Is the "Startup File" option on the docker web app options for docker-compose files? or shell commands? I cannot find any documentation for it...
Basically I'd like my Web App to run a docker-compose.yml instead of executing docker run [options] when I push an image to it.
This is documented now, see below or click here.
What are the expected values for the Startup File section when I
configure the runtime stack?
For Node.js, you specify the PM2 configuration file or your script
file. For .NET Core, specify your compiled DLL name as dotnet <myapp>.dll. For Ruby, you can specify the Ruby script that you want
to initialize your app with.
Not sure if this is still a problem but I just noticed it appends whatever you put in there to the default startup command.
2019-09-02 05:03:04.493 INFO - docker run -d -p 55721:80 --name xxxxxx -e WEBSITES_ENABLE_APP_SERVICE_STORAGE=false -e WEBSITE_SITE_NAME=xxxxx -e WEBSITE_AUTH_ENABLED=False -e PORT=80 -e WEBSITE_ROLE_INSTANCE_ID=0 -e WEBSITE_HOSTNAME=xxxxxx.azurewebsites.net -e WEBSITE_INSTANCE_ID=xxxxxxxxx -e HTTP_LOGGING_ENABLED=1 xxxxxx.azurecr.io/xxxxxxx:latest -p 80:4000 -p 443:8000
I put the -p 80:4000 -p 443:8000 into the textbox in the portal config
Azure Web Apps for Containers does not support multi-container apps (with docker-compose) at the time of writing.
Related
I have a linux server, with no connectivity to github (it's blocked in our office), and need to run standalone-chrome-debug docker image.
So in my side, i clone the repo and transfer it to the linux machine, but when i run the docker command:
docker run -d -p 4444:4444 -p 0:5900 -v /dev/shm:/dev/shm -e VNC_NO_PASSWORD=1 selenium/standalone-chrome-debug
i got a lot of error, such as entry_point.sh not found, and different similar issues of missing files, so my question is:
how can i make this docker run successfully , if i have the repository locally, and have no access to github, can you assist me with this issue ?
I know intellij has a docker container plugin, however it doesn't seem to allow me to develop inside the container itself. The idea is simple, I don't want to configure my host to have the correct environment tools. I'd rather just a docker container setup and then use intellij to find libs, functionality and such with in the container itself.
This would be incredibly helpful for c++, java, and scala dev. Also it would be useful debugging as well.
So is it possible to develop within a docker container with intellij?
So you just want to work within a container just as you would within a full-blown VM, right? Then you should just run a container, attach a display (to run IDEA) and start configuring your development environment.
For the display part I'd test some answers given in Can you run GUI apps in a docker container?. There are some very cool answers in this topic showing various approaches to running GUI apps within a container.
Shouldn't the approach be rather:
Have local repository and local IDE. In the repository have docker file and eventually docker-compose.yml, which spins up environment required to run project.
Mount your local drive with sources into docker (volumes), so changes done in your local folder are reflected in docker, similar in other direction.
Please look at this example for Intellij IDEA CI and JDK8 based on Alpine Linux (taken here
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/shaharv/docker/master/alpine/dev/Dockerfile)
# Alpine 3.8 C++/Java Developer Image
#
# For IntelliJ and GUI (X11), run the image with:
# $ XSOCK=/tmp/.X11-unix && sudo docker run -i -v $XSOCK:$XSOCK -e DISPLAY -u developer -t [image-name]
#
# Then run IntelliJ with:
# /idea-IC-191.6707.61/bin/idea.sh
FROM alpine:3.8
ENV LANG C.UTF-8
RUN set -ex && \
apk add --no-cache --update \
# basic packages
bash bash-completion coreutils file grep openssl openssh nano sudo tar xz \
# debug tools
gdb musl-dbg strace \
# docs and man
bash-doc man man-pages less less-doc \
# GUI fonts
font-noto \
# user utils
shadow
RUN set -ex && \
apk add --no-cache --update \
# C++ build tools
cmake g++ git linux-headers libpthread-stubs make
RUN set -ex && \
apk add --no-cache --update \
# Java tools
gradle openjdk8 openjdk8-dbg
# Install IntelliJ Community
RUN set -ex && \
wget https://download-cf.jetbrains.com/idea/ideaIC-2019.1.1-no-jbr.tar.gz && \
tar -xf ideaIC-2019.1.1-no-jbr.tar.gz && \
rm ideaIC-2019.1.1-no-jbr.tar.gz
# Create a new user with no password
ENV USERNAME developer
RUN set -ex && \
useradd --create-home --key MAIL_DIR=/dev/null --shell /bin/bash $USERNAME && \
passwd -d $USERNAME
# Set additional environment variables
ENV JAVA_HOME /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.8-openjdk
