I am attempting to calculate a value inside a view, from 2 rows on a table.
SQL Server.
The table has these columns
----------------------------------------------
|RefId | Quantity | TransferFrom | TransferTo |
----------------------------------------------
|5601 | 100 | 5580 | null |
-----------------------------------------------
|5850 | 200 | null | 5601 |
-----------------------------------------------
I would like to add the quantity of the current row, and the quantity of another row if the other row's TransferTo col equals the current row's RefId.
In the view I have:
MyAmount = [Quantity] + (SELECT [Quantity]
FROM MyTable
WHERE [TransferTo] = [RefId])
However, this is returning NULL.
Would I better be using variables or a CAST function?
Thanks in advance for any input
The problem is that the subquery could be returning NULL. This is a case where ISNUL() is preferable over COALESCE():
MyAmount = ([Quantity] +
ISNULL((SELECT t2.[Quantity] FROM MyTable t2 WHERE t2.[TransferTo] = t.[RefId]), 0)
)
(This assumes that the table alias from the outer query is t.)
ISNULL() is preferable because COALESCE() might evaluate the subquery twice, which is unnecessary overhead. (Otherwise, I prefer COALESCE() because it is the ANSI standard function.)
Note: If you are using correlated subqueries, you should always qualify all your column names.
You Will Get the Value as NULL while adding 2 values if either of the value is NULL. So Use the ISNULL() on both sides to avoid the NULL.
MyAmount = ISNULL([Quantity],0.00) + ISNULL((SELECT [Quantity]
FROM MyTable
WHERE [TransferTo] = [RefId]),0.00)
Do you want get this result?
;WITH MyTable(RefId,Quantity,TransferFrom,TransferTo) AS(
SELECT 5601,100,5580,null UNION ALL
SELECT 5850 ,200,null , 5601
)
SELECT x.*,MyAmount = x.[Quantity]+ISNULL( y.[Quantity] ,0)
FROM MyTable x
LEFT JOIN MyTable AS y ON x.TransferTo=y.RefId
RefId Quantity TransferFrom TransferTo MyAmount
5601 100 5580 NULL 100
5850 200 NULL 5601 300
Related
SELECT
SELECT pp.id, TO_CHAR(pp.created_dt::date, 'dd.mm.yyyy') AS "Date", CAST(pp.created_dt AS time(0)) AS "Time",
au.username AS "User", ss.name AS "Service", pp.amount, REPLACE(pp.status, 'SUCCESS', ' ') AS "Status",
pp.account AS "Props", pp.external_id AS "External", COALESCE(pp.external_status, null, 'indefined') AS "External status"
FROM payment AS pp
INNER JOIN auth_user AS au ON au.id = pp.creator_id
INNER JOIN services_service AS ss ON ss.id = pp.service_id
WHERE pp.created_dt::date = (CURRENT_DATE - INTERVAL '1' day)::date
AND ss.name = 'Some Name' AND pp.status = 'SUCCESS'
id | Date | Time | Service |amount | Status |
------+-----------+-----------+------------+-------+--------+---
9 | 2021.11.1 | 12:20:01 | some serv | 100 | stat |
10 | 2021.12.1 | 12:20:01 | some serv | 89 | stat |
------+-----------+-----------+------------+-------+--------+-----
Total | | | | 189 | |
I have a SELECT like this. I need to get something like the one shown above. That is, I need to get the total of one column. I've tried a lot of things already, but nothing works out for me.
