I am new to GemFire.
Currently we are using an MySQL DB and would like to move to GemFire.
How to move the existing data stored in MySQL over to GemFire? I.e., is there any way to to import existing MySQL data into GemFire?
There are many different options available for you to migrate data from 1 data store (e.g. an RDBMS like MySQL) to an IMDG (e.g. Pivotal GemFire). Pivotal GemFire does not provide any tools for this purpose OOTB.
However, you could...
A) Write a Spring Batch application to migrate all your data from MySQL to Pivotal GemFire in 1 large swoop. This is typical for most large-scale conversion processes, converting from 1 data store to another, either as part of an upgrade or a migration.
The advantage of using Pivotal GemFire as your target data store is that it stores Java Objects. So, if you are, say, using an ORM tool (e.g. Hibernate) to map the data stored in your MySQL database tables back to your application domain objects, you can then immediately and simply turnaround and store those same Objects directly into a corresponding Region in Pivotal GemFire. There is no additional mapping required to store an Object into GemFire.
Although, if you need something less immediate, then you can also...
B) Take advantage of Pivotal GemFire's CacheLoader, and maybe even the CacheWriter mechanisms. The CacheLoader and CacheWriter are implementations of the "Read-Through" and "Write-Through" design patterns.
More details of this approach can be found here.
In a nutshell, you implement a CacheLoader to load data from some external data source on Cache miss. You attach, or register the CacheLoader with a GemFire Region when the Region is created. When a Key (which can correspond to your MySQL Table Primary Key) is requested (Region.get(key)) and an entry does not exist, then GemFire will consult the CacheLoader to resolve the value, providing you actually registered a CacheLoader with the Region.
In this way, you slowly build up Pivotal GemFire from the MySQL RDBMS based on need.
Clearly, it is quite likely Pivotal GemFire will not be able to store all the data from your RDBMS in "memory". So, you can enable both Persistence and Overflow [to Disk] capabilities. By enabling Persistence, GemFire will load the data from it's own DiskStores the next time the nodes come online, assuming you brought them down prior.
The CacheWriter mechanism is nice if you want to run both Pivotal GemFire and MySQL in parallel for while, until you can shift enough of the responsibilities of MySQL over to GemFire, for instance. The CacheWriter will write back to your underlying MySQL DB each time an entry is written or updated in the GemFire Region. You can even do this asynchronously (i.e. "Write-Behind") using GemFire's AsyncEventQueues and Listeners; see here.
Obviously, you many options at your disposal. You need to carefully way your options and choose an approach that best meets your application requirements and needs.
If you have additional questions, let me know.
Related
I am trying to build a ETL process that extracts data out to GemFire and load in Teradata. However, I am not finding a good mechanism to export data out. The only thing I have found so far is rest api that gets all entries from a region. However, is this good for bulk export ? It will give data back in json which has to be parsed before loading in table, which I assume won't be very performant for large volume of data. Is there any other solution to this ? Like exporting data as csv from GemFire? Or ODBC/JDBC connection to GemFire ? I found both the bulk export and ODBC/JDBC in Gemfire XD documentation but not in core GemFire? So are they not supported in core GemFire? What is the difference between core GemFire and the XD version ?
These are two different products designed with different things in mind. GemFire XD provides a low-latency SQL interface to in-memory table data, so it's generally used as an in-memory RDBMS. GemFire, on the other hand, is an in-memory data grid with "no restrictions" regarding the data you insert into the regions, you basically deal with custom java objects, not with tables. Also, I know GemFire XD was built on top of GemFire in the past, not sure what's the current status of that (you might want to have a look at Snappy Data for more details).
That said, and strictly speaking of GemFire, you can export snapshots of your regions and import them afterwards into another cluster. Even better, you can read a snapshot entry by entry for further processing or transformation into other formats, which I believe is exactly what you're looking for. Please have a look at Cache and Region Snapshots to get the details.
Hope this helps. Cheers.
We need to load millions of key/values into Apache Geode and we'd like to know what are some the options available. Our values happen to be in the 256kb range.
There are several options depending on your application requirements/SLAs or whether you need to perform conversion or other transformations, etc.
Out-of-the-box, Apache Geode provides the Cache & Region Snapshot Service. This is useful when you want to migrate data from 1 existing Apache Geode cluster to another, for instance. Not so useful if your data is coming from an external source, like a RDBMS.