ENV JDK_HOME /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.8-openjdk
ENV JAVA_EXE /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.8-openjdk/bin/java
There is a better way to do this now with Jetbrains Gateway. Just make sure you have OpenSSH server installed (latest Ubuntu containers have this already installed) in the container that you initially ran with exposed ports, i.e. -p 220:22 (I like 220) and the SSH service running, i.e. service ssh start, after modifying the /etc/ssh/sshd_config to enable root login and password authentication then service ssh restart. Make sure you set a password for the root user, i.e. passwd root, (or go through other steps to setup a new user). Then all you need to do is open Jetbrains Gateway, and SSH to the container with the fields set thus: user=root, host=localhost, and port=220 (or whatever you chose); note, you will also need to specify a project location, which in my use case is a Java application repository root directory -- this means you will need to have Java and Maven or whatever other tools installed in the container at some point, but doesn't affect ability to connect. Assuming you connect with no issues you will see activity whereby Gateway installs an IDE backend inside the container (takes about 10 minutes) and then starts up a IDE client which is a light version of IntelliJ (or whatever other IDE version you selected) that is honestly a bit buggy at time of writing. But it works and has unblocked some of my colleagues stuck with Windows machines and not many options to upgrade to Macs in the current chip shortage environment. Note that any time you restart the container you also need to restart the SSH service unless you script it to automatically start up when the container does.
I am currently learning to use docker to run selenium tests.
However, to run tests on different versions of the browser, it requires creating our own image.
I tried few ways but failed to run them.
I used the docker file at below path:
https://hub.docker.com/r/selenium/node-chrome/~/dockerfile/
and tried to build the image by using the following command:
docker build -t my-chrome-image --build-arg CHROME_DRIVER_VERSION=2.23 --build-arg CHROME_VERSION=google-chrome-beta=53.0.2785.92-1 NodeChrome
Can anyone guide me on how to implement the same?
Regards,
Ashwin Karangutkar
Use
docker build -t my-chrome-image --build-arg CHROME_DRIVER_VERSION=2.23 --build-arg CHROME_VERSION=google-chrome-beta <path_to_Dockerfile>
I am using elgalu/selenium.
docker run -d --name=grid -p 4444:24444 -p 5900:25900 --shm-size=1g elgalu/selenium
And looking in elgalu looks like you can change the browser versions.
Adding -e FIREFOX_VERSION=38.0.6 to the docker run command.
I am building a script that will mount some local folders into the container, one of which is the user's ~/.ssh folder. That way, users can still utilize their SSH key for Git commits.
docker run -ti -v $HOME/.ssh/:$HOME/.ssh repo:tag
But that does not mount the SSH folder into the container. Am I doing it incorrectly?
The typical syntax is (from Mount a host directory as a data volume):
docker run -d -P --name web -v /src/webapp:/opt/webapp training/webapp python app.py
(you can skip the command part, here 'app.py', if your image defines an entrypoint and default command)
(-d does not apply in your case, it did in the case of that python web server )
Try:
docker run -ti -v $HOME/.ssh:$HOME/.ssh repo:tag
I have a basic hello world Node application written on express. I have just dockerised this application by creating a basic dockerfile in the applications root directory. I created a docker image, and then ran that image to run it in a running container
# Dockerfile
FROM node:0.10-onbuild
RUN npm install
EXPOSE 3000
CMD ["node", "./bin/www"]
sudo docker build -t docker-express
sudo docker run --name test-container -d -p 80:3000 docker-express
I can access the web application. My question is.. When I made code changes to my application, eg change 'hello world' to 'hello bob', my changes are not reflected within the running container.
What is a good development workflow to update changes in the container? Surely I shouldn't have to delete and rebuild the images after each change?
Thank you :)
Check out the section on Sharing Volumes. You should be able to share your host volume with the docker container and then any time you need a change you can just restart the server (or have something restart it for you!).
Your command would look something like: sudo docker run -v /src/webapp:/webapp --name test-container -d -p 80:3000 docker-express
Which mounts /src/webapp (on the host) to /webapp (in the container).