If I understand correctly you want a result where extra row with aggregated value is appended after result of original query. You can achieve it multiple ways:
1. (recommended) the simplest way is probably to union your original query with helper query:
with t(id,other_column1,other_column2,amount) as (values
(9,'some serv','stat',100),
(10,'some serv','stat',89)
)
select t.id::text, t.other_column1, t.other_column2, t.amount from t
union all
select 'Total', null, null, sum(amount) from t
2. you can also use group by rollup clause whose purpose is exactly this. Your case makes it harder since your query contains many columns uninvolved in aggregation. Hence it is better to compute aggregation aside and join unimportant data later:
with t(id,other_column1,other_column2,amount) as (values
(9,'some serv','stat',100),
(10,'some serv','stat',89)
)
select case when t.id is null then 'Total' else t.id::text end as id
, t.other_column1
, t.other_column2
, case when t.id is null then ext.sum else t.amount end as amount
from (
select t.id, sum(amount) as sum
from t
group by rollup(t.id)
) ext
left join t on ext.id = t.id
order by ext.id
3. For completeness I just show you what should be done to avoid join. In that case group by clause would have to use all columns except amount (to preserve original rows) plus the aggregation (to get the sum row) hence the grouping sets clause with 2 sets is handy. (The rollup clause is special case of grouping sets after all.) The obvious drawback is repeating case grouping... expression for each column uninvolved in aggregation.
with t(id,other_column1,other_column2,amount) as (values
(9,'some serv','stat',100),
(10,'some serv2','stat',89)
)
select case grouping(t.id) when 0 then t.id::text else 'Total' end as id
, case grouping(t.id) when 0 then t.other_column1 end as other_column1
, case grouping(t.id) when 0 then t.other_column2 end as other_column2
, sum(t.amount) as amount
from t
group by grouping sets((t.id, t.other_column1, t.other_column2), ())
order by t.id
See example (db fiddle):
(To be frank, I can hardly imagine any purpose other than plain reporting where a column mixes id of number type with label Total of text type.)
I'm attempting to write an SQL statement to select records such that each record has a unique PartNo, and I want that record to be based off of the most recent ReceiveDate. I got an answer when I asked this question:
SELECT t.*
FROM Table as t
WHERE t.ReceiveDate = (SELECT MAX(t2.ReceiveDate)
FROM Table as t2
WHERE t2.PartNo = t.PartNo
);
However, this answer assumes that for each ReceiveDate, you would not have the same PartNo twice. In situations where there are multiple records with the same PartNo and ReceiveDate, it does not matter which is selected, but I only want one to be selected (PartNo must be unique)
Example:
PartNo | Vendor | Qty | ReceiveDate
100 | Bob | 2 | 2020/07/30
100 | Bob | 3 | 2020/07/30
Should only return one of these records.
I'm using Microsoft Access which uses Jet SQL which is very similar to T-SQL.
Use NOT EXISTS:
select distinct t.*
from tablename as t
where not exists (
select 1 from tablename
where partno = t.partno
and (
receivedate > t.receivedate
or (receivedate = t.receivedate and qty > t.qty)
or (receivedate = t.receivedate and qty = t.qty and vendor > t.vendor)
)
)
manually set up a standard Aggregate query (sigma icon in ribbon) where grouped on Part No and Date field is set to MAX...
run the query to check to see it returns the values you seek... then while in design view - - select SQL view and this will give you the sql statement...
TABLE A: Pre-joined table - Holds a list of providers who belong to a group and the group the provider belongs to. Columns are something like this:
ProviderID (PK, FK) | ProviderName | GroupID | GroupName
1234 | LocalDoctor | 987 | LocalDoctorsUnited
5678 | Physican82 | 987 | LocalDoctorsUnited
9012 | Dentist13 | 153 | DentistryToday
0506 | EyeSpecial | 759 | OphtaSpecialist
TABLE B: Another pre-joined table, holds a list of providers and their demographic information. Columns as such:
ProviderID (PK,FK) | ProviderName | G_or_I | OtherColumnsThatArentInUse
1234 | LocalDoctor | G | Etc.
5678 | Physican82 | G | Etc.
9012 | Dentist13 | I | Etc.
0506 | EyeSpecial | I | Etc.
The expected result is something like this:
ProviderID | ProviderName | ProviderStatus | GroupCount
1234 | LocalDoctor | Group | 2
5678 | Physican82 | Group | 2
9012 | Dentist13 | Individual | N/A
0506 | EyeSpecial | Individual | N/A
The goal is to determine whether or not a provider belongs to a group or operates individually, by the G_or_I column. If the provider belongs to a group, I need to include an additional column that provides the count of total providers in that group.
