I am going to calculate the daily income of masternode, but I am a new in this field so I don`t know how to get the data from which.
I am going to obtain them using transaction history(They are provided from API),
but I am not sure I am correct or not.
Related
This is my first post so apologies if something is posted incorrectly - please let me know and I will fix it.
I am trying to build a SQL query in bigQuery that creates a cohort analysis so I can see how many customers have been retained over time by the month they joined (their cohort).
I work in insurance, so we have data on customers, when they joined, and any time they changed the policy (e.g., when they added a car to their coverage), but I do not have it laid out as every month of premium. The data is as follows:
Data vs how I need the data
Do you know how I could fill in the missing months?
iam working on a school monthly returns database, in which i enter data that comes in every month. during entries on the form, i want the month to remain the same until and unless i do the changes. the same thing i want for the name of the school.
can someone kindly assist with this?
Well, I'm absolute newbie in Google Data Studio, but for any reason, my grand totals rows is not working.
I'm learning to use this tool, and I made an easy table with just countries and sessions.
Piece of Cake. Now I just want to add a total row where it sums all sessions. That's all. I activated option Show Summary Row but it shows nothing.
Thing's I've done and not worked:
Update and refresh
Changed time period and tried different dates just in case.
Delete and create again full table.
Checked connection. I get data and the data is right, I just cannot sum it.
Changed size and format of table, just in case it where a problems or margins or font color.
And I know it can be done, because different sources. I've read this question here:
Grand Total is wrong in Google Data Studio
But it did not help. In that question, a user posted an image in the comments:
As you can see, he managed to get what I'm trying to do.
So I must be doing something wrong, and I do not why.
UPDATE 2: If I apply a filter, I get no totals. You can see my config in the right side of image.
Can anybody give me a clue of how to make a grand totals row in Google Data Studio?
Thanks
Sounds like a bug. It should be a case of selecting that tick box. Strangely, I looked at an existing table I have with totals and when I unticked the box and then ticked again, the totals didn't reappear and disappeared off another table on the page (like your example). They did reappear eventually with some refreshing of the data and page but seems like there's something wrong with them.
I don't think this is a bug I think it part of the design.
I actually just discovered the reason this is happening at least for me, it doesn't actually sum the values in the table, the grand total summary of a table is a sum of whatever the metric being used is not the actual rows shown in the chart. so if you have a dimension (like age / gender) where there is data thresholding applied internally by google but are using a metric such as users you will see the grand total from the metric value without the thresholding applied from the dimension.
Proof below
You can see the grand total for column 2 is not 953.6 its 453.6 and if i look at a non threshold dimension (country)
you can see where the 953.6 comes from since the data source supplied to the table uses 80% of all users 1192 * .8 give me 953.6 which is what the grand total is displaying. Conclusion, the only way this number could be possible is if, when using a threshold dimension for a table with metric there will be a discrepancy since the grand total value is not coming from the table values but rather from metric source data, which will not have the tables dimension applied for some odd reason.
I need to build a named set with mdx which tells me for a whole year what which are the large records. I cannot share my data, so I'll use a sales example.
All sales reps. need to enter their sales numbers in a application and on top of that database there is a cube configured. One of the goals is to find weird sales behaviour in this cube. This would mean a sales rep that is selling 100k every year, suddenly only sells 30k a year.
I have created a dynamic set that allows me to filter on this by using a calculated member named 'qualifies'. This qualifies is defined like this. (Diff is calculated before)
CREATE MEMBER Currentcube.qualifies AS iif(abs([Diff]) > 50000, 1, NULL),DISPLAY_FOLDER = 'Check big difference';
So this check can be used to filter all the sales reps that have a difference of 50k sales.
When I add aonther filter to my cube, for example region, the 50k threshold will never be exceeded, because no body has more than 50k sales in one region. I want to make the 50K dynamic based on my where clause in my filter.
My question is, is this possible? I'm fairly new to MDX so if this is an easy question, please forgive me. I have been trying lots of different scenario's but none gave a wanted result. I have been looking online, but this specific scenario hasn't passed in my search results.
I want to have a table that will track all the commissions we are due from our wireless sales. Each plan pays a different Commission, not a problem. We do our reconciliation as sometimes the carriers don't pay (they may miss a line or 2).
The problem occurs when the carriers change how much they pay for the commissions. We want to be able to go back and see that there was 4 lines not paid for in January at commission rate x. but Feb the same types of plans were sold but their commission rates were x-10.
If I change the rate in the commission table for the plan, when i go back to pull the data from the January report I will get incorrect commission rates.
I have a table for sales set up with a date stamp so I was thinking i can cross reference that somehow.
Hope someone followed this.
I am looking for the best way to structure this.
You should "STAMP" the record with the commission rate. You could either stamp the actual rate into every record... or you could keep a commission ID and put that into each record.