I'm classifying digits of the MNIST dataset using a simple feed forward neural net with Keras. So I execute the code below.
import os
import tensorflow as tf
import keras
from keras.models import Sequential
from keras.layers import Dense, Activation
from tensorflow.examples.tutorials.mnist import input_data
mnist = input_data.read_data_sets('/tmp/data', one_hot=True)
# Path to Computation graphs
LOGDIR = './graphs_3'
# start session
sess = tf.Session()
#Hyperparameters
LEARNING_RATE = 0.01
BATCH_SIZE = 1000
EPOCHS = 10
# Layers
HL_1 = 1000
HL_2 = 500
# Other Parameters
INPUT_SIZE = 28*28
N_CLASSES = 10
model = Sequential
model.add(Dense(HL_1, input_dim=(INPUT_SIZE,), activation="relu"))
#model.add(Activation(activation="relu"))
model.add(Dense(HL_2, activation="relu"))
#model.add(Activation("relu"))
model.add(Dropout(rate=0.9))
model.add(Dense(N_CLASSES, activation="softmax"))
model.compile(
optimizer="Adam",
loss="categorical_crossentropy",
metrics=['accuracy'])
# one_hot_labels = keras.utils.to_categorical(labels, num_classes=10)
model.fit(
x=mnist.train.images,
y=mnist.train.labels,
epochs=EPOCHS,
batch_size=BATCH_SIZE)
score = model.evaluate(
x=mnist.test.images,
y=mnist.test.labels)
print("score = ", score)
However, I get the following error:
model.add(Dense(1000, input_dim=(INPUT_SIZE,), activation="relu"))
TypeError: add() missing 1 required positional argument: 'layer'
The syntax is exactly as shown in the keras docs. I am using keras 2.0.9, so I don't think it's a version control problem. Did I do something wrong?
It seems perfect indeed....
But I noticed you're not creating "an instance" of a sequential model, your using the class name instead:
#yours: model = Sequential
#correct:
model = Sequential()
Since the methods in a class are always declared containing self as the first argument, calling the methods without an instance will probably require the instance as the first argument (which is self).
The method's definition is def add(self,layer,...):
Related
I am new to Tensorflow and Keras. I just started beginning my Deep learning Journey. I installed Tensorflow 2.4.3 as well as Keras. I was learning Tensorboard. I created a model for imdb dataset as follows
import tensorflow as tf
import keras
from tensorflow.keras import *
from tensorflow.keras.datasets import imdb
from tensorflow.keras.preprocessing import sequence
## model making
max_features = 2000
max_len = 500
(x_train, y_train), (x_test, y_test) = imdb.load_data(num_words=max_features)
x_train = sequence.pad_sequences(x_train, maxlen=max_len)
x_test = sequence.pad_sequences(x_test, maxlen=max_len)
model = models.Sequential()
model.add(layers.Embedding(max_features, 128,
input_length=max_len,
name='embed'))
model.add(layers.Conv1D(32, 7, activation='relu'))
model.add(layers.MaxPooling1D(5))
model.add(layers.Conv1D(32, 7, activation='relu'))
model.add(layers.GlobalMaxPooling1D())
model.add(layers.Dense(1))
model.summary()
model.compile(optimizer='rmsprop',
loss='binary_crossentropy',
metrics=['acc'])
I used the tensorboard callback here.
callbacks = [
keras.callbacks.TensorBoard(
log_dir='my_log_dir',
histogram_freq=1,
embeddings_freq=1,
)
]
history = model.fit(x_train, y_train,
epochs=3,
batch_size=128,
validation_split=0.2,
callbacks=callbacks)
Then I got the following warning.
C:\Users\ktripat\Anaconda3\envs\tf2\lib\site-packages\keras\callbacks\tensorboard_v2.py:102: UserWarning: The TensorBoard callback does not support embeddings display when using TensorFlow 2.0. Embeddings-related arguments are ignored.
warnings.warn('The TensorBoard callback does not support.'
Please find any solution if you guys have any. Thank you in advance!
You will need to follow this guide.
