I would like to see all compilation/syntax errors in a single list, so it would be easier to understand what should be fixed. I would describe it like something similar to vim`s quickfix window.
Currently I'm using Analyze -> Inspect Code..., but it lists all inspections, which could be sometimes too much. I can probably configure different profiles for inspections and switch between them, but probably there is some other approach which I miss?
When you run Build | Build Project, the Messages toolwindow will display the list of all compilation errors.
The question is unclear so I'll answer the two possible questions.
For IntelliJ IDEA you can use Build | Build Project.
For Go functionality / GoLand, you cannot use this, it's not supported. Follow https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/GO-4618 for updates there.
Related
I am new to writing intellij plugins, so I apologize in advance if my question might be a bit unclear.
I know that (live) code inspections are achieved via Annotators or LocalInspectionTools. I also know there is an API to write a custom Annotator or Inspection tool and I have seen several examples.
What I do not know (my question): is there a manager/helper/"global inspector" that can provide me with the results of an existing code annotator/inspection process (done by the IDE's plugins or by some 3rd party plugin)?
For instance: I do not want to write a custom Lint annotator/inspection plugin for WebStorm. One can configure JSLint/JSHint inside WebStorm settings. The results of the live inspection can be seen over the current file/current open editor.
I would like to get the results of this live inspection, that occurs in the current open editor (inside my own custom code). For this I am interested in the API to get this annotator/inspector and/or the results it provides.
(I apologize for maybe using annotator and inspection terms in a confusing manner)
If there is another question (which I could not find) that duplicates what I have asked above, please re-direct me.
Thank you in advance!
Andrei.
Unfortunately regular annotating process for the linters is asynchronous so you cannot get the annotation results directly (by calling 'Manager' method).
You can create instances of JSLintInspection, JSHintInspection, etc. and call #createVisitor().visit(File) method but the operation is very slow and you must call it outside of AWT thread.
Also you can try to run the method com.intellij.codeInsight.daemon.impl.DaemonCodeAnalyzerEx#processHighlights but as I mentioned above the annotation results for linters can be not available (or outdated)
I'm looking for the way to create inspection to warn about large non-javadoc comments in code. I didn't found any suitable common inspection to do this. It looks like I should create a custom inspection rule. Does anybody know how to do it?
As far as I know, there are two ways to create your own code inspection in IntelliJ IDEA:
(simple but limited way) Creating custom inspection based on "search templates".
(more complex and more powerfull way) Developing an IDEA-plugin (here are the guidlines) using your own InspectionToolProvider implementation as "application-component". Also you may use sources of my inspections-plugin as the starting point.
See http://confluence.jetbrains.com/display/IDEADEV/Developing+Custom+Language+Plugins+for+IntelliJ+IDEA#DevelopingCustomLanguagePluginsforIntelliJIDEA-CodeInspectionsandIntentions. You can look at Open API and Plugin Development forum for assistance.
I have a problem with several references in my VB.NET project.
For example I have this line of code:
Dim m As New Chilkat.Email
It comes from the library "ChilkatDotNet45.dll".
When I click on "References" and locate this dll, I can see that it has the settings "Use local copy" and "Do not include interop types".
When I switch to Release mode, the compiler tells me that "Chilkat.EMail" is not defined.
I have this problem with several DLLs, so it is not specific to Chilkat.
Can somebody tell me what I did wrong?
Thank you.
One of the standard approaches to solving any programming-related issue is trying to reduce the scope of the investigation. If you have a big project, in which something doesn't work, try to create a smaller project, and try to replicate desired functionality in it. Reduce as much as possible, down to a brand new project with maybe 5-10 lines of code in it.
If you were unable to solve your problem after making a reduced test case, now it's good time to post it on StackOverflow. I am usually reducing problems while writing a question on SO (not before, as one might think), constantly thinking "ok, is it minimized enough"; and this is how 90% of the questions never get posted - I often find a solution along the way of reducing my question to bare bones. :)
In your case, can you build a simplified project which has this problem and post a link here? We could then try switching Debug to Release on our machines and see if the we can reproduce. There are too many options to do the guesswork.
I've been playing with Sublime Text 2 the last few days and was wondering if anyone out there has had any success getting Cocoa method completions working yet? Is there a plugin (or in-progress project to create one) out there?
Any general comments on using Objective-C in Chocolat or Sublime Text 2 would also be welcome.
There is an in-progress Sublime Text package that connects to clang to get autocomplete data called SublimeClang I've not managed to successfully get it to work totally with Cocoa/UIKit Dev, but here's a screenshot
and my options, that are a start
In MacVim I use a plugin called Cocoa.vim which haves useful python scripts that generates a classes and methods files for autocompletion. I didn't try so much with ST2, but may be is posible to create a sublime-package or sublime-completions file with all this data.
For the moment, I only create a sublime-completions file with some snippets. If I find a way to make this work, I will tell you.
I let my SublimeClang configuration options if helps anybody. I've already some of the autocompletions working:
"options":[
"-Wall",
"-isystem", "/Applications/XCode.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/iPhoneOS.platform/Developer/SDKs/iPhoneOS6.0.sdk/usr/include/",
"-isystem", "/Applications/XCode.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/iPhoneOS.platform/Developer/SDKs/iPhoneOS6.0.sdk/usr/include/c++/4.2.1/",
"-I/usr/lib/clang/3.1/include/**",
"-I", "/Applications/Xcode.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/iPhoneSimulator.platform/Developer/usr/llvm-gcc-4.2/lib/gcc/i686-apple-darwin11/4.2.1/include/",
"-arch","armv7",
"-isysroot", "/Applications/XCode.app/Contents/Developer/Platforms/iPhoneOS.platform/Developer/SDKs/iPhoneOS6.0.sdk",
"-D__IPHONE_OS_VERSION_MIN_REQUIRED=50000",
"-ferror-limit=0"
]
Answering my own question here. A quick visit to the Sublime forums didn't turn up any leads nor did Google. It looks as though method completions for Objective-C aren't currently part of the default install nor available via 3rd-party quite yet.
This user http://b.rthr.me/wp/?p=368 claims to have gotten SublimeClang working. I may report back myself once I try it...
I have been developing a project which contains a TestLauncher class that'll read a given directory and for each file it contains, run it against my tool and yield the results.
So, when coding in Eclipse, it would show up one result for each test (as expected). Today I've been toying with Intellij, and I've decided to try to run and code a bit of this project in Intellij.
When trying to run the tests, though, it seems to be only showing up 2 results instead of the 100+ it should. Although I am sure it is running the full suite, it seems to be folding all the results of a given category in a single result. That means that if I have at least one failing test in each category, it shows up as a "failed test".
I guess this must not be a bug, but rather some configuration that I am not aware about and that is on by default in Intellij but not in Eclipse. Could anyone explain what might be going on?
Edit: I am using the latest Intellij (downloaded one of these days).
Thanks
What you're seeing is simply a difference in the way the Eclipse and IDEA plug-ins are implemented. I implemented the Eclipse plug-in to be pretty clever in its display, so it will show different things depending on various factors such as the presence of a toString() method in your test class or whether your test class implements org.testng.ITest.
I suggest you ask this question on the IDEA forums and if you don't get any response, feel free to email the testng-users list and I can put you in touch with the JetBrains engineer in charge of the TestNG plug-in.
The IntelliJ-IDEA TestNG Plugin has a filter symbol called "Hide Passed" above the output Test Results. You can toggle that to display all tests, including the passed ones.