The Group/Individual portion is relatively easy - I've done something like this:
SELECT DISTINCT
A.ProviderID,
A.ProviderName,
CASE
WHEN B.G_or_I = 'G'
THEN 'Group'
WHEN B.G_or_I = 'I'
THEN 'Individual' END AS ProviderStatus
FROM
TableA A
LEFT OUTER JOIN TableB B
ON A.ProviderID = B.ProviderID;
So far so good, this returns the expected results based on the G_or_I flag.
However, I can't seem to wrap my head around how to complete the COUNT portion. I feel like I may be overthinking it, and stuck in a loop of errors. Some things I've tried:
Add a second CASE STATEMENT:
CASE
WHEN B.G_or_I = 'G'
THEN (
SELECT CountedGroups
FROM (
SELECT ProviderID, count(GroupID) AS CountedGroups
FROM TableA
WHERE A.ProviderID = B.ProviderID
GROUP BY ProviderID --originally had this as ORDER BY, but that was a mis-type on my part
)
)
ELSE 'N/A' END
This returns an error stating that a single row sub-query is returning more than one row. If I limit the number of rows returned to 1, the CountedGroups column returns 1 for every row. This makes me think that its not performing the count function as I expect it to.
I've also tried including a direct count of TableA as a factored sub-query:
WITH CountedGroups AS
( SELECT Provider ID, count(GroupID) As GroupSum
FROM TableA
GROUP BY ProviderID --originally had this as ORDER BY, but that was a mis-type on my part
) --This as a standalone query works just fine
SELECT DISTINCT
A.ProviderID,
A.ProviderName,
CASE
WHEN B.G_or_I = 'G'
THEN 'Group'
WHEN B.G_or_I = 'I'
THEN 'Individual' END AS ProviderStatus,
CASE
WHEN B.G_or_I = 'G'
THEN GroupSum
ELSE 'N/A' END
FROM
CountedGroups CG
JOIN TableA A
ON CG.ProviderID = A.ProviderID
LEFT OUTER JOIN TableB
ON A.ProviderID = B.ProviderID
This returns either null or completely incorrect column values
Other attempts have been a number of variations of this, with a mix of bad results or Oracle errors. As I mentioned above, I'm probably way overthinking it and the solution could be rather simple. Apologies if the information is confusing or I've not provided enough detail. The real tables have a lot of private medical information, and I tried to translate the essence of the issue as best I could.
Thank you.
You can use the CASE..WHEN and analytical function COUNT as follows:
SELECT
A.PROVIDERID,
A.PROVIDERNAME,
CASE
WHEN B.G_OR_I = 'G' THEN 'Group'
ELSE 'Individual'
END AS PROVIDERSTATUS,
CASE
WHEN B.G_OR_I = 'G' THEN TO_CHAR(COUNT(1) OVER(
PARTITION BY A.GROUPID
))
ELSE 'N/A'
END AS GROUPCOUNT
FROM
TABLE_A A
JOIN TABLE_B B ON A.PROVIDERID = B.PROVIDERID;
TO_CHAR is needed on COUNT as output expression must be of the same data type in CASE..WHEN
Your problem seems to be that you are missing a column. You need to add group name, otherwise you won't be able to differentiate rows for the same practitioner who works under multiple business entities (groups). This is probably why you have a DISTINCT on your query. Things looked like duplicates which weren't. Once you've done that, just use an analytic function to figure out the rest:
SELECT ta.providerid,
ta.providername,
DECODE(tb.g_or_i, 'G', 'Group', 'I', 'Individual') AS ProviderStatus,
ta.group_name,
CASE
WHEN tb.g_or_i = 'G' THEN COUNT(DISTINCT ta.provider_id) OVER (PARTITION BY ta.group_id)
ELSE 'N/A'
END AS GROUP_COUNT
FROM table_a ta
INNER JOIN table_b tb ON ta.providerid = tb.providerid
Is it possible that your LEFT JOIN was going the wrong direction? It makes more sense that your base demographic table would have all practitioners in it and then the Group table might be missing some records. For instance if the solo prac was operating under their own SSN and Type I NPI without applying for a separate Type II NPI or TIN.
