'm stuck with this problem and I do not understand why it keeps doing this. What am I missing?
Flowable has the concept of RuntimeService and HistoryService. The first one contains only the runtime data (what is currently active) and the second one has all the data. The runtime data is a subset of the history data.
The reason why you can’t find the variables via the RuntimeService is due to the fact that the process is completed.
If you use the HistoryService then it would work as expected.
I need to set variables in root scope in one job to be used in a different job. The first job has a Javascript job entry, with the statements:
parent_job.setVariable("customers_full_path", "C:\\customers22.csv", "r");
true;
But the compilation fails with:
Couldn't compile javascript:
org.mozilla.javascript.EvaluatorException: Can't find method
org.pentaho.di.job.Job.setVariable(string,string,string). (#2)
How to set a variable at root level in a Javascript job entry?
Sorry for the passive agressive but:
I don't know if you are new to Pentaho but, the most common mistake for new users, with previous knowledge of programming, is to be sort of 'addicted' to know methods, as such you are using JavaScript for a functionality that is built in the tool. Both Transformations(KTR) and JOBs(KJB) have a similar step, you can better manipulate this in a KTR.
JavaScript steps slow down the flow considerably, so try to stay away from those as much as possible.
EDIT:
Reading This article, seems the only thing you're doing wrong is the actual syntax of the command..
Correct usage :
parent_job.setVariable("Desired Value", [name_of_variable]);
The command you described has 3 parameters, when it should be 2. If you have more than 1 variable you need to set, use 3 times the command. Try it out see if it works.
I got many scripts. I want to be able to manage them all in 1 in script.
What I want is that the main script will activate a certain script, then when the secondary script is done, it returns a value to the main script. After that, the main script calls another secondary script, etc...
Is there a proper way to do this?
More precise question:
Is it possible to activate a AHK script from another script AHK?
At the moment, to detect that at a secondary script is complete, the way I currently use is that right before the end of the secondary script, I press a combinaison of keys that the main script will detect. And once detected, it will increase a main script variable by one and this will trigger the activation of the next script. Is there a better way to achieve this?
The main script could call the other scripts using RunWait. The scripts could then communicate back before terminating themselves.
The best option for communication would be to use OnMessage.
The following is a working example from the documentation:
; Example: Send a string of any length from one script to another. This is a working example.
; To use it, save and run both of the following scripts then press Win+Space to show an
; InputBox that will prompt you to type in a string.
; Save the following script as "Receiver.ahk" then launch it:
#SingleInstance
OnMessage(0x4a, "Receive_WM_COPYDATA") ; 0x4a is WM_COPYDATA
return
Receive_WM_COPYDATA(wParam, lParam)
{
StringAddress := NumGet(lParam + 2*A_PtrSize) ; Retrieves the CopyDataStruct's lpData member.
CopyOfData := StrGet(StringAddress) ; Copy the string out of the structure.
; Show it with ToolTip vs. MsgBox so we can return in a timely fashion:
ToolTip %A_ScriptName%`nReceived the following string:`n%CopyOfData%
return true ; Returning 1 (true) is the traditional way to acknowledge this message.
}
; Save the following script as "Sender.ahk" then launch it. After that, press the Win+Space hotkey.
TargetScriptTitle = Receiver.ahk ahk_class AutoHotkey
#space:: ; Win+Space hotkey. Press it to show an InputBox for entry of a message string.
InputBox, StringToSend, Send text via WM_COPYDATA, Enter some text to Send:
if ErrorLevel ; User pressed the Cancel button.
return
result := Send_WM_COPYDATA(StringToSend, TargetScriptTitle)
if result = FAIL
MsgBox SendMessage failed. Does the following WinTitle exist?:`n%TargetScriptTitle%
else if result = 0
MsgBox Message sent but the target window responded with 0, which may mean it ignored it.
return
Send_WM_COPYDATA(ByRef StringToSend, ByRef TargetScriptTitle) ; ByRef saves a little memory in this case.