It describes how to save the weights of your embedding layer in a way that you can visualize it in TensorBoard:
# Set up a logs directory, so Tensorboard knows where to look for files.
log_dir='/logs/imdb-example/'
if not os.path.exists(log_dir):
os.makedirs(log_dir)
# Save Labels separately on a line-by-line manner.
with open(os.path.join(log_dir, 'metadata.tsv'), "w") as f:
for subwords in encoder.subwords:
f.write("{}\n".format(subwords))
# Fill in the rest of the labels with "unknown".
for unknown in range(1, encoder.vocab_size - len(encoder.subwords)):
f.write("unknown #{}\n".format(unknown))
# Save the weights we want to analyze as a variable. Note that the first
# value represents any unknown word, which is not in the metadata, here
# we will remove this value.
weights = tf.Variable(model.layers[0].get_weights()[0][1:])
# Create a checkpoint from embedding, the filename and key are the
# name of the tensor.
checkpoint = tf.train.Checkpoint(embedding=weights)
checkpoint.save(os.path.join(log_dir, "embedding.ckpt"))
# Set up config.
config = projector.ProjectorConfig()
embedding = config.embeddings.add()
# The name of the tensor will be suffixed by `/.ATTRIBUTES/VARIABLE_VALUE`.
embedding.tensor_name = "embedding/.ATTRIBUTES/VARIABLE_VALUE"
embedding.metadata_path = 'metadata.tsv'
projector.visualize_embeddings(log_dir, config)
If you want to visualize during training, you can call this code in a save callback during training every X episodes using this.
I made a script in tensorflow 2.x but I had to downconvert it to tensorflow 1.x (tested in 1.14 and 1.15). However, the tf1 version performs very differently (10% accuracy lower on the test set). See also the plot for train and validation performance (diagram is attached below).
Looking at the operations needed for the migration from tf1 to tf2 it seems that only the Adam learning rate may be a problem but I'm defining it explicitly tensorflow migration
I've reproduced the same behavior both locally on GPU and CPU and on colab. The keras used was the one built-in in tensorflow (tf.keras). I've used the following functions (both for train,validation and test), using a sparse categorization (integers):
train_datagen = tf.keras.preprocessing.image.ImageDataGenerator(
horizontal_flip=horizontal_flip,
#rescale=None, #not needed for resnet50
preprocessing_function=None,
validation_split=None)
train_dataset = train_datagen.flow_from_directory(
directory=train_dir,
target_size=image_size,
class_mode='sparse',
batch_size=batch_size,
shuffle=True)
And the model is a simple resnet50 with a new layer on top:
IMG_SHAPE = img_size+(3,)
inputs = Input(shape=IMG_SHAPE, name='image_input',dtype = tf.uint8)
x = tf.cast(inputs, tf.float32)
# not working in this version of keras. inserted in imageGenerator
x = preprocess_input_resnet50(x)
base_model = tf.keras.applications.ResNet50(
include_top=False,
input_shape = IMG_SHAPE,
pooling=None,
weights='imagenet')
# Freeze the pretrained weights
base_model.trainable = False
x=base_model(x)
# Rebuild top
x = GlobalAveragePooling2D(data_format='channels_last',name="avg_pool")(x)
top_dropout_rate = 0.2
x = Dropout(top_dropout_rate, name="top_dropout")(x)
outputs = Dense(num_classes,activation="softmax", name="pred_out")(x)
model = Model(inputs=inputs, outputs=outputs,name="ResNet50_comp")
optimizer = tf.keras.optimizers.Adam(lr=learning_rate)
model.compile(optimizer=optimizer,
loss="sparse_categorical_crossentropy",
metrics=['accuracy'])
And then I'm calling the fit function:
history = model.fit_generator(train_dataset,
steps_per_epoch=n_train_batches,
validation_data=validation_dataset,
validation_steps=n_val_batches,
epochs=initial_epochs,
verbose=1,
callbacks=[stopping])
I've reproduced the same behavior for example with the following full script (applied to my dataset and changed to adam and removed intermediate final dense layer):
deep learning sandbox
The easiest way to replicate this behavior was to enable or disable the following line on a tf2 environment with the same script and add the following line to it. However, I've tested also on tf1 environments (1.14 and 1.15):
tf.compat.v1.disable_v2_behavior()
Sadly I cannot provide the dataset.