Another option is to lazily load the data based on need. This can be accomplished by implementing the CacheLoader interface and registering the CacheLoader with a Region. Obviously, you could create a CacheLoader implementation that intelligently loads a block of data based on some rules/criteria in addition to loading and returning the single value of interests based on the current requests.
A lot of times, users create an external, custom Conversion process or tool to extract, transform and bulk load (ETL) a bunch of data into Apache Geode. This is typical in complex Use Cases or requirements. However, it is highly advisable to use perhaps a framework/tool like...
Spring XD (now Spring Cloud Data Flow on Pivotal's Cloud Foundry (PCF)) is great ETL tool and pipeline for creating stream-based applications. Spring XD / SCDF provides many different options for "sources" and "sinks" (e.g. GemFire Server). In addition to sources & sinks, you can even "tap" the stream to process the data with "Processors". So whether you are doing real-time stream or batch-oriented data operations (e.g. bulk loads), Spring XD is a great option.
I am sure Google might provide other answers on how to perform ETL with a KeyValue store like Apache Geode.
Hope this helps get you going.
Cheers,
John
We have very limited options to load Gemfire regions .
1) Spring batch:
Create Gemfire writer for load data and remove data
Create batch configuration and lod it
2) Apache Spark
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/fast-data-access-using-gemfire-apache-spark-part-vaquar-khan-/
I am new to hbase and want to learn more. I just want to know if there is any auto commit concept available in HBASE?
HBase documentation it is not an ACID compliant database. However, it does guarantee certain specific properties.
This specification enumerates the ACID properties of HBase.
Their is a concept of AutoFlush in HBase which is similar to autocommit.
How ever If you are using Apache Phoenix for fetching or updating data in HBase, then you can set property phoenix.connection.autoCommit to true by default it is false.
Commits come majorly at two places : insert/update(Put in HBase) and delete(Delete in HBase)
Since we are in Big Data environment, the requirements would be different when you are ingesting huge volumes of data.
As metnioned in Documentation, the autoCommit should be set to false - for better performance rather than each record maintained individually. It helps in handling buffers in general and load at region server for HBase.
Delete
HBase does not modify data in place, and so deletes are handled by creating new markers called tombstones. These tombstones, along with the dead values, are cleaned up on major compactions
One last word on Phoenix, any layer coming on top of HBase will eventually work based on HBase architecture. Hope this helps in your design
I have been studying 'in-memory data grids' and saw the term 'gemfire'. I'm confused. It seems that gemfire is a term to refer to technologies that store and manipulate data like a database but in the computer memory, isn't it? What exactly is gemfire?
Which technologies can I use to work with 'in-memory data grids' in Node.js?
I saw some applications, like 'Apache Geode' and 'Pivotal gemfire'. How do I work with them? Is it like work with some cache technologies (like Redis or Memcached)? In geode's case, are the data only accessed through an API or are there other ways to access this one?
There are many products that qualify as a "in-memory data grid", GemFire is one of the leading ones. From this article the main ones are:
VMware Gemfire (Java)
Oracle Coherence (Java)
Alachisoft NCache (.Net)
Gigaspaces XAP Elastic Caching Edition (Java)
Hazelcast (Java)
Scaleout StateServer (.Net)
Most of these products have drivers in many languages. You can access data in GemFire over REST, or over the native node.js client.
Apache Geode is the open source version of GemFire. It is much more powerful than memcached and Redis; You can use Geode not only as a cache, but as a store of record (it has native persistence). It has an Object Query Language (OQL) engine built in, which allows you to query nested objects, has powerful features like Continuous Queries and replication over WAN, among others. Geode also has protocol adapters for memcached and Redis, allowing your memcached and Redis clients to connect to Geode.
I would add to the list of "In memory data grid" solutions:
Apache Ignite
Infinispan
They also provide powerful features.
For feature comparison you can use this website: https://db-engines.com/en/system/Hazelcast%3BIgnite .
Last note: GemFire is now a Pivotal solution.
GemFire is a high performance distributed data management infrastructure that sits between application cluster and back-end data sources.
With GemFire, data can be managed in-memory, which makes the access faster.