; This function sends the specified string to the specified window and returns the reply.
; The reply is 1 if the target window processed the message, or 0 if it ignored it.
{
VarSetCapacity(CopyDataStruct, 3*A_PtrSize, 0) ; Set up the structure's memory area.
; First set the structure's cbData member to the size of the string, including its zero terminator:
SizeInBytes := (StrLen(StringToSend) + 1) * (A_IsUnicode ? 2 : 1)
NumPut(SizeInBytes, CopyDataStruct, A_PtrSize) ; OS requires that this be done.
NumPut(&StringToSend, CopyDataStruct, 2*A_PtrSize) ; Set lpData to point to the string itself.
Prev_DetectHiddenWindows := A_DetectHiddenWindows
Prev_TitleMatchMode := A_TitleMatchMode
DetectHiddenWindows On
SetTitleMatchMode 2
SendMessage, 0x4a, 0, &CopyDataStruct,, %TargetScriptTitle% ; 0x4a is WM_COPYDATA. Must use Send not Post.
DetectHiddenWindows %Prev_DetectHiddenWindows% ; Restore original setting for the caller.
SetTitleMatchMode %Prev_TitleMatchMode% ; Same.
return ErrorLevel ; Return SendMessage's reply back to our caller.
}
Well, I'm not sure why you'd want to make one script run another one... but here are a few other methods:
Include a script in another one
but, you know you can include a script inside another one, right? That is, you can use another scripts functions in your main script.
Make sure a particular script is loaded
"I got many scripts" too. Sometimes I need to make sure that a particular one is included before I can use it, so I put this at the top:
;make sure core.ahk is loaded since it is required
#include c:\ahk\core.ahk
And you don't have to worry about it getting included more than once (unless you need it) because:
#Include ensures that FileName is included only once, even if multiple inclusions are encountered for it. By contrast, #IncludeAgain allows
multiple inclusions of the same file, while being the same as #Include
in all other respects.
Now, when I include file.ahk in main.ahk, I am assured of no problems using the functions from core.ahk that file.ahk requires. And even if I include core.ahk again in main.ahk it is no worry (unless it contains subroutines instead of just functions - in which case they get run at the point where they were included, so it's best not to put subroutines in your ahk libraries).
Use good ole' RUN on Scripts
Aside from that, you know you can always use the run command to launch an ahk script. You don't have to do all that fancy WM_SENDMESSAGE stuff.
Communicate betweenst scripts using a hidden GUI
Another way for two scripts to communicate between each other is for script #1 to keep open a hidden GUI window that has an edit box and a submit button. This window will never be shown. Now, Script #2 hunts for that message box, uses send to put a string in the edit box, and then control-click to push the submit button. Now script #1 has just received input from script #2. And you don't even have to hunt for the window if you put the windows hwnd value in both scripts (so they already know it ahead of time). This works like a charm.
Tell if a script has completed
If you use ahk's run command, there is an parameter that will give you back the PID of that process (PID = Process ID). You can use this PID to check to see if the script is running, and you can use it to terminate the process.
Also, if you use runwait - the script using that command will pause and wait for the runn-ed process to complete and close before continuing.
theoretically you could also use a file object between the scripts as a sort of stdin/stdout method as when opening a file with the file object you can set it as shared.
You could also set an environment variable and pass the name of the variable to the script ,given that you have setup argument handling in the target script, which then sets the environment variable value on closing. using RunWait and this you could find out what the return result of the script is after it runs.
Lastly, look into using a function as that is probably the "best practice" for what you are trying to do. Since a function can do anything a script can do and you can pass it an array to operate on or with using ByRef on the array param. This would mean that you don't have to write in a bunch of parameters when writing the function and the variables would release memory once the function is complete, automatically. You can even write your functions in a separate file and use #Include to use them in your script.