Update 26/11/2020
For full reproducibility I've obtained a similar behaviour by means of the food101 (101 categories) dataset enabling tf1 behaviour with 'tf.compat.v1.disable_v2_behavior()'. The following is the script executed with tensorflow-gpu 2.2.0:
#%% ref https://medium.com/deeplearningsandbox/how-to-use-transfer-learning-and-fine-tuning-in-keras-and-tensorflow-to-build-an-image-recognition-94b0b02444f2
import os
import sys
import glob
import argparse
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import tensorflow as tf
# enable and disable this to obtain tf1 behaviour
tf.compat.v1.disable_v2_behavior()
from tensorflow.keras import __version__
from tensorflow.keras.applications.resnet50 import ResNet50, preprocess_input
from tensorflow.keras.models import Model
from tensorflow.keras.layers import Dense, GlobalAveragePooling2D
from tensorflow.keras.optimizers import Adam
# since i'm using resnet50 weights from imagenet, i'm using food101 for
# similar but different categorization tasks
# pip install tensorflow-datasets if tensorflow_dataset not found
import tensorflow_datasets as tfds
(train_ds,validation_ds),info= tfds.load('food101', split=['train','validation'], shuffle_files=True, with_info=True)
assert isinstance(train_ds, tf.data.Dataset)
print(train_ds)
#%%
IM_WIDTH, IM_HEIGHT = 224, 224
NB_EPOCHS = 10
BAT_SIZE = 32
def get_nb_files(directory):
"""Get number of files by searching directory recursively"""
if not os.path.exists(directory):
return 0
cnt = 0
for r, dirs, files in os.walk(directory):
for dr in dirs:
cnt += len(glob.glob(os.path.join(r, dr + "/*")))
return cnt
def setup_to_transfer_learn(model, base_model):
"""Freeze all layers and compile the model"""
for layer in base_model.layers:
layer.trainable = False
model.compile(optimizer='rmsprop', loss='sparse_categorical_crossentropy', metrics=['accuracy'])
def add_new_last_layer(base_model, nb_classes):
"""Add last layer to the convnet
Args:
base_model: keras model excluding top
nb_classes: # of classes
Returns:
new keras model with last layer
"""
x = base_model.output
x = GlobalAveragePooling2D()(x)
#x = Dense(FC_SIZE, activation='relu')(x) #new FC layer, random init
predictions = Dense(nb_classes, activation='softmax')(x) #new softmax layer
model = Model(inputs=base_model.input, outputs=predictions)
return model
def train(nb_epoch, batch_size):
"""Use transfer learning and fine-tuning to train a network on a new dataset"""
#nb_train_samples = train_ds.cardinality().numpy()
nb_train_samples=info.splits['train'].num_examples
nb_classes = info.features['label'].num_classes
classes_names = info.features['label'].names
#nb_val_samples = validation_ds.cardinality().numpy()
nb_val_samples = info.splits['validation'].num_examples
#nb_epoch = int(args.nb_epoch)
#batch_size = int(args.batch_size)
def preprocess(features):
#print(features['image'], features['label'])
image = tf.image.resize(features['image'], [224,224])
#image = tf.divide(image, 255)
#print(image)
# data augmentation
image=tf.image.random_flip_left_right(image)
image = preprocess_input(image)
label = features['label']
# for categorical crossentropy
#label = tf.one_hot(label,101,axis=-1)
#return image, tf.cast(label, tf.float32)
return image, label
#pre-processing the dataset to fit a specific image size and 2D labelling
train_generator = train_ds.map(preprocess).batch(batch_size).repeat()
validation_generator = validation_ds.map(preprocess).batch(batch_size).repeat()
#train_generator=train_ds
#validation_generator=validation_ds
#fig = tfds.show_examples(validation_generator, info)
# setup model
base_model = ResNet50(weights='imagenet', include_top=False) #include_top=False excludes final FC layer
model = add_new_last_layer(base_model, nb_classes)
# transfer learning
setup_to_transfer_learn(model, base_model)
history = model.fit(
train_generator,
epochs=nb_epoch,
steps_per_epoch=nb_train_samples//BAT_SIZE,
validation_data=validation_generator,
validation_steps=nb_val_samples//BAT_SIZE)
#class_weight='auto')
#execute
history = train(nb_epoch=NB_EPOCHS, batch_size=BAT_SIZE)
And the performance on food101 dataset:
update 27/11/2020
It's possible to see the discrepancy also in the way smaller oxford_flowers102 dataset:
(train_ds,validation_ds,test_ds),info= tfds.load('oxford_flowers102', split=['train','validation','test'], shuffle_files=True, with_info=True)
Nb: the above plot shows confidences given by running the same training multiple times and evaluatind mean and std to check for the effects on random weights initialization and data augmentation.