Kindly check the Link below for further details
https://www.baeldung.com/spring-data-gemfire
I'm creating a mobile app and it requires a API service backend to get/put information for each user. I'll be developing the web service on ServiceStack, but was wondering about the storage. I love the idea of a fast in-memory caching system like Redis, but I have a few questions:
I created a sample schema of what my data store should look like. Does this seems like it's a good case for using Redis as opposed to a MySQL DB or something like that?
schema http://www.miles3.com/uploads/redis.png
How difficult is the setup for persisting the Redis store to disk or is it kind of built-in when you do writes to the store? (I'm a newbie on this NoSQL stuff)
I currently have my setup on AWS using a Linux micro instance (because it's free for a year). I know many factors go into this answer, but in general will this be enough for my web service and Redis? Since Redis is in-memory will that be enough? I guess if my mobile app skyrockets (hey, we can dream right?) then I'll start hitting the ceiling of the instance.
What to think about when desigining a NoSQL Redis application
1) To develop correctly in Redis you should be thinking more about how you would structure the relationships in your C# program i.e. with the C# collection classes rather than a Relational Model meant for an RDBMS. The better mindset would be to think more about data storage like a Document database rather than RDBMS tables. Essentially everything gets blobbed in Redis via a key (index) so you just need to work out what your primary entities are (i.e. aggregate roots)
which would get kept in its own 'key namespace' or whether it's non-primary entity, i.e. simply metadata which should just get persisted with its parent entity.
Examples of Redis as a primary Data Store
Here is a good article that walks through creating a simple blogging application using Redis:
http://www.servicestack.net/docs/redis-client/designing-nosql-database
You can also look at the source code of RedisStackOverflow for another real world example using Redis.
Basically you would need to store and fetch the items of each type separately.
var redisUsers = redis.As<User>();
var user = redisUsers.GetById(1);
var userIsWatching = redisUsers.GetRelatedEntities<Watching>(user.Id);
The way you store relationship between entities is making use of Redis's Sets, e.g: you can store the Users/Watchers relationship conceptually with:
SET["ids:User>Watcher:{UserId}"] = [{watcherId1},{watcherId2},...]
Redis is schema-less and idempotent
Storing ids into redis sets is idempotent i.e. you can add watcherId1 to the same set multiple times and it will only ever have one occurrence of it. This is nice because it means you don't ever need to check the existence of the relationship and can freely keep adding related ids like they've never existed.
Related: writing or reading to a Redis collection (e.g. List) that does not exist is the same as writing to an empty collection, i.e. A list gets created on-the-fly when you add an item to a list whilst accessing a non-existent list will simply return 0 results. This is a friction-free and productivity win since you don't have to define your schemas up front in order to use them. Although should you need to Redis provides the EXISTS operation to determine whether a key exists or a TYPE operation so you can determine its type.
Create your relationships/indexes on your writes
One thing to remember is because there are no implicit indexes in Redis, you will generally need to setup your indexes/relationships needed for reading yourself during your writes. Basically you need to think about all your query requirements up front and ensure you set up the necessary relationships at write time. The above RedisStackOverflow source code is a good example that shows this.
Note: the ServiceStack.Redis C# provider assumes you have a unique field called Id that is its primary key. You can configure it to use a different field with the ModelConfig.Id() config mapping.
Redis Persistance
2) Redis supports 2 types persistence modes out-of-the-box RDB and Append Only File (AOF). RDB writes routine snapshots whilst the Append Only File acts like a transaction journal recording all the changes in-between snapshots - I recommend adding both until your comfortable with what each does and what your application needs. You can read all Redis persistence at http://redis.io/topics/persistence.
Note Redis also supports trivial replication you can read more about at: http://redis.io/topics/replication
Redis loves RAM
3) Since Redis operates predominantly in memory the most important resource is that you have enough RAM to hold your entire dataset in memory + a buffer for when it snapshots to disk. Redis is very efficient so even a small AWS instance will be able to handle a lot of load - what you want to look for is having enough RAM.
Visualizing your data with the Redis Admin UI
Finally if you're using the ServiceStack C# Redis Client I recommend installing the Redis Admin UI which provides a nice visual view of your entities. You can see a live demo of it at:
http://servicestack.net/RedisAdminUI/AjaxClient/