Trying to pull data from a single table called tblTooling where two TlPartNo numbers are equal to different values and the TlToolNo are not equal for these TlPartNo . This is an Access DB and the following statement gets me close, but still gives too much data.
SELECT DISTINCT
tblTooling.TlToolNo,
tblTooling.TlPartNo,
tblTooling.TlOP,
tblTooling.TlQuantity
FROM tblTooling, tblTooling AS tblTooling_1
WHERE (((tblTooling.TlToolNo)<>tblTooling_1.TlToolNo)
AND ((tblTooling.TlPartNo)="10290722")
AND ((tblTooling_1.TlPartNo)="10295379"));
The included image has the tblTooling structure and Data. Plus the expected results from the query.
You seem to want exclude a ToolNo value when it occurs with both PartNo values. In that case you could group intermediate results by ToolNo, and see whether in such a group there is only one PartNo present (with having). In that case keep that record, and in the outer query, get the two other columns added to it:
SELECT DISTINCT
tblTooling.TlToolNo,
tblTooling.TlPartNo,
tblTooling.TlOP,
tblTooling.TlQuantity
FROM tblTooling
INNER JOIN (
SELECT TlToolNo,
Min(TlPartNo) AS MinTlPartNo,
Max(TlPartNo) AS MaxTlPartNo
FROM tblTooling
WHERE TlPartNo IN ("10290722", "10295379")
GROUP BY TlToolNo
HAVING Min(TlPartNo) = Max(TlPartNo)
) AS grp
ON grp.TlToolNo = tblTooling.TlToolNo
AND grp.MinTlPartNo = tblTooling.TlPartNo
Note that for your sample data this will return 4 rows:
TlToolNo | TlPartNo | TlOP | TlQuantity
----------+----------+------+-----------
T00012362 | 10290722 | OP10 | 2
T00012456 | 10290722 | OP10 | 1
T00013456 | 10290722 | OP20 | 1
T00014348 | 10295379 | OP20 | 1
I think you can do this with not exists:
select t.*
from tblTooling as t
where not exists (select 1
from tblTooling as t2
where t2.TlPartNo in ("10290722", "10295379") and
t2.TlToolNo = t.TlToolNo and
t2.tiid <> t.tiid
) and
t.TlPartNo in ("10290722", "10295379");
This saves on the select distinct, which should be a performance boost.
I've been stuck for quite a while now trying to get this query to work.
Here's the setup:
I have a [Notes] table that contains a nonunique (Number) column and a nonunique (Result) column. I'm looking to create a SELECT statement that will display each distinct (Number) value where the count of the {(Number), (Result)} tuple where Result = 'NA' is > 25.
Number | Result
100 | 'NA'
100 | 'TT'
101 | 'NA'
102 | 'AM'
100 | 'TT'
200 | 'NA'
200 | 'NA'
201 | 'NA'
Basically, have an autodialer that calls a number and returns a code depending on the results of the call. We want to ignore numbers that have had an 'NA'(no answer) code returned more than 25 times.
My basic attempts so far have been similar to:
SELECT DISTINCT n1.Number
FROM Notes n1
WHERE (SELECT COUNT(*) FROM Notes n2
WHERE n1.Number = n2.Number and n1.Result = 'NA') > 25
I know this query isn't correct, but in general I'm not sure how to relate the DISTINCT n1.Number from the initial select to the Number used in the subquery COUNT. Most examples I see aren't actually doing this by adding a condition to the COUNT returned. I haven't had to touch too much SQL in the past half decade, so I'm quite rusty.
you can do it like this :
SELECT Number
FROM Notes
WHERE Result = 'NA'
GROUP BY Number
HAVING COUNT(Result) > 25
Try this:
SELECT Number
FROM (
SELECT Number, Count(Result) as CountNA
FROM Notes
WHERE Result = 'NA'
GROUP BY Number
)
WHERE CountNA > 25
EDIT: depending on SQL product, you may need to give the derived table a table correlation name e.g.
SELECT DT1.Number
FROM (
SELECT Number, Count(Result) as CountNA
FROM Notes
WHERE Result = 'NA'
GROUP
BY Number
) AS DT1 (Number, CountNA)
WHERE DT1.CountNA > 25;