Moreover I've tried some hyperparameter tuning on tf2 resulting in the following picture:
changing optimizer (adam and rmsprop)
not applying horizontal flipping aumgentation
deactivating keras resnet50 preprocess_input
Thanks in advance for every suggestion. Here are the accuracy and validation performance on tf1 and tf2 on my dataset:
Update 14/12/2020
I'm sharing the colab for reproducibility on oxford_flowers at the clic of a button:
colab script
I came across something similar, when doing the opposite migration (from TF1+Keras to TF2).
Running this code below:
# using TF2
import numpy as np
from tensorflow.keras.applications.resnet50 import ResNet50
fe = ResNet50(include_top=False, pooling="avg")
out = fe.predict(np.ones((1,224,224,3))).flatten()
sum(out)
>>> 212.3205274187726
# using TF1+Keras
import numpy as np
from keras.applications.resnet50 import ResNet50
fe = ResNet50(include_top=False, pooling="avg")
out = fe.predict(np.ones((1,224,224,3))).flatten()
sum(out)
>>> 187.23898954353717
you can see the same model from the same library on different versions does not return the same value (using sum as a quick check-up). I found the answer to this mysterious behavior in this other SO answer: ResNet model in keras and tf.keras give different output for the same image
Another recommendation I'd give you is, try using pooling from inside applications.resnet50.ResNet50 class, instead of the additional layer in your function, for simplicity, and to remove possible problem-generators :)
I want to create a custom keras layer which does something during training and something else for validation or testing.
from tensorflow import keras
K = keras.backend
from keras.layers import Layer
import tensorflow as tf
class MyCustomLayer(Layer):
def __init__(self, ratio=0.5, **kwargs):
self.ratio = ratio
super(MyCustomLayer, self).__init__(**kwargs)
#tf.function
def call(self, x, is_training=None):
is_training = K.learning_phase()
tf.print("training: ", is_training)
if is_training is 1 or is_training is True:
xs = x * 4
return xs
else:
xs = x*0
return xs
model = Sequential()
model.add(Dense(16, input_dim=input_dim))
model.add(MyCustomLayer(0.5))
model.add(ReLU())
model.add(Dense(32, activation='relu'))
model.add(Dense(16, activation='relu'))
model.add(Dense(output_dim, activation='softmax', kernel_regularizer=l2(0.01)))
model.compile(loss='categorical_crossentropy', optimizer='adam', metrics=['accuracy'])
model.fit(X_train, y_train, validation_split=0.05, epochs=5)
In the output I always get:
training: 0
training: 0
training: 0
training: 0
training: 0
training: 0
training: 0
training: 0
Does anyone knows how to fix this?
There are some issues and misconceptions here. First you are mixing imports between keras and tf.keras imports, you should use only one of them. Second the parameter for call is called training, not is_training.
I think the issue is that tf.print does not really print the value of the training variable as its a tensorflow symbolic variable and might change value indirectly. There are other ways to check if the layer behaves differently during inference and training, for example:
class MyCustomLayer(Layer):
def __init__(self, ratio=0.5, **kwargs):
super(MyCustomLayer, self).__init__(**kwargs)
def call(self, inputs, training=None):
train_x = inputs * 4
test_x = inputs * 0
return K.in_train_phase(train_x,
test_x,
training=training)
Using then this model:
model = Sequential()
model.add(Dense(1, input_dim=10))
model.add(MyCustomLayer(0.5))
model.compile(loss='mse', optimizer='adam')
And making an instance of a function that explictly receives the K.learning_phase() variable:
fun = K.function([model.input, K.learning_phase()], [model.output])
If you call it with Klearning_phase() set to 1 or 0 you do see different outputs:
d = np.random.random(size=(2,10))
print(fun([d, 1]))
print(fun([d, 0]))
Result:
[array([[4.1759257], [3.9988194]], dtype=float32)]
[array([[0.], [0.]], dtype=float32)]
And this indicates that the layer has differen behavior during training and inference/testing.
So, I just figured out what was going wrong. I was mixing two different types of classes:
from keras import Sequential
from tensorflow import keras
K = keras.backend
So, the model is using keras and I was calling the flag from tensorflow.keras. For this reason K.learning_phase() was not working as expected.
To fix it I used
from tensorflow.keras import Sequential
from tensorflow import keras
K = keras.backend
I want to build a Keras model with two inputs and two outputs which both use the same architecture/weights. Both outputs are then used to compute a single loss.
Here is a picture of my desired architecture.
This is my pseudo code:
model = LeNet(inputs=[input1, input2, input3],outputs=[output1, output2, output3])
model.compile(optimizer='adam',
loss=my_custom_loss_function([output1,outpu2,output3],target)
metrics=['accuracy'])
model.fit(x_train, y_train, epochs=5)
Can this approach work?
Do I need to use a different Keras API?
The architecture is fine. Here is a toy example with training data of how it can be defined using keras' functional API:
from keras.models import Model
from keras.layers import Dense, Input
# two separate inputs
in_1 = Input((10,10))
in_2 = Input((10,10))
# both inputs share these layers
dense_1 = Dense(10)
dense_2 = Dense(10)
# both inputs are passed through the layers
out_1 = dense_1(dense_2(in_1))
out_2 = dense_1(dense_2(in_2))
# create and compile the model
model = Model(inputs=[in_1, in_2], outputs=[out_1, out_2])
model.compile(optimizer='adam', loss='mse')
model.summary()
# train the model on some dummy data
import numpy as np
i_1 = np.random.rand(10, 10, 10)
i_2 = np.random.rand(10, 10, 10)
model.fit(x=[i_1, i_2], y=[i_1, i_2])
Edit given that you want to compute the losses together you can use Concatenate()
output = Concatenate()([out_1, out_2])
Any loss function you pass into model.compile will be applied to output in it's combined state. After you get the output from a prediction you can just split it back up into it's original state:
f = model.predict(...)
out_1, out_2 = f[:n], f[n:]
tensorflow.keras api not working on while creating the layers reference, any other methods of creating layers reference?
code :
layer=keras.layers
Error message : NameError: name 'leyer' is not defined
Full code is pasted here...
import tensorflow as tf
from tensorflow import keras
import pandas as pd
from sklearn.model_selection import KFold
from sklearn.model_selection import cross_val_score
from sklearn.preprocessing import LabelEncoder
import numpy as np
#makin seed values
seed=7
np.random.seed(seed)
#setting up the dataset for training
dataframe=pd.read_csv("../datasets/iris.csv",header=None)
data=dataframe.values
input_x = data[:,0:4]
true_y = data[:,4]
#Encoding the true_y data to one hot encoding
le=LabelEncoder()
le.fit(true_y)
y_encoded = le.transform(true_y)
y_encoded = keras.utils.to_categorical(y_encoded,num_classes=3)
# creating the model
def base_fun():
layer=keras.layers
model = keras.models.Sequential()
model.add(layer.Dense(4,input_dim=4,kernel_initializer='normal',activation='relu'))
model.add(leyer.Dense(3, kernel_initializer='normal', activation='relu'))
estimator=keras.wrappers.scikit_learn.KerasClassifier(build_fn=base_fun,epochs=20,batch_size=10)
kfold = KFold(n_splits=10, shuffle=True, random_state=seed)
result = cross_val_score(estimator, input_x, y_encoded,cv=kfold)
print("Accuracy : %.2%% (%.2%%)" %(result.mean()*100, result.std()*100))
Well, this line:
model.add(leyer.Dnese(3, kernel_initializer='normal', activation='relu'))
has two typos, namely leyer should be layer and Dnese should be Dense like
model.add(layer.Dense(3, kernel_initializer='normal', activation='relu'))
Based on your comment, this line also causes an error:
estimator = keras.wrappers.scikit_learn.KerasClassifier( build_fn = base_fun, epochs = 20, batch_size = 10 )
From the Keras Scikit documentation:
build_fn should construct, compile and return a Keras model, which will then be used to fit/predict.
But you function base_fun() does not return anything. Append this line at the end of base_fun():
return model
As per your comment, the last print line could be changed to this (I don't know the % formatting, I generally use the syntax below):
print( "Accuracy : {:.2%} ({:.2%})".format( result.mean(), result.std() ) )